The decline of center back talent

njred

HALA MADRID!
Joined
Nov 3, 2001
Messages
7,225
Supports
Liverpool
I think the game is better and faster these days. Tactics have also developed with more pressing and fast transitions. I don't think the old school central defenders would do that well in the modern game.
I agree. VVD is the evolution of the CB at it's highest level. Fitness and speed has changed. The old plodding CBs of yesterday couldn't compete now. What's weird is it wasn't that long ago that the likes of Rio and Terry were playing but the game has evolved so quickly in the last few years that it seems watching clips of them looks like something out of the 1950s.
I don't think they could play in todays game and would get found out. Whoever said that VVD couldn't lace their boots sounds like a bitter old man.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
I don't think they have declined - they just can't stick around and defend like they used to because the type of attack has greatly changed.

Very few attackers are like Drogba or even Lewandowski anymore who go toe to toe with central defenders.

Ronaldo changed the game and made team's most deadly attackers come out from wide which meant that Central defenders had to come out of their positions with pace and read the game from that area.

Messi changed the game with the false 9 role where he would almost find clear space in front of the central defence to bring them out centrally to take them on directly or play the inverted forwards in behind.

Then possession football meant that attackers started playing in tip tap triangles much more so defenders had to again wait much more and defend as a unit to take down a team attack than a single defender stopping a single attacker like the Brazilian Ronaldo or Henry. Not only that - it meant that defenders also needed to be just as good at initiating a quick counterattacking pass or breaking away from a high press because chances became minimal.

The thing is - we can talk about Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, Pep's Barcelona and how they were so good - but many teams big and small use parts of these tactics now and the game evolved 5-10 years ago. In the Premier League alone only Burnley play old school classic football with crossing and target men.Football isn't played nor do strikers attack the way defenders like Stam or Maldini constantly dealt with.

Back during the wonderful Milan defence period - attackers used to play Central cutting through balls, balls over the top, big wide crosses - that hardly happens anymore. Teams like to literally open up the team to absolute pieces with passing, dribbling and possession before tapping the ball in to the net - passing the ball or crossing it how it was used to is deemed as giving the opportunity for the opposition the chance to get the ball and attack themselves.

Van Dijk has been the best for the last 2 years & there's no shame in admitting it even if it's Liverpool as a team that have a good defensive work ethic.
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,205
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on
Regarding not being fit to lace the boots.

I am a Serbian United fan so I have seen Vidic play more than 99% of this forum. I dont see him as a superior player to VVD, I actually think its the other way around.

To be perfectly honest, I consider him (VVD) to be the best central defender bar Nesta that I have seen in my 22 years of watching football.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
Regarding not being fit to lace the boots.

I am a Serbian United fan so I have seen Vidic play more than 99% of this forum. I dont see him as a superior player to VVD, I actually think its the other way around.

To be perfectly honest, I consider him (VVD) to be the best central defender bar Nesta that I have seen in my 22 years of watching football.
United fans would love Van Dijk. Vidic was great to watch because he got down and dirty almost like no other defender I have ever seen - but I don't think that type of defending is compatible with the sport now.

He'd still be a great defender though but would have to be much less erratic.
 

RedDevilCanuck

Quite dreamy - blue eyes, blond hair, tanned skin
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
8,426
Location
The GTA
Vidic was better than Rio. Rio couldn't even run after 2008 and would hoof the ball upfield even more than Vidic.

Vidic was excellent on the ground and is incorrectly labelled as a blood and thunder defender. He was incredible in Europe and against the top 4 all the time minus ONE game against Torres and Eto'o in the CL final.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
Vidic was better than Rio. Rio couldn't even run after 2008 and would hoof the ball upfield even more than Vidic.

Vidic was excellent on the ground and is incorrectly labelled as a blood and thunder defender. He was incredible in Europe and against the top 4 all the time minus ONE game against Torres and Eto'o in the CL final.
I'd say that was a partnership though wouldn't you? I couldn't see Vidic & Terry setting up to the same standard like Rio & Vidic would do never mind who the better defender was.

'Vidic would put his head where you wouldn't dare put your foot'

- Wayne Rooney​
 

RedDevilCanuck

Quite dreamy - blue eyes, blond hair, tanned skin
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
8,426
Location
The GTA
I'd say that was a partnership though wouldn't you? I couldn't see Vidic & Terry setting up to the same standard like Rio & Vidic would do never mind who the better defender was.

