James Maddison | Spurs

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,336
Location
india
and that attitude is a massive part of the reason you are in a mess, too many running the club seem to think you have a divine right to be challenging for the league, you weren't before Sir Alex and haven't since
That's not why were are in this mess. And nobody here thinks that either except Leicester fans projecting their own seemingly insecure views on others.

Manchester United clearly are an absolute giant of club football, and hence many players would want to join us. That was true while Sir Alex was here and will (hopefully) continue to be the case.

Bang on, getting tired of hearing all the "We're Manchester United" brigade. It's so arrogant and embarrassing.
Yeah, why feel any pride in one of the greatest clubs in football? And if anything the majority of our fanbase especially on the caf these days seem to believe we are absolutely worthless. Maybe you're better off putting everybody who doesn't post in line with that view on ignore?
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,080
Location
Hope, We Lose
That's not why were are in this mess. And nobody here thinks that either except Leicester fans projecting their own seemingly insecure views on others.

Manchester United clearly are an absolute giant of club football, and hence many players would want to join us. That was true while Sir Alex was here and will (hopefully) continue to be the case.


Yeah, why feel any pride in one of the greatest clubs in football? And if anything the majority of our fanbase especially on the caf these days seem to believe we are absolutely worthless. Maybe you're better off putting everybody who doesn't post in line with that view on ignore?
We're probably the most generous paying club in terms of money for level of performances and yet the top players dont seem to want to come here. Why? Because we arent winning anything. We arent in the top cup tournament.
 

Jimmy Skitz

Full Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
2,555
Location
Leicester
Supports
Leicester City
That's not why were are in this mess. And nobody here thinks that either except Leicester fans projecting their own seemingly insecure views on others.

Manchester United clearly are an absolute giant of club football, and hence many players would want to join us. That was true while Sir Alex was here and will (hopefully) continue to be the case.
its exactly why, the people calling the shots at the club think that simply being Manchester United is enough to all but guarantee success instead of doing what it takes with regards to scouting and signing players and appointing a manager that had a track record worthy of the job.

Ther managers press conferences early on were filled with "we're Manchester United" type statements, what you achieved in the past means feck all, they are things to be proud of nothing more, if given the choice between you and another so called big club you won't be the first choice anymore because you have no one running the club that actually has a strategy and when a player sis given the choice of which manager he wants to work with do you really think OGS will cut the mustard?

I would love to hear what Maguire thinks now, not that he'd ever be truly honest about it
 

Harry190

Bobby ten Hag
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
7,603
Location
Canada
and that attitude is a massive part of the reason you are in a mess, too many running the club seem to think you have a divine right to be challenging for the league, you weren't before Sir Alex and haven't since
Don't care. Divine right or not, the club paid its dues for it. If tradition, prestige and standing didn't exist in life, you'd have a point.
 

thegregster

Harbinger of new information
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
13,447
Maddison is a mercenary. He joined Leicester for money.

He will leave for bigger wages.

I dont know why this is even up for debate.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,336
Location
india
its exactly why, the people calling the shots at the club think that simply being Manchester United is enough to all but guarantee success instead of doing what it takes with regards to scouting and signing players and appointing a manager that had a track record worthy of the job.

Ther managers press conferences early on were filled with "we're Manchester United" type statements, what you achieved in the past means feck all, they are things to be proud of nothing more, if given the choice between you and another so called big club you won't be the first choice anymore because you have no one running the club that actually has a strategy and when a player sis given the choice of which manager he wants to work with do you really think OGS will cut the mustard?

I would love to hear what Maguire thinks now, not that he'd ever be truly honest about it
You're clearly clueless about what's happening at Manchester United. Van Gaal and Mourinho were two of the three managers hired post Moyes (picked by SAF) so clearly going for managers who had a "worthy track record" wasn't the issue. So there's that theory debunked.

