Chelsea 2020/21 - General discussion

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
You do have your Lampard now so.....

Its weird Chelsea fans only tag me after they've won asking if I have change my stance :lol:
If we're still looking this defensively shit when (a) Mendy and Silva are in and (b) the rest of the league have sorted themselves out (meaning we can't hide behind no pre season rust anymore) then I won't lie, I will start getting worried and probably veer on the side of we need a replacement to ultimately strike the next level.

People may say (a) is just a convenient excuse but look at Villa, second worst defense last season now all of a sudden have the best, which do you think is more likely, Martinez has made a huge difference or Dean Smith has suddenly become a good defensive coach?
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
I honestly think if we can just manage to not be absolutely terrible defensively we can achieve something this season - the attack will take us places as long as we can improve from utterly calamitous to meh or below average defensively.
 
Last edited:

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
I honestly if we can just manage to not be absolutely terrible defensively we can achieve something this season - the attack will take us places as long as we can improve from utterly calamitous to meh or below average defensively.
As i said above the Villa transformation with Martinez combined with the (all be it small) early sample size of Mendy and Silva gives me hope. Hopefully there's no more hitches with Mendy's fitness because it appears Kepa has (frightenly) got even worse.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
As i said above the Villa transformation with Martinez combined with the (all be it small) early sample size of Mendy and Silva gives me hope. Hopefully there's no more hitches with Mendy's fitness because it appears Kepa has (frightenly) got even worse.
We had one game with the preferred back 5 and we won 4-0. Granted Palace didn't attack us a whole lot but it was an extremely assured defensive performance and I felt relatively safe.

We just need to not be comically bad defensively tbh. The attack will carry us far if we stop throwing away games we no business dropping points in - we have scored 3 goals or more in 4 out of 5 games so far. We've only won 2 of those 4, that's unacceptable and a complete waste of all the good work the attack is doing.
 

Mb194dc

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
4,636
Supports
Chelsea
As i said above the Villa transformation with Martinez combined with the (all be it small) early sample size of Mendy and Silva gives me hope. Hopefully there's no more hitches with Mendy's fitness because it appears Kepa has (frightenly) got even worse.
Kepa should have been loaned out, heads gone playing for us. Big mistake in the window to keep him.

Willy needs to start if Mendy not fit and in January Kepa must be loaned out, go try rebuild his career away from Chelsea.
 

Mount's Goatieson

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
545
Supports
Chelsea
But coincidentally all these "stupid" posts seem to happen at the exact time you view a thread and always involve you in some way shape or form.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Its so obvious isn't it? Doesn't agree with what you say.....shit poster!!
When he/she gets called out for his/her own shitty posts....no “youre a shit poster...you prove it with every post” rinse repeat comment.
You'd be forgiven to think its a bot account. Maybe programmed to scout oppo opinions incompatible with top-redness.
 
Last edited:

Mount's Goatieson

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
545
Supports
Chelsea
I think they are mostly laughing to be honest. But don't worry I am pretty sure the turning will start soon if results don't improve. Hopefully by this weekend? Even if you win it proves nothing though. Still hot and cold. Luckily for you guys no one is getting their act together.
I love posts like this. Covering all bases right? If we win it proves nothing about Lampard and our team, but if you win I guess it proves Ole is.....what exactly? United are better perhaps?
 

Listar

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
1,147
I love posts like this. Covering all bases right? If we win it proves nothing about Lampard and our team, but if you win I guess it proves Ole is.....what exactly? United are better perhaps?
Same... proves nothing for Ole.
The proof is in the results for a few matches, not on one match.
 

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,515
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
I personally do not see Chelsea improving much unless Lampard changes his tactics that he has been using for the past two plus years. People keep pointing to individual errors but the reason this is happening is due to the way Lampard leaves his defence completely exposed to the counter attack and seems incapable of setting up a defence at set pieces (in particular I think his comment a couple of months back about how he and the old Chelsea guard would 'sort it out amongst ourselves' when defending set pieces was very telling.)

For me, watching the amount of space between midfield and defence with simple through balls is the reason why Chelsea are conceeding so much. For sure, the CB's and GK aren't great but when they are constantly being left exposed by the midfield, individual errors are going to happen and get worse as it knocks their confidence.

