Lingard to join West Ham on loan

Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
I have seen Lingard stinking the place for United for years playing ton of games regularly while this is just VDB's first season and barely even played. No thanks I'll prefer trying something new in VDB than what I have seen last several years.
to be clear, my perspective is that it’s time for Lingard to go. Some fans are far too harsh on his time with us.

whether VDB is a better option...? At the moment he’s not.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,762
It's strange how well he's hit the ground running at West Ham given how poor he was for us (and for quite a long time). Well done to the young man.
I think it's because he's in a free role behind a striker who is an absolute unit and good aerially/holding the ball up - the little pockets he can exploit are key for him. That and teams tend to attack WHUM more than us so he'll generally receive the ball in better positions and with less opposition in front of him.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
to be clear, my perspective is that it’s time for Lingard to go. Some fans are far too harsh on his time with us.

whether VDB is a better option...? At the moment he’s not.
Not really, it's not harsh at all. It's just that now he's away, people will like to just remember the good things about him.

Lingard only scored more than 6 goals in a season once for United. Otherwise his numbers otherwise have been ranging from 3 to 5 goals a season. For a player who played on the wings and in attacking midfield, and played a lot of games a season and many times as a regular player, this is beyond dreadful. In all these seasons for us he was ranging 36-42 games a season.

We have barely seen VDB to conclude he's better than Lingard or not. He has played only 13 games in the league with the majority of his minutes ranging from 7 to 23 minutes, two times played 45 minutes and only one time played the full 90 minutes in the league ? On what basis can we even judge him properly ? As meanwhile Lingard has been a useless player for United for his last 1.5 years here.

I'll prefer trying something new in VDB and giving him a proper chance first. We have seen Lingard ton of times across the last several years. We haven't seen VDB much yet. I know what my choice will be.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
If our reported finances are correct then we're not spending this summer, a returning in form Lingard might be the best addition to our attack we can hope for :(
 

Patchbeard

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
2,578
Has no one asked why the feck was he on pens?! Surely they have someone better from a dead ball...
 

The holy trinity 68

The disparager
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
5,811
Location
Manchester
Has no one asked why the feck was he on pens?! Surely they have someone better from a dead ball...
He won the penalty and there was a little bit of a squabble between him and the captain Declin Rice over who should take it. Lingard wouldn't have taken the pen it he didn't win it.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,311
Dunno about suicidal but I can’t be the only one thinking Lukaku would improve us. I’ve said the same thing in that thread, to similar responses that I’m seeing in this thread. People who think it’s literally impossible for a fresh start to revitalise the career of talented footballers struggling at their former club. Which is a bit fecking weird, seeing how often it happens.
So are you suggesting we should try to re-sign Lukaku, if the move to another team/league revitalized his career which it seems to have, then what would have sparked the revitalization if he stayed?

Because the unprofessional overweight Lukaku that played here in 19/20 definitely wouldn't improve us.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,311
If we sell Lingard for £20m at £75k p/w wages and replace him with an inferior player in Van de Beek for £40m at £108k p/w wages, that'd be terrible business.
So Van De Beek is shit after 6 months and Lingard is good after 6 games. Seems like sound logic, or maybe let's just see how both of them get on next season before deciding if it was bad business or not.
 

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,324
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
Then it's clear. If we want to get the best out him, we need to hire Moyes.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,217
If he's trusted with pens at WHU, surely they'd pay up £25m in the summer, right? Do it for the old times, Moyesy.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,022
I think it's because he's in a free role behind a striker who is an absolute unit and good aerially/holding the ball up - the little pockets he can exploit are key for him. That and teams tend to attack WHUM more than us so he'll generally receive the ball in better positions and with less opposition in front of him.
This precisely, he was always very good running in behind off a striker. Especially when he was on loan in the championship - scored 4 goals on his debut for birmingham. Teams will play further up the pitch against the hammers which will benefit him.

however, this ‘form’ will not translate to man utd, where he will be expected to play quick interchanges and create play with clever passes.

the best result is he is sold to west ham or similar. He will always be a cracking player in a team further down the table or a team which sets up in a way that benefits him.
 

USREDEVIL

Full Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Messages
4,882
Location
California U.S.A.
If our reported finances are correct then we're not spending this summer, a returning in form Lingard might be the best addition to our attack we can hope for :(
What a summer "signing" that would be. A young up and coming Mancunian. Seriously though...nah. He and West Ham are a good match.
 

Andersonson

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,791
Location
Trondheim
Not really, it's not harsh at all. It's just that now he's away, people will like to just remember the good things about him.

Lingard only scored more than 6 goals in a season once for United. Otherwise his numbers otherwise have been ranging from 3 to 5 goals a season. For a player who played on the wings and in attacking midfield, and played a lot of games a season and many times as a regular player, this is beyond dreadful. In all these seasons for us he was ranging 36-42 games a season.

We have barely seen VDB to conclude he's better than Lingard or not. He has played only 13 games in the league with the majority of his minutes ranging from 7 to 23 minutes, two times played 45 minutes and only one time played the full 90 minutes in the league ? On what basis can we even judge him properly ? As meanwhile Lingard has been a useless player for United for his last 1.5 years here.

