Let's not buy Raiola players again - ever

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,319
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
No one actually cares about Raiola's precise wording. What people will take away from this and remember is that Pogba is unhappy and should United not invest (significantly) in the squad it will be used as a stick to beat Woodward&co with.
Are you sure? maybe for those who understand. Words like "United will ruin even Maradona's talents" will mean exactly that for majority of people and most of the time They will defend what They love (United). I can't see his words helping Pogba's situation to be honest, if He has one shit game all hell will break loose. But fair enough, We'll see.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,349
Don't take it personally, we are a fallen giant and currently have his biggest client, so he is putting some heat on us. When Ibrahimovic and Maxwell had issues at Barcelona, he was on their back too and Bartomeu said that he hated having to deal with him. With all agents everything is cool until it's not, some will shaft you by surprise and others will do it openly but clubs should be able to anticipate these things, if they are properly run they should know which context will create issues and how to fix it smoothly.
Fair enough, and for some reason I feel like Woodward/United have enough experience to know this as well. Chances are - they are not taking Raiola comments as painfully as we are? :)
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
Are you sure? maybe for those who understand. Words like "United will ruin even Maradona's talents" will mean exactly that for majority of people and most of the time They will defend what They love (United). I can't see his words helping Pogba's situation to be honest, if He has one shit game all hell will break loose. But fair enough, We'll see.
What do you mean by "help Pogba"? There is only two outcomes here, either United build a winning foundations or Pogba is out, there is only answer that can be given and it's from the club with actions, whether hell break loose or not isn't the issue here.
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,437
He planted the seed, that's the goal. If United don't act accordingly, it will be used against them. An other thing, yes Raiola is classless, on that you are 100% correct.
Ok well if we’ve got to the end and we both agree that Raiola is a classless prat but united need to sort their act out then that’s probably fair fecks
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Agent fees sould be illegal. Receiving 15 mil euros for a transfer is f***ing ridiculous. Who pay for that? it's minions like you and me.
In an open and free European market, I don't think the law would allow restrictions on salaries and fees.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
In an open and free European market, I don't think the law would allow restrictions on salaries and fees.
It's also an highly questionable point. Players and clubs need representation and that function will be remunerated.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,349
In an open and free European market, I don't think the law would allow restrictions on salaries and fees.
FIFA is considering it https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...ned-limits-on-agent-fees-loan-deals/40200545/

UEFA also has considered it https://www.espn.com/soccer/blog-ue...sidering-cap-on-fees-that-clubs-pay-to-agents

Ironically, the two examples of feck ups they discuss both involve United transfers - Sanchez and Pogba ones.

Your point about compiance with EU laws is indeed interesting. If FIFA/UEFA introduce something it will likely be amendment to Fair Play and can still get contested in EJC court just like 3+2 rule got overruled in '90s
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,045
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
What's the issue here?

If you want the player pay up. If you think the amount is too much then dont buy the players.

How is it agents fault? Raiola or no raiola. We value pogba at 90m hence we strike the deal to buy him for 90m. It's like buying a yatch and complaining about the docking cost.

Isnt that how free market works? I dont see united fans complaining when they flex their muscle and use their financial prowess to poach players from a weaker league that can't compete in terms of wages, but somehow when they screw us for a few extra millions we're crying foul? If we are paying 15m for raiola that simply meant he has our balls in his grip, and there's nothing we can do to tell him to feck off.


We point the fingers on agents and accuse them to inflate prices, they didnt. It's the big clubs that's keep on paying more and more so that they can get the best players playing for them that's inflating the price.

It takes two to tangoes.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,349
What's the issue here?

If you want the player pay up. If you think the amount is too much then dont buy the players.

How is it agents fault? Raiola or no raiola. We value pogba at 90m hence we strike the deal to buy him for 90m. It's like buying a yatch and complaining about the docking cost.

Isnt that how free market works? I dont see united fans complaining when they flex their muscle and use their financial prowess to poach players from a weaker league that can't compete in terms of wages, but somehow when they screw us for a few extra millions we're crying foul? If we are paying 15m for raiola that simply meant he has our balls in his grip, and there's nothing we can do to tell him to feck off.


We point the fingers on agents and accuse them to inflate prices, they didnt. It's the big clubs that's keep on paying more and more so that they can get the best players playing for them that's inflating the price.

