Solskjaer's contract

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,918
Location
Rehovot, Israel
Does progress and form only count when you cherry pick the dates?
I think my question is fair. We should always strive to improve and last season we were clealry like different teams before and after Bruno.

We are clearly still a better team than we were before him, which makes this season as a whole better than last season. But did we make further positive steps with him? Did we take the team and football we had in June and July and further enhanced them?
 

Devil81

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6,680
He could win his first trophy this season and potentially finish second, that's progression.

On the other hand it could be another season without a trophy and and a Champions league spot. I'd be hugely underwhelmed if that were the case.
 

ExecutionerWasp001

Full Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2019
Messages
439
The Glazers will be very happy if Ole get's top 4 again. It will be the first time since SAF retired that we've had consecutive top 4 finishes. This will be enough to gain a contract extension. The Glazers want to make money with minimal outlay.

We won't win a title with Ole as he won't be given the backing he would need in the transfer market. As we don't have the funds to compete we need a manager in the SAF mould who can make a team perform greater than the sum of their parts. These are in short supply.
 

K Stand Knut

Full Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
5,198
Location
Stretford End
Mid-season, yes they are unattainable. Honestly, when was the last high profile manager transfer? If you can name me at least two recent ones, fair enough. It’s absolute alternate reality if you think we can just snipe a manager mid-season.
But we’re not sniping him mid-season because we have a manager.

Any move for Potter will come at the end of a season, whether it be this season or next
 

jem

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
9,325
Location
Toronto
He could win his first trophy this season and potentially finish second, that's progression.

On the other hand it could be another season without a trophy and and a Champions league spot. I'd be hugely underwhelmed if that were the case.
That's why I think we should wait till the end of the season before deciding on an extension. If we blow both the top 4 and FA Cup/Europa, then I don't think he should be extended.
 

edgecutter

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
4,633
There is absolutely no need to give him a new contract. No other club will be wetting their lips looking for Ole to be their manager and he isn't a prize asset that will bring in money like a player being sold. If he is to get an extension it should be 12 months and no more.
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,224
Location
The stable
There is absolutely no need to give him a new contract. No other club will be wetting their lips looking for Ole to be their manager and he isn't a prize asset that will bring in money like a player being sold. If he is to get an extension it should be 12 months and no more.
I think this is sensible and I'm an Ole-inner.
 

Water Melon

Guest
Agreed
Graham Potter plays better football with worse players. Going by XG stats, Brighton have outperformed their opponents in over 70% of their games this season. Watch their games recently, it’s an absolute joke how they’re not in the top 8 at the very least going by how they play. If Potter had a better finisher up top, they’d be cruising to EL football. The phrase ‘false position’ was invented for this Brighton team. No matter who they play, they go for it full throttle, as evidenced by their recent dominating wins over Spurs and Pool. We do not do that.

Also, I’m not Ole out at this moment as you can tell from my previous post, but when you talk about qualifications, Ole had only ever been successful at Molde before he came to us. Even so, that is nothing compared to Potter’s achievements at Ostersunds. He took them from amateur football in the Swedish 4th division right to the Allsvenskan and got EL football, where they beat Arsenal at the Emirates. Remarkable stuff you don’t see unless you play Football Manager. He essentially built a club from the ground up, improving the playing squad, expanding the club, infrastructure etc.

At Cardiff, Ole relegated them despite them being 14th when he took over. The season after, Ole was sacked when he took Cardiff to an inauspicious start in the Championship. Potter, in the same situation, stabilised Swansea and got them to 10th and an FA Cup quarter final where the whole world can agree they deserved to beat City. All this after losing 15 first team players. By comparison, Ole lost 8.

Finally, there is the simple fact that while we can debate Potter vs Ole all day, if you asked any of the other 18 PL clubs’ chairman and fans who they’d rather have at the helm, it would be a unanimous vote for Potter. I don’t think anyone can deny that, no matter how much you like Ole.

On the basis of all this, the qualifications of Potter and Ole cannot even be compared. I’d keep Ole until the summer and see what he does simply because Nagelsmann and Potter are currently unattainable.
[/QUOTE
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
7,582
We improved compared with our terrible form up until the end of January 2020. Did we improve compared with our better form after that?
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't know this was a pick and chose your own adventure kind of discussion.
 

