What would SAF do with this team?

iHicksy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
1,833
He'd win the league with it. I think Pogba would be used as a sub or sold.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,568
Yes, I hate this about any manager. LVG used to be the same, except for showing us how a player falls. SAF showed Motivation and Tactical awareness that Ole and his crew have not got.
:lol: One of the highlights of his time here along with his speech at the award ceremony (or was it Christmas party)! Priceless!
 

Pablo18th

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
108
Martial
Bruno
Rashford Van de Beek McTominay Greenwood
Telles Lindelof Tuanzebe Wan-Bissaka
De Gea

Probably lines up with something like this (4-4-1-1) and challenges for the title...
92 under SAF there. He would also use Mata as second striker and Daniel James would be better player too.
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
Sir Alex always had exceptional CMs in them. As time went he reduced the work rate (ex Keane and Ince) in favour of more creativity. Workrate in CM became something a donkey can do (ex Cleverley) in specific times to cover for a lack (an ageing Giggs/Scholes). There's no way Sir Alex would play with a midfield made up of Fred and McT.
100% I think he would play these two but the instructions would be completely different. Our midfielders in the past played the ball forwards because thats what Fergie demanded. I don't see much between McT and Fletcher, and to be completely honest Fred is a similar midfielder to Anderson, both players that Fergie gave a lot of time to. Don't forget that Fergie also played Park based purely on his industriousness on the pitch. Every team needs a balance of flair and industry.
 

Bestietom

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
8,021
Location
Ireland
100% I think he would play these two but the instructions would be completely different. Our midfielders in the past played the ball forwards because thats what Fergie demanded. I don't see much between McT and Fletcher, and to be completely honest Fred is a similar midfielder to Anderson, both players that Fergie gave a lot of time to. Don't forget that Fergie also played Park based purely on his industriousness on the pitch. Every team needs a balance of flair and industry.
Yes, we need to get the players from the back and midfield to move the ball forward more. Maguire has also got a habit of coming across the backline with the ball and then passing it back to De Gea. I close my eyes when this happens as I can see that some day he will be caught out by a speedy forward. McTominay and Fred are not good passers of the ball either. Zakaria or Soumare could do this job as Matic has got too slow.
 

Rajiztar

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
2,102
Supports
Chelsea
I don't know what exactly SAF would do with this players but Mike Dean won't referee another game for United this season if SAF still in dugout for United after his performance yesterday.
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
Yes, we need to get the players from the back and midfield to move the ball forward more. Maguire has also got a habit of coming across the backline with the ball and then passing it back to De Gea. I close my eyes when this happens as I can see that some day he will be caught out by a speedy forward. McTominay and Fred are not good passers of the ball either. Zakaria or Soumare could do this job as Matic has got too slow.
I don't think you need to have a range of passing like Scholes / Pirlo to be able to play the ball 20-30 yards into the forwards. Fred and McT are definitely capable of that because they have been doing it in some games, maybe its a tactics thing when they don't do it. All of our forwards a capable of receiving the ball to their feet too. Really in a midfield of Fred, McT and Bruno I would be expecting Bruno to be the player that is making the most incisive passes anyway because he has better vision than Fred and McT.

Its also surprising that we don't see either of those players getting up the pitch to take some shots more often. So what if they aren't that good, the point is to force the opponent into having to push players out to them, which opens them up a little bit. When they sit it makes containing our front line very easy for the opposition. The basic pass and move principle gets lost sometimes and we just pass and don't keep moving. Pogba is one of the guiltiest of this, he will pass the ball and then drop back into space rather than running forward to allow us to maintain that forward momentum. Its not just Pogba but he seems to be the one that does it the most. It kills all of our attacking momentum when he does it.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,631
100% I think he would play these two but the instructions would be completely different. Our midfielders in the past played the ball forwards because thats what Fergie demanded. I don't see much between McT and Fletcher, and to be completely honest Fred is a similar midfielder to Anderson, both players that Fergie gave a lot of time to. Don't forget that Fergie also played Park based purely on his industriousness on the pitch. Every team needs a balance of flair and industry.
Fletcher had produced 27 assists in his career. Do you know how many assists McT had done in the EPL? Here's a hint. He's got as many assists Fred does ie one a piece. If we assume that McT produces an assist every 63 EPL games then he'll reach Fletcher's 27 assists in 1701 matches. That's around the same amount of EPL games the combined amount of games played by Ryan Giggs (632), Paul Scholes (499), Gary Neville (400) and this McT (63) had played. So seriously, that's insulting towards Fletcher and I wasn't a great fan of his to start with.

