Premier league matches to be shown on PPV basis via BT and Sky

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,515
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
Reminds me of when Sky used to have a channel called Prem Plus,you could buy games individually for reasonable price or invest in a season ticket to cover them all for around £60
Yeah, I remember this too. People seem to be forgetting that we had PPV PL games before. Not saying that people should be happy with paying £15 a pop, but rather that the PL/SKY have sold PPV PL games before.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,062
Location
Where the grass is greener.
Prem Plus was back when they showed less games on tv though, I seem to remember. We've now got used to having a certain amount, rightly or wrongly, so now being asked to pay for them is a bit like.....no thank you.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,163
Saw today that there is one game on BT, one game on Sky, and two on PPV. What an absolute fecking joke this has become.

The worst thing? If you do fork out the ridiculous amounts of money to watch football, you are bombarded with an unholy amount of adverts too. Half time consists of MAYBE 30 seconds of “analysis” padded with multiple massive advert breaks. When you are already paying stupid money for the subscriptions.

The model in this country has to change. The bubble has to burst at some point surely?
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
It's gone from sky having their "friday night football" to now showing it on PPV, aren't we lucky! so nice of them.

They'll just show less and less from now on and expect extra from PPV sales. if it continues like this i'll cancel the whole lot and just stick to finding streams or other ways around it.

We already pay SO much more than other countries for our TV packages and they want to add £15 a game on top :lol:
 

McGrathsipan

Dawn’s less famous husband
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
24,672
Location
Dublin
Saw today that there is one game on BT, one game on Sky, and two on PPV. What an absolute fecking joke this has become.

The worst thing? If you do fork out the ridiculous amounts of money to watch football, you are bombarded with an unholy amount of adverts too. Half time consists of MAYBE 30 seconds of “analysis” padded with multiple massive advert breaks. When you are already paying stupid money for the subscriptions.

The model in this country has to change. The bubble has to burst at some point surely?
it will never burst if people keep paying.

Adverts on a PPV is like them knowing they have you by the balls for paying and giving them a good hard twist as well.

Cutns
 

Wedge

Full Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2012
Messages
3,079
Location
Various fields
Supports
a soft spot for Ajax
I had sky ring me just before the game and trying to get me to sign up (never had
or never will have sky), told me about the great sports package, then subtly dropped in the new ppv, I proceeded to tell them I've been watching illegal streams in great quality for years and I I'm not paying for sky. In the end the guy tried to question my morals on illegal streaming, so I asked where skys morals on charging 100 pound for sky then 15 for ppv games, he went quiet.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,385
I reckon if that has done £5 there would have still been outrage but much more buys

Glad something good has come with a lot of donations to charity on the back of the greed
 

saintquin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
198
Supports
Southampton, Harlequins
I swear we've got less games than normal on non-ppv here?
What they really should have is PPV over the internet for a fiver. That would be really good. 55 games a season would equal 275 euros. Which is a hell of a lot cheaper than the 900 i pay sky yearly.

All i want to watch is Man Utd and nothing else.
Don't know if my point here has been made already, but.
You're lucky in the fact you support Man Utd with the amount they're on Sky/BT in the normal manner.
Us fans of clubs who only get shown the minimal amount they have to show teams will pay a lot more for PPV over a season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jippy

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
100,976
Location
Barrow In Furness
Don't know if my point here has been made already, but.
You're lucky in the fact you support Man Utd with the amount they're on Sky/BT in the normal manner.
Us fans of clubs who only get shown the minimal amount they have to show teams will pay a lot more for PPV over a season.
Agree with you about that some fans will be fleeced mercilessly. Even Mike Ashley has said they are charging too much. I still think when they organise the TV schedule for later in the season a lot of the big teams will miraculously appear on PPV.
 

saintquin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
198
Supports
Southampton, Harlequins
Agree with you about that some fans will be fleeced mercilessly. Even Mike Ashley has said they are charging too much. I still think when they organise the TV schedule for later in the season a lot of the big teams will miraculously appear on PPV.
You could be and probably are correct with that.
Though the whole thing is just wrong, I think that would fairer to us fans that support the none big clubs!
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
Do we have any figures yet to see how many mugs, I mean people, have been paying for these extra games?
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,385
Agree with you about that some fans will be fleeced mercilessly. Even Mike Ashley has said they are charging too much. I still think when they organise the TV schedule for later in the season a lot of the big teams will miraculously appear on PPV.
You know things are bad when Mike Ashley is calling you greedy.
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,639
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
Talks on bringing it down to a 10er just moss the whole point of why people are refusing.

Its a time when people are losing their jobs and they've decided to recind showing the extra games for free and charge for them. In a normal season where those games aren't on TV this move may well be welcomed, but at the moment asking for more and more money is a joke.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
Do we have any figures yet to see how many mugs, I mean people, have been paying for these extra games?
Saw somewhere Newcastle v Manutd had 40,000 (PPV) viewers and Manutd v Chelsea had 1.4m (Sky)
 

Nero

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
3,287
I just hope people don't fall for the clear strategy of:

-Deliberately overcharge
-Wait for fan outrage
-Reduce price
-Fans lap it up
-Profit
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,666
I just hope people don't fall for the clear strategy of:

-Deliberately overcharge
-Wait for fan outrage
-Reduce price
-Fans lap it up
-Profit
Exactly this. There is a captive audience currently who can't really go to a pub to watch it (I know some people are but numbers are way down), you obviously can't go to any stadiums and it's even hard to watch it round friends' houses. This will remain and then they'll offer some kind of festive period package that we'll all lap up, they'll show one game per club for free or something and then back to the extortionate prices.