It takes two to tangoes.
You keep saying "free market" but I am not sure it means what you think it means. "Free market" does not mean it's free for all, especially in sports. There are many examples of regulations, including Fair Play. Caps on agent fees can be established to avoid exploitation. The idea being that super agents have more power than players so it's important to ensure they don't abuse their power. Protecting players is important since they are the ones playing in the end. There would be no game without them. Whether you agree or not, is up to you, but it has nothing to do with "free market", whatever you think it means.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
You keep saying "free market" but I am not sure it means what you think it means. "Free market" does not mean it's free for all, especially in sports. There are many examples of regulations, including Fair Play. Caps on agent fees can be established to avoid exploitation. The idea being that super agents have more power than players so it's important to ensure they don't abuse their power. Protecting players is important since they are the ones playing in the end. There would be no game without them. Whether you agree or not, is up to you, but it has nothing to do with "free market", whatever you think it means.
That idea is fallacious though, you naively think that the idea is to protect players when it's in reality to limit the amount of money shared with players. The reason clubs don't like agents and want to limit their influence is because it increases labour costs, most players have no idea about how much they are actually worth and clubs won't and don't tell them.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,349
That idea is fallacious though, you naively think that the idea is to protect players when it's in reality to limit the amount of money shared with players. The reason clubs don't like agents and want to limit their influence is because it increases labour costs, most players have no idea about how much they are actually worth and clubs won't and don't tell them.
I am actually not saying anything, mate, just citing what UEFA said:
"Citing the risk of "economic exploitation of young players, fraud, corruption, and money laundering," UEFA said European lawmakers can help address illegal practices."
(from: https://www.espn.com/soccer/blog-ue...sidering-cap-on-fees-that-clubs-pay-to-agents). What I am saying is that "free market" doesn't mean no regulation. Obviously, everybody has their "sinister" interests in this, there're huge amounts of money involved.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
I am actually not saying anything, mate, just citing what UEFA said:


(from: https://www.espn.com/soccer/blog-ue...sidering-cap-on-fees-that-clubs-pay-to-agents). What I am saying is that "free market" doesn't mean no regulation. Obviously, everybody has their "sinister" interests in this, there're huge amounts of money involved.
Free market doesn't mean no regulation but as I said, in your article Ceferin isn't even hiding where his priorities are.

Ceferin told the Telegraph that FIFA was "absolutely wrong" to have deregulated agents, adding: "We should have a cap, how much a club can pay [an agent]. If the player is stupid enough to pay by himself then we can't stop that."
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,349
Free market doesn't mean no regulation but as I said, in your article Ceferin isn't even hiding where his priorities are.
Yeah, pretty incredible.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
Yeah, pretty incredible.
Some agents are shady but it's generally for the benefit of clubs or concerns the exploitation of young players from poor backgrounds and wouldn't really be included in an agent fee cap because these things are generally illegal from the beginning and aren't in the books. But if you want an anecdotal example outside of football, you have Russell Okung who thought that he could negotiate his own contract.
 

VP

Full Member
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
11,556
Yes. Most agents does. There's a documentary somewhere. They actually enables kids from parts of the world to live their dream (albeit for monetary interest if they made it). Many young players (10s) from poor country are already taken care of by agents, nurtured and provided connection to the best footballing school for a tit for tat. They paid for their living cost, ticket cost, marketing etc.
But your man Raiola isn't that type of agent. He's a fat prick who fixes meetings for the world's best players - he has nothing to do with them being good players.
 

bonothom

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
843
You think Dortmund paid the most money for Haaland?
No one knows what's written into a sell on clause. Wouldn't surprise me if Dortmund have had to have a smallish sell on clause with a nice fat bonus for Raiola inked in. If he does well at Dortmund I expect he will be on his way within 2 seasons to a big club. Not United obviously but Real or Juve.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,407
No one knows what's written into a sell on clause. Wouldn't surprise me if Dortmund have had to have a smallish sell on clause with a nice fat bonus for Raiola inked in. If he does well at Dortmund I expect he will be on his way within 2 seasons to a big club. Not United obviously but Real or Juve.
Which us exactly what Haaland and his father wanted. Another stepping stone club