Let's now have a look how Fletcher was utilised. At the beginning the Scottish was often tucked in the right wing. It was a stupid move but it allowed Sir Alex to discipline a young Ronaldo. If the Portuguese dribbled too much or decided to put his head down and run blindly to the corner flag then rest assured that he wouldn't play and Fletch would play instead. As time went by Scholes was starting to show signs of ageing and Carrick who was no Roy Keane in terms of workrate couldn't carry him on alone. Thus Fletcher was starting to get more games. However as said, Fletch was far from a headless chicken with zero creativity. The trio Fletch-Carrick-Park had 88 assists between them which is quite good for a rather defensive trio.

It's difficult to say how Sir Alex would act with this team without asking the man himself. However here's some educated guesses from my part

a- our team has some fantastic attacking talent but there's no exceptional talent like Ronaldo that's worth building a squad around him. Greenwood is the closest thing we have to that but I think Sir Alex would see him as a striker.
b- Sir Alex moved from having two tough as nails CMs (Ince-Robson, Ince-Keane, Keane-Butt) to a far more light weight CM. He then distributed the defensive weight across the board. Beckham, Valencia, Young/Park, Teveth and Rooney had more workrate then Kanchelskis, Cantona and a young Giggs

Therefore I think he'll do what he always done

a- give players proper coaching. The Ronaldo of the early years is nowhere near to the WC giant of the late United years. Sir Alex transformed him. Sir Alex could do the same to the current players
b-give players proper motivation. Sir Alex could turn donkeys like OShea, Cleverley and Phil Nev into semi decent cogs that proved instrumental at times. Cleverley added mileage to an ancient Scholes while Phil Nev still has Vieira hidden in his pockets. Sir Alex could do the same with these players
c- He would get rid of nuisances who hold the ball for too long (Pogba) and static players (Mata, Matic etc)
d- He would build a balanced midfield. The base of that team would be players who offers both creativity and workrate (Bruno and VDB). Fred would probably play behind them. He'll then play Rashford/Martial on the left only to balance the right with someone like Adama Traore. If Greenwood becomes a key player on the right then I can see Sir Alex moving Telles on the left flank and bring in Haaland.
e- Sir Alex would probably rely heavily on Cavani. He's the only proven scorer we've got. If the Uruguayan repays Sir Alex's trust then expect more crosses (Telles and in the long run Dalot as well). If Greenwood becomes our no 1 striker then 1 attacking wingback would suffice.
f- Balance will need to be found in defence as well. Lindelof and Maguire are too slow thus Tuanzebe would be used instead. AWB would be used as a FB/CB hybrid in the same way Wes was used. Telles would still be played as Sir Alex had always had at least 1 wingback who could move forward with the ball.

Regarding McT. Sir Alex would either use him as he used Nicky Butt/Phil Nev/Cleverley or else.....he's 6ft3, he's decent defensively, he's passionate......I wonder who gave Steve Clarke the idea of playing McT as CB.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
I find it funny that those against Martial suggest he wouldnt be in the team at the same time say SAF would have this team winning the league.

For SAF to make this team win the league every player would have to be 10x better.

SAF would turn Martial/Rashford or Martial/Greenwood into a star partnership.

Martial is easily one of our most consistent in actually playing with the ball and pass and move.

A top manager gets players playing to their best. Martial at his best is incredible.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,211
McTominay wouldn't have stayed at the 1st team under SAF for more than one season, and that's if he was even able to make it out of the reserves.
 

Gabagoo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
246
He'd have us playing exciting, risk-taking football. Solksjaer, as much as he thinks that he's Fergie, has us playing like pussies.

Ferguson would probably have us in a 4-3-3, with Rashford and Martial more as wingers than forwards, telling them to take on players. Cavani would be a starter. Greenwood would correctly be nurtured and played only sparingly.

This is what a Ferguson team, with this current squad and everyone fit, would look like - and our style of play would be more aggressive than the shite we're seeing at the moment.

.............................. de Gea .................................

Wan-Bissaka ... Tuanzebe ... Maguire ... Telles

... van de Beek ... McTominay ... Fernandes ...

Rashford ................ Cavani ................. Martial
 

hungrywing

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
10,225
Location
Your Left Ventricle
I don't think you need to have a range of passing like Scholes / Pirlo to be able to play the ball 20-30 yards into the forwards. Fred and McT are definitely capable of that because they have been doing it in some games, maybe its a tactics thing when they don't do it. All of our forwards a capable of receiving the ball to their feet too. Really in a midfield of Fred, McT and Bruno I would be expecting Bruno to be the player that is making the most incisive passes anyway because he has better vision than Fred and McT.

