Chelsea 2020/21 - General discussion

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
Definitely think it's possible and makes sense for both sides
It makes no sense for Chelsea, he’s a world class midfielder and after bringing in a ton of attacking talent we’d be mugs to offload a guy who can keep us solid. We learned that lesson with Makalele and how much his departure made Real weaker.

I’ve heard the club aren’t looking to sell anyway, they’ll only sell if he wants a move (which is a general club policy anyway).
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,407
Supports
Chelsea
It makes no sense for Chelsea, he’s a world class midfielder and after bringing in a ton of attacking talent we’d be mugs to offload a guy who can keep us solid. We learned that lesson with Makalele and how much his departure made Real weaker.

I’ve heard the club aren’t looking to sell anyway, they’ll only sell if he wants a move (which is a general club policy anyway).
I think the Maka comparisons are a bit misguided outside of them being small and French.

Maka was actually a sitter and pretty underrated in first phase build up play, Kante doesn't fall into either category. On paper it makes sense him being the engine in the Bentley (as Zizou described Maka) but in reality his proactive nature leaves us vulnerable when teams play through his press and when he's a sitter there's no one to sweep up behind him (that was a problem even in his prime, for reference Ozil's goal against us that forced Conte to change the system). People will likely come at me with "yeah but look at how Jorginho defends" and they have a point, but with Jorgi we atleast have a trade off that he's good in possession and can keep us ticking at a good tempo a lot of the time, Kante doesn't, hopefully this will change with better attackers but I felt every game bar City we played with Kante as sitting DM was boring as hell, we had no tempo set and he never got in the correct positions to aid playing out from the back (something Jorgi and Billy are excellent at).

That said I think we've done too much in one summer and changing Kante/Jorgi aswell will be overkill so I think we have to grin and bear the DM issues this year and get proper stuck into it the next. For park the bus games I'd still pick Jorgi (or Gilmour when he's back) for big games I'd probably say we may have to revert to three off Jorgi-Kante-Kova-Mount midfield in the short term.
 

ZolaWasMagic

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2018
Messages
2,714
Supports
Chelsea
Edouard Mendy fee agreed. The Athletic Chelsea guys say Rice is next on the list, and we also have other defensive midfielders being looked at this window, incase Rice deal doesnt happen but confidence is there.

Think the backup is Soumare at Lille
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,419
Location
left wing
Edouard Mendy fee agreed. The Athletic Chelsea guys say Rice is next on the list, and we also have other defensive midfielders being looked at this window, incase Rice deal doesnt happen but confidence is there.

Think the backup is Soumare at Lille
What's the starting XI next season? I assume that the new guys will all start.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
Lampard must be under huge pressure to deliver this season. He has got everything he wanted this window.

Keeper
CB
LB
RW
CAM
ST

Interesting to see how he manages to gel them and fit players in. Players like Mount, CHO, Tomori, RLC
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,873
Location
New York City
I'd say anything less than top 4 would be a huge failure. Not expecting to finish top 2 though, but do expect to be competing with them for a decent chunk of the season overall. Will be games where we win 5/6/7-0 I think but will also be ones where we struggle as the new players adapt. I think the gap to City is too big to bridge over a season, Liverpool could be caught though if their luck runs out/motivation isn't as high this season. Comfortably top 4 and a decent run in Europe would be my aims for this season. I do have my doubts as to whether Lampard has the tactical nous to get us near City's level in terms of points. Can sign the best players in the world but Pep has a great system for beating the smaller teams and racking up huge points totals, not sure Lampard can do the same.
Who do you see finishing top?
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,379
Supports
Chelsea
Lampard must be under huge pressure to deliver this season. He has got everything he wanted this window.

Keeper
CB
LB
RW
CAM
ST

Interesting to see how he manages to gel them and fit players in. Players like Mount, CHO, Tomori, RLC
He was asked about the pressure in the presser, and his answer was something to the effect of "it's Chelsea, when is there not any pressure?" So yes, he's not a stupid guy, he knows after such a big transfer window, the pressure will be amped up. He doesn't shy away from it and his confidence fills me with confidence.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,379
Supports
Chelsea
I think players joining up with the squad late, being injured etc could be a good thing.

It's just Werner and Havertz who are in line to start the first game. Mendy will likely be in contention for week 2, Silva's status is unknown, but will likely feature at some point in the first couple of games, and then you have Ziyech and Chilwell who will probably be out for several more weeks.

This sort of staggered integration of the new players might actually work out in our favour.
 