I'll prefer trying something new in VDB and giving him a proper chance first. We have seen Lingard ton of times across the last several years. We haven't seen VDB much yet. I know what my choice will be.
4-5 goals is better than Martial!

On a more serious note, glad he is doing well. Means more cash for us
 

JakeC

Last Man Standing 2 champion 2020/21
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
29,755
How long is left on his contract?
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
I think it's because he's in a free role behind a striker who is an absolute unit and good aerially/holding the ball up - the little pockets he can exploit are key for him. That and teams tend to attack WHUM more than us so he'll generally receive the ball in better positions and with less opposition in front of him.
That and the midfielders behind him. I haven't watched him play but his name seems to feature a lot. New club bounce too maybe? Good luck to him, glad he is resurrecting his career. Thought he'd do more with us but he seemed to plateau in his development around 24/25.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,676
Location
india
I think he is just having a purple patch with a new club bounce.
That, and starting regularly for a team with less pressure/completion. See VDB at Ajax and now at United. Lingard is doing well but he's never playing ahead of Bruno isn't a winger.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,722
6 goals + assists in 6 games, he played against Villa, City, Spurs, Leeds. That's a very good return.

West ham doesn't have any player who match that output, so we should expect good money for him.
 

Bobcat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
6,388
Location
Behind the curtains, leering at the neighbors
That, and starting regularly for a team with less pressure/completion. See VDB at Ajax and now at United. Lingard is doing well but he's never playing ahead of Bruno isn't a winger.
Yup. Honestly im glad hes doing well. Both for the young man himself but also for us since it means WH will need to put some money on the table to keep him
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,722
Only Bruno has scored more goals than Lingard since his move to West Ham and only Bruno, Kane and Bale are involved in more goals than Lingard.
 

Okey

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
2,433
Keep doing your thing JLingz. Your last bit of service for United might be staying at West Ham as part of a Declan Rice deal. We'll always remember you fondly.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,875
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
So are you suggesting we should try to re-sign Lukaku, if the move to another team/league revitalized his career which it seems to have, then what would have sparked the revitalization if he stayed?

Because the unprofessional overweight Lukaku that played here in 19/20 definitely wouldn't improve us.
I definitely don’t think we should re-sign him. That ship has sailed. I also don’t know what needed to be done to get him to produce this season’s form at United. I’m not a manager.

The only reason I mentioned him was because I’m seeing similar comments in his thread and this one. Bitter fans trying to convince everyone (and themselves, presumably?) that these two players aren’t actually playing at a level that would be good enough for United, when they obviously are. In fact they’re both clearly playing a lot better than the players we signed to replace them.

Whether they could reproduce that form back at the club where they previously struggled is a whole other issue.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,722
I definitely don’t think we should re-sign him. That ship has sailed. I also don’t know what needed to be done to get him to produce this season’s form at United. I’m not a manager.

The only reason I mentioned him was because I’m seeing similar comments in his thread and this one. Bitter fans trying to convince everyone (and themselves, presumably?) that these two players aren’t actually playing at a level that would be good enough for United, when they obviously are. In fact they’re both clearly playing a lot better than the players we signed to replace them.

Whether they could reproduce that form back at the club where they previously struggled is a whole other issue.
Make ManUtd play in Serie A? :D
 

KikiDaKats

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
2,607
Location
Salford
Supports
His Liverpool supporting wife
He seem a bit more confident.. Hearing players at West Ham talking of him bringing a winning mentality can be an ego boost for any player.
Everyone wants a bit of love somehow. That he is getting at his club right now. He is not even scared to do the risky stuff these days and that’s a good place to be for any player. Knowing your colleagues believe you can make things happen.
 

RazorOz

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
252
Him playing well is good because it will give him actual value when we come to sell him in the summer. There's no point keeping a player who had pretty much added nothing to Utd for at least 18 months and probably longer. This is actually what we wanted given before this run of form we were clearly struggling to sell him with no real takers given his wages, that's why he ended up on loan in the first place, given he was clearly free to go in the summer but there were no takers.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
Glad that he is loving his football. All the best for Lingard.

If West Ham want him him, we should ask no less than £20m like what they will do to us if we asked for Rice, they'd want £80m
 

Hughes35

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
2,593
Really should be offering Lingard as part of a deal involving either Soucek or Rice.

Lingard + 20 million for Soucek
Lingard + 30 million for Rice

I think that's good business for all parties.

Glad he's gone but it is annoying that he did feck all for us yet looks a player for them.
 

Doracle

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,009
Hopefully we can get £20 million for him. I am really concerned though that we will decide his form is so good for West Ham that we need to offer him a renewed contract or we overvalue him and price him out of a move. Even on this run of form, he’d only be a bench option for us.
 

Mike Smalling

Full Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
11,000
Hopefully we can get £20 million for him. I am really concerned though that we will decide his form is so good for West Ham that we need to offer him a renewed contract or we overvalue him and price him out of a move. Even on this run of form, he’d only be a bench option for us.
I share that concern, even though Ole has in general been good at rooting out the deadwood. Phil Jones is the one obvious mistake that comes to mind.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,587
Location
Manc
Happy for him, sometimes a change is what you need, he should never come back to United, the bench is all Ole can offer him here.