Are you guys happy with Maguires distribution of the ball?

CM

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,328
Not against Everton I wasn't. Generally speaking I suppose he's done alright but I can't claim to have been blown away by him in any sense
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,763
Maguire's on the ball play has been much better than Lindelof's. Its not just about playing a progressive pass, he also does a better job dribbling and drawing players to himself before playing the progressive pass to a player who now has more space because the player came to him.

Unfortunately no CB was going to come in and significantly improve our attacking play and anyone who thought it would was clearly deluded as has been proven this season. Thats not how it works. Its just a minor improvement to buildup play.

On top of this we still have a DM dropping deep to collect the ball from a short pass from the CBs - Fred. So anyone who suggested Matic was doing that because of our CBs has also been proven incorrect.
Completely agree with this, He's our only defender who carries the ball forward, Lindelof has the occasional great pass in him but Maguire pushes the team forward more often than not with the way he carries the ball. I think he's done really well on that front. When Lindelof was paired with Smalling it was side pass after side pass in defence, until pressure from the opponents forced us to hoof the ball to nowhere, it has gotten much better now since Maguire arrived.
 

Web of Bissaka

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
8,553
Location
Losing to Comeback Winning!
Happy? No but I'm fine with it.

I don't rate his passing abilities n distribution skills that high in the first place though.

Definitely an upgrade than Jones and Smalling. I think Rojo and Bailly can distribute better but alas they're always not available so Mag have the edge.
 

norm87cro

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
1,782
Location
Split, HR
Threads like these make me want to jump off the window. No offense. If we had enough midfield options this wouldn't (as it shouldn't) be a topic in the first place. The fact that he's the one with the ball passing around tells you a lot about our midfield in general. But giving the fact he is a 6,4 big defender yeah I'm happy (maybe fine is the better word like someone said earlier) with his distribution of the ball.
 
Last edited:

Bobcat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
6,385
Location
Behind the curtains, leering at the neighbors
He was shite at it vs Everton, but hes been fine most of the season imo.

The problem was that Everton where good at pushing up their attackers/midfielders so Fred/McTomminay was always marked and passing to them would be very risky 90% of the time. Its critical we get Pogba back as soon as possible since hes the only one of our CM's with the strength/technique to receive the ball under pressure and consistently turn away players
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
I don’t like how he takes ages to release the ball. He gets it, just stands over it and then releases it after 10 seconds, killing the tempo.
This is my biggest concern. We're looking to play quick counter attacking football but have a goalkeeper that rarely releases the ball quickly and a centre back who is ponderous on the ball.

This is what makes me question Ole more than anything. It's like he's explained the overall style he's looking for to the team, but then allowed individuals to just do as they please without any individual tactical discussion.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,312
Not against Everton I wasn't. Generally speaking I suppose he's done alright but I can't claim to have been blown away by him in any sense
Lindelöf's long service to Rashford against Everton (which Rashy fecked up, unsurprisingly) was quite sublime, however.

I think Lindelöf is much better at ball distribution. Maguire's main positives, in this season have been:
  1. Consistency and reliability. He rarely makes stupid mistakes. Which we couldn't have said about our CBs before Maguire. We had CBs who would give at least 1-2 real chances to opposition, every single game. Not anymore.
  2. He has made Lindelöf much better. They have good partnership and until that pair formed, we'd almost written off Lindelöf, but Harry has helped Lindelöf improve significantly. Not a small thing.

He was shite at it vs Everton, but hes been fine most of the season imo.

The problem was that Everton where good at pushing up their attackers/midfielders so Fred/McTomminay was always marked and passing to them would be very risky 90% of the time. Its critical we get Pogba back as soon as possible since hes the only one of our CM's with the strength/technique to receive the ball under pressure and consistently turn away players
I wonder if you are joking? Pogba has the highest rate of losing the ball in the midfield. If I was trying to find a midfielder to pass a ball from behind, Pogba would be the last person to pass it to.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,639
He’s fine, problem for a lot of people is that they built him up to something he never was before we signed him. Since he joined he’s playing to the same level as he did for Leicester, we didn’t buy a top class player, a great passer, a leader or the new VVD.

Leicester completely shafted us over the fee but he’s a decent all round defender. To get beat out of him will probably have to find right partner for him, ridiculous given his fee but that’s how it is.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Im not going by conformation bias, I'm going from my preference to see him play the ball out and pass along the floor to the heart of the midfield. A few of his successful long passes would undoubtedly be some where martial or Rashford would try and knock it down awkwardly and lose the ball from doing so.
If you only remember the 3 very poor passes out of the eleven that he made to confirm a negative opinion of him then that is the definition of confirmation bias.

It's believed here that both Maguire and Lindelof are great at it(or at least was until people actually saw them playing for us).
What I would say about Lindelof is that he does have a great first touch which is a part of being good on the ball, it helps with taking the ball under pressure and moving the ball on. Keep an eye out for it and you'll see what I'm talking about.
 