Last edited:

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,873
Location
New York City
The pace of the Premiere League will catch him out?
At this point I'm really not sure you know who Timo Werner is (won't be surprising at all).
How many PL strikers are “technically strong”? Aguero? Auba?(maybe) Firmino? (definitely exchanging goals for technique that one)
To be a successful PL striker, you need movement and the ability to actually finish a chance. That's what make Vardy, Aguero,Kane, Ings (last season), Auba etc successful not how ‘sexy’ your passes look or how many men you take on before scoring. Movement, finishing and a reliable supply line behind you, that's all it takes. Technique, skill, passing range/accuracy, holdup play, aerial ability, pace, agility, strength etc.....those are just added bonuses that gives you a distinct advantage in CERTAIN match scenarios.

Werner has movement in and around the box and can finish (although still requires some work in being more clinical). Those are better indicators for success IMO than his pace.
Good post - I think people (including myself) question his ability to finish, not his movememt.
 

Orc

Pretended to be a United fan for two years
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,322
Supports
Chelsea
Think Thiago Silva and Mendy will make the most immediete, noticeable impact to our team so I hope they're both ready for Liverpool a week from now.
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,585
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
Good post - I think people (including myself) question his ability to finish, not his movememt.
His finishing last year was genuinely excellent - more than half his shots were on target (50.4%), resulting in a 21% conversion rate (goals per shot).

This was very comparable to Martial, for instance (48.1% / 22%) and Aubameyang (44.4% / 22%), and better than Aguero (34.2% / 19%). In terms of the Bundesliga specifically, he was also on par with Lewandowski (44.0% / 22%).

That said, it remains to be seen whether he has a learning curve and can translate this to the PL. Aubameyang's success at least bodes well for him.

Just as a further illustration, here's a representation of Werner's quality across a wide variety of different finishes:


(In case anyone is interested in reading more, here's a very comprehensive analysis: https://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation...o-werner-in-depth-scouting-report-for-chelsea )
 

jesperjaap

Full Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
5,726
Funny, see so many fans on this site saying we would be stupid to make several signings in one window, not feasible, disrupt harmony, wont gel blah blah blah blah.....yet Chelsea do it this window (yes I appreciate they have had a transfer ban so inevitable before anybody uses that card) and now everyone saying they will definately challenge for the title?

Think there window so far is very much in the middle of those two arguments myself. Notice got the Morata fee so net spend is actually not too bad so far.
I do wonder about harmony within the group over the season though with some of the youngsters vying for places that may not get so many opportunities. And in all honesty though all the signings are good signings, are they great signings and maybe getting a tad overhyped?

For me Havertz obviously stands out and I also think short term Silva is a very astute signing. They are very weak for me in central defence and he still look sto have another season in him to me, almost as importantly is the leadership and organisation he will bring to that defence though, something that has been missing for them even more than it has for us the season gone.

Though they were obviously slightly past there best and one not consistent for a while.....is Ziyech actually a better player than Willian or Pedro or are people a bit carried away from his champions league performances. I dont think he is anything special personally.

I also think in a current climate of not many great young strikers......because Werner is a young striker, he is overhyped. Of course, a good, pacey young striker and brings them another type of striker they dont have, so good in that aspect. I again (and in a minority) am not sure he will set the world on fire though myself, think he is a it overhyped.

Chilwell again is a good solid signing who does everything well but again not sure he is a serious upgrade apart from maybe consistency which has been poor from there current options.

Of course the other thing to remember. Lampard is not an experienced manager, he has had one season with Derby and one season in the premiership. He has done well so far, but lets not forget he didnt get a promotion with Derby and he also finished behind us with Chelsea. And now he has spent all that money, CHelsea legend or not.......will be a lot more pressure on his shoulders this season.

Obviously I expect Chelsea to be better this year, challenge the top two if they perform as before though.....no
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,367
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
Funny, see so many fans on this site saying we would be stupid to make several signings in one window, not feasible, disrupt harmony, wont gel blah blah blah blah.....yet Chelsea do it this window (yes I appreciate they have had a transfer ban so inevitable before anybody uses that card) and now everyone saying they will definately challenge for the title?
Everyone? Has anyone said that?
 

dannyrhinos89

OMG socks and sandals lol!
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
14,435
If Lampard doesn’t challenge for the title this season he’s failed.

he’s got everything he wanted so there’s no excuse. Honestly I’d rather your lot win it over Liverpool and city though.
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,585
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
If Lampard doesn’t challenge for the title this season he’s failed.

he’s got everything he wanted so there’s no excuse. Honestly I’d rather your lot win it over Liverpool and city though.
Harsh I think. Especially given the condensed schedule, need for new squad members to settle, and unprecedented quality of Liverpool and Man City. If we finish with 80+ points and make decent progress in the cups I'd be very satisfied.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Harsh I think. Especially given the condensed schedule, need for new squad members to settle, and unprecedented quality of Liverpool and Man City. If we finish with 80+ points and make decent progress in the cups I'd be very satisfied.
What more do you think you need to challenge?
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,585
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
Have you seen him play?
Of course but not extensively. That said, he was 9th in save percentage among keepers from top 5 leagues while also being an elite collector of crosses. Kepa was literally last in the first metric and also managed to go the entire season without collecting a single corner. At this point, a traffic cone would be an upgrade over Kepa.