'Vidic would put his head where you wouldn't dare put your foot'

- Wayne Rooney​
Rio missed loads of matches and Vidic was just as dominant with Oshea, Brown and Evans.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,045
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
Naturally, a lot of the focus goes to attackers in the modern game but if you look at the defensive players out there in recent years I feel there's been a massive decline compared to 10/15 or so years ago where we were filled in a world with Lucio, Puyol, Nesta, Vidic, Rio, Terry, Carvalho, Campbell etc.

I understand defence is something that's quite hard to quantify, everyone has their own measures whether it be tackles, interceptions, headers and in the modern game distribution/ball playing ability. If we are to look at individuals you merely have to take one look at national sides to see if there has been a steep decline of talent. Is there anyone that matches to Rio, Terry for England, Puyol for Spain? Maldini, Nesta for Italy, Carvalho for Portugal etc.

It's been refreshing to see the likes of Van Dijk win the UEFA best player award if you're a neutral, he seems like a rare breed of genuine defensive talent as a CB in the modern game, by how much was paid to sign him it only illustrates how hard it is to get a quality center back. Nowadays if we were to state the top center backs we'd probably list Van Dijk, Ramos and maybe Pique? Why do you think the stock of center backs has fallen so much?

Share your thoughts.
Nah. Team defend better, attacking team relies more on inside forwards and less on big target men, 3 men midfield means the ball is played and stopped more in midfield, packed midfield means less space for blistering run through which ultimately leads to less guts and blood tackle.
 

Harry190

Bobby ten Hag
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
7,617
Location
Canada
Yeah, Baresi wouldn't stand a chance in today's game. Get a load of that garbage.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,575
Vidic was better than Rio. Rio couldn't even run after 2008 and would hoof the ball upfield even more than Vidic.

Vidic was excellent on the ground and is incorrectly labelled as a blood and thunder defender. He was incredible in Europe and against the top 4 all the time minus ONE game against Torres and Eto'o in the CL final.
Rio was more complete. With his pace and positioning he was able to stay on his feet most of the time and was unbeatable. Vidic was dominant in the air, one of the best ive seen, abut I remember he had to make alot of last ditch tackles, which he was very good at in his prime, and that plays into peoples memory. Both declined in similar ways, both suffered a knee injury that took away their legs, and I remember Vidic being far more exposed from the lack of pace in his last two seasons, he had to resort to desperate fouling like Smalling in the cup final.
 

RedDevilCanuck

Quite dreamy - blue eyes, blond hair, tanned skin
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
8,426
Location
The GTA
Rio was more complete. With his pace and positioning he was able to stay on his feet most of the time and was unbeatable. Vidic was dominant in the air, one of the best ive seen, abut I remember he had to make alot of last ditch tackles, which he was very good at in his prime, and that plays into peoples memory. Both declined in similar ways, both suffered a knee injury that took away their legs, and I remember Vidic being far more exposed from the lack of pace in his last two seasons, he had to resort to desperate fouling like Smalling in the cup final.
Rio had zero pace and ball playing after 2008.

He was still excellent but these myths need to stop. I watched every game including league cup games and pace and passing was not in Rio's game.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,575
Rio had zero pace and ball playing after 2008.

He was still excellent but these myths need to stop. I watched every game including league cup games and pace and passing was not in Rio's game.
What myth? That he was the best defender of his time?
 

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,468
Location
London
I don't think they have declined - they just can't stick around and defend like they used to because the type of attack has greatly changed.

Very few attackers are like Drogba or even Lewandowski anymore who go toe to toe with central defenders.

Ronaldo changed the game and made team's most deadly attackers come out from wide which meant that Central defenders had to come out of their positions with pace and read the game from that area.

Messi changed the game with the false 9 role where he would almost find clear space in front of the central defence to bring them out centrally to take them on directly or play the inverted forwards in behind.

Then possession football meant that attackers started playing in tip tap triangles much more so defenders had to again wait much more and defend as a unit to take down a team attack than a single defender stopping a single attacker like the Brazilian Ronaldo or Henry. Not only that - it meant that defenders also needed to be just as good at initiating a quick counterattacking pass or breaking away from a high press because chances became minimal.

The thing is - we can talk about Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, Pep's Barcelona and how they were so good - but many teams big and small use parts of these tactics now and the game evolved 5-10 years ago. In the Premier League alone only Burnley play old school classic football with crossing and target men.Football isn't played nor do strikers attack the way defenders like Stam or Maldini constantly dealt with.