Here is an example of what I am talking about:

Why Chelsea gave up their lead so meekly

https://theathletic.com/2144166/2020/10/18/chelsea-southampton-premier-league/

Long before it arrived in the 92nd minute, Southampton’s equaliser felt inevitable. Pinned back by a combination of Ralph Hasenhuttl’s high press and their own mistakes, Chelsea had conceded a steady stream of good chances prior to Jannik Vestergaard glancing Theo Walcott’s shot just inside Kepa Arrizabalaga’s far post. Nine of the visitors’ 13 shots came in the second half, six of them from inside the box, four of which found the target.
This isn’t a new problem for Chelsea under Frank Lampard; 15 of the 54 Premier League goals they conceded last season hit the net between minutes 76 and 90, giving them the third-worst late-game defensive record in the division, behind only Aston Villa (18) and relegated Norwich City (17). There were eight matches in which they failed to win after scoring first, yielding six draws and two defeats.
After the game, Lampard highlighted costly individual errors that made Southampton’s fightback possible, but there were also broader structural issues that set the stage for the visitors’ dominance in the second half at Stamford Bridge, and a failure of game management on the touchline as well as on the pitch. The Athletic went back through the footage to tell the story of another Chelsea masterclass in self-destruction.
53 minutes: Early in the second half it’s clear Southampton have set their stall out to try to dictate the direction of Chelsea’s play. Walcott and Nathan Redmond push up alongside Danny Ings and Che Adams to form a high wall of pressure in front of Jorginho, who has slotted in between Kurt Zouma and Andreas Christensen. Southampton are determined not to let their opponents build through the middle of the pitch, and any pass to N’Golo Kante is rendered far too risky.
Jorginho ultimately plays it to Zouma and the ball finds Ben Chilwell by the touchline. Timo Werner drops deep to offer a passing option, but James Ward-Prowse easily intercepts the attempt to find the Germany international. Southampton are on the front foot, and Chelsea’s midfield has been taken out of the game. This will become a recurring theme during the second half.
54 minutes: Cesar Azpilicueta is forced to foul Redmond just inside his own half after passing the ball straight to him. Ryan Bertrand floats the subsequent free kick to the far post, where Kai Havertz competes well in the air against Vestergaard but can’t clear the danger.
Neither can Zouma or Christian Pulisic, and the passage of play ends with Ings working a decent shooting chance just outside the box and firing wide.
56-57 minutes: Southampton work the ball around Chelsea’s own half-hearted press to the right touchline, where Kyle Walker-Peters shapes to play a pass inside towards Ward-Prowse. Jorginho recognises what is happening and moves to intercept…
… but he can’t get there in time, and Ward-Prowse whips a first-time pass over the top of Chelsea’s defence:
Zouma, under pressure from Adams, makes it clear from his body shape that he’s playing a pass back to Kepa. The ball is at an awkward height but provided he makes a solid contact, it shouldn’t matter. In the middle, Christensen has allowed Ings to drift a few yards in front of him, while Azpilicueta isn’t particularly worried:
The pass is scuffed, forcing Kepa to dash and slide in to make sure he gets there ahead of Adams. If he clears or smothers it, the danger is gone. If he doesn’t, the position that Christensen has allowed Ings to drift into means there will be big trouble:
Kepa somehow completely misses the ball. Christensen makes a brilliant recovery slide to prevent Adams from giving Ings a tap-in, but the ball is still live. Kepa flies back towards his own post but fails to clear again. Zouma has completely stopped, seemingly still hoping that one of his team-mates can redeem his initial mistake.
Only when Adams is pulling his foot back to shoot does Zouma attempt to get involved again, and by then it’s too late. The shot beats Kepa and Azpilicueta on the line:
71 minutes: A nice team move finished by Havertz almost immediately restored Chelsea’s lead, but they aren’t managing it well. Here, six blue shirts are in the Southampton half, none applying any pressure to Vestergaard as he winds up a long diagonal pass that will take them all out of the game:
Chilwell wins the header, but the result is a four-versus-four situation while Kante and Jorginho scramble to recover. With a one-goal lead, this type of situation simply shouldn’t be allowed to happen.
78 minutes: Lampard has made only one substitution, replacing Mount with Hakim Ziyech and sticking with 4-2-3-1, despite growing evidence that Jorginho and Kante are being overrun. Another header from Chilwell is brought down in the visiting midfield. Jorginho rushes forward to press Oriol Romeu but is easily sidestepped, opening an avenue to a relatively straightforward pass through to Walcott…
… and once again, Chelsea’s entire midfield and attack are bypassed, leaving Walcott free to drive at Lampard’s defence in another four-versus-four situation. He finds Adams, who shoots wide from the angle.
81 minutes: Chilwell has the ball on the left touchline again and, with Kante and Jorginho in no position to present a passing option, he elects to go long towards Werner. It worked in the first half, when Chelsea were able to turn Southampton’s defenders and get Werner running through on goal…
… but on this occasion there isn’t enough on the pass to get it over Vestergaard, and Werner has no chance of winning an aerial duel. Possession is cheaply lost and, seconds later, Jan Bednarek is allowed to advance into the Chelsea half. Walcott has taken up a great position between Chilwell, Kante and Pulisic:
The ball finds him, he drives into the box and crosses low for Ings, who is able to force a save out of Kepa:
85 minutes: Southampton’s press is relentless and Chelsea’s passing is getting more passive. Having just received the ball from Jorginho, Christensen tries to go back to him with Ings and Adams in close attendance. He manages to scramble it clear — just:
87 minutes: Lampard has finally moved to shore things up, bringing on Reece James for Pulisic and shifting to 4-3-3, but Chelsea continue to gift Southampton the ball. Azpilicueta tries to free Werner with a first-time ball over the top via his weaker left foot, but it hangs in the air and Bednarek easily takes it away:
90+1 minutes: After a panicky head-tennis sequence in Chelsea’s defensive third, the ball rolls kindly out to Ziyech. He has a relatively simple pass to free fellow substitute Tammy Abraham and Havertz, who are primed for a counterattack. Instead he plays it straight to Ibrahima Diallo:
Southampton almost immediately launch the ball towards Chelsea’s right-back position. James, eager to provide cover, dashes to deal with it but only succeeds in blocking off Bertrand. A free kick is given:
90+2 minutes: Havertz is once again stationed towards the back post, standing behind Walcott…
… but when Bertrand swings in the cross, Walcott is able to find space simply by standing still. Havertz runs away from him, Zouma heads the ball to him, and Vestergaard glances his shot inside Kepa’s far post:
“In the second half I wouldn’t blame the shape of the team, more that we didn’t deal with the fact that Southampton were really keen to put us under pressure in their own half,” Lampard said. “We wanted to miss out their press, we didn’t do enough and that meant we turned the ball over in our own half, which irrespective of shape is always a problem.
“There is certainly a game management element of it. We want to have a lead and see it off. We turn over the ball that led to the free kick and then it is about the second balls. There are a lot of elements that led to it, you can recreate that in training and talk about it a lot but it is very disappointing when it happens.”
Lampard is generally good at diagnosing the nature of Chelsea’s defensive problems after the fact, which makes the lack of improvement all the more puzzling. Last season yielded 54 goals conceded, the worst defensive record of the Roman Abramovich era. Five matches into 2020-21, they are on course to let in 68.
Unless that trend changes markedly, it’s hard to see how this expensively-assembled team — or their manager — can possibly meet significantly raised expectations.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
I'm reading he's coming back as an emergency 4th choice so he's probably not that keen on it but is prepared to help out if it truly comes to it.

