No.1 for next season - De Gea or Henderson?

No.1 for next season

  • De Gea

    Votes: 264 37.0%
  • Henderson

    Votes: 309 43.3%
  • Someone else

    Votes: 99 13.9%
  • Play both

    Votes: 42 5.9%

  • Total voters
    714

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,303
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
That’s four keepers. And still nowhere near 700k.
Rounded down its 600k it’s actually pretty close to 700k unless you want to be pedantic and yes it’s 4 keepers. 2 who never play, 1 in the cups and 1 on the absolute decline. Shocking waste. What’s your argument here beyond being argumentative? We are getting value? Other successful clubs operate like this? Our keeper situation is actually sorted? None of the above?
 
Last edited:

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,080
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
Whoever goes in goal cannot win. If De Gea fecks up we should have played Henderson because he had a good game against.....
If Henderson fecks up we should have stuck with the more experienced De Gea.
Personally I would give Henderson a chance, but will be slagged off the first mistake he makes.
We know what we're getting with De Gea. There are question marks about Henderson but at least he has his peak ahead of him.
It's highly unlikely that Henderson is worse than current De Gea anyway.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,284
Rounded down its 600k it’s actually pretty close to 700k unless you want to be pedantic
Anywhere I see has Romero earning 70k a week. Henderson on 100k and Grant on 30k a week. That would make it 575k a week for four keepers. Still a lot but not the 700k for three that you’re claiming. The situation is ridiculous enough without making shit up.
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,303
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
Anywhere I see has Romero earning 70k a week. Henderson on 100k and Grant on 30k a week. That would make it 575k a week for four keepers. Still a lot but not the 700k for three that you’re claiming. The situation is ridiculous enough without making shit up.
so you’re on here arguing about a difference of 25k a week when we are talking about 500k a week and up of almost pure waste in a position. Fair enough. You must know way more than me
 
Last edited:

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
Hendo has played behind a much worse than DeGea. He needs to play to settle down. If he doesn't play he is going to move away.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,284
so you’re on here arguing about a difference of 25k a week when we are talking about 500k a week and up of almost pure waste in a position. Fair enough. You must know way more than me
It was 125k a week and an extra player. Why can nobody just admit they’re wrong about something?
 

Fitchett

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
1,599
Location
Manchester
Henderson for me. He is brave, commands his area, vocal with his defenders and comes for crosses. De Gea doesn't have those qualities, and his exceptional shot stopping ability is on the wane. Yes, there may be the occasional worldy which De Gea can stop and Henderson can't, but Henderson is the better all round keeper. That must improve the confidence and performance of the four defenders in front of him.
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,746
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
But the manager doesn’t want to give him more of a chance. It’s not like Solskjaer hasn’t shown the balls to drop big name players before. He did it sharply with Lukaku and has dropped Pogba many times. Henderson has started one league game this season and he dropped as big a clanger as De Gea has all season. I don’t really see it in Henderson. The manager doesn’t seem to either.
A former employer once told me "if you're going to f*ck up, f*ck up big because it's the stupid little mistakes that drive me nuts"

I see the keeper position in the same way. Henderson held the ball too long and got caught on the ball. It was a big mistake and I'm sure he learned from it and likely won't let it happen again.

De Gea on the other hand keeps making little mistakes over and over again by not controlling his area. So while there haven't been many "big mistakes" that will be directly attributed to him as "an error leading to a goal" there have been so many goals scored that possibly could have been avoided if he had better positioning and was a commanding keeper. And these errors drive me nuts and don't seem to be going away.

For me, Henderson should be given a run of games. I don't know if he's the answer, but from what we have seen so far, it has been nice seeing (and hearing) a keeper who controls his area (and his defense)...
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,284
i rounded it down and factored in the extra player and you’re still trying to prove me wrong over 25k.
I’m saying your initial statement was wrong. Which it was. Instead of just admitting you were vastly overestimating the amount on three keepers you keep going on about it. You were wrong, by a lot, but can’t admit it.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,284
A former employer once told me "if you're going to f*ck up, f*ck up big because it's the stupid little mistakes that drive me nuts"

I see the keeper position in the same way. Henderson held the ball too long and got caught on the ball. It was a big mistake and I'm sure he learned from it and likely won't let it happen again.

De Gea on the other hand keeps making little mistakes over and over again by not controlling his area. So while there haven't been many "big mistakes" that will be directly attributed to him as "an error leading to a goal" there have been so many goals scored that possibly could have been avoided if he had better positioning and was a commanding keeper. And these errors drive me nuts and don't seem to be going away.

For me, Henderson should be given a run of games. I don't know if he's the answer, but from what we have seen so far, it has been nice seeing (and hearing) a keeper who controls his area (and his defense)...
Live I’ve said from the start, I’d have no complaints about dropping De Gea. After Everton was certainly a good time. What I disagree with is the notion that Henderson is much more commanding. Watch the two league games he’s started. We conceded from set pieces in both of them. Our defence was no more organised.

