- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 27,474
- Supports
- Arsenal
Dave
Didn't or wasn't able to?I thought Obama was seen now as quite a poor President who didn't actually get much done?
Didn't. He had the house and the senate in his first two years.Didn't or wasn't able to?
This. I think Roosevelt 1 has a strong case for being placed as the "worst" president in this elite tier.FDR, Lincoln, and Washington are all pretty interchangeable as the top 3.
Eh? He could have ruled for life if he wanted to.I thought Washington was quite unpopular at the time? Seems to make it on these lists mainly due to being the first.
Alf Landon 4 lyf?ALF.
That is a bit misleading, as he only held a filibuster-proof supermajority in the Senate for around 4 months. Not that I think he was ever as progressive as initially advertised; that was evident when he picked Biden as VP.Didn't. He had the house and the senate in his first two years.
A president whose gangster father used his organized crime connections to help get elected maybe isn’t the best example of ‘best’.JFK ..The only president who wasn't a warmonger but he didn't subscribe to the Amercian views about war so they killed him
Teddy actually normally does flip flop with Jefferson between 4th and 5th.This. I think Roosevelt 1 has a strong case for being placed as the "worst" president in this elite tier.
Those 3, plus Franklin Pierce and Andrew Johnson.Anyway, I think a similarly interesting conversation is, who's the worst US president?
Buchanan, Harding, or Drumpf?
the perfect listWashington, Lincoln, FDR, LBJ
He was seen that way while still in office. Clinton also did very little and LBJ's social contribution merits inclusion in the best of list, despite Vietnam which wasn't a war of his making. Foreign policy was never his thing.I thought Obama was seen now as quite a poor President who didn't actually get much done?
FDR was a warmonger?JFK ..The only president who wasn't a warmonger but he didn't subscribe to the Amercian views about war so they killed him
I'm not American so i only know what I've read with passing interest in various books but i thought his presidency became troubled during his second term. Both internally with lots of back stabbing and publically with the tax rebellions and treaties.This. I think Roosevelt 1 has a strong case for being placed as the "worst" president in this elite tier.
Eh? He could have ruled for life if he wanted to.
One of those things is not like the othersWashington, Lincoln, FDR, LBJ
He's probably one of my favorite politicians overall! One day in retirement I'll make it through the Caro volumesOne of those things is not like the others
It was two years. Granted, their actual working days were abysmally low hence the caveat you've noted but still, a fair bit of legislation was passed.That is a bit misleading, as he only held a filibuster-proof supermajority in the Senate for around 4 months. Not that I think he was ever as progressive as initially advertised; that was evident when he picked Biden as VP.
He’s definitely fascinating... but he bears a lot of responsibility for the fiasco in Vietnam and shouldn’t be close to the top 4. That said, the Caro history would be a great summer read.He's probably one of my favorite politicians overall! One day in retirement I'll make it through the Caro volumes
Working days is not the caveat here. He did not have 2 years to push whatever legislation he wanted through.It was two years. Granted, their actual working days were abysmally low hence the caveat you've noted but still, a fair bit of legislation was passed.
I feel like Clinton’s stock has fallen as time has gone by. He was the last president to run a surplus and was generally seen pretty favorably at the time. His philandering and misbehavior has been seen differently in the #MeToo era however (rightly so) and the long term effects becoming apparent of criminal justice reform and NAFTA have really hurt his legacy.Clinton also did very little
Regan is the reason American politics is so fecked. He is also the reason that alot of American manufacturing businesses are now struggling massively.Trump, in a recent speech, mentioned that he was setting up a National Garden of Heroes. People he name-checked ranged from Lincoln to Dr King to the Wright brothers, but also Ronald Reagan. Does Reagan merit inclusion though?
Reagan is a top 10-15 president, as much as I dislike his idealogyTrump, in a recent speech, mentioned that he was setting up a National Garden of Heroes. People he name-checked ranged from Lincoln to Dr King to the Wright brothers, but also Ronald Reagan. Does Reagan merit inclusion though?
He’s the closest republicans are gonna get to the second coming of Christ, so no doubt he’d get a mention.Trump, in a recent speech, mentioned that he was setting up a National Garden of Heroes. People he name-checked ranged from Lincoln to Dr King to the Wright brothers, but also Ronald Reagan. Does Reagan merit inclusion though?
Wasn't he the bloke who married his family member or something like that?'Groovy' Grover Cleveland, the only one to serve two non-consecutive terms in office!!
https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/was-abraham-lincoln-a-white-supremacist-37626Abraham Lincoln quote said:“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races,” said Lincoln to applause.
He added, finally, “I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality.”
They had a super majority for the first half of that congress, then for the last half they were vulnerable to filibusters. The dems still had control of the senate and house for two years. While they achieved a good deal legislatively before and after the super majority, as the dismal record of the next session shows, it still didn't meet the expectations that Obama's presidential campaign generated. This is why there is a perception he didn't get (enough) things done.Working days is not the caveat here. He did not have 2 years to push whatever legislation he wanted through.
Due to deaths and other happenings, they only held that briefly during the summer and then continuously from the end of Sept 2009 to the beginning of February 2010. That is the four moths I was referring to.They had a super majority for the first half of that congress, then for the last half they were vulnerable to filibusters. The dems still had control of the senate and house for two years. While they achieved a good deal legislatively before and after the super majority, as the dismal record of the next session shows, it still didn't meet the expectations that Obama's presidential campaign generated. This is why there is a perception he didn't get (enough) things done.
It’s a speech he made in his Senate campaign against Stephen Douglass, with the other accusing him of supporting intermarriage, a big no no even for the Northern anti slavery voters.Abraham Lincoln was a white supremacist:
https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/was-abraham-lincoln-a-white-supremacist-37626
fair enough. Go, enjoy life! We'll all blame Ted Kennedy.Due to deaths and other happenings, they only held that briefly during the summer and then continuously from the end of Sept 2009 to the beginning of February 2010. That is the four moths I was referring to.
I don’t know why I’m arguing this as I’m not normally an Obama apologist...oh well.
Andrew Johnson.Anyway, I think a similarly interesting conversation is, who's the worst US president?
Buchanan, Harding, or Drumpf?