Solskjær press conference vs Le Arse (H)
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
We did just that against newcastle.
standard
What the feck are you talking about? Win our game in hand and we're 3 points off the top.
He may or may not be a cnut. But then if someone goes on an Ole press conference thread for a game against Arsenal and keep saying "Look at Mou", then it is because they can't get their heads out of Jose's a**, even after he stopped stinking up this place ages ago.
Already taking one hand off the wheel! Disgusting.
The United boss will be addressing the media ahead of the home game vs Arsenal.
Everyone has a maximum number in their squad. The better teams have better squads, water is wet eh? 3 is normally enough, I think. This season it should absolutely be 5. Could be 3 years without a proper break for the top players, especially in England. Injuries galore is coming.
After Christmas the small club's will only have their league games to worry about as they will be knocked out of the other comps so it will not be a concern for them.
The schedule up to that point might leave them with injured squads barely scraping the barrel. But they might also get lucky and survive.
Club's have been playing FA and League Cups alongside their respective league games for decades and years back they were doing it with one substitution.
I am not against it but this has nothing to do with the smaller club's it is all about the big boys chasing the money.
This season is very different though in terms of getting a break though right? There was a month between our game against Sevilla and the opening game of the prem. That's a pretty unprecedented rest period considering they usually have over three months between seasons.
Especially when Dinge got his reduced to 1 game, his was far worse then the little tap from Martial
What money? How are the big clubs making money by having 5 subs?
And you must be really lazy to check or just can't comprehend the difference in the schedule this season compared to past years...
But that is us and that was a Euro semi. I am not talking about us I am talking about the many clubs whose only glimpse of Europe is their summer holidays.
Because they have bigger and better squads, have more rotation to not be weakened at home and in Europe thus progressing further in mentioned competitions which brings more prize money, TV rights and sponsorship.
Can you comprehend????
So, the 3 subs would somehow make the smaller clubs get European competition places? Are you mad?
No!
But it might keep them in the Premier League.
Try and broaden your horizons and actually watch a game that does not involve the top ten teams in England Or the best teams in Europe and you might realise that most teams do not have the luxury of having internationals on the bench and are weakened considerably when playing teams that do.
These are totally unprecedented times. Honestly, it’s nothing to do with big boys and money. Watch how knackered the players will be by the time the next season starts after a gruelling full season with the Euros straight after.
With the subs rule I would imagine it’s the clubs who are usually not in Europe who voted against the 5 sub rules. Would have been really good for the players of the better clubs this season as they would get some rest between so many games for club and country.
But the other clubs - let’s take Newcastle or Palace - who aren’t in Europe and don’t have many players playing for the national teams will have a marginally better chance to win games against big clubs with only 3 subs after a midweek CL or EL game. Small margins, but can’t really blame the clubs who couldn’t care less about players’ health or injuries at bigger clubs.
But the other clubs - let’s take Newcastle or Palace - who aren’t in Europe and don’t have many players playing for the national teams will have a marginally better chance to win games against big clubs with only 3 subs after a midweek CL or EL game. Small margins, but can’t really blame the clubs who couldn’t care less about players’ health or injuries at bigger clubs.
He speaks good English but I think he gets a little mixed up sometimes with his choice of words....understandable really.
I'm talking about the lady crawling behind him.
Exactly this. Yes, as a United fan I would love 5 subs. But lots of teams do not have that syremghr in depth and have a considerable drop off in quality after the first 11. In fact, many of them only have a few top class players. Then City have a squad of their insane depth and play 5 amazing subs too. If you can't see the issue with that, you're willfully naive.
Glad someone gets my drift as some are just clueless.
Don't know why but this made me laugh
It's not about what's best for the clubs. It's what's best for the players.
They are the ones going out there picking up a significantly higher amount of injuries. They are the ones out there putting their bodies on the line. They are the ones who are going to have to play three seasons in a row without having a proper break because of international competitions in every window.
Also, how's it going to 'keep them in the premier league'? How is the team coming 17th going to handle it better than the team who comes 18th? Every other league is doing it even though the gap in depth between the top and bottom teams is probably even bigger than it is in England, and the fact that many of them started earlier so their games aren't as condensed together, and the fact that most of them play less games in total over the course of their season. They realise it's for the good of the players in these unique times.
I thought it was a dog on first viewing. Had to go back and watch it after reading your post.
On the flip side, these weaker teams will also be screwed if they don't have the option of taking off their players to rest and their thin squad gets hit with muscular injuries
I thought it was a dog and wondered why somebody had put a shirt on itI thought it was a dog on first viewing. Had to go back and watch it after reading your post.
I do watch quite a lot of games from the PL, involving all teams. And btw, all other leagues on Europe kept the 5 subs.
Also, the teams that survive usually do so because they beat their peers. Not sure how having 3 subs and not 5 will help them achieve that.
So you mean the rule that has been in place for decades currently isnt effective. Bless him wanting 5 subs every game. Next you will be telling me we should bring the water breaks back at 20 min interval so the players can have a refreshment and an orange.
Fair enough. Personally I’d be quite happy to read abit of Mourinho bashing in every thread I head into
"We need assists and goals from them"(AWB and Shaw)
I'm really happy to hear that from Ole because fullbacks need to contribute in the transition.
Has the game had this schedule for decades too? I seem to remember differently. Also, if rules that were in place for decades were never supposed to be improved, you'd still be fearing Primae Noctis..