"So many managers have been sacked"...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,088
4 managers. Ole's only our 4th manager in 7 years. Since 2013 :

Real Madrid - 6 managers.
Barcelona - 5 managers.
Bayern Munich - 5 managers.
Chelsea - 5 managers.

How many managers do you think these clubs would've ran through had they ever approached our levels of crap in the last 7 years?

Mod edit:
Folks asked for trophy comparisons...
United since 2013 - 1 FA, 1 EFL, 1 EL
Real since 2013 - 2 leagues, 1 Copa, 4 CL
Barca since 2013 - 4 leagues, 4 Copa, 1 CL
Bayern since 2013 - 7 leagues, 4 Pokal, 1 CL
Chelsea since 2013 - 2 leagues, 1 FA, 1 EFL, 1 EL
 
Last edited by a moderator:

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,144
4 managers. Ole's only our 4th manager in 7 years. Since 2013 :

Real Madrid - 6 managers.
Barcelona - 5 managers.
Bayern Munich - 5 managers.
Chelsea - 5 managers.

How many managers do you think these clubs would've ran had they ever approached our levels of crap in the last 7 years?
Moyes wouldn't have gone past Christmas and LVG too would have been gone by Christmas. We are so indecisive its unreal, they are depths that once a manager reaches it's clear that he will never be good enough, the depths we reached under Ole from the day he was confirmed permanent until Bruno came in were telling.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,407
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
Who knows?

Is there a correlation between manager sack rate and trophy count? What are Liverpool and City doing?

*This post is not an endorsement of Ole.
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,113
4 managers. Ole's only our 4th manager in 7 years. Since 2013 :

Real Madrid - 6 managers.
Barcelona - 5 managers.
Bayern Munich - 5 managers.
Chelsea - 5 managers.

How many managers do you think these clubs would've ran through had they ever approached our levels of crap in the last 7 years?
We stuck with thinking that we will have another Fergie here for 25 years.
 

elmo

Can never have too many Eevees
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,370
Location
AKA: Slapanut Goat Smuggla
4 managers. Ole's only our 4th manager in 7 years. Since 2013 :

Real Madrid - 6 managers.
Barcelona - 5 managers.
Bayern Munich - 5 managers.
Chelsea - 5 managers.

How many managers do you think these clubs would've ran through had they ever approached our levels of crap in the last 7 years?
1 for every change in the seasons.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,260
If we sacked more managers or the same ones earlier, it would've meant the club and the board has better standards.

Unfortunately, they don't.
 

pratyush_utd

Can't tell DeGea and Onana apart.
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
8,430
It's people like Gary who is responsible for this nonsense that manager should get eternity to get it right. Every top club goes through manager and still be successful.

We love to be romantic about these things
 

altodevil

Odds winner of 'Odds or Evens 2023/2024'
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
17,491
Aye but how many of those teams have Ed Woodward managing recruitment?
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,873
Location
Somewhere out there
4 managers. Ole's only our 4th manager in 7 years. Since 2013 :

Real Madrid - 6 managers.
Barcelona - 5 managers.
Bayern Munich - 5 managers.
Chelsea - 5 managers.

How many managers do you think these clubs would've ran through had they ever approached our levels of crap in the last 7 years?
Both Moyes and Ole should’ve been gone in no time, and we’d have been miles better off for it. We instead like to set ourselves back and waste so much time on managers that are clearly not up to it.

A ruthless board would’ve instantly hired Poch.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,391
If we sacked Van Gaal when we should have, we would've had a clear run at Klopp.
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
12,737
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
Managers get sacked when things aren't working out. That's how every club operates. There's no such thing as a "sacking club" and a "non-sacking club" as some like to say.
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,224
Location
Lucilinburhuc
4 managers. Ole's only our 4th manager in 7 years. Since 2013 :

Real Madrid - 6 managers.
Barcelona - 5 managers.
Bayern Munich - 5 managers.
Chelsea - 5 managers.

How many managers do you think these clubs would've ran through had they ever approached our levels of crap in the last 7 years?
To answer your question, 5-7 easily. Every one of them would sack their manager at this stage after such a loss and the previous time he got. Because there is no coming back or improvement to be expected. We won't finish top 3.
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,621
If we sacked more managers or the same ones earlier, it would've meant the club and the board has better standards.

Unfortunately, they don't.
Surely it would mean that they didn';t have a clue and couldn't get anything right?
 

b82REZ

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
9,350
Location
Manchester
We stuck with thinking that we will have another Fergie here for 25 years.
Fergie's farewell speech did more damage to this club than we realise.

