Lionel Messi’s Obscene Contract

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
It kind of is actually. Barcelona work under a salary cap too
It's not football contracts have a large non-guaranteed component that allows teams flexibility with regard to playing staff. Barcelona, as far as I know, has mostly guaranteed contracts on its books.
 

Sara125

Full Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
3,045
Location
London
esta lleno de bobos este lugar, por eso deje de postear hace tanto

de vez en cuando vengo a pelearme un ratito

igual, aunque Bartomeu aparezca en televisión y en perfecto inglés les diga que Messi genera el doble de lo que cobra, a estos tipos no les interesa
Why couldn’t you just say in English that we are all fools and this is why you hardly come on the caf (thanks google translate)
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,572
Supports
Real Madrid
ah, the cap

what cap? as far as i know Barcelona can pay whatever they want to the player they want

in fact, that's exactly what they did in this case

so unless you tell me that messi put a gun on bartomeus head i don't see why messi is being accused
Heh, he kind of did. Bartomeu would have had to relocate his family out of catalunya if messi left back then. He knew he had them by the balls and made full use of it. Definitely not the behaviour of someone who put the club first

It's his career though, so good for him
 

Marcosdeto

Guess who's back?
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
49,983
Location
Buenos Aires - Argentina
Heh, he kind of did. Bartomeu would have had to relocate his family out of catalunya if messi left back then. He knew he had them by the balls and made full use of it. Definitely not the behaviour of someone who put the club first

It's his career though, so good for him
I see.

Bartomeu offered him that much money because he understands that’s what the fans want.

The fans are the ones that make Barcelona earn money.

Ergo, Messi is worth the money they pay him.

Thank you for clearing that up.
 

Sir Marcus

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
206
Just the one SF CL appearance in that time, a few QF's and a last 16...

I don't think it was worth it, ultimately.
 

Daysleeper

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2014
Messages
4,790
Supports
Barcelona
You're literally a billion in debt (and growing at a rapid rate), on the verge of bankruptcy, you're far from the best team in europe. You've sold your soul to the devil and you will pay for it in the long term massively. You should be livid because the return on that investment in the last 4 years has not been worth it.
livid? Haha we just had one of our best trophy stretches in our entire clubs history over the last 4 years. Bad CL runs but amazing la liga runs which still means a lot. We are not on the verge of bankruptcy while the debt is terrible. The team is fan owned. Without him the last four years we would barely get a top 4 spot and have zero trophies. He has absolutely been with his contract and only someone who doesn’t seem him week in and week out would think otherwise. It’s an insane amount of money, but none of the fans or reputable media even in and out of Spain think it was a bad one. The athletic article I shared earlier breaks down how without Messi Barca would be worse off in the long run because of how much he beings I. Regards to tourists to camp nou. He’s a household name and his brand has been huge in getting obscene sponsorship deals as well. The fact that the club refused to sell him even when they finally had an opportunity to do so they held him back
 

Rojow

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 8, 2015
Messages
404
Why not? It's not only about CL performances. It's about the income he produces for Barcelona. It's not so hard to understand, really.

And this huge contract was signed the same year that PSG bought Neymar. I assume that Bartomeu feared City or PSG could return the next year and buy Messi or something like that. There's a Barcelona with and without Messi. There's a price they can charge for every match ticket or advertising with Messi's name in their possesion. As i said, it's not so hard to understand. At least why this huge contract exists.
 

Andersonson

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,791
Location
Trondheim
He can earn whatever he wants, but when you earn that kind of money and still try to evade taxes you're a scumbag.

Pay up Messi!
 