Back during the wonderful Milan defence period - attackers used to play Central cutting through balls, balls over the top, big wide crosses - that hardly happens anymore. Teams like to literally open up the team to absolute pieces with passing, dribbling and possession before tapping the ball in to the net - passing the ball or crossing it how it was used to is deemed as giving the opportunity for the opposition the chance to get the ball and attack themselves.

Van Dijk has been the best for the last 2 years & there's no shame in admitting it even if it's Liverpool as a team that have a good defensive work ethic.
I dunno, to me the idea that defenders like Ferdinand, Vidic, Campbell, Adams, Terry, Carvalho, Carragher, Hyypia, King etc would struggle in the modern day Premier League astounds me.
I don’t really see the idea that defenders have to defend differently to how they used to.
I mean you only have to look at the majority of goals City and Liverpool score(more so Liverpool) to see that crossing football is still dominant. This idea that all teams are passing through defences, hogging possession, dribbling and playing triangles is not the actual reality.
And even going back to early noughties, you had the Milan side under Ancelotti who very much played through the middle. Kaka, Rui Costa , Seedorf, they never even played with wingers. The Real Madrid team of that era that utilised Zidane as a wide playmaker, with Raul pulling out wide. Arsenal didn’t play with crossing wingers, Pires cut inside, Ljungberg was essentially a wide poacher and Henry pulled out wide, centre backs had to deal with that for years.

A lot of these teams are scoring goals like this because defenders don’t seem to want to defend. Defending your box by doing simple things like heading, anticipating and marking. Basic defensive principles that a lot of centre backs seem to lack. Watch big games nowadays compared to the old days, they are full of catastrophic defensive mistakes. Is that because attackers and attacking football is that much better? I don’t think so. All those ridiculous comebacks, look at Liverpool’s goals against Barcelona, it was comical, basic defending not being done. Liverpool and City are capitalising in this era of defenders not wanting to defend. So they overload wide areas and fizz balls into the box over and over because they have good attackers and they know defenders don’t defend.

Also disagree that there are fewer Drogbas and Lewandowski around. Because city and Liverpool don’t have them doesn’t mean they aren’t around. There are still plenty of physically imposing penalty box strikers around, Lukaku, Cavani, Abraham, Dzeko, Piatek Aubemyang etc. Even in the PL, you have Wesley, Haller, Gimenez, Vardy.
I completely agree that Ronaldo and Messi have changed the way wide forwards play but I don’t think it’s meant the dying of the traditional centre forward. All it is is that teams now play with one instead of two.
 

LARulz

Full Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
18,194
I'm not too sure Sol Campbell, Terry or even Ferdinand would be that great in todays type of game. These days defenders need pace too, and many of those legends mentioned above had 0 pace. Back in their days, full backs did not attack. The centre backs had way more help defending.
:lol: what?

Anyway. VVD I think would be considered in that bracket of top tier defenders if they were all still playing. He has the lot - positioning, tackling, heading, speed, leadership and strength.
 

RedDevilCanuck

Quite dreamy - blue eyes, blond hair, tanned skin
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
8,426
Location
The GTA
What myth? That he was the best defender of his time?
he was always class but post 2008 he was slow amd hoofed the ball.

The myth is that Rio was always a pacy and ball playing CB.

Vidic was the aggressive partner and Scholes and or Carrick came deep to pass out of defense.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,575
he was always class but post 2008 he was slow amd hoofed the ball.

The myth is that Rio was always a pacy and ball playing CB.

Vidic was the aggressive partner and Scholes and or Carrick came deep to pass out of defense.
Yes, he declined after persistent back injuries and then to his knee. But lets not forget the 4-5 years before that during his prime. Many people are already putting VVD on the same level with him and others based off of one class season, and I think thats what irks some united fans. In his prime, he was pacy and technical on the ball, something that was far ahead of his time.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,946
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
I agree. VVD is the evolution of the CB at it's highest level. Fitness and speed has changed. The old plodding CBs of yesterday couldn't compete now. What's weird is it wasn't that long ago that the likes of Rio and Terry were playing but the game has evolved so quickly in the last few years that it seems watching clips of them looks like something out of the 1950s.
I don't think they could play in todays game and would get found out. Whoever said that VVD couldn't lace their boots sounds like a bitter old man.
Seriously? If we're going back 30 years ago, maybe even 20 years ago, I'd largely agree. But the likes of Rio and Terry would have no problem and would be competing with VVD to be the best in the world (well, Terry would be a little below him). Hell, a 34yo Terry was still playing quite well for Chelsea only four years ago.
 

