English cricket thread

Dargonk

Ninja Scout
Scout
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
18,751
Location
Australia
Just tuned in to the game. What happened to England, I thought the pitch was meant to be ok for batting today?
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
Just tuned in to the game. What happened to England, I thought the pitch was meant to be ok for batting today?
It's seaming, not swinging, although England seem to be getting it to talk a bit through the air right now. And England are bad at batting.
 

Djemba-Djemba

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
21,306
Location
Manchester
Is the time away from Test cricket what's affecting Warner so badly?

He's never been much good outside of Australia, especially in England, but he's never been this bad before.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,170
Location
Canada
Is the time away from Test cricket what's affecting Warner so badly?

He's never been much good outside of Australia, especially in England, but he's never been this bad before.
He hasn't been that great since coming back. Even in this year's IPL he looked rusty even though he scored some good runs. Then in WC also he didn't look that great. He is much better than this and maybe it's only matter of time before we see the old ruthless Warner back.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,098
Aye, he needs to look after himself.

The match and the ashes have gone. No point breaking his back now.

Even if Archer ripped through Australia again and we got them out for 100, that's a 212 run lead.

We aren't chasing 212 down.
Agree. We'll probably bowl him until he drops though.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,879
Location
W.Yorks
Australia have got a third of our total in about 20 minutes of play :lol:

Australia should get 150 and then declare for a laugh.

They'd still win.
 

Rams

aspiring to be like Ryan Giggs
Joined
Apr 20, 2000
Messages
42,532
Location
midtable anonymity
England’s batting is a shambles, the top order is even more shite than those of the 80’s & 90’s. But who do they pick in Godsname at the top of the order? Desperate times call for desperate meassurea.
 

12OunceEpilogue

In perfect harmony
Scout
Joined
Oct 2, 2016
Messages
18,443
Location
Wigan
England’s batting is a shambles, the top order is even more shite than those of the 80’s & 90’s. But who do they pick in Godsname at the top of the order? Desperate times call for desperate meassurea.
You don't mean...?!
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
England’s batting is a shambles, the top order is even more shite than those of the 80’s & 90’s. But who do they pick in Godsname at the top of the order? Desperate times call for desperate meassurea.
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,600
Root's going to have to bowl Leach all day and rotate the pace bowlers otherwise he's just going to break them down.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,098
You don't mean...?!
The top order of the 90s was much, much better than the one we have now. Atherton, Stewart, Hussain or Thorpe would walk into the current team.

Don't forget that every other team had at least one high-class bowler back then, so there was nowhere to hide. England had good batsmen - it's just that they were facing world-class opponents every time they took the field.

Even the Aussie batsmen of that era were only averaging early 40s, which shows how deflated the batting statistics were back then. If you want proof, here you go: Usman Khawaja averages the same as Mark Waugh.
 

12OunceEpilogue

In perfect harmony
Scout
Joined
Oct 2, 2016
Messages
18,443
Location
Wigan
The top order of the 90s was much, much better than the one we have now. Atherton, Stewart, Hussain or Thorpe would walk into the current team.

Don't forget that every other team had at least one high-class bowler back then, so there was nowhere to hide. England had good batsmen - it's just that they were facing world-class opponents every time they took the field.

Even the Aussie batsmen of that era were only averaging early 40s, which shows how deflated the batting statistics were back then. If you want proof, here you go: Usman Khawaja averages the same as Mark Waugh.
No doubt. I'm just having a giggle at bringing Nas in in 2019.

It's actually a serious question whether you'd have Cook back, maybe with a couple of weeks to train up.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
It does feel like Australia dodged a '60 all out' type of day. England will hope it doesn't nip as much and the pitch flattens out in the sun.
This was a very astute observation last night.

Only difference between Australia and England innings was the Warner/Labuschagne partnership, albeit very different weather conditions.

England will have to win this game batting day 3 and perhaps 4, but with spin also coming into play.

Edit: Leach already takes a wicket!
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
That wicket just brings it home, if they batted sensibly England would have pissed this test.
 

jungledrums

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
2,674
That wicket just brings it home, if they batted sensibly England would have pissed this test.
I mean... Aus have given wickets away as well. Couldn’t you say that if Aus batted sensibly when 2-130 odd that they’d have pissed the test too...?
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
I mean... Aus have given wickets away as well. Couldn’t you say that if Aus batted sensibly when 2-130 odd that they’d have pissed the test too...?
Yeah, it's a tricky pitch to be fair, but the England wickets were worse considering the overhead conditions Australia had to deal with. Australia rode their luck and it evened out over the innings, England were just rubbish.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,170
Location
Canada
Yeah, it's a tricky pitch to be fair, but the England wickets were worse considering the overhead conditions Australia had to deal with. Australia rode their luck and it evened out over the innings, England were just rubbish.
To be fair apart from Archer and Broad to some extent, your other bowlers have been poor. Woakes should be bowling better but he has been pretty poor this match.

Edit: And he takes a wicket.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
To be fair apart from Archer and Broad to some extent, your other bowlers have been poor. Woakes should be bowling better but he has been pretty poor this match.
I don't think Woakes is fit. Nor was in the last match. I doubt he'll play the next match.
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
To be fair apart from Archer and Broad to some extent, your other bowlers have been poor. Woakes should be bowling better but he has been pretty poor this match.
That's another thing. This Australian attack is the best I've seen from them over here since 2001.
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
What changes do you suggest? The batsman required don’t seem to exist right now.
Sibley, Vince in. Denly and Buttler out. Burns, Sibley, Vince, Root, Stokes, Roy, Bairstow, Woakes, Archer, Leach, Broad.
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
Worth a try, but by no means guaranteed to offer any better - just another pie at the wall.
Well it's batting everyone where they like to bat. You could even turf out Roy for Pope but if you're gonna bother with Roy in tests you have to give him a long dart at 6.
 

Boycott

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
6,306
Haseeb Hameed being let go by Lancashire. Feels like only a few months ago he was debuting in test cricket against India :eek:
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,098
No doubt. I'm just having a giggle at bringing Nas in in 2019.

It's actually a serious question whether you'd have Cook back, maybe with a couple of weeks to train up.
Think we need to move on don't we. Obviously Cook wouldn't come back but even if he was up for it, we need to start thinking about the future.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,098
What changes do you suggest? The batsman required don’t seem to exist right now.
Pope looks like a good bet, given he's just scored a double-hundred for Surrey. Sibley as well. But yeah, after that you're getting a bit thin on the ground.

Of course we could always put Sam Curran in the top order, as I've been droning on about for months.
 

Rams

aspiring to be like Ryan Giggs
Joined
Apr 20, 2000
Messages
42,532
Location
midtable anonymity
Pope looks like a good bet, given he's just scored a double-hundred for Surrey. Sibley as well. But yeah, after that you're getting a bit thin on the ground.

Of course we could always put Sam Curran in the top order, as I've been droning on about for months.
Yeah Curran & Pope, but not lower than 4. That’s the problem, big pool of talent for the middel order and nothing for the top 3 positions. I guess we could try Sibley instead of Roy, bring in Stokes at 3, Root at 4, drop Denly for Pope and play him at 5, then Bairstow at 6 and finaliteit drop Buttler for Curran at 7. So:
Burns
Sibley
Stokes
Root
Pope
Bairstow
Curran
Woakes
Archer/Anderson
Broad/Anderson
Leache
 

Boycott

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
6,306
I don't think the Aussies will mind Archer charging in for the rest of the day. Keep *arching* your back banging it in short. His workload in the last week is going to look immense by the end of this test.