If he's actually serious about playing again and he's still at a similar level to what he was post retirement he'd probably be our number 2 within weeks.
 

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,515
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
I'm reading he's coming back as an emergency 4th choice so he's probably not that keen on it but is prepared to help out if it truly comes to it.

If he's actually serious about playing again and he's still at a similar level to what he was post retirement he'd probably be our number 2 within weeks.
I would say once fit, he is Chelsea's number two after watching Kepa and Willy C playing for the past 15 months.
 

Mount's Goatieson

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
545
Supports
Chelsea
I personally do not see Chelsea improving much unless Lampard changes his tactics that he has been using for the past two plus years. People keep pointing to individual errors but the reason this is happening is due to the way Lampard leaves his defence completely exposed to the counter attack and seems incapable of setting up a defence at set pieces (in particular I think his comment a couple of months back about how he and the old Chelsea guard would 'sort it out amongst ourselves' when defending set pieces was very telling.)

For me, watching the amount of space between midfield and defence with simple through balls is the reason why Chelsea are conceeding so much. For sure, the CB's and GK aren't great but when they are constantly being left exposed by the midfield, individual errors are going to happen and get worse as it knocks their confidence.

Here is an example of what I am talking about:

Why Chelsea gave up their lead so meekly

https://theathletic.com/2144166/2020/10/18/chelsea-southampton-premier-league/

Long before it arrived in the 92nd minute, Southampton’s equaliser felt inevitable. Pinned back by a combination of Ralph Hasenhuttl’s high press and their own mistakes, Chelsea had conceded a steady stream of good chances prior to Jannik Vestergaard glancing Theo Walcott’s shot just inside Kepa Arrizabalaga’s far post. Nine of the visitors’ 13 shots came in the second half, six of them from inside the box, four of which found the target.
This isn’t a new problem for Chelsea under Frank Lampard; 15 of the 54 Premier League goals they conceded last season hit the net between minutes 76 and 90, giving them the third-worst late-game defensive record in the division, behind only Aston Villa (18) and relegated Norwich City (17). There were eight matches in which they failed to win after scoring first, yielding six draws and two defeats.
After the game, Lampard highlighted costly individual errors that made Southampton’s fightback possible, but there were also broader structural issues that set the stage for the visitors’ dominance in the second half at Stamford Bridge, and a failure of game management on the touchline as well as on the pitch. The Athletic went back through the footage to tell the story of another Chelsea masterclass in self-destruction.
53 minutes: Early in the second half it’s clear Southampton have set their stall out to try to dictate the direction of Chelsea’s play. Walcott and Nathan Redmond push up alongside Danny Ings and Che Adams to form a high wall of pressure in front of Jorginho, who has slotted in between Kurt Zouma and Andreas Christensen. Southampton are determined not to let their opponents build through the middle of the pitch, and any pass to N’Golo Kante is rendered far too risky.
Jorginho ultimately plays it to Zouma and the ball finds Ben Chilwell by the touchline. Timo Werner drops deep to offer a passing option, but James Ward-Prowse easily intercepts the attempt to find the Germany international. Southampton are on the front foot, and Chelsea’s midfield has been taken out of the game. This will become a recurring theme during the second half.
54 minutes: Cesar Azpilicueta is forced to foul Redmond just inside his own half after passing the ball straight to him. Ryan Bertrand floats the subsequent free kick to the far post, where Kai Havertz competes well in the air against Vestergaard but can’t clear the danger.
Neither can Zouma or Christian Pulisic, and the passage of play ends with Ings working a decent shooting chance just outside the box and firing wide.
56-57 minutes: Southampton work the ball around Chelsea’s own half-hearted press to the right touchline, where Kyle Walker-Peters shapes to play a pass inside towards Ward-Prowse. Jorginho recognises what is happening and moves to intercept…
… but he can’t get there in time, and Ward-Prowse whips a first-time pass over the top of Chelsea’s defence:
Zouma, under pressure from Adams, makes it clear from his body shape that he’s playing a pass back to Kepa. The ball is at an awkward height but provided he makes a solid contact, it shouldn’t matter. In the middle, Christensen has allowed Ings to drift a few yards in front of him, while Azpilicueta isn’t particularly worried:
The pass is scuffed, forcing Kepa to dash and slide in to make sure he gets there ahead of Adams. If he clears or smothers it, the danger is gone. If he doesn’t, the position that Christensen has allowed Ings to drift into means there will be big trouble:
Kepa somehow completely misses the ball. Christensen makes a brilliant recovery slide to prevent Adams from giving Ings a tap-in, but the ball is still live. Kepa flies back towards his own post but fails to clear again. Zouma has completely stopped, seemingly still hoping that one of his team-mates can redeem his initial mistake.
