Jack Grealish / signs new 5 year contract

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slysi17

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
821
Why are people taking Tim Sherwood's words as gospel. He wouldn't have a clue what's going on.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
33,977
Could see him replacing Sané (on a numbers front). They have bigger positions of priority but Pep’s never been afraid to hoard attackers.
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,227
Why are people taking Tim Sherwood's words as gospel. He wouldn't have a clue what's going on.
20 years as a footballer - short-term manager of both Spurs and Villa, and he knows Grealish. He probably knows a lot more than ITK journalists
 

patty123

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 12, 2017
Messages
511
Location
Republic Of Ireland
He later asked a question to Ryan Giggs whether Grealish is the one what United need, Giggs didn't answer his question directly about Grealish and instead Giggs spoke about the quality of Bruno & Pogba can give to help United. :lol:
You mean giggs who's trying to push that welsh lad playing in Germany on us like he did wasteful James over Jadon, meh.

Also in another post you say " If Grealish comes here, he's likely to play as Bruno & Pogba backup " as do a fair few others to be fair, seriously ? You really think a guy who turned his back on a country in hope of playing for England and is 27 is just going to go to a club to play backup or the odd game :confused:
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
You mean giggs who's trying to push that welsh lad playing in Germany on us like he did wasteful James over Jadon, meh.

Also in another post you say " If Grealish comes here, he's likely to play as Bruno & Pogba backup " as do a fair few others to be fair, seriously ? You really think a guy who turned his back on a country in hope of playing for England and is 27 is just going to go to a club to play backup or the odd game :confused:
What about you take a deep breath, drink water & re-read my post again because it looks to me you are drunk. Your post doesn't make any sense, you are arguing about something that isn't even connected to my post.
 

Dozer

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
165
You mean giggs who's trying to push that welsh lad playing in Germany on us like he did wasteful James over Jadon, meh.

Also in another post you say " If Grealish comes here, he's likely to play as Bruno & Pogba backup " as do a fair few others to be fair, seriously ? You really think a guy who turned his back on a country in hope of playing for England and is 27 is just going to go to a club to play backup or the odd game :confused:
Maybe not, but 24 year old Jack Grealish probably would.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,570
I totally agree that it makes him sound very irresponsible but do people think there is anything in this recurring rumour that Grealish was celebrating sealing a move to United on that night he crashed his car, initially I thought it was complete and utter rubbish but when you think back there were stories back in February he was set to join until coronavirus stopped the season.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2015
Messages
2,596
Location
Whalley Range
I really don't see what all the fuss is about.

Is this guy really going to help us close the gap on the best clubs in Europe?

Not saying he's a bad player, but is he the best player United could get?
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,338
I totally agree that it makes him sound very irresponsible but do people think there is anything in this recurring rumour that Grealish was celebrating sealing a move to United on that night he crashed his car, initially I thought it was complete and utter rubbish but when you think back there were stories back in February he was set to join until coronavirus stopped the season.
If that’s the case it’s not irresponsible, it’s totally understandable. feck covid, feck lockdown, feck drink drive laws, let’s sign this guy he clearly loves United.
 

BenitoSTARR

One Minute Man
Scout
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
13,379
If that’s the case it’s not irresponsible, it’s totally understandable. feck covid, feck lockdown, feck drink drive laws, let’s sign this guy he clearly loves United.
So potentially endangering lives is understandable drink driving understandable tell that to a victim of it whose lost their child or friend.
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,338
So potentially endangering lives is understandable drink driving understandable tell that to a victim of it whose lost their child or friend.
Easy tiger, I was taking the piss. What is it with some people on here?
 

BarstoolProphet

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6,500
I'm still a huge fan. Would hate to see him go to City. Think Guardiola would work wonders with him
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,570
I'm still a huge fan. Would hate to see him go to City. Think Guardiola would work wonders with him
Yeah totally agree,hopefully the fact we already tried to buy him in January shows we are keen.

Thought I also read somewhere we have been tracking him since the final days of Fergie,mind you I could easily be mistaken on that.
 

ghagua

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
5,992
Agreed. We need better than Pereira. But I don't think that spending millions on Grealish is worth it since his primary role would be as cover.

Our priority should be a RW to give better cover to MMM.

Unfortunately, that's what it costs for a top-class player as a backup.
 

DCP

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
285
I think a lot of people are underrating how good Grealish actually is.
 

Slysi17

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
821
I really don't see what all the fuss is about.

Is this guy really going to help us close the gap on the best clubs in Europe?