Pocho

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
1,808
Didn't Messi gave Barça the opportunity to break that supposedly horrible contract? Didn't Barça refused and threatend him to take him in to court? No more questions
 

Sir Marcus

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
206
livid? Haha we just had one of our best trophy stretches in our entire clubs history over the last 4 years. Bad CL runs but amazing la liga runs which still means a lot. We are not on the verge of bankruptcy while the debt is terrible. The team is fan owned. Without him the last four years we would barely get a top 4 spot and have zero trophies. He has absolutely been with his contract and only someone who doesn’t seem him week in and week out would think otherwise. It’s an insane amount of money, but none of the fans or reputable media even in and out of Spain think it was a bad one. The athletic article I shared earlier breaks down how without Messi Barca would be worse off in the long run because of how much he beings I. Regards to tourists to camp nou. He’s a household name and his brand has been huge in getting obscene sponsorship deals as well. The fact that the club refused to sell him even when they finally had an opportunity to do so they held him back

Is this even if you had reinvested the money you made/saved from him?
 

United Junkie

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 22, 2018
Messages
297
do you understand that messi makes barcelona earn more money than what he recieves?
Pre covid? Asolutely. Now he's making them suffer. But that's their own fault.

Mes que un club.... Yeah right, more like Messi's Casino. Except he never loses a dime.
 

United Junkie

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 22, 2018
Messages
297
livid? Haha we just had one of our best trophy stretches in our entire clubs history over the last 4 years. Bad CL runs but amazing la liga runs which still means a lot. We are not on the verge of bankruptcy while the debt is terrible. The team is fan owned. Without him the last four years we would barely get a top 4 spot and have zero trophies. He has absolutely been with his contract and only someone who doesn’t seem him week in and week out would think otherwise. It’s an insane amount of money, but none of the fans or reputable media even in and out of Spain think it was a bad one. The athletic article I shared earlier breaks down how without Messi Barca would be worse off in the long run because of how much he beings I. Regards to tourists to camp nou. He’s a household name and his brand has been huge in getting obscene sponsorship deals as well. The fact that the club refused to sell him even when they finally had an opportunity to do so they held him back
You just know you're ass is going to get bailed out again of course your not fuming.
 

0le

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Messages
5,806
Location
UK
Every time I see the word "ergo" used in a post, I know the dude probably just watched the matrix.
 

ReallyUSA

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2015
Messages
2,990
This is great. Mr. One Club guy crippled the one club, and now is living them next year as they fall deeper into the abyss. Couldn't have happened to a better club.
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,013
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
This is great. Mr. One Club guy crippled the one club, and now is living them next year as they fall deeper into the abyss. Couldn't have happened to a better club.
Great to see them suffer. But we all know they will get bailed out like their cousins have in the past.
 

nyanza

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
468
Location
Bulgaria
Is this even if you had reinvested the money you made/saved from him?
To be fair, looking at their incoming transfers for the last half a decade and what they did with the Neymar money, yes, they might have very well been way worse reinvesting in someone else. :lol:
And even with perfect investment you'd be unlikely to properly replace a 29 year old Messi looking just at the next 4 years, not to mention losing Neymar the same summer as well.
 

welshwingwizard

Full Member
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
492
Location
London
What I don't understand is why they make that much more when he is playing. Do fans look at the team sheet and just not bother coming if he is due to be rested? And how do they even know? Unless he is injured you are unlikely to cancel a trip you have planned from far away if you learn on the day he won't be there.

And if my Spanish is right they get 50% less? So is it saying that the stadium is half empty when he isn't playing? Wow. That isn't a great look for the fans in terms of commitment.

I suppose the 2 could he linked without one causing the other. Like messi being rested in cup games against lower league teams. But fans not wanting to go see that match. So it looks like its Messi but in fact it's the opposition.
 

