Jeppers7
Pogfamily Mafia
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 7,363
HahahahaPeople think Cavani isn't a racist, but this says otherwise:
otherwise
HahahahaPeople think Cavani isn't a racist, but this says otherwise:
otherwise
Damn, it's true you know. It's best if we carted him off to Eibar and forget this whole sordid affair.People think Cavani isn't a racist, but this says otherwise:
otherwise
People think Cavani isn't a racist, but this says otherwise:
otherwise
Not really I guess. It has to first be charged under the "bringing game to disrepute" clause and then this is on top of it.So if someone references to a nationality, it can be fall under this stupid breach ? A player could say something like " I love my Ivory Coast teammate" and he could potentially be banned then ?
This excellent summary gets right to the heart of it.Very dangerous precedent.
Any foreign word that sounds or looks offensive in English should not be spoken or written by foreign players in their native language, even if it doesn't mean what the non-speaker thinks.
Very dystopian.
It sounds very randomNot really I guess. It has to first be charged under the "bringing game to disrepute" clause and then this is on top of it.
That's the ideaIt sounds very random
PerfectThis excellent summary gets right to the heart of it.
To be offended by Cavani's tweet you would have to be have to be clever enough to translate it into English and ignorant enough to misunderstand its meaning.
Whereas i argue we have a dystopian society without equality.Very dangerous precedent.
Any foreign word that sounds or looks offensive in English should not be spoken or written by foreign players in their native language, even if it doesn't mean what the non-speaker thinks.
Very dystopian.
Trigger is problematic......The next time a journalist refers to a "niggling" injury. I hope the same social media warriors will get him banned as its, "a bit close to a word that may possibly trigger people". But then is suppose they'd then get the same abuse for using a word which rhymes with the same bad word and the circle of idiocy would be complete!
People think Cavani isn't a racist, but this says otherwise:
otherwise
The FA trying best to cover their own faults. Not even hiding their dislike of our club. I guess some things never change.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Regarding your "test", if you think this is how Cavani conducted himself, or more cynically how people in South America conduct themselves in general, which your post seems to imply, then I can't help you.Whereas i argue we have a dystopian society without equality.
There is an test:
“...On Friday, Uruguay's Academia Nacional de Letras said the words "negro" or its diminutive "negrito" -- similar to "gordo" (fatso) or "gordito" and "flaco" (skinny one) -- are commonly used as terms of endearment...“
Next time you’re out use the words fatso etc.. Yes, some will smile and say you’re being a bit cheeky, others will be offended..
The point being comments can be a term of endearment in the UK; they're also insulting. I find it very odd that there is an assumption they cannot be insulting. It is irrelevant how Cavani conducted himself. If you called someone fatso in the UK you might offend a friend of that person and they might give you a slap. Most seem to ignore that reality.Regarding your "test", if you think this is how Cavani conducted himself, or more cynically how people in South America conduct themselves in general, which your post seems to imply, then I can't help you.
What happens when you call your friend Gordon, Gordo?The point being comments can be a term of endearment in the UK; they're also insulting. I find it very odd that there is an assumption they cannot be insulting. It is irrelevant how Cavani conducted himself. If you called someone fatso in the UK you might offend a friend of that person and they might give you a slap. Most seem to ignore that reality.
If you think it wasn't his intent and that is enough, then i cannot help you. It's not about him it's about others..
None of what you described is what Cavani did.The point being comments can be a term of endearment in the UK; they're also insulting. I find it very odd that there is an assumption they cannot be insulting. It is irrelevant how Cavani conducted himself. If you called someone fatso in the UK you might offend a friend of that person and they might give you a slap. Most seem to ignore that reality.
If you think it wasn't his intent and that is enough, then i cannot help you. It's not about him it's about others..
I chose not to use the other word; the principle is the same.None of what you described is what Cavani did.
Your test is saying the following: "to see if thing A is bad, do different thing B and see the results..." It makes no sense.
Yeah , that summarises the FA perfectly.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
People think Cavani isn't a racist, but this says otherwise:
otherwise
Roibal is a fecking idiot.I am not thinking in terms of 1984, dystopian and other such concepts and ideas.
I just found this article which excellently captures what I am thinking on this subject https://www.goal.com/en/news/first-...n-footballers-keep/1cd21rta8eh521fqvd7zqn8tnq
As I mentioned in another post this is a very poor medium to express ideas fully without pumping out a 1000 words. A couple of times on the thread I have been accused of straw manning and Wumming. I would never wind people up on this subject and dont WUM on this forum aside from the odd sarcastic post about footy. I ultimately agree with the conclusion of the article that the FA has been harsh on Cavani and he shouldn't probably have receieved the 3 match ban. But who knows, a warning would have may kicked up the same derision. I just find it hard to condemn the FA for their decision on such a complex subject where they are try to draw a clear line in the sand.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Well apparently being in your early thirties and from the UK, and not knowing doing the Nazi salute is offensive because 'you don't know who Adolf Hitler is' is more reasonable than being from another country, and using a word in your own language that has no translation in to English but looks like another word that is potentially offensive.Yeah , that summarises the FA perfectly.