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
7,582
There is absolutely no need to give him a new contract. No other club will be wetting their lips looking for Ole to be their manager and he isn't a prize asset that will bring in money like a player being sold. If he is to get an extension it should be 12 months and no more.
A 12 month extension is a bridge or "prove you're worth it" type of deal that's reserved for special situations, like the manager retiring, or a hired replacement coming in. The club is not going to insult their own project by giving a 12 month contact extrension.

It's not about someone migth stealing him, it's about providing stability and continuity. The players know who will be in charge 12 months from now, and most importantly new signings will know what they are signing up for. Players sign on for both club, manager and project. It's not "Oh Ill play for Machester United now, I dont care what new manager comes in, Im sure I will fit into the system perfectly fine".

If we secure a good end to the season with stable results, and a happy playergroup the manager will be extended for a minimum of 2 years. And I am sure that we'll get a "Should have been Nagelsmann" thread popping up 10 minutes after.

Andre Villas Boas was another hipster manager from a foreign league everyone thought was Manager Jesus. It doesn't always work out.
 

James35

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,934
Location
Cardiff
All contract talk should be shelved until the season ends.

If he wins nothing and finishes outside the top 4 he should be sacked.

If he finishes in the top 4 but wins nothing he should get a year extension.

In top 4 and a trophy he should get two or three years.

He is a legend but we are not a charity, the board and owners may realise we are some way from being the best but surely a cup trophy is not out of the question with the squad he has.
 

Counterfactual

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
3,311
Location
Mobil Avenue station
All contract talk should be shelved until the season ends.

If he wins nothing and finishes outside the top 4 he should be sacked.

If he finishes in the top 4 but wins nothing he should get a year extension.

In top 4 and a trophy he should get two or three years.

He is a legend but we are not a charity, the board and owners may realise we are some way from being the best but surely a cup trophy is not out of the question with the squad he has.
Hopefully we're not this fixated on short term goals but are building for the future over several seasons.
 

edgecutter

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
4,633
A 12 month extension is a bridge or "prove you're worth it" type of deal that's reserved for special situations, like the manager retiring, or a hired replacement coming in. The club is not going to insult their own project by giving a 12 month contact extrension.

It's not about someone migth stealing him, it's about providing stability and continuity. The players know who will be in charge 12 months from now, and most importantly new signings will know what they are signing up for. Players sign on for both club, manager and project. It's not "Oh Ill play for Machester United now, I dont care what new manager comes in, Im sure I will fit into the system perfectly fine".

If we secure a good end to the season with stable results, and a happy playergroup the manager will be extended for a minimum of 2 years. And I am sure that we'll get a "Should have been Nagelsmann" thread popping up 10 minutes after.

Andre Villas Boas was another hipster manager from a foreign league everyone thought was Manager Jesus. It doesn't always work out.
I honestly don't see Ole being the guy to win trophies here, he's a stop gap and the club really should be looking at getting someone in who can challenge the likes of city. If he gets top 4 again by all means give him a new deal, but there is no way we should be giving him more than 12 month extension (He already has year left after the end of this season).

On the players signing on for the manager I don't think has the same significance as it once had. Players will go to the highest bidders, to a part of the world they want to live in and very importantly a club that looks like winning trophies (which Manchester United do not look like they will do).
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,528
A 12 month extension is a bridge or "prove you're worth it" type of deal that's reserved for special situations, like the manager retiring, or a hired replacement coming in. The club is not going to insult their own project by giving a 12 month contact extrension.

It's not about someone migth stealing him, it's about providing stability and continuity. The players know who will be in charge 12 months from now, and most importantly new signings will know what they are signing up for. Players sign on for both club, manager and project. It's not "Oh Ill play for Machester United now, I dont care what new manager comes in, Im sure I will fit into the system perfectly fine".

If we secure a good end to the season with stable results, and a happy playergroup the manager will be extended for a minimum of 2 years. And I am sure that we'll get a "Should have been Nagelsmann" thread popping up 10 minutes after.

Andre Villas Boas was another hipster manager from a foreign league everyone thought was Manager Jesus. It doesn't always work out.
Seen when has a contract provided any sort of managerial stability. What on earth :lol:
 

DuruttiColumn

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
93
No reason whatsoever to offer an extension at the moment.
what’s he gonna do, quit and go to Real?
 