Only when Adams is pulling his foot back to shoot does Zouma attempt to get involved again, and by then it’s too late. The shot beats Kepa and Azpilicueta on the line:
71 minutes: A nice team move finished by Havertz almost immediately restored Chelsea’s lead, but they aren’t managing it well. Here, six blue shirts are in the Southampton half, none applying any pressure to Vestergaard as he winds up a long diagonal pass that will take them all out of the game:
Chilwell wins the header, but the result is a four-versus-four situation while Kante and Jorginho scramble to recover. With a one-goal lead, this type of situation simply shouldn’t be allowed to happen.
78 minutes: Lampard has made only one substitution, replacing Mount with Hakim Ziyech and sticking with 4-2-3-1, despite growing evidence that Jorginho and Kante are being overrun. Another header from Chilwell is brought down in the visiting midfield. Jorginho rushes forward to press Oriol Romeu but is easily sidestepped, opening an avenue to a relatively straightforward pass through to Walcott…
… and once again, Chelsea’s entire midfield and attack are bypassed, leaving Walcott free to drive at Lampard’s defence in another four-versus-four situation. He finds Adams, who shoots wide from the angle.
81 minutes: Chilwell has the ball on the left touchline again and, with Kante and Jorginho in no position to present a passing option, he elects to go long towards Werner. It worked in the first half, when Chelsea were able to turn Southampton’s defenders and get Werner running through on goal…
… but on this occasion there isn’t enough on the pass to get it over Vestergaard, and Werner has no chance of winning an aerial duel. Possession is cheaply lost and, seconds later, Jan Bednarek is allowed to advance into the Chelsea half. Walcott has taken up a great position between Chilwell, Kante and Pulisic:
The ball finds him, he drives into the box and crosses low for Ings, who is able to force a save out of Kepa:
85 minutes: Southampton’s press is relentless and Chelsea’s passing is getting more passive. Having just received the ball from Jorginho, Christensen tries to go back to him with Ings and Adams in close attendance. He manages to scramble it clear — just:
87 minutes: Lampard has finally moved to shore things up, bringing on Reece James for Pulisic and shifting to 4-3-3, but Chelsea continue to gift Southampton the ball. Azpilicueta tries to free Werner with a first-time ball over the top via his weaker left foot, but it hangs in the air and Bednarek easily takes it away:
90+1 minutes: After a panicky head-tennis sequence in Chelsea’s defensive third, the ball rolls kindly out to Ziyech. He has a relatively simple pass to free fellow substitute Tammy Abraham and Havertz, who are primed for a counterattack. Instead he plays it straight to Ibrahima Diallo:
Southampton almost immediately launch the ball towards Chelsea’s right-back position. James, eager to provide cover, dashes to deal with it but only succeeds in blocking off Bertrand. A free kick is given:
90+2 minutes: Havertz is once again stationed towards the back post, standing behind Walcott…
… but when Bertrand swings in the cross, Walcott is able to find space simply by standing still. Havertz runs away from him, Zouma heads the ball to him, and Vestergaard glances his shot inside Kepa’s far post:
“In the second half I wouldn’t blame the shape of the team, more that we didn’t deal with the fact that Southampton were really keen to put us under pressure in their own half,” Lampard said. “We wanted to miss out their press, we didn’t do enough and that meant we turned the ball over in our own half, which irrespective of shape is always a problem.
“There is certainly a game management element of it. We want to have a lead and see it off. We turn over the ball that led to the free kick and then it is about the second balls. There are a lot of elements that led to it, you can recreate that in training and talk about it a lot but it is very disappointing when it happens.”
Lampard is generally good at diagnosing the nature of Chelsea’s defensive problems after the fact, which makes the lack of improvement all the more puzzling. Last season yielded 54 goals conceded, the worst defensive record of the Roman Abramovich era. Five matches into 2020-21, they are on course to let in 68.
Unless that trend changes markedly, it’s hard to see how this expensively-assembled team — or their manager — can possibly meet significantly raised expectations.
Decent read and I agree about the defence - midfield problem. Its one of the more glaring tactical issues we have with Franks setup. I was thinking it's more of a personnel issue hence his desire to get Declan Rice in there as Jorginho is the most physical and mobile player out there which leaves our defence at risk of exposure with every turn over in attack. Hopefully he finds a way around it as the season progresses.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
Another solid defensive display with the Silva and Mendy axis, even with Zouma not having his best game we didn't look in much danger of conceding. Early days but I'm very confident they (alongside Chilwell) will transform us at the back, vital they stay fit, especially Mendy.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
I would say once fit, he is Chelsea's number two after watching Kepa and Willy C playing for the past 15 months.
Thinking about it again now I think that might be what actually being planned.