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,468
Location
London
I agree. VVD is the evolution of the CB at it's highest level. Fitness and speed has changed. The old plodding CBs of yesterday couldn't compete now. What's weird is it wasn't that long ago that the likes of Rio and Terry were playing but the game has evolved so quickly in the last few years that it seems watching clips of them looks like something out of the 1950s.
I don't think they could play in todays game and would get found out. Whoever said that VVD couldn't lace their boots sounds like a bitter old man.
I think the game is better and faster these days. Tactics have also developed with more pressing and fast transitions. I don't think the old school central defenders would do that well in the modern game.
Minus Van dijk who are these modern day great centre backs that The plodding likes of Ferdinand and Terry would not compete with?
John Stones? Lindelof? Lovren? Davison Sanchez? Mustafi? Otamendi? Honestly it’s like some weird world I’m in.
Opposite of nostalgia but even more ridiculous.

Furthermore the notion that football is faster these days is another mythical one. There are SOME teams playing a faster quicker brand but that doesn’t mean it’s all teams. I mean ffs look how slow we play half the time. Arsenal the same, Chelsea for a lot of last season. I don’t get why people pick two outstanding teams like city and Liverpool and then make out everyone is doing what they’re doing.
Watch united games of 14/15 years ago those games were non stop end to end. Due to their being a lot less focus on possession football teams attacked far more at will.
I’ll further add what makes it funnier is that you see so many supporters whinging about how rubbish slow and boring their football is but you read the cafe and everyone is playing like Liverpool and City.
 
Last edited:

Web of Bissaka

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
8,553
Location
Losing to Comeback Winning!
Good thread.

Other than VVD in recent years, the CB department is boring. Lacking pool of top class players (WC nor elites). Granted there are frequent potentials now and then about every two years but seriously though.. it "dies" quickly.

I don't get the rationale it's because the game is changing nor does the past great players will struggle in today's hippy so called modern style of football.

Maybe it's just the lack of top class talents at CB at the moment. Art in defending is getting lost? Too much emphasis now on team tactical coaching? but less on individual defending so the talents of prospects did not or not yet mature.

I'm a bit hoping eventually more best CB contenders will arise. I think it can happen in let's say 5 to 10 years thr quality and competition of best players in any department eg. Cbs, mids, etc are lacking then suddenly the next year many rose up to fame from top consistent performances in big competitions. So we're still at that "lag" period for CB. Let's see how it plays out next year.
 

Harry190

Bobby ten Hag
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
7,617
Location
Canada
Minus Van dijk who are these modern day great centre backs that The plodding likes of Ferdinand and Terry would not compete with?
John Stones? Lindelof? Lovren? Davison Sanchez? Mustafi? Otamendi? Honestly it’s like some weird world I’m in.
Opposite of nostalgia but even more ridiculous.

Furthermore the notion that football is faster these days is another mythical one. There are SOME teams playing a faster quicker brand but that doesn’t mean it’s all teams. I mean ffs look how slow we play half the time. Arsenal the same, Chelsea for a lot of last season. I don’t get why people pick two outstanding teams like city and Liverpool and then make out everyone is doing what they’re doing.
Watch united games of 14/15 years ago those games were non stop end to end. Due to their being a lot less focus on possession football teams attacked far more at will.
I’ll further add what makes it funnier is that you see so many supporters whinging about how rubbish slow and boring their football is but you read the cafe and everyone is playing like Liverpool and City.
Why do you bother? You should abide by King Eric's words: '' Faut pas parler aux cons, ça les instruit.'' He took that from Audiard.
 