Its also surprising that we don't see either of those players getting up the pitch to take some shots more often. So what if they aren't that good, the point is to force the opponent into having to push players out to them, which opens them up a little bit. When they sit it makes containing our front line very easy for the opposition. The basic pass and move principle gets lost sometimes and we just pass and don't keep moving. Pogba is one of the guiltiest of this, he will pass the ball and then drop back into space rather than running forward to allow us to maintain that forward momentum. Its not just Pogba but he seems to be the one that does it the most. It kills all of our attacking momentum when he does it.
Whoa. We're all on the same side here, so don't get me wrong, but a player like Scholes is on another level (and then some) to 'Fred and McT are definitely capable of that because they have been doing it in some games, maybe its a tactics thing when they don't do it.'

Fred and McT can hit the long ball to the isolated winger in space. Scholes could hit a wide player attacking space behind a fullback from a range of forty-fifty yards and time the offsides.

If you're up against a player like Scholes, you have to set your whole team up passively and things snowball from there.
 

432JuanMata

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
3,097
Location
Dublin
He would sign a top class striker that would guarantee 30 goals a season like he always did and then he’d challenge. The team is better than were we our
 

RashyForPM

New Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
3,183
It wouldn’t be this team. After blooding a few talented youngsters and making a couple of astute signings, Fergie’s team now would be:

Henderson
AWB Stones Maguire Williams
Sancho Rice Thiago Rashford
Kane Greenwood

Bench: DDG, Tuanzebe, Shaw, Bellingham, VdB, Lingard, Vardy

Why? Well, it’s a typical SAF team. Strong British core with many academy players in there, littered with world class foreign talent. Players we deem average now like Maguire, Stones and Williams would be world class defenders under the genius, and AWB would be brilliant at attacking under an actual attacking manager, not a half-arsed one. Meanwhile, Henderson would have displaced DDG by now, especially after some high profile gaffs last season. Even Fergie can’t stop an aging goalkeeper from having a natural organic decline. As for the front 6, these are all players SAF would have loved. The most disputable one is Thiago, but SAF actually did buy him for Moyes in 2013. Typical 4-4-2, with actual wing play and not just spamming close to a 100 crosses in.

As for the bench, same concept. Talented British lads (he rated Lingard btw before anyone says otherwise) and Vardy, who SAF would have loved. Then you have VdB who’d be a rotation option but would actually get minutes on the pitch. Lads like Grant, Laird, Smalling, Jones, Young, McT, Garner, Powell, Januzaj, Welbeck, Chicharito etc would make up the reserves, ready to step in whenever needed.

So, where would we finish with in the hypothetical scenario that Fergie managed this team and our rivals had the same team as they currently do bar the players in our team, like Thiago? Top obviously, for probably the 3rd season in a row. Would have won the CL the year Liverpool won it too. He’d have knocked PSG, Barca and then Pool out, before teaching Spurs how to win a trophy in the final.
 

OleBoiii

New Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
6,021
SAF is the greatest manager of all time. He had an amazing ability to adapt to new challenges and get the best out of his players.

Having said that, I rate all of his title winning teams significantly above our current team. Most of his runner-up teams as well. People are seriously underestimating the players we've had throughout the years.
 

Red00012

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
12,169
You seem to be ignoring the fact that he has probably been our best player in every game since Spurs.

Leipzig aside but he was still excellent in that game
PSG ? AWB / Fred / Axel were all better than him.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
He would find a way to make us consistent.

He would sign two wingers and a defensive midfielder and an elite striker.

Pogba wouldn’t play again (says me who sticks up for him most of the time :wenger:)
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,285
Sign Dele Alli according to Mourinho. ;)

I think even the greatness of SAF would struggle to wrap his around the modern player. Social media was just starting to take off when he retired. Seeing how vocal Rio, Evra, Scholes and Neville are over the past few years, it’s incredible that he was able to keep them relatively tightlipped during his time in charge. I would never have known Evra is the way he is without his Instagram presence. We saw glimpse of Rooney’s idiocy on Twitter circa 2011/2012. But that didn’t last long.

If he were still in charge, we would have made sure he has a top assistant coach next to him to help on the tactical side of the game. Man management, motivation and leadership were his key skills. His mere presence and the players knowing that he’s unsackable would help keep them toeing the line.
Players would do what they were told because they wanted to play here, for him, and wanted to win. Anybody who forgot that was quickly sidelined and shipped out. Players like Pogba and his agent would have been long gone.