There's a section of supporters who think it's not in our culture to question the managers and if given enough time they'll turn into SAF 2.0.
 

elmo

Can never have too many Eevees
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,370
Location
AKA: Slapanut Goat Smuggla
Moyes wouldn't have gone past Christmas and LVG too would have been gone by Christmas. We are so indecisive its unreal, they are depths that once a manager reaches it's clear that he will never be good enough, the depths we reached under Ole from the day he was confirmed permanent until Bruno came in were telling.
Ole supporters are sticking their hand into the ground and shouting that it's a rebuild / pogba's injured / rashford's injured / we've no depth/ pogba's not match fit / ole's not backed by the board.

Nothing at all to do with his coaching or as it's quite clear, the lack of it.
 

bazalini

The Baz Man - He made us laugh 2000 - 2012
Joined
May 17, 2000
Messages
24,589
Location
Dines out
I like Donald Trump more then Ole tbh. That is the magnitude of it.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,236
We should never have appointed a dour mid-table plodder like Moyes.

We should never have appointed LVG knowing he was planning to retire after 3 seasons.

We should never have given a permanent contract to the Championship-standard caretaker manager.


Real, Barca and Bayern would never have hired the above 3. Let alone take ages sacking them.
 

RashyForPM

New Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
3,183
And each of those 4 clubs have experienced great success in that period of time. Only Chelsea hasn’t had a CL, but they’ve won 2 PL’s. If managers are doing badly, sack them.
 

Raw

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2013
Messages
25,432
Location
Manchester, UK
We don't operate like a big club really. Those teams will get rid of managers if the football is tumescent to watch and the players clearly lose interest. We keep them on in the hopes they can scrape top 4, then when they don't we get shocked and sack them immediately after without really planning much in the future.

Then when the next manager comes in, we have to give him time to deal with the mess the previous manager left. At least 2 seasons. Sacking Mourinho was probably the quickest decision we made with regards to getting rid of a manager, and even then it was still a little late.

Why is it we're so eager to give new managers extensions so quickly (or the full time position in Ole's case) yet take forever to get rid when it's clearly not working?
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,621
Both Moyes and Ole should’ve been gone in no time, and we’d have been miles better off for it. We instead like to set ourselves back and waste so much time on managers that are clearly not up to it.

A ruthless board would’ve instantly hired Poch.
Thankfully they didn't.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,848
The reality is all of those clubs have more appeal than United. Better places to live, better structures, better payouts for the sack. Only one of those things is fixable and outside of football manager it isn't easy to do, especially when it competes with United's biggest strength, its commercial power. That's the reality.

Being "decisive" is irrelevant when the decision to sack a failing manager means bringing in a mediocre manager. We were rejected by the elite managers straight after sir Alex for a reason. Our fans have trouble accepting that.

We should never have appointed a dour mid-table plodder like Moyes.

We should never have appointed LVG knowing he was planning to retire after 3 seasons.

We should never have given a permanent contract to the Championship-standard caretaker manager.


Real, Barca and Bayern would never have hired the above 3. Let alone take ages sacking them.
Who did we have on our list of managers ahead of Moyes? The answer gets to the heart of the point you're overlooking.
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,766
4 managers. Ole's only our 4th manager in 7 years. Since 2013 :

Real Madrid - 6 managers.
Barcelona - 5 managers.
Bayern Munich - 5 managers.
Chelsea - 5 managers.

How many managers do you think these clubs would've ran through had they ever approached our levels of crap in the last 7 years?
Each of those 4 clubs, even Barcelona who are a shambles, are better structured behind the scenes than we are.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,088
We should never have appointed a dour mid-table plodder like Moyes.

We should never have appointed LVG knowing he was planning to retire after 3 seasons.

We should never have given a permanent contract to the Championship-standard caretaker manager.


Real, Barca and Bayern would never have hired the above 3. Let alone take ages sacking them.
All of those clubs have made their fair of shocking managerial appointments - but they're smart enough to move on, rather than doubling down on poor mistakes.
 

VP

Full Member
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
11,556
We really have a cult of a manager in this club and among our fans.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,260
Surely it would mean that they didn';t have a clue and couldn't get anything right?
Changing them would mean they were at least trying to correct their mistakes quickly and they aim for something more than the bare minimum.

Right now, they're slow, incompetent, and have no standards.
 

AbusementPark

Operates the Unfairest Wheel
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
2,609
Location
Belfast
Why start pogba, guy has been absolute muck this season. No protection for the defence, be more ruthless bench him and ddg. Today was mot the game to play pogba and Bruno. Fred should have started, maguire another shocker. People will complain manager hasn't been backed, he's spent over 200m and I know he's undoing a lot of the previous managers mistakes but cmon it's going down hill rapidly.
 

monosierra

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
374
Managers get sacked when things aren't working out. That's how every club operates. There's no such thing as a "sacking club" and a "non-sacking club" as some like to say.
The thing is the club has to have some kind of consistency regardless of managers. Some kind of institutional principles and setup that goes on throughout managerial changes. Clubs continue despite players coming in and out and managers should be no different. The thing is United had an one man institution in SAF which has yet to be replaced by an institution. That could be a Director of Football or some kind of council of wise men with footballing experience. Bayern wouldn’t collapse with a managerial change. Not Real or Barca or even Chelsea. Somehow there’s the idea that United lives and dies by our manager. That really should not be so.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
The reality is all of those clubs have more appeal than United. Better places to live, better structures, better payouts for the sack. Only one of those things is fixable and outside of football manager it isn't easy to do, especially when it competes with United's biggest strength, its commercial power. That's the reality.