Good agents make deals happen that suit their client not the club
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,670
Haaland is 19 years old and developing, moving too soon to a big club isn't necessarily a good idea, they can't guarantee playing time or proper development. They generally offer a lot of money though. As for picking Juventus over Barcelona, thy are both big clubs that will win trophies and Barcelona are among the clubs that give the biggest wages, so I'm not sure about how it fits with your argument.
I agree that Juventus aren't a good fit for Haaland at the moment. They have 3 strikers who are clearly better then him. However Juventus aren't usually great spenders. They tend to pay less in salary then we or Real do.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
Re Pogba and Raiola, am not sure why anyone has a problem with Raiola. He is merely Pogbs’s mouthpiece and conduit. And Raiola's job is to get what his client wants, and for his client and himself to be paid the most possible amount for that. So of course in such a public and specialised industry, that will involve lots of subterfuge and brinksmanship. Raiola is just doing his job, and he is very very good at it.

When Raiola speaks in public about one of his clients, it is as good as words coming directly from the client, whom has most likely vetted and approved the exact wording. In Pogba's case, we had the same shit from Pogba via Raiola in the summer (and from Pogba himself!) and so it’s not surprising the same rhetoric is starting as a new transfer window opens.

Given how pogba abused the club as a teenager and his cynical behaviour after we paid a world record fee to bring him back, I can’t think of a mercenary like him in our history. I feel more positively towards Tevez!

How Pogba gets any sympathy or support from United fans on this matter is difficult for me to emphasise with or understand. I don’t get it.
 
Last edited:

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,045
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
You keep saying "free market" but I am not sure it means what you think it means. "Free market" does not mean it's free for all, especially in sports. There are many examples of regulations, including Fair Play. Caps on agent fees can be established to avoid exploitation. The idea being that super agents have more power than players so it's important to ensure they don't abuse their power. Protecting players is important since they are the ones playing in the end. There would be no game without them. Whether you agree or not, is up to you, but it has nothing to do with "free market", whatever you think it means.
Cap means clubs can exploit players for cheap. Nothing to do with protecting them. Protecting them from smart agents to they earn less?
 

MrMarcello

In a well-ordered universe...
Joined
Dec 26, 2000
Messages
52,717
Location
On a pale blue dot in space
That idea is fallacious though, you naively think that the idea is to protect players when it's in reality to limit the amount of money shared with players. The reason clubs don't like agents and want to limit their influence is because it increases labour costs, most players have no idea about how much they are actually worth and clubs won't and don't tell them.
They're worth what a club will pay to secure a transfer from another club, not what an agent's commission is.
 

ravi2

Full Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
9,043
Location
Canada
Re Pogba and Raiola, am not sure why anyone has a problem with Raiola. He is merely Pogbs’s mouthpiece and conduit. And Raiola's job is to get what his client wants, and to be paid the most possible amount for that. So of course in such a public, niche and specialised industry, that will involve lots of subterfuge and brinksmanship. Raiola is just doing his job, and he is very very good at it.

When Rail speaks in public about one of his clients, it is as good as words coming directly from the client whom has most likely vetted and approved the exact wording. In Pogba's case, we had the same shit from Pogba via Raiola mouth in the summer (and from Pogba himself!) and so it’s not surprising the same rhetoric is starting as a new transfer window opens.

Given how he abused the club as a teenager and his cynical behaviour after we paid a world record fee to bring him back, I can’t think of a mercenary like him in our history. I feel more positively towards Tevez! How Pogba gets any sympathy or support from United fans on this matter is difficult for me to emphasise with or understand. I don’t get it.
Raiola might be a dick but he doesnt do anything that isnt sanctioned by the player and his management team. Not sure why people here dont realize that.
Pogba could silence him with a word but he will not because Raiola is doing the job he is paid to do.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
No one knows what's written into a sell on clause. Wouldn't surprise me if Dortmund have had to have a smallish sell on clause with a nice fat bonus for Raiola inked in. If he does well at Dortmund I expect he will be on his way within 2 seasons to a big club. Not United obviously but Real or Juve.
To be fair, if I were Haaland agent, I’d exactly advise him to do the same. Sign for Dortmund for more game time first and as stepping stone to fully develop/establish himself as good player, then move to another big club later in his career to take more challenge for more trophies and bigger pay cheque.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,045
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
To be fair, if I were Haaland agent, I’d exactly advise him to do the same. Sign for Dortmund for more game time first and as stepping stone to fully develop/establish himself as good player, then move to another big club later in his career to take more challenge for more trophies and bigger pay cheque.
That's why he sign for dortmund. Because they accept being a stepping stone, got a damn good deal out of it, made a gentlement agreement that they wont stop him leaving in 3-4 years time. Dortmund got a great talent, some tens of millions eventually, and probably similar deal in the future with other raiola talent.


