No, I suggested charging others for a tip on a single is poor form. I did more than suggest however, I stated, that my own position is that small bets are a waste of my time. In a wider conversation with the poster you are seemingly legally representing who first told me how THEY like to bet. The conversation was cordial, language friendly. Nobody was offended. Until you missed the point, and then have been trying to proceed as if you didn’t for a few subsequent posts.
Who gives a feck if you think it is condescending of me to dig rival tipsters anyway? I don’t need a lecture on ‘my attitude’. I’ve been fine with all posters in here. Naturally, from one tipster account to another on Twitter, I have exchanged in banter. Which has nothing to do with you and is perfectly normal, just as it is for the KFC and Burger King Twitter accounts to exchange in banter. As far as Redcafe goes, a poster says to me that they have followed other tipsters on Twitter but are not a fan of their style, and I agree, and explain why I’m not a fan of such online tipsters either, and you have come to give me some lecture on condescension, because I of course need to be more polite to gambling tipsters on Twitter. So you being able to ‘do without’ my high and mighty means feck all to me. I could have done without your unsolicited and unnecessary interjection in the first place.
I don’t need you to explain that it is ‘voluntary’ to pay for a tip either. That is common sense. If you think it’s a generalisation to say people shouldn’t pay for a single tip, that’s fair enough. This isn’t a legal argument ffs. It (was) a casual conversation about different tipster strategies. And they shouldn’t have ‘genuine information’ on a single occurrence on a football match anyway, otherwise it would be clearly illegal.