I know Mendy tends to parry more shots than he should, but if he's at least diving for them he's an upgrade on Kepa.

What more do you think you need to challenge?
All of the players we've bought to get settled and adapted to the PL! I expect we'll be closer but not genuine title contenders. Next year I'd hope to be at that level.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,677
Location
india
The pace of the Premiere League will catch him out?
At this point I'm really not sure you know who Timo Werner is (won't be surprising at all).
How many PL strikers are “technically strong”? Aguero? Auba?(maybe) Firmino? (definitely exchanging goals for technique that one)
To be a successful PL striker, you need movement and the ability to actually finish a chance. That's what make Vardy, Aguero,Kane, Ings (last season), Auba etc successful not how ‘sexy’ your passes look or how many men you take on before scoring. Movement, finishing and a reliable supply line behind you, that's all it takes. Technique, skill, passing range/accuracy, holdup play, aerial ability, pace, agility, strength etc.....those are just added bonuses that gives you a distinct advantage in CERTAIN match scenarios.

Werner has movement in and around the box and can finish (although still requires some work in being more clinical). Those are better indicators for success IMO than his pace.
You say this as if we're topping about some chap who has been absolutely top class for years. It's of course true that pace and goalscoring instinct are more than enough to make you a very good Pl striker.

But the very best - Aguero, Suarez, Henry, RvP etc do tend to have that brilliant technical ability. Unless your RVN and obscenely good infront of goal. So yeah, if Werner hasn't got that ability and is going to be your Jamie Vardy it's fair enough if someone doesn't fancy him all that much, as there are players Vardy and then players like Aguero etc and there's a difference between the two.

Not that I'm not putting Werner in any category myself. I'm just clearly outlining that a line of argument isn't complete flawed that's being put up against Timo "do you know who he is?" Werner.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,677
Location
india
And Aguero, Martial and Firminho are technically very good. Kane can be, too.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
If Lampard doesn’t challenge for the title this season he’s failed.

he’s got everything he wanted so there’s no excuse. Honestly I’d rather your lot win it over Liverpool and city though.
I wouldn't say that. Chelsea's starting 11 is worse than both Liverpools and Citys in almost every position, while City also have better depth. Not to mention City and Liverpool have the 2 by a very large margin best and most influential managers of the past 10 years in charge, and settled squads in their peaks. They both also have the best peak level players, so its not like Chelsea can point to one player being better than anyone or most of what another team has.

What this does is cement them in 3rd probably, give them the ground to challenge for trophies and a platform to challenge for the league once they gel/develop and City/Liverpool fall a bit.

Thats what United also needs to do, capitalize on the young squad and potential and spend big on players like Sancho and Upamecano to add to Rashford/Martial/Greenwood who will peak as a team together when City and Liverpool fall down to more normal levels where you don't need a "super manager" to compete with them.
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,585
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
I wouldn't say that. Chelsea's starting 11 is worse than both Liverpools and Citys in almost every position, while City also have better depth. Not to mention City and Liverpool have the 2 by a very large margin best and most influential managers of the past 10 years in charge, and settled squads in their peaks. They both also have the best peak level players, so its not like Chelsea can point to one player being better than anyone or most of what another team has.

What this does is cement them in 3rd probably, give them the ground to challenge for trophies and a platform to challenge for the league once they gel/develop and City/Liverpool fall a bit.

Thats what United also needs to do, capitalize on the young squad and potential and spend big on players like Sancho and Upamecano to add to Rashford/Martial/Greenwood who will peak as a team together when City and Liverpool fall down to more normal levels where you don't need a "super manager" to compete with them.
Spot on. And by all accounts this is Chelsea's mindset as well - we're about to enter year 2 of what has been described extensively as a minimum 3 year plan.

The goals this year are to finish top 4 comfortably, reach the CL knockouts, and put up a fight in the domestic cups. Talk of winning the league is hugely premature, be it from our fans or rivals.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
Spot on. And by all accounts this is Chelsea's mindset as well - we're about to enter year 2 of what has been described extensively as a minimum 3 year plan.

