If these deaths are still in the dozens next month then we can call it a mild second wave vis-a-vis Italy. However the people catching and testing positive now could wind up dead next month.More testing is going on in a day than back then in a week. The number of deaths is still on dozens per day, while in April it went to almost a thousand.
Of course it is bad and it is going to get worse before it gets better, but I do not think it is gonna be as bad as in spring (talking about the number of deaths and people in ICU, not the number of official infections).
It might be bad, and there might be another lockdowns but I would be surprised if it ever gets as bad as in last spring. Checking just the number of confirmed infections is totally pointless when the number of testings has increased so much since then. Back then, even with clear symptoms and potentially having been in contact with confirmed cases was not guaranteed to get a test, while now you can easily get a test without any symptoms at all.If these deaths are still in the dozens next month then we can call it a mild second wave vis-a-vis Italy. However the people catching and testing positive now could wind up dead next month.
Yes - I'm not saying it's not going to be necessary or useful.It also stops hospitals reaching maximum capacity, so reduces deaths.
But you are right, the government should have prepared better during the last lockdown.
who knows 10,000 to invite them to a wedding?
It’s utterly baffling. Even getting 1000 people for a normal couple would be an extremely heavy lift.who knows 10,000 to invite them to a wedding?
what are you hiding sparky?
Pretty good watch. Thanks for that.
How are Spanish population behaving in general?Pretty good watch. Thanks for that.
What it boils down to is Spain depends so much on tourism that the risk was deemed to be worth taking in opening up the country, which obviously failed big time and sending students back to school has basically caused this second outbreak to be so high which should of been avoided.
The jury is still out if they're trying their own model or if the government is as useless as suggested in the video. Whatever the reason Madrid was/is the epicenter and was left far too late to at least try and control the virus.
From 2 days ago we're back once again to all bars and restaurants being closed but I don't think it's going to reach the complete lockdown restrictions imposed at the start of the pandemic because basically Spain can't afford it.
In general the people are accepting the restrictions. No one (at least in barcelona) is going out without masks not only for their own safety but also because its impossible to go into shops, use public transport etc etc without them. There were demonstrations from people in the hospitality business but there were no reported problems.How are Spanish population behaving in general?
Is their rebellion or are people willing to accept the restrictions?
Deaths are far from the only issue as lots of people get long term problems and in any case the death rate will skyrocket if ICU's become over whelmed. And 3% of the UK's population is just shy of 2 million people. This is a health problem and should first and foremost be dealt with as such. The economic costs that entails should then be mitigated. You shouldn't start from the $ value and work back for ethical reason's imo. Overwhelmed hospitals will also prevent people with things like cancer getting the treatment so things would be worse, not better. And economically controlling the spread also makes sense.Oh we at least agree on the economy. It's completely fecked. We are in deep trouble. Let's be honest, it's like 97 or more percent of people recover from this virus. The statistics are out there in various places (too lazy to go find them now),. My problem is in light of that recovery rate, aren't the measures disproportionate when we consider the low percentage of deaths? The deaths are horrible, but unfortunately, apart from protecting the vulnerable as much as you can, the rest of us have to get on (with precautions), but we have to live.There are people out there with cancer snd other diseases who will most certainly die because they can't get treatment. I consider cancer to be far more deadly than this virus (as bad as it gets for a small percentage). I've been reading about suicides and mental health issues, and folks losing their livelihood on account of this lockdown. It's doing more harm than good. We need to have a balance. I suspect though the government is loving having such autonomy over our lives, not to mention awarding lucrative contracts to their cronies to supply equipment and handle track and trace, which is a bloody disaster.
It is a mess.
India has been forced to open up for economic reasons, curious how the numbers will look over the coming months.
All from a Tweet someone else shared earlier. The main site is here https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-global-data/ and there is more to be released every day this week.India has been forced to open up for economic reasons, curious how the numbers will look over the coming months.
Hopefully the lack of a severe winter keeps them low.
South Africa is in a somewhat similar boat.
UK and Spain have the dual hit of high deaths and a major contraction. Not sure if either country can take another quarter of contraction. The US actually hasn't done so terribly for a country of its size.
Thanks for sharing these charts wibble.
The fear is that massive under-reporting could be why their deaths looks so good. I hope not of course.India has been forced to open up for economic reasons, curious how the numbers will look over the coming months.
Even if the actual death count was 100% higher, it would still be very low. India is too chaotic a democracy with lots of independent media for the number to be a thousand % higher.The fear is that massive under-reporting could be why their deaths looks so good. I hope not of course.
I don't think you need to look for conspiracies on that one. India just has a very young population. Nearly half the population is 19 or under, who the CDC estimate have a 0.003% mortality risk. So if all of the 463m Indians aged 0-19 contracted the virus, you would "only" expect 13,886 to die. And if the 850m people under 49 (i.e. 83% of the population) contracted the virus the overall mortality figure would still be less than 100k. Those under 49 represent just 64% in the US, or 62% in the UK.The fear is that massive under-reporting could be why their deaths looks so good. I hope not of course.