UpWithRivers

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
3,640
Its hard to tell when they have no options. They are both (Lindelof and Maguire) forcing it because they look around and 0 options. We need a CM that shows for the ball and then be able to handle tight spaces and move the ball to the number 10. The midfield has a similar problem with the fact the number 10 is sht and the front 3 are marked. 0 options. This results in long balls, holding on to the ball too long, sideways and backwards passes and misplaced passes. When we get Pogba back you will see this improve. If we ever get a decent number 10 and another CM option. Not saying Kroos but someone like that you will see our CBs are great players on the ball.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,587
Among the CBs, Maguire is 9th in most long balls completed. Among the top 10 CBs with most long balls completed, Maguire has second best completion rate.

Coady with 62% and Maguire completed 58%.
 

Tomuś

Nani is crap, I tell you!
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,177
Location
Świdnik
His passing reminds me of Lindelof's when he came here where every pass was to De Gea or sideways. It was only since the Juventus game at Old Trafford that Lindelof started taking any sort of risk with the ball. Definitely expected more of Maguire in that sense but I think he'll be more expansive when he finally settles.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,812
The problem is that because he's so poor at turning, if under pressure, he soon gets himself into a nightmare.

Same problem happens with his defending. Just slightly wrong foot him and he's dead in the water.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,812
Threads like these make me want to jump off the window. No offense. If we had enough midfield options this wouldn't (as it shouldn't) be a topic in the first place. The fact that he's the one with the ball passing around tells you a lot about our midfield in general. But giving the fact he is a 6,4 big defender yeah I'm happy (maybe fine is the better word like someone said earlier) with his distribution of the ball.
The point is that he was bought for his passing, which makes up for his defending.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,397
If you only remember the 3 very poor passes out of the eleven that he made to confirm a negative opinion of him then that is the definition of confirmation bias.
Someone else mentioned they only remember the 3 poor passes. I remember his general distribution. He's very good when he brings the ball out into the half himself and finds cutting passes along the floor. He's not so useful with sweeping Scholes esque passes, because we have enough of that from others as it is.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Someone else mentioned they only remember the 3 poor passes. I remember his general distribution. He's very good when he brings the ball out into the half himself and finds cutting passes along the floor. He's not so useful with sweeping Scholes esque passes, because we have enough of that from others as it is.
Fair enough if I picked up the wrong comment. Sorry.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
His distribution was never on point but he tends to play risky which is why his passing sometime a bit off and sometime he stops playing those risky passes. However, everytime I watched him at Hull, Leicester and even now he always very comfortable on the ball, very composed on the ball, can keep possession when under pressure and capable to hold the ball, which what made the difference this season.

Last season we can’t even control the ball across the back that we had to conceded 4 goals against Everton.
 

Lord

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 15, 2019
Messages
13
Not happy with Maguire at all, the price tag is just eye wateringly extreme for a player of such limited capacity.
 

cptkeane1993

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 31, 2019
Messages
183
Let’s give him some time. Even Pallister, Evra and Vidic found it challenging in the beginning but they all came round. And this was before the age of social media, statistics galore, etc.
 

andy dufresne

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Messages
221
Location
Shawshank Prison
I have posted many times already about the most over-rated defender in the premiership at the present time.Yes you guessed it,Harry Maguire.Look I am a Manchester United Season Ticket holder,like I suspect many others on here so I do not want to be negative just for negative sake but when are folk going to realise that this lad is simply not good enough at the highest level and certainly not someone who can lead our defence for years to come and help and bring on other players around him.He is completely paceless,pure and simple and in our modern game,lacking that yard or two of pace is crucial unless you have ultimate positional sense say like a Vincent Kompany had for all those years at City.I look at the likes of Van Dijk in particular and feel that Maguire is not at all capable of reaching half of what that lad has/can achieve.His passing is average at best and all this so called skill he has at bringing the ball out from the back is just nonsense,it really is,I would ask you to look at him over half a dozen games and each and every time he brings it forward,he looks to his left and plays a pass to the player nearest to him.I do not think he commands and he certainly does not inspire confidence in others in the way some seem to say.For example,do we honesty,hand on heart,think Lindelof is a better player now than he was last season.Maguire is a good header of the ball but again,not as good as people may think and for me,pure and simple,his reputation stems from him having a decent World Cup but so did Jesse Lingard and surely we wouldn't say he is a world beater either.I hope for our sake that United can find another centre half in the next coupe of seasons in the mould of a Nemanja Vidic or JaapStam and then we possibly may start seeing a vast improvement in our defending
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,526
Supports
Mejbri
My prediction was the first line. Out the door or hanging on like Phil
But with better players it might change right?

When he gets partnered with a centre back who can actually run and do most of the defensive parts of the job, I reckon he'll be fine. Not 80m fine, but a very good player for us. He'll also be helped if we start to play a left back who can do the job well. And of course, if and when we manage to put together a midfield, aided by great coaching, a lot of pressure will be taken off the defense both in terms of being under pressure and in terms of having to dictate play (against those deep sitting sides).