Can someone just hire a drone with a HD video camera and fly around OT for us to login and watch next game ;)
 

Guy Incognito

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
17,766
Location
Somewhere
These were the figures that floated around Twitter:

-Newcastle vs Man Utd; 40k
-Leicester vs Aston Villa; 20k
-Liverpool vs Sheff Utd; 110k
-Arsenal vs Leicester; 140k

Household numbers:
-Newcastle vs Man Utd; 30k
-Leicester vs Aston Villa; 20k
-Liverpool vs Sheff Utd; 60k
-Arsenal vs Leicester; 70k
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
These were the figures that floated around Twitter:

-Newcastle vs Man Utd; 40k
-Leicester vs Aston Villa; 20k
-Liverpool vs Sheff Utd; 110k
-Arsenal vs Leicester; 140k

Household numbers:
-Newcastle vs Man Utd; 30k
-Leicester vs Aston Villa; 20k
-Liverpool vs Sheff Utd; 60k
-Arsenal vs Leicester; 70k
Wow clearly lots of people have way more disposable income than I do!
 

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,325
Location
UK
I just hope people don't fall for the clear strategy of:

-Deliberately overcharge
-Wait for fan outrage
-Reduce price
-Fans lap it up
-Profit
Eh, I’d be ok with it for a fair price, as long as it means we can watch games that otherwise wouldn’t have been on TV. Really, every game should be available to everyone.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,766
Eh, I’d be ok with it for a fair price, as long as it means we can watch games that otherwise wouldn’t have been on TV. Really, every game should be available to everyone.
This is the part that’s catching people though, we don’t know what is the next schedule, we’ll see when the derbies are going to miraculously not have been on tv anyway even though they’ve been super Sunday’s for the last twenty years.
 

saintquin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
198
Supports
Southampton, Harlequins
So an average of £550-600k per game? I have no idea about the operating costs etc but that sounds like a success to me. Cnuts.
That's the thing. They would have had cameras at the grounds anyway. Now they want us to pay for something they are already getting paid for by television companies all around the world!
 

Untd55

Full Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
1,516
This is the part that’s catching people though, we don’t know what is the next schedule, we’ll see when the derbies are going to miraculously not have been on tv anyway even though they’ve been super Sunday’s for the last twenty years.
Yep, they have already done it with Leicester v Arsenal, which would definitely have been picked by BT or Sky last season. It is a bad sign of things to come.

I wouldn't bother cancelling my subscription normally, but if they start removing these type of games, then it will be time for everyone to cancel.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,766
Yep, they have already done it with Leicester v Arsenal, which would definitely have been picked by BT or Sky last season. It is a bad sign of things to come.

I wouldn't bother cancelling my subscription normally, but if they start removing these type of games, then it will be time for everyone to cancel.
I actually started writing that :lol: But then didn’t bother. I agree with you
 

Spark

Full Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
2,248
The fan initiatives of donating the price they’d pay to food banks is the truly damaging part to the Premier League. Will cost more than £500k in the long run if that campaign gathers proper momentum (which it can).

Combined with Rashford’s initiative and they’re truly on the wrong side of the fence. Even got Mike Ashley saying it’s a shit idea now.

Be ironic if Manchester United’s striker who has been lauded as a hero by the club speaks out against the £15 PPV that was blatantly an idea from the Project Big Picture cabal.
 

billdrama

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
41
An average of 39k is better than I expected to be honest - although I'm not sure it brings in enough money to be worth the bad PR.

I guess the other point is there's a big disparity between the lower performing games and those performing well. The more popular teams are generally on Sky/BT more anyway and it's the Fulham V West Brom type game that will bring it down.

Also worth noting average doesn't include Brighton V West Brom from yesterdya which you'd expect to be pretty low.
 

Shane88

Actually Nostradamus
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
35,173
Location
Targaryen loyalist
The bad PR will die down. It'll just be accepted in 2-3 months.

That's all companies need to do these days, ride out the week or two of rage on Twitter before everyone moves on to the next thing that upsets them.
 

billdrama

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
41
Liverpool and Manchester United aren't on PPV again before international break so you'd expect average to probably fall in that time (unless large numbers of people previously boycotting relent.)
 

billdrama

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
41
I wonder how the lower-profile clubs who aren't getting large PPV numbers at all will feel about the scheme continuing. It's really just illustrating how certain teams pull in high viewing numbers and others don't which they might not think it in their interests to continue. I don't think they've decided how to divide the money up yet which might play a part - if the money isn't divided equally between the 20 teams but goes to the two teams directly involved in the match for instance then a team like Fulham are going to earn very little from it (I'd imagine their games against Sheff Utd and Palace are two of the matches to have had less than 10,000 and their game against West Brom early evening next Monday likely to be another one.)
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,841
As I feared the United v Newcastle game got close to 100 000 subscriptions and the average overall is around 39 000 per game which is what the Premier League were aiming for .

I knew United fans would be stupid enough to pay for this and this will just continue until it becomes the norm
 

the_answer

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
104
As a fan from Germany.
I've read some news about this and I'm utterly shocked...

You guys pay the highest ticket prices, the highest Sky/BTV prices and now are asked to pay 15quid!!! for PPV?
Surely the only answer is to not buy a season ticket, not pay for sky anymore and definitely never to pay for the PPV?

Its economics really and if we never push back against the corporations we'd always be the ones to get fleeced.

So I'm really wondering, why do our fellow british fans accept this situation that in germany would just lead to boycotts. (In a bigger sense that's what we should do with United as well, just simply boycott, but that's my personal opinion)
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,289
As I feared the United v Newcastle game got close to 100 000 subscriptions and the average overall is around 39 000 per game which is what the Premier League were aiming for .

I knew United fans would be stupid enough to pay for this and this will just continue until it becomes the norm
If i could get every United game PPV, CL included for a fiver, it would be a good deal.

Not such a good deal at 17 euros agreed.