I dont see why Ole's pedigree always ends up being a matter of debate.
1. Has he not beaten the bigger teams consistently?
2. Has he not come up with a system to beat the lower teams more recently?
3. Has he not overseen a sustained winning run with minimum number of goals conceded?
4. Has he not signed players that we have been a reasonable success?
5. Has he not gotten rid of deadwood?
6. Has he not established an identity for the club and what it stands for?
7. Has he not made press conferences about not throwing players under the bus?
Will we lose games here and there? Absolutely. But there is enough evidence to say that maybe, just maybe, Ole has it in him to win us the title?
Edit: Unless ofcourse you weren't criticizing Ole. In which case, render my post pointless and directed at the other Ole haters..
Last edited: