Greatest European striker of the 21st Century - Cristiano Ronaldo

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,311
BBC running a poll on their website today - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/52796655. It's a tournament format running towards a final round tonight.

The head to head is a nice idea but some of the matchups are daft - Van Nistelrooy out in the first round because he was matched against Ronaldo.


Final:

Cristiano Ronaldo v Thierry Henry - Ronaldo 54%


Semi-finals:

Match 1: Alessandro Del Piero v Thierry Henry – Henry 83%
Match 2: Cristiano Ronaldo v Robert Lewandowski - Ronaldo 78%


Quarter Finals:

Match 1: Alessandro Del Piero v David Villa – Del Piero 56%
Match 2: Thierry Henry v Zlatan Ibrahimovic - Henry 77%
Match 3: Wayne Rooney v Cristiano Ronaldo - Ronaldo 89%
Match 4: Robin van Persie v Robert Lewandowski - Lewandowski 70%


Last 16 results:

Match 1: Mbappe v Del Piero - Del Piero wins 65%
Match 2: Villa v Costa - Villa 83%
Match 3: Dzeko v Henry - Henry 97%
Match 4: Ibrahimovic v Shearer - Ibrahimovic 51%
Match 5: Rooney v Larsson - Rooney 70%
Match 6: Totti v Ronaldo - Ronaldo 89%
Match 7: Van Persie v Benzema - Van Persie 73%
Match 8: Lewandowski v Raul - Lewandowski 62%


Round of 32 results:

Match 1: Mbappe v Kane - Mbappe wins 58%
Match 2: Bale v Del Piero - Del Piero 72%
Match 3: Villa v Lukaku - Villa 90%
Match 4: Huntelaar v Costa - Costa 66%
Match 5: Di Natale v Dzeko - Dzeko 63%
Match 6: Henry v Trezeguet - Henry 97%
Match 7: Ibrahimovic v Shevchenko - Zlatan 76%
Match 8: Shearer v Muller - Shearer 77%
Mach 9: Rooney v Owen - Rooney 72%
Match 10: Larsson v Mandzukic - Larsson 77%
Match 11: Kluivert v Totti - Totti 71%
Match 12: Ronaldo v Van Nistelrooy - Ronaldo 90%
Match 13: Toni v Van Persie - Van persie 90%
Match 14: Benzema v Berbatov - Benzema 66%
Match 15: Klose v Lewandowski - Lewandowski 78%
Match 16: Raul v Torres - Raul 70%
 
Last edited:

hasanejaz88

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
5,919
Location
Munich
Supports
Germany
What so you have Larsson, Luca Toni, Diego Costa, Huntelaar, Di Natale and Berbatov but no Aguero, Eto'o, Milito, Tevez or Mario Gomez? :lol:

EDIT: Ah okay so it's only European nationalities. Mario Gomez should still be there ahead of many of them :rolleyes:
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,504
What so you have Larsson, Luca Toni, Diego Costa, Huntelaar, Di Natale and Berbatov but no Aguero, Eto'o, Milito, Tevez or Mario Gomez? :lol:
That's right, it's the greatest European striker so of those only Gomez would be eligible.
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
BBC running a poll on their website today - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/52796655. It's a tournament format running towards a final round tonight.

The head to head is a nice idea but some of the matchups are daft - Van Nistelrooy out in the first round because he was matched against Ronaldo.


Round of 32 results:

Match 1: Mbappe v Kane - Mbappe wins 58%
Match 2: Bale v Del Piero - Del Piero 72%
Match 3: Villa v Lukaku - Villa 90%
Match 4: Huntelaar v Costa - Costa 66%
Match 5: Di Natale v Dzeko - Dzeko 63%
Match 6: Henry v Trezeguet - Henry 97%
Match 7: Ibrahimovic v Shevchenko - Zlatan 76%
Match 8: Shearer v Muller - Shearer 77%
Mach 9: Rooney v Owen - Rooney 72%
Match 10: Larsson v Mandzukic - Larsson 77%
Match 11: Kluivert v Totti - Totti 71%
Match 12: Ronaldo v Van Nistelrooy - Ronaldo 90%
Match 13: Toni v Van Persie - Van persie 90%
Match 14: Benzema v Berbatov - Benzema 66%
Match 15: Klose v Lewandowski - Lewandowski 78%
Match 16: Raul v Torres - Raul 70%
A few odd match-ups there to be sure - also Mbappe over Kane is a bit of a stretch! I know I'm biased but I am very surprised at that one - I get his has all the potential in the world but right now it's mostly still potential.
 