Dr. StrangeHate

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
5,498
Don’t see any issues and we’ll played, for once, Woodward regarding timing. This is how it should be for any unproven manager.

Ole gets CL, he’ll get an extension and if he doesn’t I think the search for a new manager will start.
It shouldn't be like that though. If the club believe he can win us the CL or PL then he should be here regardless of Top 4. If the club don't believe that, then he should be let go at the end of season. We have two years of evidence now, surely the club has a team that can determine this.
 

Dr. StrangeHate

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
5,498
You can not go in to a new season with the manager on his last year. It reeks of instability and that will affect all players plus potential new signings; it would be the definition of setting a manager up to fail. One year extension would be fair imo. and more then that, necessary.
Won't PSG and Chelsea be exactly in that situation. Doesn't Pep also do this quite often?

If we don't give him a contract until he wins something it tells signings you either sink or swim at United there is no third option.
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
There is absolutely no need to give him a new contract. No other club will be wetting their lips looking for Ole to be their manager and he isn't a prize asset that will bring in money like a player being sold. If he is to get an extension it should be 12 months and no more.
Here here.
 

Jonno

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
8,375
Location
Preston, Lancashire
City's run has nothing to do with us bottling it and losing at home to Sheffield United and Arsenal and not being able to beat West Brom or conceding a soft equaliser deep into injury time against Everton, dropping two more points. Our reaction to talk of challenging for the title was to completely implode against lesser opposition at the first sign of expectation. I get we are largely a work in progress but the fact Ole will pick Maguire and De Gea regardless of how bad their performances are over sustained periods makes me wonder about the sense of giving him a new long-term deal. As an elite club we should have an elite coach. At this moment in time I couldn't say with any certainty that another premier league club would even hire him as manager and that is damning. Part of me thinks he is going to be our Roy Evans who largely stabilises the club and hands over to better qualified managers who take us onto trophies. I just don't see it being him that leads us onto the next league title, naturally I would be over the moon if he proved me wrong but if if I were a betting man that's not where my money would go.
Bottle what? When did you expect us to challenge for the title? We were streets behind City AND Liverpool last season, the season before, this season we're comfortably better than Liverpool, its no our fault they're imploding. We're better than Leicester, Spurs, etc.... you get my drift, we're the 2nd best team.

As for dropping points against poor opposition, ask Klopp about that. Ask Pep about when City lost 5-2 to Leicester, drew to West Brom, dropped points loads at the start of the season. This is currently our turn to drop points. Every team has ups and downs, but ultimately we're 2nd in the league which is good progress.

You're judging Ole's success on how much of a juggernaut City are. Thats not fair. Look inside United, look at the strides forward since he took over in all sorts of aspects, league position being 1, squad overhaul being another, amongst lots of things he's done.

I'd understand your argument if we were 5th, 6th, 7th, not making progress. But the progress is there in black and white. 2 years in to a huge overhaul.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,773
It shouldn't be like that though. If the club believe he can win us the CL or PL then he should be here regardless of Top 4. If the club don't believe that, then he should be let go at the end of season. We have two years of evidence now, surely the club has a team that can determine this.
I was trying to give a diplomatic answer/think in a completely neutral way but you are probably right that the club hierarchy will have formed an opinion on him by now. The fact he hasn't been extended is probably indicative of that.

Even if the board have decided Ole is probably not the guy, they will see if he's a decent steady eddie to have in charge if he gets top four whilst they look for/wait for a standout candidate. There also might genuinely be a thought process of not wanting to spend money right now and so Ole, who is never going to quit or be poached by another club, is a safe person to have in charge. All conjecture but I agree with your point that the club already knows if they think he's the long term solution.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,135
If you thought it would affect who would sign for us, you'd say we have to extend it, or move on from him. One or the other.

But I doubt many players join clubs due to the manager. Not as first concern anyway.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,924
Location
Sunny Manc
I think my question is fair. We should always strive to improve and last season we were clealry like different teams before and after Bruno.

We are clearly still a better team than we were before him, which makes this season as a whole better than last season. But did we make further positive steps with him? Did we take the team and football we had in June and July and further enhanced them?
Progress should be judged on seasons, ie this season so far vs the same point last season. Cherry picking dates is what people with agendas do and proves absolutely nothing.
 

