Defending or Attacking, pick one

What would you pick?


  • Total voters
    20

Crackers

greasy ginfers
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
29,321
Location
Glazers Out
If you were a manager of a team who were either

  • Insanely good at attacking but utterly woeful at defending
  • A brick wall at defending, but couldn't attack at all.
What would you choose, and why?
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Obviously the first as if nothing else they'd be entertainment
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,296
Location
The Netherlands
Neither options are going to make you win things.. i would take the attacking option. 4-4 is way more fun than 0-0
 

Walters_19_MuFc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
29,262
Location
Birmingham
Defending.

Title winning teams are built from a solid foundation.

We saw how much Pep spent on his back line and how much Klopp paid for Van Dijk, who, although didnt win the league, made a massive difference, in comparison to previous seasons.
 

V.O.

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
7,847
Attacking for a league (3 points for a win).

Defending for knockout football.