King7Eric

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
3,113
Location
Cardiff
I'm not too sure Sol Campbell, Terry or even Ferdinand would be that great in todays type of game. These days defenders need pace too, and many of those legends mentioned above had 0 pace. Back in their days, full backs did not attack. The centre backs had way more help defending.
Which Ferdinand did you watch mate? He was among the quickest CBs I saw before his injury. His turn of pace is what made him so good because he could easily make up for a mistake due to his recovery speed
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
I dunno, to me the idea that defenders like Ferdinand, Vidic, Campbell, Adams, Terry, Carvalho, Carragher, Hyypia, King etc would struggle in the modern day Premier League astounds me.
I don’t really see the idea that defenders have to defend differently to how they used to.
I mean you only have to look at the majority of goals City and Liverpool score(more so Liverpool) to see that crossing football is still dominant. This idea that all teams are passing through defences, hogging possession, dribbling and playing triangles is not the actual reality.
And even going back to early noughties, you had the Milan side under Ancelotti who very much played through the middle. Kaka, Rui Costa , Seedorf, they never even played with wingers. The Real Madrid team of that era that utilised Zidane as a wide playmaker, with Raul pulling out wide. Arsenal didn’t play with crossing wingers, Pires cut inside, Ljungberg was essentially a wide poacher and Henry pulled out wide, centre backs had to deal with that for years.

A lot of these teams are scoring goals like this because defenders don’t seem to want to defend. Defending your box by doing simple things like heading, anticipating and marking. Basic defensive principles that a lot of centre backs seem to lack. Watch big games nowadays compared to the old days, they are full of catastrophic defensive mistakes. Is that because attackers and attacking football is that much better? I don’t think so. All those ridiculous comebacks, look at Liverpool’s goals against Barcelona, it was comical, basic defending not being done. Liverpool and City are capitalising in this era of defenders not wanting to defend. So they overload wide areas and fizz balls into the box over and over because they have good attackers and they know defenders don’t defend.

Also disagree that there are fewer Drogbas and Lewandowski around. Because city and Liverpool don’t have them doesn’t mean they aren’t around. There are still plenty of physically imposing penalty box strikers around, Lukaku, Cavani, Abraham, Dzeko, Piatek Aubemyang etc. Even in the PL, you have Wesley, Haller, Gimenez, Vardy.
I completely agree that Ronaldo and Messi have changed the way wide forwards play but I don’t think it’s meant the dying of the traditional centre forward. All it is is that teams now play with one instead of two.
I would never say out right any of those defenders would struggle in modern day football - because ultimately these were professional footballers who would adapt to the modern game. If those legends dealt with whatever was put on their plate back then then there's not much doubt that they would adapt and still deal with it now.

But -

I just don't think the art of defending is as eye catching right now & the game is more tactical than ever.

I feel like the attackers are attacking like a team full of extremely technical & tactical ballerinas over the last 10 years. Be that whether you play against Bournemouth, Barcelona, Leicester or Liverpool.

To nullify this, defenders can't defend like bodyguards either and have to themselves defend like a team full of ballerinas.

I think it's unfair that some of the current gen CB's like Van Dijk & Ramos maybe underrated.

If we say that alot of the legend defenders would be great in the modern game, then I'd say that these two and many more would also find it easier playing it couple years back aswell.

On a side note -
After watching closely how the 3 central defenders has come back in to football to nullify everyone's favourite 433 possession/high press tactic; I reckon all it takes is a generational group of defenders like the Milan lot to get the defensive game to feel like it once did. Ball playing defenders and maybe the evolution of the modern day sweeper?
 

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,468
Location
London
I would never say out right any of those defenders would struggle in modern day football - because ultimately these were professional footballers who would adapt to the modern game. If those legends dealt with whatever was put on their plate back then then there's not much doubt that they would adapt and still deal with it now.

But -

I just don't think the art of defending is as eye catching right now & the game is more tactical than ever.

I feel like the attackers are attacking like a team full of extremely technical & tactical ballerinas over the last 10 years. Be that whether you play against Bournemouth, Barcelona, Leicester or Liverpool.

To nullify this, defenders can't defend like bodyguards either and have to themselves defend like a team full of ballerinas.

I think it's unfair that some of the current gen CB's like Van Dijk & Ramos maybe underrated.

If we say that alot of the legend defenders would be great in the modern game, then I'd say that these two and many more would also find it easier playing it couple years back aswell.

On a side note -
After watching closely how the 3 central defenders has come back in to football to nullify everyone's favourite 433 possession/high press tactic; I reckon all it takes is a generational group of defenders like the Milan lot to get the defensive game to feel like it once did. Ball playing defenders and maybe the evolution of the modern day sweeper?
Yep, the art of defending is lost and the emphasis is on overall team tactics as well as the “ball playing centre back”.
What amazes me is when the lesser teams become fixated on ball playing defenders, like I get Pep with his squad of world class talent doing it. But when these shitty teams, who are going to be on the back foot for the majority of their games, they should be focusing far more on the practical side of defending than fancy passes and fannying about with the ball.