Why is it so hard to understand for united that football used to be a win win deal. All they asked is a release clause that's higher than our purchase price. If we had a believe the kids would fall in love with us why not? Can't blame halaan for wanting an insurance before committing to a midtable team without a clear plan. Getting him for 30m with a buyout clause of 50m is still better than nothing at all. At worse we got 2 years of good services and 20m profit.
 
Last edited:

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
They're worth what a club will pay to secure a transfer from another club, not what an agent's commission is.
I'm talking about the negotiation of a contract and the cost of labour not transfer fees but even then clubs use intermediaries to go around the fact that they can't talk to under contract players without their clubs' consent, so they can't complain when they have to pay said intermediaries.
 

Volumiza

The alright "V", B-Boy cypher cat
Joined
Jul 13, 2018
Messages
13,538
Location
Somewhere in the middle
Raiola might be a dick but he doesnt do anything that isnt sanctioned by the player and his management team. Not sure why people here dont realize that.
Pogba could silence him with a word but he will not because Raiola is doing the job he is paid to do.
This. I still find it hard to read when people are almost excusing Pogba in all this.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Why is it so hard to understand for united that football used to be a win win deal. All they asked is a release clause that's higher than our purchase price. If we had a believe the kids would fall in love with us why not?
Because we're not some stepping stone and a feeder club ? We're low now but not that yet.

Maybe you're fine with being a stepping stone but thanks God not the majority of our fans, and our club.
 

Catania

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Newbie
Joined
Aug 31, 2019
Messages
52
Supports
Catania
Because we're not some stepping stone and a feeder club ? We're low now but not that yet.

Maybe you're fine with being a stepping stone but thanks God not the majority of our fans, and our club.
Juve are known to let players go if they want to leave, I wouldn't call Juve a stepping stone/feeder club.
Release clause Is not a problem if players want to stay, and if players dont want to stay you should ask yourself why.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Juve are known to let players go if they want to leave, I wouldn't call Juve a stepping stone/feeder club.
Release clause Is not a problem if players want to stay, and if players dont want to stay you should ask yourself why.
It's very different between let players go if they want and the club thinks it's ok with a right price and let them go whenever they feel like with a price well below their worth.

The Juve case is an interesting one. They were a big club without the supposed financial muscle of a big club just few years ago. Atm I have no idea how financially strong they are but they seem doing fine.

We're not??

We're definitely not halaand last stop by the look of it.
You think Utd is a feeder club ?

Do you even know the difference between a feeder club and a big club ? If yes, could you tell me?
 
Last edited:

Warlord

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
103
Supports
Liverpool
Days after blasting Manchester United and their project for their recent malaise, agent Mino Raiola has now slammed Ajax for how they handed Matthijs de Ligt's transfer to Juventus in the summer.

The central defender was pursued by a number of elite clubs in Europe including PSG, Manchester United and Barcelona but the Italian champions secured his signature on a five-year deal in July.

Juventus paid an initial fee of £67.8million to Ajax for the player, who followed Frenkie de Jong in leaving Ajax after the midfielder left for Barcelona in a £65million deal which was announced nearly a year ago.

But Raiola insists he remains unhappy with how Ajax handled losing their two star players, especially with their demands once de Jong had departed.

'I don't want to say too much about it anymore, the most important thing is that Matthijs is happy,' Raiola told Dutch outlet Voetbal International.

'A year earlier, Matthijs was able to go to Juventus, but Ajax asked him to stay when certain agreements were made.

'But due to the transfer of Frenkie de Jong to Barcelona, from which a top amount rolled out, Ajax suddenly wanted much more than what was agreed upon.