Back in the real world, our major issue has been multiple fold - a CEO who is brilliant at the business side of his job but has been undoubtedley been unsuited to the football side and failed in this respect (badly). This has led to the other issue - we've picked managers who have A) simply not been good enough regardless of CV b) wasted money of poor signings c) also had no cohesion with one another (see LVG to Mourinho). So yeah, it's a deeper problem that has more to do with incompetence than "we are Manchester United".

Also anybody who isn't terribly off the mark, knows that when Ole says "we're Manchester United" - he is A) instilling a sense of expectation, responsibility and pride among the players and fans of standards that have to be set. B) reminding everybody of our past and hence the level we have to reach. He is definitely not hinting that we will be successful because we are Manchester United. That interpretation makes no sense whatsoever.

And yes, Ole is a mediocre manager. We'll replace him soon. If we get the right man in, and start putting things back together, our lure will be huge again, given the statute of the football club.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,336
Location
india
What was the implication then? Just a pointless observation? Nice one.
Thanks. It's better than asking daft questions and answer them yourself. Nice one.

I think Maddison looks a very good footballer. But wouldn't wrote Mount off as some sub standard talent just yet. He himself looks very impressive. But I'd much rather see him perform at this level for a couple of seaosns or thereabouts to see his quality in comparison to Maddison (depending the younger ones development as these things are linear as someone put it). Like I said, Maddison is really good but he's hardly a top class footballer were comparing a nothing 20 year old Mount with.
 

OleTheGreat

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
814
Location
Bangalore, India
I think this Leicester team is as good as the one which went on to win the title. Maddison is very good in his position but i don't think any individual in that team can go out and make an impact as part of another team. Even if so, it will take time and i think United is his best choice to really make an impact as we are in that stage now and require players who can go out there and try to involve themselves in the play rather than hiding on the field.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,446
Location
Manchester
That's not why were are in this mess. And nobody here thinks that either except Leicester fans projecting their own seemingly insecure views on others.

Manchester United clearly are an absolute giant of club football, and hence many players would want to join us. That was true while Sir Alex was here and will (hopefully) continue to be the case.


Yeah, why feel any pride in one of the greatest clubs in football? And if anything the majority of our fanbase especially on the caf these days seem to believe we are absolutely worthless. Maybe you're better off putting everybody who doesn't post in line with that view on ignore?
its exactly why, the people calling the shots at the club think that simply being Manchester United is enough to all but guarantee success instead of doing what it takes with regards to scouting and signing players and appointing a manager that had a track record worthy of the job.

Ther managers press conferences early on were filled with "we're Manchester United" type statements, what you achieved in the past means feck all, they are things to be proud of nothing more, if given the choice between you and another so called big club you won't be the first choice anymore because you have no one running the club that actually has a strategy and when a player sis given the choice of which manager he wants to work with do you really think OGS will cut the mustard?

I would love to hear what Maguire thinks now, not that he'd ever be truly honest about it
Jimmy I just don't think you get it do you?
You seem to have a chip on your shoulder about United so God knows why you're on our forum. United, like it or not, are still a footballing giant. Some players will want to play here irrespective of current on field situations. History does count for alot still so perhaps you need to look at things from a different perspective. Maguire dreamed of playing for United as a kid and has bought into our rebuild. He'll be happy he made the move and can live out a childhood dream. What's your problem with that? It's weird. Just cause your own club doesn't have that history and appeal doesn't mean you have to come across so bitter. It's not a good look.

You're clearly clueless about what's happening at Manchester United. Van Gaal and Mourinho were two of the three managers hired post Moyes (picked by SAF) so clearly going for managers who had a "worthy track record" wasn't the issue. So there's that theory debunked.

Back in the real world, our major issue has been multiple fold - a CEO who is brilliant at the business side of his job but has been undoubtedley been unsuited to the football side and failed in this respect (badly). This has led to the other issue - we've picked managers who have A) simply not been good enough regardless of CV b) wasted money of poor signings c) also had no cohesion with one another (see LVG to Mourinho). So yeah, it's a deeper problem that has more to do with incompetence than "we are Manchester United".