The goals this year are to finish top 4 comfortably, reach the CL knockouts, and put up a fight in the domestic cups. Talk of winning the league is hugely premature, be it from our fans or rivals.
It'll happen because of the spending, without using any logic. The same would be said of United if we sign Sancho, ignoring that our average age of the main attacking group would be 21, ignoring the starting 11 and squads City and Liverpool have, along with their managers. Last season both Chelsea and United had the target of starting a rebuild with a young squad to get top 4, and then had to aggressively build off it to maintain top 4 with the view of entering their peak just as Liverpool and City start to leave theirs. Chelsea is seemingly building like that, United have seemingly decided top 4 is enough and aren't doing anything else.
 

Mount's Goatieson

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
545
Supports
Chelsea
You say this as if we're topping about some chap who has been absolutely top class for years. It's of course true that pace and goalscoring instinct are more than enough to make you a very good Pl striker.

But the very best - Aguero, Suarez, Henry, RvP etc do tend to have that brilliant technical ability. Unless your RVN and obscenely good infront of goal. So yeah, if Werner hasn't got that ability and is going to be your Jamie Vardy it's fair enough if someone doesn't fancy him all that much, as there are players Vardy and then players like Aguero etc and there's a difference between the two.

Not that I'm not putting Werner in any category myself. I'm just clearly outlining that a line of argument isn't complete flawed that's being put up against Timo "do you know who he is?" Werner.
Well this is a typical case of you reading other meanings into my statement.
Its not “you don't know who Timo Werner is” like he is the best thing since peanut butter.... Its more of “you don't know who Timo Werner is” if you think its the pace of the PL that's going to affect him. He's being playing in a counter attacking team in an equally fast paced Bundesliga.
Physicality of the league? Maybe. Pace? Nope.
 

Pow

New Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
3,516
Location
Somewhere
Supports
Chelsea
You say this as if we're topping about some chap who has been absolutely top class for years. It's of course true that pace and goalscoring instinct are more than enough to make you a very good Pl striker.

But the very best - Aguero, Suarez, Henry, RvP etc do tend to have that brilliant technical ability. Unless your RVN and obscenely good infront of goal. So yeah, if Werner hasn't got that ability and is going to be your Jamie Vardy it's fair enough if someone doesn't fancy him all that much, as there are players Vardy and then players like Aguero etc and there's a difference between the two.

Not that I'm not putting Werner in any category myself. I'm just clearly outlining that a line of argument isn't complete flawed that's being put up against Timo "do you know who he is?" Werner.
Its hardly like hes had one good scoring season either
his rb numbers total for all his seasons there there read 21 21 19 34
just 24 years of age too
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,616
Location
DownUnder
Chelsea sure are having a very good transfer window, seems the club are going to back Frank all the way. Will be interesting how it works out with all the new additions. I still don’t see them seriously mounting a challenge for top spot in the league but I’d say 3rd place is going to them unless the Glaziers step up and invest in United.
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,873
Location
New York City
His finishing last year was genuinely excellent - more than half his shots were on target (50.4%), resulting in a 21% conversion rate (goals per shot).

This was very comparable to Martial, for instance (48.1% / 22%) and Aubameyang (44.4% / 22%), and better than Aguero (34.2% / 19%). In terms of the Bundesliga specifically, he was also on par with Lewandowski (44.0% / 22%).

That said, it remains to be seen whether he has a learning curve and can translate this to the PL. Aubameyang's success at least bodes well for him.

Just as a further illustration, here's a representation of Werner's quality across a wide variety of different finishes:


(In case anyone is interested in reading more, here's a very comprehensive analysis: https://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation...o-werner-in-depth-scouting-report-for-chelsea )
You may be right - I just base my opionion off a few matches (more than 5 less than 10) I've seen him play in both at club and national level where didn't strike me as lethal. Could be a small or statistically insignificant sample, but I'm curious to see how he gets on.
 
Last edited:

Ødegaard

formerly MrEriksen
Scout
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
11,474
Location
Norway
Chelsea have been absolutely crazy this window. I do hope they end up failing, but damn the fanbase must be looking forward to the next 2-3 years of development.
 

Pathwayz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
10
Supports
Chelsea
Where do you see the overestimate? Quote it! I don't think you even read the post you replied to.

I only said both Chelsea & United front three are on similar level on paper which you have admitted it yourself by not denying it.
Chelsea have a better front three than united on paper.
Claimibg otherwise is delusion.
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,873
Location
New York City
There's an undercurrent of envy and glee in this thread by both United and Chelsea fans.