'What frustrates me most is that this has gone behind Matthijs's back. My problem is that I identify with my football players. I am that player, at least that's how I feel.'

Raiola's comments come after he launched a withering attack on United, claiming that the club is a 'problem' for his client and insisting that he would now not help any of his other players move to Old Trafford.

In an astonishing attack, Raiola blasted the United hierarchy as 'out of touch with reality' and lacking a 'sporting project' and suggested that the club is so dysfunctional that it would even have ruined the careers of Diego Maradona, Pele and Paolo Maldini.

Raiola brokered Pogba's £89million return to Old Trafford from Juventus in 2016, but believes the club is not suited to the Frenchman anymore.

'Pogba's problem is Manchester United. It's a club out of touch with reality and without a sporting project,' Raiola told Italian news outlet La Repubblica.

'I wouldn't take anyone there, they would even ruin Maradona, Pele and Maldini.

'Paul needs a club and a squad, one like Juventus was before.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...hijs-Ligts-exit-days-savaging-Man-United.html
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Days after blasting Manchester United and their project for their recent malaise, agent Mino Raiola has now slammed Ajax for how they handed Matthijs de Ligt's transfer to Juventus in the summer.

The central defender was pursued by a number of elite clubs in Europe including PSG, Manchester United and Barcelona but the Italian champions secured his signature on a five-year deal in July.

Juventus paid an initial fee of £67.8million to Ajax for the player, who followed Frenkie de Jong in leaving Ajax after the midfielder left for Barcelona in a £65million deal which was announced nearly a year ago.

But Raiola insists he remains unhappy with how Ajax handled losing their two star players, especially with their demands once de Jong had departed.

'I don't want to say too much about it anymore, the most important thing is that Matthijs is happy,' Raiola told Dutch outlet Voetbal International.

'A year earlier, Matthijs was able to go to Juventus, but Ajax asked him to stay when certain agreements were made.

'But due to the transfer of Frenkie de Jong to Barcelona, from which a top amount rolled out, Ajax suddenly wanted much more than what was agreed upon.

'What frustrates me most is that this has gone behind Matthijs's back. My problem is that I identify with my football players. I am that player, at least that's how I feel.'

Raiola's comments come after he launched a withering attack on United, claiming that the club is a 'problem' for his client and insisting that he would now not help any of his other players move to Old Trafford.

In an astonishing attack, Raiola blasted the United hierarchy as 'out of touch with reality' and lacking a 'sporting project' and suggested that the club is so dysfunctional that it would even have ruined the careers of Diego Maradona, Pele and Paolo Maldini.

Raiola brokered Pogba's £89million return to Old Trafford from Juventus in 2016, but believes the club is not suited to the Frenchman anymore.

'Pogba's problem is Manchester United. It's a club out of touch with reality and without a sporting project,' Raiola told Italian news outlet La Repubblica.

'I wouldn't take anyone there, they would even ruin Maradona, Pele and Maldini.

'Paul needs a club and a squad, one like Juventus was before.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...hijs-Ligts-exit-days-savaging-Man-United.html
Someone posted a client list of this fat prick few hours ago. I got a quick look and none of his clients is currently in Real, Barca, Bayern, Liverpool and even fecking City.

There must be a reason for that.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,180
Location
Canada
What's the issue here?

If you want the player pay up. If you think the amount is too much then dont buy the players.

How is it agents fault? Raiola or no raiola. We value pogba at 90m hence we strike the deal to buy him for 90m. It's like buying a yatch and complaining about the docking cost.

Isnt that how free market works? I dont see united fans complaining when they flex their muscle and use their financial prowess to poach players from a weaker league that can't compete in terms of wages, but somehow when they screw us for a few extra millions we're crying foul? If we are paying 15m for raiola that simply meant he has our balls in his grip, and there's nothing we can do to tell him to feck off.


We point the fingers on agents and accuse them to inflate prices, they didnt. It's the big clubs that's keep on paying more and more so that they can get the best players playing for them that's inflating the price.

It takes two to tangoes.
Then maybe agents should also learn to shut their mouth and stop talking bs after the player is bought. Raiola since 2016 has been doing nothing but saying shit about the club. How is that fair on the club? Maybe he is still butt hurt that Sir alex called him bag of shit, which by the way he is.