Tallis

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
982
livid? Haha we just had one of our best trophy stretches in our entire clubs history over the last 4 years. Bad CL runs but amazing la liga runs which still means a lot. We are not on the verge of bankruptcy while the debt is terrible. The team is fan owned. Without him the last four years we would barely get a top 4 spot and have zero trophies. He has absolutely been with his contract and only someone who doesn’t seem him week in and week out would think otherwise. It’s an insane amount of money, but none of the fans or reputable media even in and out of Spain think it was a bad one. The athletic article I shared earlier breaks down how without Messi Barca would be worse off in the long run because of how much he beings I. Regards to tourists to camp nou. He’s a household name and his brand has been huge in getting obscene sponsorship deals as well. The fact that the club refused to sell him even when they finally had an opportunity to do so they held him back
There is a lot of conjecture in your arguments - how Barca would have performed in the absence of Messi, no-one can say with certainty.
Theoretically, the €550mm could have been spent to bring in additional players and achieve similar success. Not saying, it would have happened but it’s a possibility. It’s also possible that Coutinho / Griezman may have settled better.

I have been watching Barca from before Messi ever played for them and they have always been a top 3 global club. Success in the current era started with the emergence of Ronaldinho, and others like Iniesta, Xavi, Henry, Busquets, Villa and many others contributed to it. I haven’t read the Athletic article but I know enough about business and finance to understand that there is no way to segregate how much one “player” brought in. It’s one or couple of journalists view. If someone links the article, I am happy to go through it and change my mind.
 

Daysleeper

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2014
Messages
4,790
Supports
Barcelona
Is this even if you had reinvested the money you made/saved from him?
The thing is the money we “saved” on Messi we would’ve wasted on other players because we had one of the most incompetent boards in the history of football for an elite club. After neymar everything was mostly one terrible move after another. If we’re going to throw obscene amounts of money at a player may as well be Messi because he is actually worth it. Look at how poorly we handled replacing the void neymar left And blew all that transfer money. I’d shudder to think what we would do had Messi left after 2017.
 

Daysleeper

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2014
Messages
4,790
Supports
Barcelona
There is a lot of conjecture in your arguments - how Barca would have performed in the absence of Messi, no-one can say with certainty.
Theoretically, the €550mm could have been spent to bring in additional players and achieve similar success. Not saying, it would have happened but it’s a possibility. It’s also possible that Coutinho / Griezman may have settled better.

I have been watching Barca from before Messi ever played for them and they have always been a top 3 global club. Success in the current era started with the emergence of Ronaldinho, and others like Iniesta, Xavi, Henry, Busquets, Villa and many others contributed to it. I haven’t read the Athletic article but I know enough about business and finance to understand that there is no way to segregate how much one “player” brought in. It’s one or couple of journalists view. If someone links the article, I am happy to go through it and change my mind.
I linked through it a page or two ago, if you can’t find it let me know.
 

Daysleeper

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2014
Messages
4,790
Supports
Barcelona
You just know you're ass is going to get bailed out again of course your not fuming.
bailed out with what exactly? I love what Koeman has been doing and very excited about fati, pedri, dembele, arujao and puig.

but it’ll be another 50 years before this club gets another Lionel Messi
 

manutddjw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
3,700
Location
Canada
No idea why anyone’s blaming Messi for the mess Barcelona have caused themselves. These are the same idiots who have Griezmann 800k a week when any club in world football wouldn’t give him half that and Griezmann desperately wanted to be at Barcelona. It seems like they negotiate like they’re hoping to be the players best friend.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
bailed out with what exactly? I love what Koeman has been doing and very excited about fati, pedri, dembele, arujao and puig.

but it’ll be another 50 years before this club gets another Lionel Messi
I was just thinking about how before Messi you were built around one incredible player as well. It's gonna be odd seeing a Barca team sheet and it not being obvious who the biggest threat is.
 

Marcosdeto

Guess who's back?
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
49,983
Location
Buenos Aires - Argentina
What I don't understand is why they make that much more when he is playing. Do fans look at the team sheet and just not bother coming if he is due to be rested? And how do they even know? Unless he is injured you are unlikely to cancel a trip you have planned from far away if you learn on the day he won't be there.

And if my Spanish is right they get 50% less? So is it saying that the stadium is half empty when he isn't playing? Wow. That isn't a great look for the fans in terms of commitment.