Envy because Chelsea seem to have gotten Havertz, Werner, Zyiech, Chillwell, Sarr, Silva over the line with minimum fuss while Ed & co. are still preparing a bid for Sancho. The longest saga was Havertz' deal, and even that got done at a really good price vis-a-vis Leverkusen's 100m expectations. Chillwell seemed a breeze compared to our dealing with CP and LCFC for AWB and Maguire respectively. Wouldn't be surprised if they get Rice done as well at a reasonable price. And a keeper. All this against the backdrop that Hazard's incoming fee could rise to as much as 140-160m Euros. For a guy with a year left on his contract that's outstanding. The contrast with United's front office team couldn't be sharper.

Glee by Chelsea fans for the same reasons above.

The way I see it, Chelsea is a contender for the title. The club won the title in 15 and 17, so the pedigree is there and the squad transitions have been managed sensibly. In Rudiger, Alonso, Kante, Giroud you still got players that have been champions (and Kovacic, Thiago Silva, Zyiech in other leagues). Mix that experience with hungry talented youngsters (Havertz, Pulisic, Werner, Mount) and you could have a special team.

I think Lampard has got all the ingredients to give it a go - let's see if he can do it.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,379
Supports
Chelsea
It'll happen because of the spending, without using any logic. The same would be said of United if we sign Sancho, ignoring that our average age of the main attacking group would be 21, ignoring the starting 11 and squads City and Liverpool have, along with their managers. Last season both Chelsea and United had the target of starting a rebuild with a young squad to get top 4, and then had to aggressively build off it to maintain top 4 with the view of entering their peak just as Liverpool and City start to leave theirs. Chelsea is seemingly building like that, United have seemingly decided top 4 is enough and aren't doing anything else.
I'd argue that it's not because of the spending but who the funds are being spent on. People rate the players Chelsea have bought very highly and the generally accepted view is that these players will elevate the club to greater heights.

Including Mendy, Chelsea have spent about £220m this summer. We spent about £235m in 2017/2018 but nobody gave a feck because the best player from that summer was Rudiger. We spent almost £200m in 2018/2019 but again, Jorginho was the standout transfer.
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,585
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
It'll happen because of the spending, without using any logic. The same would be said of United if we sign Sancho, ignoring that our average age of the main attacking group would be 21, ignoring the starting 11 and squads City and Liverpool have, along with their managers. Last season both Chelsea and United had the target of starting a rebuild with a young squad to get top 4, and then had to aggressively build off it to maintain top 4 with the view of entering their peak just as Liverpool and City start to leave theirs. Chelsea is seemingly building like that, United have seemingly decided top 4 is enough and aren't doing anything else.
Yeah I don't doubt the expectations will be unreasonable.

I think you're spot on in describing Chelsea's approach. In particular Liverpool are edging towards a dangerous age profile in 1-2 years, especially upfront.
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,585
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
You may be right - I just base my opionion off a few matches (more than 5 less than 10) I've seen him play in both at club and national level where didn't strike me as lethal. Could be a small or statistically insignificant sample, but I'm curious to see how he gets on.
And that's 100% fair! I think there are question marks for sure. He certainly went up a level this past year; whether he can continue to improve or at least maintain that output is absolutely a valid question.
 

Reiver

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
2,544
Location
Near Glasgow
Harsh I think. Especially given the condensed schedule, need for new squad members to settle, and unprecedented quality of Liverpool and Man City. If we finish with 80+ points and make decent progress in the cups I'd be very satisfied.
I don't think that's harsh. You can't spend the money Chelsea have and not be expected to have a genuine tilt at the title.
 

Pow

New Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
3,516
Location
Somewhere
Supports
Chelsea
I don't think that's harsh. You can't spend the money Chelsea have and not be expected to have a genuine tilt at the title.
Do you have the same expectations for united an ole who are also 200 mil plus worth of transfers in since frank arrived at chelsea ?
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,585
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
I don't think that's harsh. You can't spend the money Chelsea have and not be expected to have a genuine tilt at the title.
Two years ago United finished 32 points behind Man City, then spent about 190m last year. Were you disappointed that you didn't have a genuine tilt at the title as you finished 33 points behind Liverpool this past season?

Point being that a 30+ point gap is absolutely enormous and can't be expected to be overcome in one summer, especially when there are two sides of that quality to overthrow. Given that Chelsea finished 33 points behind Liverpool last year, I'd hope that that gap is significantly reduced this season. Expecting us to be on their level immediately when players have to bed in (especially given the constrained nature of this upcoming season) is ridiculous.