As it is, I think he's an upgrade on all the centre backs we had, but we still have so many problems, in terms of personnel and coaching, that it's hard to gauge how good he will be in a competent setup.
 

M Bison

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,827
Location
In the Wilderness
Supports
York City
Considering he’s the worlds most expensive CB it’s been very underwhelming, but that’s how I feel about him in general.

Looks average across all areas at the moment in my view, hoping for improvements in the near future.
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,865
Location
Wales
It’s decent enough and would benefit a lot more from any sort of movement in front of him
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,608
I never understood when he suddenly became a great ball playing CB. He's comfortable on the ball but just because he'll play a long diagonal now and then it doesn't mean he's amazing at passing, he's good for a CB at bringing the ball out and moving the team up the pitch but he's performed kind of as expected so far.
 

joker00

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
166
Location
Tunisia
After years of Smalling passing to Fellaini, all I can feel is satisfaction now, but form the most expensive defender I would expect better in every aspect in his game and not only passing.
But for now, I can say that he's doing his job including passing no more no less.
 

Lennon7

nipple flasher and door destroyer
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
10,475
Location
M5
But with better players it might change right?

When he gets partnered with a centre back who can actually run and do most of the defensive parts of the job, I reckon he'll be fine. Not 80m fine, but a very good player for us. He'll also be helped if we start to play a left back who can do the job well. And of course, if and when we manage to put together a midfield, aided by great coaching, a lot of pressure will be taken off the defense both in terms of being under pressure and in terms of having to dictate play (against those deep sitting sides).

As it is, I think he's an upgrade on all the centre backs we had, but we still have so many problems, in terms of personnel and coaching, that it's hard to gauge how good he will be in a competent setup.
The key word being ‘might’ - who am I to say? As it is my prediction stands, and to be honest if we’re buying plenty of players to improve we should be buying a centre half, and Lindelof has been better than him.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,526
Supports
Mejbri
The key word being ‘might’ - who am I to say? As it is my prediction stands, and to be honest if we’re buying plenty of players to improve we should be buying a centre half, and Lindelof has been better than him.
Yeah, I would definitely say he’s been comfortably better than Lindelof.

We shall see.
 

Lennon7

nipple flasher and door destroyer
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
10,475
Location
M5
Yeah, I would definitely say he’s been comfortably better than Lindelof.

We shall see.
Really? Bar a few ridiculous brain farts that you could easily expect from a 22/23 year old, Lindelof’s improved massively in defence. He reads the game very well. On top of that, he can play a great pass.

Maguire on the other hand has done very, very little for me. Missed a few sitters and gets beaten on the half way line and in the air. He’s a different type of defender than Lindelof for sure, and I think the latter has done what he’s good at a lot better than what Maguire has.
 

AndersB

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2016
Messages
717
My issue with him is not his passing; it's his constantly committing fouls in the opposition's box. It's insane how regularly it happens. No idea why it isn't addressed.
 

Bobski

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
9,826
He passing ability in isolation has always been overstated, not bad, and he does pick the occasional lovely pass, but what really brought the hype was the runs forward with the ball. He is composed, sometimes to the point of playing in slow motion, not a new criticism either, but he is not afraid of taking the ball and the pressure.

I think we overstate the need for exceptional creative passing quality from the back. If they are composed, technically proficient and can move the ball quickly and efficiently that is usually enough, if the midfield and attack are up to the job.
 

Nikelesh Reddy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
1,912
I don’t like how he takes ages to release the ball. He gets it, just stands over it and then releases it after 10 seconds, killing the tempo.
Maybe he does this to draw players onto himself...Therefore creating some space for his team mates,,,
 

Craig Ward

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
2,117
But with better players it might change right?

When he gets partnered with a centre back who can actually run and do most of the defensive parts of the job, I reckon he'll be fine. Not 80m fine, but a very good player for us. He'll also be helped if we start to play a left back who can do the job well. And of course, if and when we manage to put together a midfield, aided by great coaching, a lot of pressure will be taken off the defense both in terms of being under pressure and in terms of having to dictate play (against those deep sitting sides).

As it is, I think he's an upgrade on all the centre backs we had, but we still have so many problems, in terms of personnel and coaching, that it's hard to gauge how good he will be in a competent setup.
This logic bemuses me. "Our 80 Mil new signing will be good, just as long as we buy other better players to mask his flaws".

For 80 mil - Maguire should be able to command the backline, be good on the ball and distribute it to a good standard.

We over paid, we know his limitations and he is doing exactly what we thought he would.

Players can take ownership of they're own performance levels, i dont think signing a new CB and a LB should be the reason Maguire improves - he's capable of working on his game and improving.

He's been average thus far, would have expected a bit more but like you say - he's streets ahead of Jones/Rojo/Smalling. Easily our best CB, far from perfect though