Also anybody who isn't terribly off the mark, knows that when Ole says "we're Manchester United" - he is A) instilling a sense of expectation, responsibility and pride among the players and fans of standards that have to be set. B) reminding everybody of our past and hence the level we have to reach. He is definitely not hinting that we will be successful because we are Manchester United. That interpretation makes no sense whatsoever.

And yes, Ole is a mediocre manager. We'll replace him soon. If we get the right man in, and start putting things back together, our lure will be huge again, given the statute of the football club.
Good posts Amol.
 

Klopper76

"Did you see Fabinho against Red Star & Cardiff?"
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
19,721
Location
Victoria, BC
Supports
Liverpool
I don't think Leicester will sell in January given their current position. They'd be mad to let him go when they're looking good for a top four spot.

I fully expect someone to come and get him in the summer though. Reckon he'll go for something crazy like 90 million.
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,525
Location
Polska
He’d cost a fortune. Leicester would have Uniteds pants down again.
Same as Dortmund for Sancho and Spurs for Kane, but looks like Ole has very specific taste in transfers and so far Maguire and rest of summer targets (Bissaka & James) are players that actually want to play here.

Not saying it's 100% right direction, it's just at some point it makes sense to be after this type of characters.
 

Robertd0803

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
6,530
He will cost a fortune based off the season he is having alone.

The only thing that gives me hope is that Leicester are open to selling if their price is met. (Maguire, Kante, Mahrez eventually) and we supposedly have a very good and respectful relationship over the Maguire transfer.

Plus we can offer him a fortune and hope he goes for it because we are United. Getting him to turn down playing in the Champions League with Leicester might be an issue though.
 

ROFLUTION

Full Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
7,547
Location
Denmark
if he gets the usual british price and United-interested price added to his pricetag, Id rather take Eriksen/Bruno and spend big on Sancho and try to get Haaland

Of course Glazers are not gonna spend big on 2-4 players while interested in selling the club, so we better be pragmatical about transfers
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Same as Dortmund for Sancho and Spurs for Kane, but looks like Ole has very specific taste in transfers and so far Maguire and rest of summer targets (Bissaka & James) are players that actually want to play here.

Not saying it's 100% right direction, it's just at some point it makes sense to be after this type of characters.
Issue I have is Maguire was needed, we needed a leader at the back, someone with captain material and Maguire was arguably the best option around. Who else could we have got in that position that wouldn't have cost even more than Maguire did? Maguire himself was obviously massively overpriced and dare I say his performances thus far are proving that but I still believe he was the best option out there, Maddison on the other hand...

No one is going to convince me he's the best young number 10 out there (and in the unlikely scenario he is then we should look to move away from needing a number 10 before dropping the kind of money that would be needed to sign him). If we think Maguire was overpriced for his ability then we'll be getting an even worse deal with Maddison, he's not even a regular for his country (nor will he ever be imo). I really dont see what boxes he ticks other than the age and this myth that we're only interested in British

Honestly how much is there in terms of ability between Maddison and someone like Ceballos? Or if you want to stick with British the likes of McGinn and Grealish?

Maguire, AWB and James I get as signings, Maddison I really question
 

Stookie

Nurse bell end
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
9,071
Location
West Yorkshire
I don’t give a feck if the end result is us having a better team honestly.
Yeah me neither really, if they do go for him I hope it’s not dragged out like the Maguire one.

Same as Dortmund for Sancho and Spurs for Kane, but looks like Ole has very specific taste in transfers and so far Maguire and rest of summer targets (Bissaka & James) are players that actually want to play here.

Not saying it's 100% right direction, it's just at some point it makes sense to be after this type of characters.
Has he shown any inkling that he wants to come here? I hope he does. If United can get both him and Haaland it’s definitely a new phase for United. I wonder if the board will back Ole that much.
 

thepolice123

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
12,179
Issue I have is Maguire was needed, we needed a leader at the back, someone with captain material and Maguire was arguably the best option around. Who else could we have got in that position that wouldn't have cost even more than Maguire did? Maguire himself was obviously massively overpriced and dare I say his performances thus far are proving that but I still believe he was the best option out there, Maddison on the other hand...

