- Joined
- Jul 11, 2015
- Messages
- 821
Why are people taking Tim Sherwood's words as gospel. He wouldn't have a clue what's going on.
20 years as a footballer - short-term manager of both Spurs and Villa, and he knows Grealish. He probably knows a lot more than ITK journalistsWhy are people taking Tim Sherwood's words as gospel. He wouldn't have a clue what's going on.
You mean giggs who's trying to push that welsh lad playing in Germany on us like he did wasteful James over Jadon, meh.He later asked a question to Ryan Giggs whether Grealish is the one what United need, Giggs didn't answer his question directly about Grealish and instead Giggs spoke about the quality of Bruno & Pogba can give to help United.
What about you take a deep breath, drink water & re-read my post again because it looks to me you are drunk. Your post doesn't make any sense, you are arguing about something that isn't even connected to my post.You mean giggs who's trying to push that welsh lad playing in Germany on us like he did wasteful James over Jadon, meh.
Also in another post you say " If Grealish comes here, he's likely to play as Bruno & Pogba backup " as do a fair few others to be fair, seriously ? You really think a guy who turned his back on a country in hope of playing for England and is 27 is just going to go to a club to play backup or the odd game
Maybe not, but 24 year old Jack Grealish probably would.You mean giggs who's trying to push that welsh lad playing in Germany on us like he did wasteful James over Jadon, meh.
Also in another post you say " If Grealish comes here, he's likely to play as Bruno & Pogba backup " as do a fair few others to be fair, seriously ? You really think a guy who turned his back on a country in hope of playing for England and is 27 is just going to go to a club to play backup or the odd game
Chuck in Jones, Chong, Rojo and maybe even Mata while you're at it. Instant squad improvement.When Villa go down, I’d offer them Lingard/Pereira + 30m for Grealish.
If that’s the case it’s not irresponsible, it’s totally understandable. feck covid, feck lockdown, feck drink drive laws, let’s sign this guy he clearly loves United.I totally agree that it makes him sound very irresponsible but do people think there is anything in this recurring rumour that Grealish was celebrating sealing a move to United on that night he crashed his car, initially I thought it was complete and utter rubbish but when you think back there were stories back in February he was set to join until coronavirus stopped the season.
So potentially endangering lives is understandable drink driving understandable tell that to a victim of it whose lost their child or friend.If that’s the case it’s not irresponsible, it’s totally understandable. feck covid, feck lockdown, feck drink drive laws, let’s sign this guy he clearly loves United.
Easy tiger, I was taking the piss. What is it with some people on here?So potentially endangering lives is understandable drink driving understandable tell that to a victim of it whose lost their child or friend.
It's a squad game, and he's a clear upgrade on our backups.I really don't see what all the fuss is about.
Is this guy really going to help us close the gap on the best clubs in Europe?
Not saying he's a bad player, but is he the best player United could get?
Yeah totally agree,hopefully the fact we already tried to buy him in January shows we are keen.I'm still a huge fan. Would hate to see him go to City. Think Guardiola would work wonders with him
Agreed. We need better than Pereira. But I don't think that spending millions on Grealish is worth it since his primary role would be as cover.
Our priority should be a RW to give better cover to MMM.
There's Thiago Alcantara who's apparently available on cheap. Can be fantastic cover for both Bruno and Pogba.Unfortunately, that's what it costs for a top-class player as a backup.
Indeed, he's quality.I think a lot of people are underrating how good Grealish actually is.
Nope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.I really don't see what all the fuss is about.
Is this guy really going to help us close the gap on the best clubs in Europe?
Not saying he's a bad player, but is he the best player United could get?
I don't see United wanting to pay £40m for a squad player. I also don't see Grealish wanting to be a backup player at this time in his career.It's a squad game, and he's a clear upgrade on our backups.
I dont think so, Grealish would probably be cheaper than VDB. We need a squad at a reasonable price.Nope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.
Grealish has not only the technical ability but the personality to be a top Manchester United player. He plays without fear and works his socks off. We cannot rely on just 2 creative protagonists (Bruno and Pogba) and that’s assuming Pogba stays or neither player gets injured. Man City have rotated or played all of de Bruyne and the 2 silvas. We need 3 and in fact they can all play at the same timeI dont think so, Grealish would probably be cheaper than VDB. We need a squad at a reasonable price.
Considering there are 50-60 games to play and we now know our best 11 - who outside that first 11 can come in without diluting the quality. Injuries? Rotation? We cannot rely on Bruno and Pogba - simpleAll this talk about his personality and how he's a leader and shows no fear. So why would he want to sit on the bench? Why would we even spend 40m on a player that isn't going straight to the starting lineup? I've asked this question before but how many times has clubs spent 40m on a player in his prime that isn't needed as a starter?
Between Matic, Fred and McT, I just cannot see how people think that DM is a priority. We didn't struggle this season with a leaking midfield against strong teams - we struggled with creativity and lack of depth over the course of the campaign. Signing Grealish would solve these issues and he would get more than enough game time.I don't think its sensible to spend a fee north of £50m for a squad option when we have other needs in the squad. Unless if we are saying that we are giving up on the Sancho chase I don't see how we can afford to pull both deals off and still fund the signing of a DM.
And I don't think that he would accept to play second fiddle to Bruno, Pogba or Rashford nor do I see either of them being happy to lose a place to him. Whilst competition is good I think we are just at a stage where we need to dedicate our resources to upgrading our weak options in the starting line up first then look to replacing Matic.
What have I missed?Feck sake. Thought he had inside info.
How is this still a thing post-Bruno? Jesus weptNope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.
I'm aware of that. I'm not questioning whether we need him because we do. I'm questioning whether we can get him. Because it makes no sense to spend 40m on a rotational player in Covid. If we can get him for less then fine but 40m is the fee being thrown out there and that's too much for a rotational player even pre Covid. I'm also questioning why he would come here to be a rotational option with how his character has been described.Considering there are 50-60 games to play and we now know our best 11 - who outside that first 11 can come in without diluting the quality. Injuries? Rotation? We cannot rely on Bruno and Pogba - simple
Post Bruno post IghaloHow is this still a thing post-Bruno? Jesus wept
Started reading Sherwood's comments and though he has inside info. Looks like he is just speculating.What have I missed?
Tough. They need to play better then to retain their place. If United want to return to the top level of English football they need competition for places and no players resting on their laurels.I don't think its sensible to spend a fee north of £50m for a squad option when we have other needs in the squad. Unless if we are saying that we are giving up on the Sancho chase I don't see how we can afford to pull both deals off and still fund the signing of a DM.
And I don't think that he would accept to play second fiddle to Bruno, Pogba or Rashford nor do I see either of them being happy to lose a place to him. Whilst competition is good I think we are just at a stage where we need to dedicate our resources to upgrading our weak options in the starting line up first then look to replacing Matic.
Then he should not be going anywhere near City where Sterling, B.Silva and KDB are the first names on the sheet across the positions he plays.I don't see United wanting to pay £40m for a squad player. I also don't see Grealish wanting to be a backup player at this time in his career.
Van de Beek isn't clearly better. Most people here have seen him play 3 times, in an Ajax team that was flowing on enthusiasm and a few fantastic talents. Grealish would be the better fit for us I think.Nope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.
I mean, we did just bring in Bruno Fernandes and Odion Ighalo. Tough to argue we have a British ONLY policy imo.Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.
Bruno will look good in the England top in the next Euros.Nope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.