I see it in the football league every weekend, some Neanderthal of a centre half thinks he’s Pirlo, dicks about with the ball, gets pick pocketed by a centre forward and lo and behold balls in the back of the net.

I think the biggest problem with centre backs and @Rifer touched on it, is encouraging individual defenders to hone their defensive skills. Van Dijk is incredible because he likes defending, you see it, he likes heading, tackling, going shoulder to shoulder. Then you see someone like Otamendi throwing himself to the floor when going shoulder to shoulder, absolutely criminal as a centre half. Then players like Lindelof who apparently receives a fine every time he has the audacity to try and win a header.

About everybody attacking like ballerinas, again I think this is isolated to certain teams. You only have to look at our attacking over the years which has ranged from pathetic to mediocre.
Arsenal’s attacking play seems to get worse every year. Even Barcelona’s has stagnated. These are three clubs normally associated with an entertaining brand of attacking football.

I think it might be a while before we see an exceptional array of centre half talents because the fixation atm is still on ball paying centre halves but like you said the influx of back threes will improve things because to match up to the front threes of the top clubs you need to be able to have defenders who want and will defend, being able to have a 98% pass completion ratio certainly won’t help.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,603
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
I dunno, to me the idea that defenders like Ferdinand, Vidic, Campbell, Adams, Terry, Carvalho, Carragher, Hyypia, King etc would struggle in the modern day Premier League astounds me.
I don’t really see the idea that defenders have to defend differently to how they used to.
Going back to last time this got brought up:

Defending has changed massively in the last decade, because attacking has changed more than in that period than probably any other comparable period in the history of the game.

Compared to 10 years ago, there are more goals scored, more passes attempted and completed, yet fewer shots attempted and fewer crosses being made and fewer goals from set pieces, despite the increase in goalscoring. There are less duels challenging for the ball and more take ons attempted. This is true across all the top leagues.

What it means is that there is a lot less percentage football being played for defenders to clear. There is simply more high quality chances being created now than a decade ago and a lot less 50/50s challenges for defenders to compete for.
Overall, defenders have much fewer defensive interactions than 10 years ago, yet come up against what one would consider difficult to defend scenarios far more often. You could almost say that what was the difficult to defend scenario a decade ago is the standard defensive interaction today.

The ball is moved faster than ever before and players make more off the ball runs than before. It's a lot more about movement, positioning and anticipation than it used to be. Man marking for example is basically dead. Defenders trusting their ability to win duels and challenges by sticking close to their man aren't as valuable as they used to be.

At the top end, defenders also generally have to defend much bigger spaces than before due to the compression of play over the past decade.
I'd say defenders in most places have it harder than ever, which is also why there is a perceived lack of top defenders compared to 15 years ago.
Main exception perhaps is guardiolas teams whose tactics distribute the defending across the whole team to greater effect than anyone else around.
 

Class of 63

Sourness
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
9,028
Location
Going through the Desert on a Horse with no Name
Regarding not being fit to lace the boots.

I am a Serbian United fan so I have seen Vidic play more than 99% of this forum. I dont see him as a superior player to VVD, I actually think its the other way around.

To be perfectly honest, I consider him (VVD) to be the best central defender bar Nesta that I have seen in my 22 years of watching football.
Was VVD stood behind you with a gun to your head as you typed that?
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,401
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
Attacking has become better. Not the raw skill of players, but how space is manipulated and all. And yes, even though you have outliers like Ramos who are praised for doing everything but defending, I think that defenders of today get a lot of unfair stick. Defending with the ball is just as valid as defending without the ball if both keep the ball out of the net. Personally think the former is the bigger challenge but to each their own.

And yes, a lot of recency bias here. I remember Rio getting mugged by Yakubu in 2005.
 

Nickelodeon

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
2,325
Was VVD stood behind you with a gun to your head as you typed that?
At the risk of further derailing this thread with VVD talk, I'll take the bite. I feel that our supporters here are deliberately downplaying Van Dijk due to his obvious Liverpool connections and further comparisons with Vidic, Ferdinand etc. can only be taken so far as objectively it is quite difficult to actually conclude that who has been better.


One thing which is absolutely undeniable is that the impact of his signing on Liverpool is definitely right up there with the maximum one player can have on a team. We shouldn’t forget that he hasn’t even completed 2 years at Liverpool and has already seen (and led) the highs most Liverpool legends failed to achieve in their careers. So I would agree with the assertions that he is one of the best and most complete CBs we have witnessed in the last couple of decades.


On the original point of the OP, I would like to raise a hypothesis that rather than a dearth of CBs (which seems to exist vis-à-vis the previous generation), I feel that rather than a shortfall in talent, there has been a displacement as we’re seeing a better variety of wingers /wing forwards as well as a massive improvement in the full back department. Specifically from a Premier League standpoint, I don’t recall a non-striker leading the goal-scoring charts before Ronaldo and even he was a one-off. Currently, with Salah, Mane, Sterling, and (dare I say) Rashford, the threats to be faced by CBs are different than what it used to be and it is actually quite difficult to estimate that the great CBs of the previous generation, particularly the one with pace issues such as Vidic, Terry etc. could’ve performed at a similar level. Though stating that we don’t have a similar talent base in CBs today without analyzing the overall change in the game might be a bit too simplistic.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
I don't really think it's a case of defenders decline it's more the way the game is evolving.

The best teams defend from the front and play out from the back, the traditional heart on his sleeve defend and 'get rid of it' defender is long gone, if Tony Adams (who is in many areas regarded as the PL best ever defender) was around today he'd have to adapt his game a bit or be left behind, same if some of the modern day defenders were around 20 years ago.

The era of build from the back solid shape first everything else second is a long gone, even clubs like Stoke are sacking managers because they're too defensive. These days you have to access a centre back on how adept they are at playing high up and playing out from defense, they are the most crucial elements of a CB at the top level, the romantics don't like it but it's how it is. If you are offered a choice of two defenders, one's pacey, rated 8 on ball playing skills and 7 on "pure defending" while the others slower rated 5 on the ball but 9 on "pure defending", 99.9% of managers will choose the former because it's the required skillset in this day and age.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,952
I don't buy this argument that because the CBs are more exposed they don't look as good. That should make them better players if they have to do a lot of 1 on 1 defending every game. Fact is the coaches rate other abilities higher than defending in their CBs these days it seems. Southgate and Ole sending Smalling packing, or Pep playing random midget midfielders in defence is a perfect illustration of this. Yet if you look at the results, the likes of Leicester's title winning defence had 2 commanding old school centre backs, City look poor at the back without Kompany, Liverpool improved immeasurably when they got Van Dijk, Atletico's dominant defence with Godin et al, Juventus with Chiellini - having defenders who can defend is still important.

The fad will end at some point and we'll start getting proper centre halves through again. After all, how many of these modern ball playing centre backs are actually better than the ones from the 90s and 2000s on the ball? Baresi, Maldini, Desailly, Thuram, Nesta, Stam, Campbell, King, Terry, Rio, Vidic etc etc. Even the ones who weren't anything special on the ball were composed in possession, which is pretty much how I see a lot of the "ball playing" ones now. Maguire, Lindelof, Stones, all get called ball playing but their passing ranges from decent to poor in any given game. Their only trait is being comfortable holding the ball and drawing opposition forwards in, but all the best centre backs always were good at that.
 
Last edited:

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
How do people rate Hummels?

I'm just asking because the VVD explosion does remind me about the sudden explosion that Mats Hummels had under Klopp.

Was he just as good without Klopp & once he moved to other clubs or his national team?
 

Matt007a

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
764
Defending has changed a lot in the last 10 years, but I always think that great players would be able to play in any era. If VVD had emerged 15 years ago, he’d play a different way to how he does now but I have no doubt he’d be one of the worlds best.

If Maldini or Nesta or Rio played today they too would have learnt to play a different game and I have no doubt they would be world class defenders still, just slightly different in style.

I do agree that the talent pool for defenders is the poorest it has been for decades though. We were spoilt from the early 90s to the end of the 00s with some truly incredible defenders.
 

Class of 63

Sourness
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
9,028
Location
Going through the Desert on a Horse with no Name
At the risk of further derailing this thread with VVD talk, I'll take the bite. I feel that our supporters here are deliberately downplaying Van Dijk due to his obvious Liverpool connections and further comparisons with Vidic, Ferdinand etc. can only be taken so far as objectively it is quite difficult to actually conclude that who has been better.