No one is going to convince me he's the best young number 10 out there (and in the unlikely scenario he is then we should look to move away from needing a number 10 before dropping the kind of money that would be needed to sign him). If we think Maguire was overpriced for his ability then we'll be getting an even worse deal with Maddison, he's not even a regular for his country (nor will he ever be imo). I really dont see what boxes he ticks other than the age and this myth that we're only interested in British

Honestly how much is there in terms of ability between Maddison and someone like Ceballos? Or if you want to stick with British the likes of McGinn and Grealish?

Maguire, AWB and James I get as signings, Maddison I really question
We will get rinsed by Leicester for sure. With the massive pricetag, fans will turn on him faster than it did with Macguire.
 

esmufc07

Brad
Scout
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
49,858
Location
Lake Jonathan Creek
Issue I have is Maguire was needed, we needed a leader at the back, someone with captain material and Maguire was arguably the best option around. Who else could we have got in that position that wouldn't have cost even more than Maguire did? Maguire himself was obviously massively overpriced and dare I say his performances thus far are proving that but I still believe he was the best option out there, Maddison on the other hand...

No one is going to convince me he's the best young number 10 out there (and in the unlikely scenario he is then we should look to move away from needing a number 10 before dropping the kind of money that would be needed to sign him). If we think Maguire was overpriced for his ability then we'll be getting an even worse deal with Maddison, he's not even a regular for his country (nor will he ever be imo). I really dont see what boxes he ticks other than the age and this myth that we're only interested in British

Honestly how much is there in terms of ability between Maddison and someone like Ceballos? Or if you want to stick with British the likes of McGinn and Grealish?

Maguire, AWB and James I get as signings, Maddison I really question
Yeah whenever I see him play I don't understand the obsession. Decent and tidy player and 10 years ago we'd have no doubt picked him up for a reasonable fee and he'd have made a good squad player for us, nothing more.


The idea of spending c.£100m on Maddison is insane.
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,108
Yeah whenever I see him play I don't understand the obsession. Decent and tidy player and 10 years ago we'd have no doubt picked him up for a reasonable fee and he'd have made a good squad player for us, nothing more.


The idea of spending c.£100m on Maddison is insane.
I agree on the price - I can justify spending £80 million om Maguire because I had a hard time finding a much better central defender that was available. There are a lot of really good attacking midfielders that can be signed for a lower price than Maddison. Having said that - he will of course be a great signing. And if we had £300 million available - fine, but we don't! I just can't see us spending £100 million on someone who isn't world-class. Not when we need 3-4 new players
 

Craig Ward

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
2,117
One small problem Pogba has never played no 10 for us yet.
A further issue with Pogba is the following:

He wants to leave
He's been bang average for 3 seasons

Maddison would actually want to be here, people live in a fantasy world with Pogba.

My big concern with Maddison is the price, he's in amazing form in a free flowing team smashing it in the league. If Maguire was 80Mil, then i'd imagine we are looking at 100Mil.

Is he worth it? No
Is he what we need? Absolutely

Before all the clowns start telling me that Pogba is a "better" player than Maddison, let me simplify. Pogba is better, problem is Pogba is always going to want the Madrid move and he is always going to be more problematic than he's worth. Pogba will come up with eye catching moments in 1 game, and then go missing for 5+. How do I know this? Its what he's done for 3 seasons.

Maddison is young, energetic and plays with creativity. He would be a much better fit for us than Pogba. He'd make us better
 

Red00012

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
12,087
I just can’t see the board sanctioning a £80-£100 million offer for Maddison.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,080
Location
Hope, We Lose
I just can’t see the board sanctioning a £80-£100 million offer for Maddison.
Given our transfer history I could see them sanctioning it for a much worse player, or twice that for Maddison at which point its very unlikely he could live up to it. We tend to overpay
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,525
Location
Polska
Yeah me neither really, if they do go for him I hope it’s not dragged out like the Maguire one.