I forgot we'd be able to register another keeper if we lose two of them (when we lost Cech and Cudicini we signed and registered Hedman outside the window) so if Cech really was an emergency option we wouldn't even need to register him at this point.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
Another solid defensive display with the Silva and Mendy axis, even with Zouma not having his best game we didn't look in much danger of conceding. Early days but I'm very confident they (alongside Chilwell) will transform us at the back, vital they stay fit, especially Mendy.
Christensen would be getting pelters if he played like Zouma tonight. Let's be honest.

I do agree though. We did seem overly cautious at times but a clean sheet is something to build on. Didnt give Sevilla anything, albeit we didn't create anything of note either.
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,568
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
Christensen would be getting pelters if he played like Zouma tonight. Let's be honest.

I do agree though. We did seem overly cautious at times but a clean sheet is something to build on. Didnt give Sevilla anything, albeit we didn't create anything of note either.
Difference is Christensen can't do what Zouma did in the air. He was key to stopping De Jong. That said, I had a heart attack every time he received the ball given how high Sevilla were pressing.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,011
Location
Dublin
You have troll better than that now, come on.
Don't worry that'll come when Ole schools Frank the weekend. Seriously though, poor result again for Chelsea tonight after spending a billion on attacking players over the summer.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
Difference is Christensen can't do what Zouma did in the air. He was key to stopping De Jong. That said, I had a heart attack every time he received the ball given how high Sevilla were pressing.
That's true, I'm just saying I have felt Christensen gets unfairly targeted even when he's not the biggest culprit, as he did after the Southampton game.

Yeah we struggled to keep possession for long stretches but Zouma and Kante in particular look very vulnerable when pressed.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
Don't worry that'll come when Ole schools Frank the weekend. Seriously though, poor result again for Chelsea tonight after spending a billion on attacking players over the summer.
I don't think it was a poor result - might have been a very cautious approach but people cried out for defensive structure after the weekend, so that's what we got. The aim is to find a balance. Lampard is struggling with that at the minute but I'm hopeful he'll find it soon.
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,568
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
Don't worry that'll come when Ole schools Frank the weekend. Seriously though, poor result again for Chelsea tonight after spending a billion on attacking players over the summer.
It's really not that bad, a poor result would be getting turned over at home, especially considering the other match was a draw as well. Quite happy to get a point out of a tricky fixture when the first choice back 5 has only just finished its second match together.

That's true, I'm just saying I have felt Christensen gets unfairly targeted even when he's not the biggest culprit, as he did after the Southampton game.

Yeah we struggled to keep possession for long stretches but Zouma and Kante in particular look very vulnerable when pressed.
Yeah agreed, there's a weird animosity towards him. Probably because his brainfarts are so glaring when they occur but his good performances are more subtle.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
If you've got the space, you may as well use it. If our squad wasn't bloated and we had the option to name Carrick despite zero possibility of him playing, I'd take it.
I mean I don't know what shape Cech is in - he's been retired for 18 months - but the idea that we might play him in an actual competitive game is mental. He's likely just an insurance policy in case something absolutely bonkers happens to the other 3 keepers.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
Yeah agreed, there's a weird animosity towards him. Probably because his brainfarts are so glaring when they occur but his good performances are more subtle.
They aren't any more glaring than Zouma's at the weekend, but its possible that people have an easier time forgiving Zouma since he offsets his shortcomings with incredible athleticism and lightening quick speed.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
Frustrated to the point where you want to top yourself.
I think we might have done that to them tbh :lol:

They played well, dominated possession without creating anything. It was more of a defensive approach from Chelsea.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
I mean I don't know what shape Cech is in - he's been retired for 18 months - but the idea that we might play him in an actual competitive game is mental. He's likely just an insurance policy in case something absolutely bonkers happens to the other 3 keepers.
I initially thought that but then why did we register him? If we lose two keepers we'd have been entitled to an emergency keeper (as i said like when we signed Magnus Hedman in 2006). I think if Mendy is out again Lampard's going to think "feck it".
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,568
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
Haven't seen any highlights... Did Chelsea get Sevillaed?
Pretty drab game. Think it was about 0.5 xG each. Sevilla had one nice volley directly from a corner that went over by about a foot and a half and that was about it. Definitely the better team in the first half, and I thought Chelsea edged it in the second.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
I think we might have done that to them tbh :lol:

They played well, dominated possession without creating anything. It was more of a defensive approach from Chelsea.
I read about Lopetegui's time at Real and comparisons with LVG's United were drawn, you can see why from his teams performance tonight.