Sayros

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
6,006
Supports
Paris Saint-Germain
A few odd match-ups there to be sure - also Mbappe over Kane is a bit of a stretch! I know I'm biased but I am very surprised at that one - I get his has all the potential in the world but right now it's mostly still potential.
This isn't 2017 anymore, Mbappe is not mostly potential, he's already a top 5-10 player in the world. So some could say it's Ligue 1 vs PL, but in Europe he's only one goal behind Kane without even being an out and out striker or taking penalties. I think it's one of the few times on that poll where the percentages are fair, it's not overwhelming but for me and a lot of people I'm sure, I'd pick Mbappe over Kane all day.

Speaking of fair, I get Henry is a great player, I consider him the best striker of all-time in the PL era, but jesus 97% over Trezeguet, not even 90% but 97%.....that's insane, Trezeguet deserves at least a few more percentages just out of respect.
 
Last edited:

hasanejaz88

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
5,919
Location
Munich
Supports
Germany
I get Henry is a great player, I consider him the best striker of all-time in the PL era, but jesus 97% over Trezeguet, not even 90% but 97%.....that's insane, Trezeguet deserves at least a few more percentages just out of respect.
Makes sense, essentially it's saying 97% of people rate Henry higher. You also said you consider him better so your vote is 100% to Henry (it doesn't say by how much percentage Henry is better, which would be lower obviously). I think if you have a general poll here you'l similar numbers favouring Henry (I would actually doubt someone who would vote for Trezeguet over Henry).
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,224
Location
Lucilinburhuc
I don't consider Ronaldo, Totti and Del Piero as strikers to be honest.

Ronaldo will win, but i don't think he belongs in the discussion. A striker is a real number 9, and/or someone that played there for large periods. Ronaldo is/did neither.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,489
Supports
Everton
Difficult when you have people like Mbappe, Ronaldo and Bale included when talking about 'strikers'. Even people like Henry it can be a bit loose.

People like Lewandowski, Shearer and Ibra were/are out and out strikers and I'd probably have Lewandowski top on that reckoning.
 

Ibi Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
6,181
RVN unlucky to come up against Ronaldo, he was better than some of those other players
 

Sayros

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
6,006
Supports
Paris Saint-Germain
Difficult when you have people like Mbappe, Ronaldo and Bale included when talking about 'strikers'. Even people like Henry it can be a bit loose.

People like Lewandowski, Shearer and Ibra were/are out and out strikers and I'd probably have Lewandowski top on that reckoning.
Yes, that's what makes it difficult. Some of those, I don't consider out-and-out strikers. Like the example of Henry, I feel Trezeguet was the better 'striker' for France than Henry, who was more of a inside forward, but some will say it's being too picky.
 

Kasper

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
3,583
Supports
Hansa Rostock / Bradford City
Ronaldo will win it but it's a bit flawed to put him in there.
Don't get me wrong, he's clearly the best player as well as the best goalscorer of the listed players but he barely played as a striker.
 

Karel Podolsky

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
1,421
Location
Borneo Jungle
Supports
Ex Laziale
Speaking of fair, I get Henry is a great player, I consider him the best striker of all-time in the PL era, but jesus 97% over Trezeguet, not even 90% but 97%.....that's insane, Trezeguet deserves at least a few more percentages just out of respect.
Glad I am not the only one who think same.
Maybe voters get the wrong Trezeguet.. :lol:
 

SilentStrike

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2014
Messages
621
Location
Netherlands
Supports
Feyenoord
Should be Henry, Lewandowski or Zlatan imo.