Has he shown any inkling that he wants to come here? I hope he does. If United can get both him and Haaland it’s definitely a new phase for United. I wonder if the board will back Ole that much.
There's a MEN article with pictures of him as a kid, wearing United shirt. Doesn't mean much, but you can clearly see through his form in Leicester his ambition is to play in a big club.

Since no director of football anytime soon It's probably up to Ole on this one, same with Haaland. I can't definitely tell if board will support him, because at one time they throw 50m just like that on Fred who was a bench player in his first season and on the other hand, they suddenly stop supporting the manager just like in Mourinho's case and block a move for a defender.
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,525
Location
Polska
Issue I have is Maguire was needed, we needed a leader at the back, someone with captain material and Maguire was arguably the best option around. Who else could we have got in that position that wouldn't have cost even more than Maguire did? Maguire himself was obviously massively overpriced and dare I say his performances thus far are proving that but I still believe he was the best option out there, Maddison on the other hand...

No one is going to convince me he's the best young number 10 out there (and in the unlikely scenario he is then we should look to move away from needing a number 10 before dropping the kind of money that would be needed to sign him). If we think Maguire was overpriced for his ability then we'll be getting an even worse deal with Maddison, he's not even a regular for his country (nor will he ever be imo). I really dont see what boxes he ticks other than the age and this myth that we're only interested in British

Honestly how much is there in terms of ability between Maddison and someone like Ceballos? Or if you want to stick with British the likes of McGinn and Grealish?

Maguire, AWB and James I get as signings, Maddison I really question
There are indeed better options than Maddison in Spain and maybe even Germany, but will they want to play here and show commitment like let's say Dan James ? Perhaps the best compromise would be Angel Gomes, but we never saw the lad in a longer run of PL games just yet. Somebody will have to arrive sooner than later and break through Lingard's and Mata's mild football display.

Perhaps Ole should drop Maddison interest and start looking for a player with pure false 9 abilities, in case of Martial's injury. It's all gamble, but as of now Maddison is a possibility that I wouldn't complain at, especially after Eriksen fiasco.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,080
Location
Hope, We Lose
Since the Villa midfielders and Ceballos were mentioned. Also a comparison with the best AM in the league





I dont know how much KDB is worth but I'm positive we can't sign him. 2nd best and 6 years younger is Maddison
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
What's to with that Leicester fan being so salty without any reason?

Also it's sad to read what some fans think about their club. Few lousy years and suddenly we lost all of our appeal.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,080
Location
Hope, We Lose
What's to with that Leicester fan being so salty without any reason?

Also it's sad to read what some fans think about their club. Few lousy years and suddenly we lost all of our appeal.
You're a fan. A footballer probably isnt. They arent going to think like you are
 

red woppit

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
2,229
Location
Buchebi
Supports
Northampton Town
Whatever we are like at this moment in time, United are still a big club, one of the best known, and respected throughout the world, that doesn't change. The fact that we have a mid table squad at the moment, in my mind, won't change any players mind about joining the club. The player that joins us at this moment in time, can see a future where the team are once again striving for the top honours, the players that don't want to join either see no time in the future where United are again vying with the best, or they want success now. Maddison is a very good footballer, who on his day looks world class, but can also look ordinary, that is pretty much what most players are like during every season. If he joined United, and his ego leads me to think that he can see himself at OT, then we would be getting a well established, exciting attacking player who can score, and create goals, not sure how good he is when we are up against it, and need hard graft and guts to get us through some matches. Personally I would love too see him at OT, along with David Brooks, who I rate very highly, but we also need that Keane type, someone not afraid to put their foot in, and work their socks off for the team, whether that player is Fred or McTominay, I'm not sure, but McTominay certainly could attain that type of status if he keeps on his current trajectory.
 

Blades1889

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
1,398
Supports
Sheffield United
Where would Maddison play if you signed him? Pogba replacement?