Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wow 2 year loan? Isn't he only under contract with us for another 2 years?Werder Bremen's sporting director confirms his club's pursuit of Tahith Chong on loan.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I think he signed 3+1Wow 2 year loan? Isn't he only under contract with us for another 2 years?
He has an option to extend the contract for 1 more year. Having said that, I think the club would only give him a 2-year loan if they are confident in his ability to make the first team.Wow 2 year loan? Isn't he only under contract with us for another 2 years?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
We prolly take him back after 12 months if he improves significantly and if James regresses further, if that’s even possible.Wow 2 year loan? Isn't he only under contract with us for another 2 years?
I doubt we’d have the option to do that, otherwise there would be no point in having a two year loan.We prolly take him back after 12 months if he improves significantly and if James regresses further, if that’s even possible.
I’m pretty sure with loans you can insert a clause that you can take back the player at any time.I doubt we’d have the option to do that, otherwise there would be no point in having a two year loan.
It kinda makes sense, but shows that we wanted to sign the contract to protect value in case he comes good, rather than thinking he would make an impact in the team straight away.
I don’t think you can if there’s any form of payment involved, which I would imagine there would be for a two year deal. I may be wrong though.I’m pretty sure with loans you can insert a clause that you can take back the player at any time.
Two years as a loan deal seems very strange to me?Werder Bremen's sporting director confirms his club's pursuit of Tahith Chong on loan.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They’re definitely few and far between, Tevez to us & Hakimi to Dortmund are the only two I can think of from the top of my head.Two years as a loan deal seems very strange to me?
Wow 2 year loan? Isn't he only under contract with us for another 2 years?
2+1 the new contractI think he signed 3+1
The claims have come from a local German newspaper, so I'm not sure if it's necessarily legit. Still, they also claim that we won't include an option to buy.Two years as a loan deal seems very strange to me?
I really thought Tomori was impressive in the first half of the season and then he couldn’t get a game. What happened? @duffer do you know?That didn't last long, giving youth a chance my ass!
We should be all over Neves. Best Matic replacement we could get right now IMO.Great. Double bid for Raul and Neves.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Ødegaard to Real Sociedad, where Real Madrid has the possibility to call him back this summer.They’re definitely few and far between, Tevez to us & Hakimi to Dortmund are the only two I can think of from the top of my head.
You are probably right about that,maybe a very cheap CB but certainly nothing extravagant like GrealishIf we get Sancho, we're not going after Jack shit!
I thought so too, but they also spent a good amount of money to bring in players this season. They may have spent more money up front to secure their incoming transfers whilst not getting as much up front from most of their outgoing transfers.Haven’t Lille brought a ton of money in from player sales over the last couple of seasons?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
kingsley coman to bayern from juventus another.They’re definitely few and far between, Tevez to us & Hakimi to Dortmund are the only two I can think of from the top of my head.
This. Makes too much sense though for us. Would get Raul as well.We should be all over Neves. Best Matic replacement we could get right now IMO.
Think RM has to pay a cancellation fee if he’s recalled actually. Which is fair enough imo, but i’m sure this is regulated in all loan contracts.Ødegaard to Real Sociedad, where Real Madrid has the possibility to call him back this summer.
Don't salary caps just mean more money for owners. I would rather that money go to the players who actually work for it.
It's probably to stop chairmen gambling straight after the virus, if it goes wrong the club goes bust and the chairman just carries on with their normal life, whilst the fans lose the club they've supported all their life.Don't salary caps just mean more money for owners. I would rather that money go to the players who actually work for it.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date