Member 102134
Guest
1. Zidane
2. Ronaldo Nazario
3. Messi
2. Ronaldo Nazario
3. Messi
I think Ronaldinho was a better all round footballer than both Messi and Ronaldo.There is no way Ronaldinho was better than Messi.
Ronaldo and Messi are comfortably 1 and 2 although I’m not sure in which order. They have single-handedly won game after game for their teams for over a decade. It’s not just their quality, it’s their longevity. I guess they have a little more time in their careers to decide first and second. Even though Ronaldo has done it for more clubs and had a better international career, it’ll probably be remembered as
1- Messi
2- Ronaldo
For number 3 the most likely candidates for me are: Ronaldo (the Brazilian one, obviously), Pele and Maradona. I wasn’t around for much of the latter twos careers, but from what I’ve seen I’m going with:
3- Maradona
Really depends on what better footballing ability is. Ronaldinho was the ultimate showboater who would make anyone fall in love with football, but Messi can effortlessy dribble trough 4 defenders and score 50 goals a season so it really depends on how you define it.I think Ronaldinho was a better all round footballer than both Messi and Ronaldo.
No doubt Messi and Ronaldo was better for a longer period and won more, but in pure footballing ability Ronaldinho was better for me.
Have not seen Pele or Maradona enough to form an opinion.
He really wasn't. Maradona was still argentina's best player along with goyco...the goalkeeper.Ronaldinho arguably won the WC on his own?! He was maybe as influential in 2002 as Maradona was in 1990 (influential in key moments but hardly a dominant force).
What Maradona did in 1986 was on a different level altogether. Did you even watch any of his performances then?
Not even close, Messi was playing with a peak Xavi in the same team and you couldn’t tell who was the better passer out of the two.I think Ronaldinho was a better all round footballer than both Messi and Ronaldo.
No doubt Messi and Ronaldo was better for a longer period and won more, but in pure footballing ability Ronaldinho was better for me.
Have not seen Pele or Maradona enough to form an opinion.
Completely disagree.I think Ronaldinho was a better all round footballer than both Messi and Ronaldo.
No doubt Messi and Ronaldo was better for a longer period and won more, but in pure footballing ability Ronaldinho was better for me.
Have not seen Pele or Maradona enough to form an opinion.
Aye. Probably 5th-6th imo. Not a criticism, he had a good tournament, but clearly a level below the other front two, while the wing-backs and Lucio were all at the top of their game.He really wasn't. Maradona was still argentina's best player along with goyco...the goalkeeper.
Ronaldinho was maybe brazil's 3rd best player, maybe
I don't really know how anyone can have Zidane first over Messi. Zidane for sure had his great iconic moments in the WC, but Messi and C. Ronaldo have just dominated football in a way not seen since Pelé and co.1. Zidane
2. Ronaldo Nazario
3. Messi
Yeah, I was being very generous with the maybe not to distract from the main point - Ronaldinho's best world cup was nowhere near Ronaldinho's. And while we're on the subject, Ronaldinho's worst was also worse than Maradona's. Both came in with big expectations and didn't meet them, but Maradona had a bit of a spark, I just remember Ronaldinho being almost entirely irrelevant. At the time he was easily my favourite player to watch too.He really wasn't. Maradona was still argentina's best player along with goyco...the goalkeeper.
Ronaldinho was maybe brazil's 3rd best player, maybe
Not quite. The arguments against Maradona, inevitably from people who haven't watched him beyond some YT video, always start with "yes ok he was great in '86 but he had the whole team built around him" or "Zidane / Ronaldo / whoever was also great in x" or "who even cares about the World Cup"? And then people who watched him at that pinnacle go on to describe it. Because it was remarkable, one of the most magical periods in football history, and deserves attention.Good lord, the arguments for Maradona so often boil down to what he did in a single month one time.
That is simply not true.1. Messi + CR7
2. Pele
3. Zidane
I don't believe Maradona, Ronaldinho and R9 performed at a high level long enough to be considered. People say 'But Diego won the WC on his own'... Yes but so did arguably Zidane, Ronaldinho, Iniesta etc
People say Maradona played during a time where forwards got butchered unlike Messi and CR7 today. True, but Diego was unprofessional and off his head on booze and drugs half the time during height of his fame.
I usually see the final *clincher* from people being *He won a world cup on his own*. It happens again and again and again. To be honest, I find these debates very tiresome as football is a team game, but marketed as an individuals' game to too great an extent.Not quite. The arguments against Maradona, inevitably from people who haven't watched him beyond some YT video, always start with "yes ok he was great in '86 but he had the whole team built around him" or "Zidane / Ronaldo / whoever was also great in x" or "who even cares about the World Cup"? And then people who watched him at that pinnacle go on to describe it. Because it was remarkable, one of the most magical periods in football history, and deserves attention.
However there are lots of reasons for saying Maradona is up there with the very best. It's just unfortunate that for some reason, people who have never watched him are so keen to dismiss him, and the discussion gets simplified to such a degree that it becomes so monotonous.
I agree with you, but that world cup really is the one exception. Maradona was scoring solo goal after solo goal, setting up teammates from nothing, etc. The final is probably the one game that he didn't win basically by himself(still was the best player on the pitch)I usually see the final *clincher* from people being *He won a world cup on his own*. It happens again and again and again. To be honest, I find these debates very tiresome as football is a team game, but marketed as an individuals' game to too great an extent.