Borys
Statistics Wizard
He is becoming a master in conceding "no-card fouls".
well I gave him 6 out of 10 which was as high as anyone else in this game, I think if you look back he had a game of two halves to use a cliché, he was decent in the 2nd half but poor in the 1st other than ruffling Neymar's feathers.The ball deflects from one side to his other, I don’t think anyone would have made Neymar given that.
Your general views on him may be fair enough, but I feel you let them colour how you saw this particular game too much. If I were a betting man, I’d bet if you rewatched the match with focus on Scott, you’d give him at least an 8 out of 10.
He's had a few games against that lot now. Never looks overwhelmedEven his first half failings are slightly excusable, you can get quite shocked as a player coming up against Neymar, Mbappe and Verratti, he was overwhelmed by their speed of passing. But he settled into the game and then started stamping his authority on midfield. I still don’t like him as our starting midfielder going forward, but I’m never against him being in the team sheet.
top comparisonTurns 24 next week. Seems implausible to me he won't be here backing up the #6 we have to buy to replace Matic as soon as 4 weeks from now and as late as this summer. Improved enough and has a skillset that's very useful to the point that he's got a place in the squad. Midfield post-Pogba should obviously be that #6 backed up by McTominay then Fred and Van De Beek rotating as the #8 and Van De Beek getting 10-15 games a year to go from 25-30 starts to a full time 35-45 type number as a #10 backing up Bruno (who you figure starts like 40-45 out of 55 games a year). If the Pogba thing shockingly comes good (and stranger things have happened) that complicates things, otherwise those 5 and maybe you bring back Garner as the #6 guy or it's Pellistri since his best qualities seem to be shielding and passing it and we do have Greenwood and Diallo and even Rashford on the right.
Basically the role in the squad played by Ambrosini at Milan, who you always felt was a downgrade from Seedorf, Pirlo and Gattuso but was obviously annoying to play against and linked play and gave you a 2nd defensive presence in midfield along with whoever he was alongside, didn't embarrass himself as a loan #6 or as a #8 trying to provide some physicality and not without a bit of a goal threat or at least a certain thrust going forward.
Limited passing? He’s the best passer we have.Still limited in his passing, but I thought he had some really good touches in tight spaces yesterday. Hadn't seen a lot of that from him before.
Fletcher was actually very good technically. Watch his goal away at Charlton in 06.1. Firstly, it's the other way around, Fletcher is shit for not having any skills nor technical abilities, just relying on high energy, combative grit and "nationality" to get Fergie's favors to play, or so those were the popular narrative back then. Seriously when does this technical superiority started? Fletcher relied a lot on physical attributes even if he don't have the strength, he got the energy.
A LOT of fans liked Fletcher, and appreciated his contributions to the squad and his importance in the big games especially.No fans wanted Fletcher to feature at all. Except very small voices maybe. Fans were very happy once we got Hargreaves because finally Fletcher won't play.
It's the "Goldbridge effect". So many muppets who just repeat whatever he says. Same goes for the Maguire hate around here. Don't get me wrong...I don't think McTominay should be starting every game. But he definitely has a spot in our rotation. He's a decent player...McTominay has been mainly good for us so surprised to see such a backlash to his performance yesterday but maybe I shouldn't be. Yesterday wasn't the game for him, I think Arteta set-up his side very well and had them so much better prepared than us. Partey had a man of the match performance too which wouldn't have helped.
Did I read that right? Based on what exactly? His passing is improving marginally but he still has the lowest passing completion among our deep lying midfielders (84.3% to Fred's 88.8 and Matic's 88.1%) and he attempts less creative passes, less long passes and less passes overall (he averages 41.3 passes a game to Fred's 53.5 and Matic's 53.2)Limited passing? He’s the best passer we have.
That's much needed thoughI don't see what he brings other the energy in midfield. Not a good passer, not a particularly good screener of defence and offers little going forward.
You could pick a CM from any club in the league and they’d do as good as him.If he was wearing a Fulham shirt and put in this performance, there is not a Utd fan on this planet that would say 'sign him up, he's just what we need'.......
Any club? Absolutely delusionalYou could pick a CM from any club in the league and they’d do as good as him.
What club doesn’t have a midfielder who is capable of running around and trying hard while offering nothing on the ball?Any club? Absolutely delusional
He is 24. He can't learn anymore to be creative, how to pass better and technical skills in general. He is our huge problem in attacking part of the game.and tbh, i don't see what he does that special in defence. Fred at least is everywhere on the pitch and covers much moreSlow brain. No real creative sparks. However he’s still very malleable. Has the same physical and mental qualities that Carrick has. Just needs to be taught the belief and confidence to think quicker and have more of an edge to his game.
Man Utd starting CM that played over 60 games for us that needs to be taught he needs to think quicker? I give up.....Slow brain. No real creative sparks. However he’s still very malleable. Has the same physical and mental qualities that Carrick has. Just needs to be taught the belief and confidence to think quicker and have more of an edge to his game.
Not even going to entertain that with naming the obvious list of teams, other than by default you are actually saying that Scott would be in any team in the prem? I'd argue he wouldn't start for more than half......What club doesn’t have a midfielder who is capable of running around and trying hard while offering nothing on the ball?
Not wrongWhat club doesn’t have a midfielder who is capable of running around and trying hard while offering nothing on the ball?