Unfortunately i don't think even he himself could do any of that if he were entering the game now. He needed 20+ years of being at the absolutely top to get that level of power.

I also don't think there are any clubs that players will make sacrifices to play for anymore. We have definitely lost that appeal, and Barcelona and Madrid are a shadow of their former selves where players would fall over themselves to go there.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,011
Location
Dublin
I think the OP is specifically asking what he would do with this team and not who he would have bought or sold. On that premise, I think he would undoubtedly be challenging for the league and probably winning it.
 

automaticflare

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2016
Messages
1,490
McTominay wouldn't have stayed at the 1st team under SAF for more than one season, and that's if he was even able to make it out of the reserves.
Think you are way off the mark here. McTominay is super valuable if used effectively throughout the season. Fergie often pulled in Butt (who granted is a better play) to play alongside Keane when he needed more physicality.
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
Whoa. We're all on the same side here, so don't get me wrong, but a player like Scholes is on another level (and then some) to 'Fred and McT are definitely capable of that because they have been doing it in some games, maybe its a tactics thing when they don't do it.'

Fred and McT can hit the long ball to the isolated winger in space. Scholes could hit a wide player attacking space behind a fullback from a range of forty-fifty yards and time the offsides.

If you're up against a player like Scholes, you have to set your whole team up passively and things snowball from there.
You didn't read what I said. Its the 20-30 yard passes that they can execute.
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
Fletcher had produced 27 assists in his career. Do you know how many assists McT had done in the EPL? Here's a hint. He's got as many assists Fred does ie one a piece. If we assume that McT produces an assist every 63 EPL games then he'll reach Fletcher's 27 assists in 1701 matches. That's around the same amount of EPL games the combined amount of games played by Ryan Giggs (632), Paul Scholes (499), Gary Neville (400) and this McT (63) had played. So seriously, that's insulting towards Fletcher and I wasn't a great fan of his to start with.

Let's now have a look how Fletcher was utilised. At the beginning the Scottish was often tucked in the right wing. It was a stupid move but it allowed Sir Alex to discipline a young Ronaldo. If the Portuguese dribbled too much or decided to put his head down and run blindly to the corner flag then rest assured that he wouldn't play and Fletch would play instead. As time went by Scholes was starting to show signs of ageing and Carrick who was no Roy Keane in terms of workrate couldn't carry him on alone. Thus Fletcher was starting to get more games. However as said, Fletch was far from a headless chicken with zero creativity. The trio Fletch-Carrick-Park had 88 assists between them which is quite good for a rather defensive trio.

It's difficult to say how Sir Alex would act with this team without asking the man himself. However here's some educated guesses from my part

a- our team has some fantastic attacking talent but there's no exceptional talent like Ronaldo that's worth building a squad around him. Greenwood is the closest thing we have to that but I think Sir Alex would see him as a striker.
b- Sir Alex moved from having two tough as nails CMs (Ince-Robson, Ince-Keane, Keane-Butt) to a far more light weight CM. He then distributed the defensive weight across the board. Beckham, Valencia, Young/Park, Teveth and Rooney had more workrate then Kanchelskis, Cantona and a young Giggs

Therefore I think he'll do what he always done

a- give players proper coaching. The Ronaldo of the early years is nowhere near to the WC giant of the late United years. Sir Alex transformed him. Sir Alex could do the same to the current players
b-give players proper motivation. Sir Alex could turn donkeys like OShea, Cleverley and Phil Nev into semi decent cogs that proved instrumental at times. Cleverley added mileage to an ancient Scholes while Phil Nev still has Vieira hidden in his pockets. Sir Alex could do the same with these players
c- He would get rid of nuisances who hold the ball for too long (Pogba) and static players (Mata, Matic etc)
d- He would build a balanced midfield. The base of that team would be players who offers both creativity and workrate (Bruno and VDB). Fred would probably play behind them. He'll then play Rashford/Martial on the left only to balance the right with someone like Adama Traore. If Greenwood becomes a key player on the right then I can see Sir Alex moving Telles on the left flank and bring in Haaland.
e- Sir Alex would probably rely heavily on Cavani. He's the only proven scorer we've got. If the Uruguayan repays Sir Alex's trust then expect more crosses (Telles and in the long run Dalot as well). If Greenwood becomes our no 1 striker then 1 attacking wingback would suffice.
f- Balance will need to be found in defence as well. Lindelof and Maguire are too slow thus Tuanzebe would be used instead. AWB would be used as a FB/CB hybrid in the same way Wes was used. Telles would still be played as Sir Alex had always had at least 1 wingback who could move forward with the ball.