I suppose the 2 could he linked without one causing the other. Like messi being rested in cup games against lower league teams. But fans not wanting to go see that match. So it looks like its Messi but in fact it's the opposition.
Television pay a lot more if messi is playing because the advertisers play more to them
Barcelona can sell season tickets higher and faster with him in the team

Even the president of the spanish football association said that la liga gets better tv deals with messi there
 

Marcosdeto

Guess who's back?
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
49,983
Location
Buenos Aires - Argentina
This is great. Mr. One Club guy crippled the one club, and now is living them next year as they fall deeper into the abyss. Couldn't have happened to a better club.
Without Messi their debt would have been higher

Messi makes Barcelona earn a year at least one hundred millon euros.
 

Sir Marcus

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
206
Thanks - though I think the question can still be asked if Barcelona would've been better off replacing him with the next biggest star and have him start generating income for them, they would arguably be better off now (easy to say in retrospect I know).

I never realised how precarious things were for La Liga clubs by the way, I can see the league going the same way as Italy in the next few years particularly once Messi has retired..
The thing is the money we “saved” on Messi we would’ve wasted on other players because we had one of the most incompetent boards in the history of football for an elite club. After neymar everything was mostly one terrible move after another. If we’re going to throw obscene amounts of money at a player may as well be Messi because he is actually worth it. Look at how poorly we handled replacing the void neymar left And blew all that transfer money. I’d shudder to think what we would do had Messi left after 2017.
Haha, fair point.

I was thinking more along the lines of Mbappe/Haaland/Pogba and keeping Suarez for example but certainly easier said in retrospect, had Messi moved to City and won the CL then people would be questioning how on earth you let him go...
 

Sir Marcus

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
206
To be fair, looking at their incoming transfers for the last half a decade and what they did with the Neymar money, yes, they might have very well been way worse reinvesting in someone else. :lol:
And even with perfect investment you'd be unlikely to properly replace a 29 year old Messi looking just at the next 4 years, not to mention losing Neymar the same summer as well.

Yeah I see your point, all if's and but's however I don't think Barca's achievements over the last few years have been monumental enough for me to think that there isn't a selection of players they could have brought that would've at least delivered the same number of leagues - obviously the big issue would be Messi playing for a European rival and competing against them for the CL (then again they may be happy that he might have stopped RM getting one or two more)!


There is a lot of conjecture in your arguments - how Barca would have performed in the absence of Messi, no-one can say with certainty.
Theoretically, the €550mm could have been spent to bring in additional players and achieve similar success. Not saying, it would have happened but it’s a possibility. It’s also possible that Coutinho / Griezman may have settled better.

I have been watching Barca from before Messi ever played for them and they have always been a top 3 global club. Success in the current era started with the emergence of Ronaldinho, and others like Iniesta, Xavi, Henry, Busquets, Villa and many others contributed to it. I haven’t read the Athletic article but I know enough about business and finance to understand that there is no way to segregate how much one “player” brought in. It’s one or couple of journalists view. If someone links the article, I am happy to go through it and change my mind.
This is what I would think too but then again I'm not an expert.
 

Daysleeper

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2014
Messages
4,790
Supports
Barcelona
Thanks - though I think the question can still be asked if Barcelona would've been better off replacing him with the next biggest star and have him start generating income for them, they would arguably be better off now (easy to say in retrospect I know).

I never realised how precarious things were for La Liga clubs by the way, I can see the league going the same way as Italy in the next few years particularly once Messi has retired..


Haha, fair point.

I was thinking more along the lines of Mbappe/Haaland/Pogba and keeping Suarez for example but certainly easier said in retrospect, had Messi moved to City and won the CL then people would be questioning how on earth you let him go...
Intheory getting 222M from neymar should’ve been enough to build on of the best teams Messi ever had but in CL it still ended up being a one man show (Suarez was great in la liga though). It’s this toxic incompetent board that has made one massive mistake after another. Very frustrating.