As much as our work in the transfer window was a train wreck - it just did not make sense.

Ranchero

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
5,913
Location
Glasgow
Then a year later, we bring in a similar but declining player in Cavani, who is SIX years older than Lukaku . All this tells me is that the reasons for getting rid of Lukaku now do not make sense other than to raise funds. And before anyone says Lukaku was pushing to leave, that was because he was being told he was not wanted. If you were told by your boss you are not wanted, you would be looking for another job. The same reason Di Maria left.

Not only that, when Lukaku left, we were told nobody was coming in because we wanted to develop those we already had, like Greenwood. So once again, if that is correct, why go for Cavani, unless it is being seen as a 'name' player to appease those of us who are furious at the Sancho mess. There is no logic here.

This signing alone underlines that the people at the top are not in sync with our football management. Some might say it adds more weight to the idea we need a director of football. What it does show is that we just need a clear direction and vision, and a competency to do deals in the market, like it seems all our rivals above and below us seem to achieve.

As much as we all want Cavani to succeed, he is here because we are the mugs that were willing to pay the wages having been punted around all the top clubs.
 

CG1010

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
3,687
Seriously you are comparing Lukaku to Cavani? We didn't want a striker who had the first touch of a league 1 player as our mainstay. That doesn't mean we don't want a goal scorer as focal point with great technique.

Also Cavani is a backup player someone to be the plan B. Lukaku was the plan A we didn't want.
 

Posh Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
3,468
Location
Peterborough, England
Lukaku himself said he wanted to leave United after his first weak of signing. He also has a poor first touch which can’t be said for Cavani.

End of the day if a player doesn’t want to be here it’s best to let him go. We actually did well to get a good fee for him
 

VojjE

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 19, 2016
Messages
155
But what was also totally puzzling is the direction we are going in. We dumped Lukaku, because Ole wanted a certain type of striker up front to suit our style fast and young, and then a year later, bring in a similar but declining player in Cavani, who is SIX years older than Lukaku . All this tells me is that the reasons for getting rid of Lukaku now do not make sense other than to raise funds. And before anyone says Lukaku was pushing to leave, that was because he was being told he was not wanted. If you were told by your boss you are not wanted, you would be looking for another job. The same reason Di Maria left.
How is a player that is supposed to be in his prime, with a poor attitude, a poor scoring record against the top 4, that doesn't work his socks off and has won just about nothing the same as an experienced striker that has won multiple trophies, works his socks off and has good technique but has gotten older? Their responsibilities within the squad are totally different.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
And before anyone says Lukaku was pushing to leave, that was because he was being told he was not wanted. If you were told by your boss you are not wanted, you would be looking for another job. The same reason Di Maria left.
That's pure delusion. Di María never wanted to come here in the first place while Lukaku himself said that from the day he had made his debut he was imagining what it would be like to leave the club. And then: “I made my decision around March, and I went to the manager’s office and told him it was time for me to find something else.”

And we're well rid of him. Cavani's a signing for depth, on a free transfer. In his prime, he was twice the player Lukaku could ever hope to be and while now he's declined quite a bit, I'd rather have him than the sulking oaf who can't control a fecking football.
 

sincher

"I will cry if Rooney leaves"
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
25,588
Location
YSC
Lukaku is clearly a good player and the club knew that, but the attack just wasn't working with him in the team. We looked so much better when we played Rashford up top. It was a matter of fit for the way we wanted to play. Everyone knew he would continue to score goals elsewhere, and it was best for both parties to sell. The other issue is that he pretty clearly had/has reached his ceiling - his touch is not likely to improve. We have Rashford, Greenwood and Martial who should all get better.

I see the Cavani deal as different for a number of reasons. Firstly, we did not shell out a big fee for him on the basis of him being the focal point of our attack for years to come, he has been brought in to give us better options in attack. Secondly, his touch and passing are better and I think he will be better combining with our quicker players. The big question is whether he is on the decline or not. PSG stopped playing him regularly but a lot of that seemed to be due to falling out with team mates rather than anything on the pitch.
 
Last edited:

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,400
The way I’m trying to look at it is we’re happy with Rashford, Martial and Greenwood.

We’ve just signed Cavani to challenge for a spot (and to replace Ighalo) and picked up 2 young wingers who are very highly rated.

Keeping Lukaku wouldn’t have worked with him on the bench and ultimately we probably needed to money to fund Maguire (cough) at the time.
 

Bondi77

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
7,308
Then a year later, we bring in a similar but declining player in Cavani, who is SIX years older than Lukaku . All this tells me is that the reasons for getting rid of Lukaku now do not make sense other than to raise funds. And before anyone says Lukaku was pushing to leave, that was because he was being told he was not wanted. If you were told by your boss you are not wanted, you would be looking for another job. The same reason Di Maria left.

Not only that, when Lukaku left, we were told nobody was coming in because we wanted to develop those we already had, like Greenwood. So once again, if that is correct, why go for Cavani, unless it is being seen as a 'name' player to appease those of us who are furious at the Sancho mess. There is no logic here.

This signing alone underlines that the people at the top are not in sync with our football management. Some might say it adds more weight to the idea we need a director of football. What it does show is that we just need a clear direction and vision, and a competency to do deals in the market, like it seems all our rivals above and below us seem to achieve.

As much as we all want Cavani to succeed, he is here because we are the mugs that were willing to pay the wages having been punted around all the top clubs.
Cavani can control a football unlike Lukaku.
 

Bobade

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2019
Messages
1,010
I'm not saying Cavani hasn't declined , but why do people make out any player over the age of 30 is basically walking about with a Zimmer frame?
 

trafford1980

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
244
Sigh.

Cavani coming in makes perfect sense.

He's a replacement for our fourth choice forward (Igahlo) who is leaving in January.

End of January is less than 4 months away.

Cavani can play wide-right in any sort of of 4-3-3 variation.

He also didn't cost us transfer fee, and his wages are much lower than any of his detractors will claim they are.

It also helps that he can mentor Pellistri, who counts him as an idol.

So we missed out on Jadon Sancho, but instead have 3 players coming in who can compete for the right-hand side attacking position.

This means Mason can move centrally, and alternate with Martial.
 

Glideman

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
406
Your thread makes no sense, Cavani is replacing Ighalo not Lukaku
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,434
Woodward is a Liverpool fan and is dismantling the club from within
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,629
Location
Sydney
a lot of what Ole says to the press is media-trained horse-shit, but it's his job

was obvious he wanted another attacker last summer (we bid for Dybala), but he didn't get one - the comments about developing our own are just putting on a positive spin on the fact we missed out on our targets, and it also helps big-up the young lads here too

trying to draw conclusions from it is futile
 

matsdf

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
605
If your plan is to develop a young striker, signing a veteran striker for rotation makes perfect sense.