But Ronaldo will take it being the biggest name, though not actually a 9.
 

ThinkTank@Cafe

Full Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
2,389
Location
Kazakhstan
English is not my mother tongue, so enlighten me if I’m mistaken. Striker is pure #9, isn’t it? CR7, Bale, Henry are wingers and 10s.
Lewwndowski is the only answer I see.
 

Pass and Move

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
797
A few odd match-ups there to be sure - also Mbappe over Kane is a bit of a stretch! I know I'm biased but I am very surprised at that one - I get his has all the potential in the world but right now it's mostly still potential.
It's not potential when one of them has won the World Cup and a number of domestic trophies, and the other, um....
 

Web of Bissaka

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
8,553
Location
Losing to Comeback Winning!
English is not my mother tongue, so enlighten me if I’m mistaken. Striker is pure #9, isn’t it? CR7, Bale, Henry are wingers and 10s.
Lewwndowski is the only answer I see.
True, if we only consider Pure 9 that is the Purest of the purest 9.. then only Lewadownski, RVN, etc.

That's the thing, the traditional 2 strikers role before, they don't actually play like pure 9, as you've said, they tend to to drift to the wing or deep becoming 10s, sort of like hybrids, and yet they still are regarded as strikers. More modern football merely "adjust" it but for me, they're still strikers despite popularly known as forwards. Just what the heck is the difference anyway -- just "convenient namings". Strikers for me are the most furthest positions (can be more than one), closest to the goal post at the opposite end, and generally they contribute the least defensively.

If the contest is "Greatest European Pure #9 Striker" then it'll be better because it's more specific, but the contest now is somewhat general.
 

mshnsh

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
1,361
Location
old trafford
So surley its Lewa or Shearer?
Edit : Maybe Zlatan also.

Ronaldo only played a striker last couple of years, so dont count imo.
He has been a striker since moving to madrid. Never really stays on the wing and always the furthest forward.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
13,970
Ronaldo is a pure goal scoring machine, which is as good a definition of "striker" as any other.

Some forwards are more mobile and have greater technical abilities than others. Ruud, goal machine he, was a pure poacher and short range scorer and thus, presumably a "pure striker". Thierry Henry, could beat a defender on the dribble from wide positions as well as poach, but there's no obvious reason why his additional tools as a forward should place him in a different category than Ruud. Both did what they did brilliantly as goal scoring machines, but you'd have to say that Henry was the greater striker.

But beyond those two is Ronaldo, who's simply in a different class at his peak and now his longevity at the elite level is legend in its own right.
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
It's not potential when one of them has won the World Cup and a number of domestic trophies, and the other, um....
Ehh.. so did Lloris so I guess he is the best GK in the world? Or perhaps we could acknowledge that football is a team game and just because a player got a medal doesn't mean he is necessarily any better than a player who didn't - or acknowledge that he is playing in a one team league and that all domestic trophies won by his club are virtually worthless due to lack of proper competition? Or we could just ignore all that and do what you did.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,311
I wish they'd defined Ronaldo as something else. With his legions of fans he will win even if he wasn't the best (clearly he is).

Out of what i consider pure strikers, it's probably Van Nistelrooy or Shearer.
 

Pass and Move

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
797
Ehh.. so did Lloris so I guess he is the best GK in the world? Or perhaps we could acknowledge that football is a team game and just because a player got a medal doesn't mean he is necessarily any better than a player who didn't - or acknowledge that he is playing in a one team league and that all domestic trophies won by his club are virtually worthless due to lack of proper competition? Or we could just ignore all that and do what you did.
Yes yes, team game etc. But when a player has already won the biggest prize there is to win, whilst being instrumental to the way that team plays, it's not potential. It's delivering.
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
Yes yes, team game etc. But when a player has already won the biggest prize there is to win, whilst being instrumental to the way that team plays, it's not potential. It's delivering.
Well Kane is a golden boot winner so you could equally argue that England not progressing further was in spite of his efforts and he was at least as influential for his country as M'Bappe was. My point though is that you have chosen to decide on who the better player is in probably the worst possible way I can think of - if you had said 'I think M'Bappe is a more talented player than Kane' then I'd have said fair enough that's your call but instead you pinned your argument on team achievements rather than individual ability.
 