It’s fair to criticise De Gea for his mistakes. It’s not fair to create a situation where he is to blame for the whole defence when the exact same weaknesses can be found when Henderson has played.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
I find it amazing how some people don't want an academy keeper to be given the opportunity to step up after already having a top season in the PL, especially when our no1 has let us down often in key games.
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,746
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
Live I’ve said from the start, I’d have no complaints about dropping De Gea. After Everton was certainly a good time. What I disagree with is the notion that Henderson is much more commanding. Watch the two league games he’s started. We conceded from set pieces in both of them. Our defence was no more organised.

It’s fair to criticise De Gea for his mistakes. It’s not fair to create a situation where he is to blame for the whole defence when the exact same weaknesses can be found when Henderson has played.
I completely disagree. We have seen Henderson come for balls that De Gea wouldn't even dream of coming for. De Gea never comes for balls that he isn't forced to come for. He is reactive, not proactive.

And just because Henderson is more commanding of his area that doesn't mean we won't ever concede from set pieces.

We can also hear him controlling his back line. De Gea is rarely heard.

I also disagree that the same weakness can be found when Henderson plays. In his last two starts the experts over at YouTube gave Henderson a 6/10 because "he had nothing to do". This was against West Ham and Real Sociedad. Two very good teams who Henderson was out of his goal taking care of problems before they occurred (meanwhile De Gea stays on his line vs West Brom to allow a header from inside his 6 that Henderson would have prevented). Henderson being proactive and a vocal presence is a huge difference maker to making sure "he had nothing to do"...
 

davidmichael

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
3,398
Find it crazy that anyone wants to pick De Gea over Henderson if we’re talking the here and now and going into the future, De Gea now isn’t the De Gea of 3 years ago and nowhere near the De Gea of 4-5 years ago.

De Gea has rapidly declined over the past 3 years and is only going to get worse whilst Henderson is probably already as good as De Gea and will only get better at his age, it’s literally a no brainer and if Romero is promised to be second choice then he’ll probably stay so we’d have Henderson and Romero.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,284
I completely disagree. We have seen Henderson come for balls that De Gea wouldn't even dream of coming for. De Gea never comes for balls that he isn't forced to come for. He is reactive, not proactive.

And just because Henderson is more commanding of his area that doesn't mean we won't ever concede from set pieces.

We can also hear him controlling his back line. De Gea is rarely heard.

I also disagree that the same weakness can be found when Henderson plays. In his last two starts the experts over at YouTube gave Henderson a 6/10 because "he had nothing to do". This was against West Ham and Real Sociedad. Two very good teams who Henderson was out of his goal taking care of problems before they occurred (meanwhile De Gea stays on his line vs West Brom to allow a header from inside his 6 that Henderson would have prevented). Henderson being proactive and a vocal presence is a huge difference maker to making sure "he had nothing to do"...
It’s a fallacy. Go and watch the games again. People are seeing what they want to see.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,284
and then I rounded it down just to be on the conservative side and you’re still going on about it
You’re the one that keeps going on about it because you can’t just say you got it wrong.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
It’s a fallacy. Go and watch the games again. People are seeing what they want to see.
You're denying the truth and not accepting you're wrong. Anyone without dodgy vision or thats not tanked up can see what Henderson brings compared to DDG.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,284
You're denying the truth and not accepting you're wrong. Anyone without dodgy vision or thats not tanked up can see what Henderson brings compared to DDG.
Watch the games. Watch the team that he used to play for pummel him at corners.
 

RashfordisRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 10, 2019
Messages
59
All being said and done, I dread the feeling of Dean Henderson making a career somewhere else and being lauded as one of the best keepers in the world without having been given a fair chance at Utd. So whatever it takes to keep him and get him a chance at the right time needs to be done.

I feel like the time was right now, but I wonder if Ole is managing things a little more elite than most of our thinking goes.

We at present have back to back Europa League ties on the horizon with Leicester in the cup - as such Dean Henderson is going to get more of a run in the next month or so - could he be taking the approach of making Dean Henderson the No. 1 when he earns his position (i.e. he keeps having good games and shows his true ability) rather than because the current incumbent has burnt his.
 

ManUnitedCanuck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
2,297
I don’t see Henderson as this commanding keeper like everyone says. Watching this match today and I don’t see him coming out and collecting crosses, similar to DeGea. Might just be me but I don’t see him dominating his area like everyone thinks.
 

davidmichael

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
3,398
I don’t see Henderson as this commanding keeper like everyone says. Watching this match today and I don’t see him coming out and collecting crosses, similar to DeGea. Might just be me but I don’t see him dominating his area like everyone thinks.
The commentators said literally 10 minutes ago that Henderson has had nothing to do all game and Sociedad haven’t had a single shot on target, can’t really be judged on tonight’s game although the whole defence seems more confident tonight and that could be down to being confident in Henderson behind them.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,359
De Gea 100% does not come for that in the 93rd min.
 

thesheriffjw

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Messages
246
Hendo does what degea will never do. He comes for crosses. A gk must be aggressive with balls into the box and ddg never has

Hendo all day long
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,746
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
That cross right near the end that Henderson grabbed De Gea would have depended on his defender winning the header. Henderson snuffs out the danger before it happens...
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,359
On the flip side, that was a dangerous spill on the only shot on target he had to deal with all game.