Being "decisive" is irrelevant when the decision to sack a failing manager means bringing in a mediocre manager. We were rejected by the elite managers straight after sir Alex for a reason. Our fans have trouble accepting that.

Who did we have on our list of managers ahead of Moyes? The answer gets to the heart of the point you're overlooking.
Better places to live? Manchester City don't seem to struggle. They had no problem attracting Pep Guardiola who's as elite as it gets. Liverpool got Klopp, one of the top managers in football. Everton have Carlo Ancelotti managing them though admittedly he's probably past being considered an elite manager now.

Better payouts for the sack? You're kidding with that one, right? What was it Mourinho got, 15m?

Better structures - yes, no argument there. Don't see why that isn't fixable, however. It's clearly beyond the willingness and competence of the current leadership but incapable and impossible are very different things.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,088
The reality is all of those clubs have more appeal than United. Better places to live, better structures, better payouts for the sack. Only one of those things is fixable and outside of football manager it isn't easy to do, especially when it competes with United's biggest strength, its commercial power. That's the reality.

Being "decisive" is irrelevant when the decision to sack a failing manager means bringing in a mediocre manager. We were rejected by the elite managers straight after sir Alex for a reason. Our fans have trouble accepting that.



Who did we have on our list of managers ahead of Moyes? The answer gets to the heart of the point you're overlooking.
Surely that doesn't matter when the two best managers in the world are in Liverpool and across the road Manchester too?
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,144
Ole supporters are sticking their hand into the ground and shouting that it's a rebuild / pogba's injured / rashford's injured / we've no depth/ pogba's not match fit / ole's not backed by the board.

Nothing at all to do with his coaching or as it's quite clear, the lack of it.
People are more concerned with being right or proving their top red credentials over actual facts. Not signing Sancho has nothing to do with today, in fact the Sancho chase highlights everything wrong with the club because a Pogba - Matic - Maguire triumvirate in the heart of the team simply lacks energy, pace and energy so spending £100m on a winger won't do anything to solve that weakness.

That is before we look at the coaching, the lack of defensive organization, the insistence to play an unbalanced midfield and the lack of any attacking patterns to get the best out of our attackers.

The recruitment decisions were all wrong and misguided. Why sign a limited fullback like AWB or a slow CB like Maguire when you intend to play a high line. Pogba and Matic are too pedestrian, Bruno plays like a second striker when he is needed to help the very one paced midfield Ole insists on.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
Once Ole goes I will resign myself to the fact that this really is potentially a 30 year wait for us.

You heard it banded about after SAF left but I’ve never bought into it (“a 30 year wait”), we are too big a club, too much money I told myself. The problem though is within the club, not what we are up against in opposition, the challenge is the owners and there is no easy or quick fix to that.

We will sack and hire, waste money, rinse repeat.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,260
Mourinho
Ancelotti
Benitez

All CL winners, two of them won big trophies with Madrid too and got moved on when they were no longer deemed fit for the club.

Zidane resigned when he thought he doesn't have more in him to give the team.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,260
Once Ole goes I will resign myself to the fact that this really is potentially a 30 year wait for us.

You heard it banded about after SAF left but I’ve never bought into it, too big a club, too much money I told myself. The problem though is within the club, not what we are up against in opposition, the challenge is the owners and there is no easy or quick fix to that.
This is very much the reality now.
 

elmo

Can never have too many Eevees
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,370
Location
AKA: Slapanut Goat Smuggla
People are more concerned with being right or proving their top red credentials over actual facts. Not signing Sancho has nothing to do with today, in fact the Sancho chase highlights everything wrong with the club because a Pogba - Matic - Maguire triumvirate in the heart of the team simply lacks energy, pace and energy so spending £100m on a winger won't do anything to solve that weakness.

That is before we look at the coaching, the lack of defensive organization, the insistence to play an unbalanced midfield and the lack of any attacking patterns to get the best out of our attackers.

The recruitment decisions were all wrong and misguided. Why sign a limited fullback like AWB or a slow CB like Maguire when you intend to play a high line. Pogba and Matic are too pedestrian, Bruno plays like a second striker when he is needed to help the very one paced midfield Ole insists on.
I would expect a competent manager to have a tactic that fits the players he has available rather than endlessly playing his supposed favoured formation that our players can't perform well in.

Ole has been given loads of excuses for all his failings and if he's not a former fan favourite, he would have been sacked by last October at the latest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.