Not saying he's a bad player, but is he the best player United could get?
Nope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2018
Messages
19,780
Nope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.
I dont think so, Grealish would probably be cheaper than VDB. We need a squad at a reasonable price.
 

yan man utd

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
182
I dont think so, Grealish would probably be cheaper than VDB. We need a squad at a reasonable price.
Grealish has not only the technical ability but the personality to be a top Manchester United player. He plays without fear and works his socks off. We cannot rely on just 2 creative protagonists (Bruno and Pogba) and that’s assuming Pogba stays or neither player gets injured. Man City have rotated or played all of de Bruyne and the 2 silvas. We need 3 and in fact they can all play at the same time
For me grealish is born to play for United. You can’t have too many good players. I love the way grealish grabs a game by the scruff of the neck. We must get him.
He is English and he knows the premier league so he can hit the ground running....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sultan

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,080
All this talk about his personality and how he's a leader and shows no fear. So why would he want to sit on the bench? Why would we even spend 40m on a player that isn't going straight to the starting lineup? I've asked this question before but how many times has clubs spent 40m on a player in his prime that isn't needed as a starter?
 

yan man utd

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
182
All this talk about his personality and how he's a leader and shows no fear. So why would he want to sit on the bench? Why would we even spend 40m on a player that isn't going straight to the starting lineup? I've asked this question before but how many times has clubs spent 40m on a player in his prime that isn't needed as a starter?
Considering there are 50-60 games to play and we now know our best 11 - who outside that first 11 can come in without diluting the quality. Injuries? Rotation? We cannot rely on Bruno and Pogba - simple
 

Oddboy

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
742
Location
UK
I don't think its sensible to spend a fee north of £50m for a squad option when we have other needs in the squad. Unless if we are saying that we are giving up on the Sancho chase I don't see how we can afford to pull both deals off and still fund the signing of a DM.

And I don't think that he would accept to play second fiddle to Bruno, Pogba or Rashford nor do I see either of them being happy to lose a place to him. Whilst competition is good I think we are just at a stage where we need to dedicate our resources to upgrading our weak options in the starting line up first then look to replacing Matic.
Between Matic, Fred and McT, I just cannot see how people think that DM is a priority. We didn't struggle this season with a leaking midfield against strong teams - we struggled with creativity and lack of depth over the course of the campaign. Signing Grealish would solve these issues and he would get more than enough game time.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,620
Location
Sydney
Nope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.
How is this still a thing post-Bruno? Jesus wept
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,080
Considering there are 50-60 games to play and we now know our best 11 - who outside that first 11 can come in without diluting the quality. Injuries? Rotation? We cannot rely on Bruno and Pogba - simple
I'm aware of that. I'm not questioning whether we need him because we do. I'm questioning whether we can get him. Because it makes no sense to spend 40m on a rotational player in Covid. If we can get him for less then fine but 40m is the fee being thrown out there and that's too much for a rotational player even pre Covid. I'm also questioning why he would come here to be a rotational option with how his character has been described.

I think if we get him it means either we are not getting Sancho or we are preparing for Pogba's possible departure. Or both. I'd be surprised if it weren't the case and happy of course
 
Last edited:

POF

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
3,797
I don't think its sensible to spend a fee north of £50m for a squad option when we have other needs in the squad. Unless if we are saying that we are giving up on the Sancho chase I don't see how we can afford to pull both deals off and still fund the signing of a DM.

And I don't think that he would accept to play second fiddle to Bruno, Pogba or Rashford nor do I see either of them being happy to lose a place to him. Whilst competition is good I think we are just at a stage where we need to dedicate our resources to upgrading our weak options in the starting line up first then look to replacing Matic.
Tough. They need to play better then to retain their place. If United want to return to the top level of English football they need competition for places and no players resting on their laurels.

You say that United need to fill other holes in the team first. Adding quality to the attack is exactly what they need. The only glaring hole is the right side of attack. You would hope they'll sign more than one player.

As for investment, they have a £190m back 4; Pogba, Bruno, Fred and Matic cost £240m. The last significant investments in attacking players (still at the club) were Martial under LVG and Mata under Moyes.
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,534
Location
Polska
Still the most realistic option, but if Woody wants to burn money on Griezmann that should be Ole's decision to make.
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,609
Location
London
I don't see United wanting to pay £40m for a squad player. I also don't see Grealish wanting to be a backup player at this time in his career.
Then he should not be going anywhere near City where Sterling, B.Silva and KDB are the first names on the sheet across the positions he plays.
 

onemanarmy

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
4,712
Location
Belgium
Nope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.
Van de Beek isn't clearly better. Most people here have seen him play 3 times, in an Ajax team that was flowing on enthusiasm and a few fantastic talents. Grealish would be the better fit for us I think.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
Nope. Donny Van De Beek is clearly better but we are blinkered when it comes to English players. Clearly a British only transfer policy which is ludicrous.
Bruno will look good in the England top in the next Euros.

I could also say fans are blinkered when it comes to foreign players. There are so many players within the PL we could buy and will fit into the team. How often have you watched Donny play? CL games?

What about eredivise games against 3rd bottom team ?

His stats are not too different to Grealish playing in a relegation team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.