I don't think anyone is suggesting a conspiracy. Just that a country the size of India with a large part of the population rural and poor may well have inconsistent reporting of covid deaths.I don't think you need to look for conspiracies on that one. India just has a very young population. Nearly half the population is 19 or under, who the CDC estimate have a 0.003% mortality risk. So if all of the 463m Indians aged 0-19 contracted the virus, you would "only" expect 13,886 to die. And if the 850m people under 49 (i.e. 83% of the population) contracted the virus the overall mortality figure would still be less than 100k. Those under 49 represent just 64% in the US, or 62% in the UK.
So even though a population 3x smaller, you would expect more people to die from covid there if it spread to the entire population. And because those under 70 represent just 3% of the Indian population vs. 11% of the US population, and then you add in the other risk factors like obesity etc., it's just the case that while the virus is spreading in a semi-controlled manner, the at-risk populations in India are much less likely to be exposed to it because they occupy a much smaller segment of society. Which theoretically should also make them easier to shield, but then you've got the cultural and economic factors working against that.
Yeah, it's surely a factor, but it is the case that India should have much fewer deaths than countries with similar numbers of cases, and we should expect that to maintain throughout the pandemic. The only way it wouldn't is if there was a massive health system collapse.I don't think anyone is suggesting a conspiracy. Just that a country the size of India with a large part of the population rural and poor may well have inconsistent reporting of covid deaths.
Totally agree with the point.. just pointing out that the data is from a 20 year old census.I don't think you need to look for conspiracies on that one. India just has a very young population. Nearly half the population is 19 or under, who the CDC estimate have a 0.003% mortality risk. So if all of the 463m Indians aged 0-19 contracted the virus, you would "only" expect 13,886 to die. And if the 850m people under 49 (i.e. 83% of the population) contracted the virus the overall mortality figure would still be less than 100k. Those under 49 represent just 64% in the US, or 62% in the UK.
We are currently at about 10% of Spring when you look at hospitalization and ICU figures, although it is rising quickly. I dont see it getting that bad again because the government is on top of it now, and crucially everybody still remembers March and accepts that sacrifices need to be made.More testing is going on in a day than back then in a week. The number of deaths is still on dozens per day, while in April it went to almost a thousand.
Of course it is bad and it is going to get worse before it gets better, but I do not think it is gonna be as bad as in spring (talking about the number of deaths and people in ICU, not the number of official infections).
Big callI dont see it getting that bad again because the government is on top of it now
Bloody socialist.With no vaccine, at some point the focus will have to be on the vulnerable, they (includes me!) will have to be isolated completely and everyone else get on with their lives.
Personally if the government will pay for me to have a Skysports with box office contract, sign me up to use Netflix, (at no cost) etc. get Sainsbury to deliver my food (I will pay for the food) and deliver my medication, then I will stay indoors (my garden when weather permits) until the vaccine is available.
Oh yes and if its possible, a new (free) widescreen wall mounted HD TV, with surround sound would be nice!
If you go on benefits you can get all of this, plus you’ll get a new iPhone.With no vaccine, at some point the focus will have to be on the vulnerable, they (includes me!) will have to be isolated completely and everyone else get on with their lives.
Personally if the government will pay for me to have a Skysports with box office contract, sign me up to use Netflix, (at no cost) etc. get Sainsbury to deliver my food (I will pay for the food) and deliver my medication, then I will stay indoors (my garden when weather permits) until the vaccine is available.
Oh yes and if its possible, a new (free) widescreen wall mounted HD TV, with surround sound would be nice!
... we'll keep the red flag flying here!...Bloody socialist.
Get a new house if he’s a forrownuhIf you go on benefits you can get all of this, plus you’ll get a new iPhone.
No
really? ...drat, just bought a new phone!If you go on benefits you can get all of this, plus you’ll get a new iPhone.
No
What makes you think there will be no vaccine. It is looking more and more like when rather than if.With no vaccine, at some point the focus will have to be on the vulnerable, they (includes me!) will have to be isolated completely and everyone else get on with their lives.
Personally if the government will pay for me to have a Skysports with box office contract, sign me up to use Netflix, (at no cost) etc. get Sainsbury to deliver my food (I will pay for the food) and deliver my medication, then I will stay indoors (my garden when weather permits) until the vaccine is available.
Oh yes and if its possible, a new (free) widescreen wall mounted HD TV, with surround sound would be nice!
I swear I have reached the point in this thread when I know who the poster is without checking the usernameWhat makes you think there will be no vaccine. It is looking more and more like when rather than if.
Pfizer is mass producing a vaccine about 10km from my home as we speak. They hope it'll get approved fast. Fingers crossed.What makes you think there will be no vaccine. It is looking more and more like when rather than if.