Regarding McT. Sir Alex would either use him as he used Nicky Butt/Phil Nev/Cleverley or else.....he's 6ft3, he's decent defensively, he's passionate......I wonder who gave Steve Clarke the idea of playing McT as CB.
You don't need to tell me how Fletcher was used, I'm a United supporter, I watched his entire career. At his base he was used for his running and his ability to break up the oppositions play with that running. 27 assists in an entire career is feck all, and its not the part of his game I was suggesting McT has in common, but McT could easily get 27 assists in his career at United, he's only 23!

Since we're on the subject McT has scored 6 in 3 years for United, Fletch managed 18 in in 12 years.
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
I think the OP is specifically asking what he would do with this team and not who he would have bought or sold. On that premise, I think he would undoubtedly be challenging for the league and probably winning it.
Yea, the quality of our overall squad is as good as our 12/13 team. Would you agree?
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
Regarding the bolded part: I did.

But I am:

a. drunk
b. extremely hypersensitive to any post regarding Scholes' passing ability.

Forgive me.
I don't think you need to have a range of passing like Scholes / Pirlo to be able to play the ball 20-30 yards into the forwards. Fred and McT are definitely capable of that.
 

OleTheGreat

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
816
Location
Bangalore, India
Martial
Bruno
Rashford Van de Beek McTominay Greenwood
Telles Lindelof Tuanzebe Wan-Bissaka
De Gea

Probably lines up with something like this (4-4-1-1) and challenges for the title...
Perfect. This is exactly how SAF would use this line-up. In fact I also feel Pogba would play better because otherwise he would be under fire. We lack a coach who loves his players enough to yell at them and get the best out of them. SAF teams had players who regardless of the formation would go out there and do the best in their ability. These days we don't look like a Man United team at all. To gain just 1 point in 4 games at home and to lose 3 games is ridiculous in his books and the players would receive treatment accordingly. No players where bigger than the club or SAF himself. These players are ruthless and don't deserve any respect as of now. They need to be pushed hard in training.
 

hungrywing

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
10,225
Location
Your Left Ventricle
No I get it, you didn't read what I posted and jumped to a conclusion that was wrong. Ok, move on, keep drinking.
Nope. You're the one not getting that what I posted was regarding a larger framework and someone was graciously acknowledging that what you posted was regarding a more granular aspect of what you were arguing with another poster.

Protip: learn to recognize when someone's on your side.
 

Tibs

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
13,752
Location
UK
With this current squad?

We would DOMINATE the League...and in a decent right winger, and we'd be fighting it out at the top in Europe.

Fergie was one of a kind
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,631
You don't need to tell me how Fletcher was used, I'm a United supporter, I watched his entire career. At his base he was used for his running and his ability to break up the oppositions play with that running. 27 assists in an entire career is feck all, and its not the part of his game I was suggesting McT has in common, but McT could easily get 27 assists in his career at United, he's only 23!

Since we're on the subject McT has scored 6 in 3 years for United, Fletch managed 18 in in 12 years.
I don't know you age mate.

Fletch and McT are passionate players but skill wise they are different. My criticism with Fletcher back then was that he was a jack of all trades and master of none. He could do anything without excelling in anything (ie in a midfield that had Carrick and Scholes in it). McT is a purely defensive player. He struggles in anything outside of that domain. McT would dream of having Fletcher's skillset and Fletcher would walk in our midfield without breaking sweat
 
Last edited:

Tel074

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
1,531
Pogba gone.

McT and Fred midfield.
Martial Bruno and Rushford up front.
Telles, Shaw, Lindelof, Maguire and AWB.

Thats our best team. Forget about individuals, thats our most balanced team.
Not for me . Our best team has Matic and VDB in it not McT and Fred
 

FahadiHossein

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
319
An underappreciated strength of SAF is his ability to turn players on a budget into real United players, and many of them performed weekly although they were not considered the core first eleve, while also changing player's position effectively.

A then 35 year old Teddy Sheringham, Park Ji Sung (a marketing gimmick I thought initially), Tom Cleverley, John O'Shea, Antonio Valencia (only Wigan experience that time) all were able to perform when called upon. Even David Bellion and Alex Butner looked decent under him. And, Scholes, Smith and Giggs had their positions changed.

Now we have too many idle players sitting around doing nothing while the team requires holes to be patched. Under SAF, could Rojo be used as a decent attacking full back? Could Lingardino be used as a deep lying playmaker? Would Dan James be successfully slotted into both wings? All these would be possible under him.