Matt851

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
2,126
Watching the palace game and I am so glad we have a manager that plays attacking football now
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,391
I think it's pretty clear that no one will be signing him or poaching him from us in the next year or so, if ever. We should only extend his contract if he exceeds expectations. He has not done that. You just know we will though and we will end up sacking him and paying out millions for the privilege of doing so.
 

RashyForPM

New Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
3,183
The Graham Potter stuff has to be a meme, right ?

:lol:
No meme. For starters, watch his Brighton team’s performance against Palace last week. They lost, but they absolutely peppered Palace and ought to have won 3 or 4-0. They had 25 shots to 3.

Compare that to what we are doing now and have a look at this post I made just now.
Graham Potter plays better football with worse players. Going by XG stats, Brighton have outperformed their opponents in over 70% of their games this season. Watch their games recently, it’s an absolute joke how they’re not in the top 8 at the very least going by how they play. If Potter had a better finisher up top, they’d be cruising to EL football. The phrase ‘false position’ was invented for this Brighton team. No matter who they play, they go for it full throttle, as evidenced by their recent dominating wins over Spurs and Pool. We do not do that.

Also, I’m not Ole out at this moment as you can tell from my previous post, but when you talk about qualifications, Ole had only ever been successful at Molde before he came to us. Even so, that is nothing compared to Potter’s achievements at Ostersunds. He took them from amateur football in the Swedish 4th division right to the Allsvenskan and got EL football, where they beat Arsenal at the Emirates. Remarkable stuff you don’t see unless you play Football Manager. He essentially built a club from the ground up, improving the playing squad, expanding the club, infrastructure etc.

At Cardiff, Ole relegated them despite them being 17th when he took over. The season after, Ole was sacked when he took Cardiff to an inauspicious start in the Championship. Potter, in the same situation, stabilised Swansea and got them to 10th and an FA Cup quarter final where the whole world can agree they deserved to beat City. All this after losing 15 first team players. By comparison, Ole lost 8.

Finally, there is the simple fact that while we can debate Potter vs Ole all day, if you asked any of the other 18 PL clubs’ chairman and fans who they’d rather have at the helm, it would be a unanimous vote for Potter. I don’t think anyone can deny that, no matter how much you like Ole.

On the basis of all this, the qualifications of Potter and Ole cannot even be compared. I’d keep Ole until the summer and see what he does simply because Nagelsmann and Potter are currently unattainable.
Can you really disagree with any of this?
 

dannyrhinos89

OMG socks and sandals lol!
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
14,435
He's steadied the club no doubt but if they offer him a longterm contract this club is dead.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,091
We're showing mid table form over our past eight games so not sure top four is even a guarantee.
Yeah it's looking a bit worrying. Under Solskjaer we generally show midtable
form for 75% of games and then hit a patch of games with unbelievable title winning form for 25% of games- that so far only tends to happen once a season under him (and I think it's already happened this season through November, December and January).
 

Giggsyking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
8,491
We will be worse than Arsenal if we offer him an extension. He should leave in the summer.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,391
Really can't wait for this Solskjaer experiment to be over. He's quite clearly not a shit coach and he's done ok but imagine what could happen with a capable coach in charge. Please don't reference Van Gaal and Mourinho in response, both who were past it.
 

padzilla

Hipster
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
3,393
Bottle what? When did you expect us to challenge for the title? We were streets behind City AND Liverpool last season, the season before, this season we're comfortably better than Liverpool, its no our fault they're imploding. We're better than Leicester, Spurs, etc.... you get my drift, we're the 2nd best team.

As for dropping points against poor opposition, ask Klopp about that. Ask Pep about when City lost 5-2 to Leicester, drew to West Brom, dropped points loads at the start of the season. This is currently our turn to drop points. Every team has ups and downs, but ultimately we're 2nd in the league which is good progress.

You're judging Ole's success on how much of a juggernaut City are. Thats not fair. Look inside United, look at the strides forward since he took over in all sorts of aspects, league position being 1, squad overhaul being another, amongst lots of things he's done.

I'd understand your argument if we were 5th, 6th, 7th, not making progress. But the progress is there in black and white. 2 years in to a huge overhaul.
We finished second the season before Ole took over with 81 points and were miles behind City. It has taken us two and a half seasons to get back to that position, that’s not progress, it’s treading water.