What I find interesting is this notion of the 'New British Way' of doing things. When exactly did it become established that this is how the British public want society to work? I'm certainly not subscribed to this way of thinking and based on what I've seen there is likely a vast number who are less open-minded on this than I am. The mindset is riddled with inconsistencies. For example seemingly any phrase with race-connotations appears to be intolerable and yet Western rap culture, for example, features the worst word of the lot (an English word, no less) and it does so regularly. Either accept that context and intent is an important factor in all cases (common sense), or have some consistency and stop the word altogether (draconian, but consistent at least). Currently there's a large amount of hypocrisy and numerous witch hunts, too.Roibal is a fecking idiot.
IMHO the once racists countries has turned into “we are better than the under developed countries and we can teach them even if they don’t want”
That’s the FA attitude when they recognize that Cavani wasn’t racist but he didnt follow the new british way of doing things
As many poster said it clearly “if you are in England is our way or the highway”. Properly forgetting that england was one of the major enslavers countries in history.
Go teach your ancestors.
Because what Luis Suarez did was racistI don't seem to call anyone from Uruguay ever going this far to defend Luis Suarez.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Exactly, which is why I'm baffled when there are people who still try to equate Cavani's actions with Suarez's.Because what Luis Suarez did was racist
Oh, ok. IndeedExactly, which is why I'm baffled when there are people who still try to equate Cavani's actions with Suarez's.
Yeah, I was trying to goad the people who aren't willing to treat this case differently from Suarez's.Oh, ok. Indeed
Well done, you go straight on my ignore list.Feck off you racist prick.
That's nonsense, you can't just throw around racism accusations with nothing to back them up. Can you show what in my posts is racist?Your posts are very borderline racist themselves. Seems you have a problem with Latin Americans and how we use our language?
You think you're on some moral high ground to judge how we use our own words and culture?
We didn't invade hundreds of countries, we didn't kill entire indigenous races, we didn't enslave and kill black people, we Uruguay in fact were accused of using African players in the Copa America of 1916 because we were the first country to use black players, our 1950 world cup winning captain was black and nicknamed el Negro jefe (the black chief), our most traditional and cultural music is directly descended from Africa. So spare me the bullcrap about the word Negrito being demeaning. Your society is not in any moral high ground to tell us Latin Americans what is racist or not.
So Cavani, who doesn't speak English, should have been fully aware of what the British press and fanblogs had to say about it? All those years ago while he was playing at Napoli? Most people outside the UK hardly spent 5 minutes mulling over it.Youre missing my point. I was referring not only the decision but media and fan debate. My point is not woefully inaccurate at all.
Who does translations for the FA? Tévez?Mr Pablo Fernandez, posted a public Instagram message including a photograph of the Player performing a goal celebration with the words “Asi te quiero Matadorrr!!!!!” (namely, “I love you like a bull fighter”).
Indeed, it's the aggravated breach which requires a ban. They state clearly he is not racist, wasn't being racist, accept tge use of the term was friendly and that the recipient is indeed white but has been called negrito for years.Maybe because Simon Stone is talking BS. Cavani was charged and punished under the below rule
A breach of Rule E3 (1) is an “Aggravated Breach” where it includes a reference, whether express or implied, to any one or more of the following :- ethnic origin, colour, race, nationality, religion or belief, gender, gender reassignment, sexual orientation or disability
Yeah, I always wondered which are supposed to be the "bad nations". Could it go as far as not calling Irish players "paddy"? Probably the other one that rhymes with it, but it's left wide open really.So if someone references to a nationality, it can be fall under this stupid breach ? A player could say something like " I love my Ivory Coast teammate" and he could potentially be banned then ?
You are missing the very basic point that terms of endearment are not used with strangersWhereas i argue we have a dystopian society without equality.
There is an test:
“...On Friday, Uruguay's Academia Nacional de Letras said the words "negro" or its diminutive "negrito" -- similar to "gordo" (fatso) or "gordito" and "flaco" (skinny one) -- are commonly used as terms of endearment...“
Next time you’re out use the words fatso etc.. Yes, some will smile and say you’re being a bit cheeky, others will be offended..
Don't worry, nobody would use it with you as you are a complete stranger. People don't use terms of endearment with strangers.Well done, you go straight on my ignore list.
That's nonsense, you can't just throw around racism accusations with nothing to back them up. Can you show what in my posts is racist?
First of all I'm black and not even British. At no point in my post did I demean Uruguayan society in favor of the British either. In terms of cruelty and crimes against humanity, I would agree that their ruling class is up there among the worst.
I simply refused to take negrito as a term of endearment. As I'm not part of your culture, I go with the literal translation of 'little black/blackie' and I would take issue with anyone who used it with me. El negro jefe on the other hand is cool and perfectly fine with me.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/10/us/usc-chinese-professor-racism-intl-hnk-scli/index.htmlIt's just such a stupid decision.
If you had 2 Chinese footballers here who didn't speak English. It would now be impossible for them to conversate in Chinese normally with each other because the Chinese word for 'that' or 'umm' sounds too much like the 'N' word and so both players would have to be punished as it could cause offence. 3 match bans all around! Such a dumb precedent to set.
The intro to the film makes a compelling argument, then it all turns to shitFecking hell.
Does butting into a conversation you weren't part of with condescension make you feel important or something? Don't answer, it's a rhetorical questionDon't worry, nobody would use it with you as you are a complete stranger. People don't use terms of endearment with strangers.