One thing which is absolutely undeniable is that the impact of his signing on Liverpool is definitely right up there with the maximum one player can have on a team. We shouldn’t forget that he hasn’t even completed 2 years at Liverpool and has already seen (and led) the highs most Liverpool legends failed to achieve in their careers. So I would agree with the assertions that he is one of the best and most complete CBs we have witnessed in the last couple of decades.


On the original point of the OP, I would like to raise a hypothesis that rather than a dearth of CBs (which seems to exist vis-à-vis the previous generation), I feel that rather than a shortfall in talent, there has been a displacement as we’re seeing a better variety of wingers /wing forwards as well as a massive improvement in the full back department. Specifically from a Premier League standpoint, I don’t recall a non-striker leading the goal-scoring charts before Ronaldo and even he was a one-off. Currently, with Salah, Mane, Sterling, and (dare I say) Rashford, the threats to be faced by CBs are different than what it used to be and it is actually quite difficult to estimate that the great CBs of the previous generation, particularly the one with pace issues such as Vidic, Terry etc. could’ve performed at a similar level. Though stating that we don’t have a similar talent base in CBs today without analyzing the overall change in the game might be a bit too simplistic.
Not at all, he's been immense at Liverpool, but the guy is 28½ and only has 32 caps for the Netherlands and they've been in the doldrums for years now on he International stage, it can't all be down to injuries and/or falling out with Managers, he's just a late bloomer, if he keeps up his current form for another 2 or 3 years he'll get the recognition he deserves. At the minute he's just somebody having a purple patch, albeit it a longer than normal one.
 

Renegade

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
5,393
I genuinely believe if Ramos wasn’t a goalscorer and playing for Madrid he wouldn’t be no where near rated as a defender.

He looks headless when he has to defend.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,603
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
I don't buy this argument that because the CBs are more exposed they don't look as good. That should make them better players if they have to do a lot of 1 on 1 defending every game.
It makes the rare few like van dijk look better because he is so good in 1on1 defending.

Having to defend more of the situations that, now and historically, lead to more goals than any other, something that all defensive organisations are set up to try and prevent, is obviously not going to make defenders look better.

I think Lovren is a good, if somewhat caricatured, example of a defender suffering from modern day defending. Put him in a deep defence with plenty to do and little distance to his nearest team mates, basically more traditional defending, and he can produce some terrific displays.

The more distance he has to his team mates and the more space he has to defend behind him, the worse his decisionmaking becomes as he ends up going for the all-or-nothing solution that will not expose him. And this is magnified by the fact when he does make a mistake, it tends to have severe consequences because of the large space he is defending on his own.

Van Dijk has it easier in these situations. Because he is that much stronger, he can expect to win every tussle and that much faster, he can recover in pretty much any sprint. He can stand off at first or go in hard early and will still come out top. He is somewhat unique in that he almost seems to benefit from having to defend a large space in isolation, which is almost never the case.

Sol Campbell stands out as someone who would still look as good in the modern era. Maybe ferdinand. Carvalho too. And peak Stam.

Vidic would not. Nor would Terry, Hyypia, Adams or Carragher.
 
Last edited:

Needham

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
11,754
This goes for every position using the old definitions. Left wing, centre forward, right back etc. Footballers occupy more ill defined spaces these days. Makes them better aware but more susceptible to this kind of criticism.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,670
In 1982 the national team who invented defensive football and the best player the world has ever seen met on a football pitch. I was too young to remember that game but those who did remembers it as a passionate or even brutal duel between Diego Armando Maradona and Claudio Gentile. We'll never see something of that kind mainly because the defender would be off after 10 minutes of play. Defenders has been stripped of a lot of things in the past decades or so. The thuggery is gone (thank god for that), however other non dangerous techniques like clean tackles from behind can put defenders in hot water these days. Not to forget VAR who keeps defenders in close scrutiny throughout the game. Tactics hasn't been kind with CBs either. The classical DM (Ince/Keane style) is gone while CBs and GKs aren't judged on their ability to do their job but also (and sometimes more importantly) on how they distribute the ball elegantly. That is leading to a situation were decent quality CBs like Maguire are forced to play alongside defensive liabilities like Stones and Lindelof who aren't good in air, they can't be trusted alone in defence, they aren't very physical BUT........they distribute the ball so elegantly upfront. Which kind of explain why CBs aren't as good as they were once were and also why the likes of Messi share ridiculous goals stats. Id love to see Messi scoring a hat trick past prime Gentile or the butcher of Bilbao on their own turf with their own rules.