Pass and Move

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
797
Well Kane is a golden boot winner so you could equally argue that England not progressing further was in spite of his efforts and he was at least as influential for his country as M'Bappe was. My point though is that you have chosen to decide on who the better player is in probably the worst possible way I can think of - if you had said 'I think M'Bappe is a more talented player than Kane' then I'd have said fair enough that's your call but instead you pinned your argument on team achievements rather than individual ability.
No, that's not quite right now, is it?

You said he was mostly just potential. I named a few of the things he's won, including the biggest prize of them all, to highlight the fact that he isn't mostly potential. He's quite clearly delivering on any 'potential' he had in the preceding years.
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
No, that's not quite right now, is it?

You said he was mostly just potential. I named a few of the things he's won, including the biggest prize of them all, to highlight the fact that he isn't mostly potential. He's quite clearly delivering on any 'potential' he had in the preceding years.
You are still inflating the importance of a team he happened to play for winning something rather than focus on him as an individual - I think he is a fantastic talent but he is playing in a duff league unlike Kane who is delivering similar (if not slightly better) stats in a much stronger league (and also not in the best team) year after year. Him winning league titles and cups with PSG is essentially like being a Celtic player and claiming to be a top class player because you have a league winners medal every year.
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,933
I guess Neymar was right. Play alongside Messi for too long your impact is forgotten. How is Suarez omitted from that shortlist
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,334
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
Nice idea. Who's your biggest miss from the list? It's hard to understand how Christian Vieri and Roy Makaay haven't made it, whereas the likes of Huntelaar and Lukaku have.

And Shearer, Kluivert and Del Piero all peaked in the 1990s: their post-2000 records are pretty underwhelming.
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
I guess Neymar was right. Play alongside Messi for too long your impact is forgotten. How is Suarez omitted from that shortlist
It is only european players. Otherwise Messi would be on the list.

Vardy might deserve a spot for the title win with Leicester.
 

Riz

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
4,245
Location
UK
Speaking of fair, I get Henry is a great player, I consider him the best striker of all-time in the PL era, but jesus 97% over Trezeguet, not even 90% but 97%.....that's insane, Trezeguet deserves at least a few more percentages just out of respect.
Glad I am not the only one who think same.
Maybe voters get the wrong Trezeguet.. :lol:
Well it’s a percentage vote? Would either of you say Trezeguet was better than Henry? 97/100 people sided with Henry and that makes pretty clear sense to me considering Henry is the better player and I don’t think there’s much debate there.

Who would the 2 of you voted for?
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,311
Nice idea. Who's your biggest miss from the list? It's hard to understand how Christian Vieri and Roy Makaay haven't made it, whereas the likes of Huntelaar and Lukaku have.

And Shearer, Kluivert and Del Piero all peaked in the 1990s: their post-2000 records are pretty underwhelming.
I wondered about Vieri. He was dynamite at Inter.

There is always going to be local and recency bias though, it's a UK poll and most people have long forgotten him.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,311
The final is predictably Ronaldo v Henry. The correct answer is obvious but there are a lot of ABUs and Arsenal fans out there that could swing it the other way.
 

Pass and Move

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
797
You are still inflating the importance of a team he happened to play for winning something rather than focus on him as an individual - I think he is a fantastic talent but he is playing in a duff league unlike Kane who is delivering similar (if not slightly better) stats in a much stronger league (and also not in the best team) year after year. Him winning league titles and cups with PSG is essentially like being a Celtic player and claiming to be a top class player because you have a league winners medal every year.
No. He won the World Cup whilst being absolutely integral to the team's performance. Swap him for any other striker in the world and there's a great chance France would not have won.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,489
Supports
Everton
The final for the greatest european striker is two players that er......weren't strikers.