U23's: Man City v Man United

jb8521

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
4,526
City's players from youth teams playing in the premier league :

Foden starting for City
Tosin Adarabioyo starting CB for Fulham
Jack Harrison starting left wing for Leeds
Iheanacho starting striker for Leicester
Kasper Schmikes starting goalkeeper for Leicester
Douglas Luiz starting DM for Aston Villa
Joe Hart sub keeper at Spurs
Eric Garcia sub for City

Europe:

Denayer starting CB for Lyon
Brahim Diaz sub for Milan
Rony Lopez starting for Nice

So while not many break into the City team because of all the money spent on new players and also they buy quite a few young developing players. Yangel Herrera at Granada, Pedro Porro at Sporting and Arsenal's Pablo Mari didnt play for the youth teams but were bought as young players and loaned out, not sure they played in any youth teams. They still have good list of players
None of Harrison, Iheanacho, Luiz, Hart or Denayer are youth products
 

TrustInJanuzaj

'Liverpool are a proper club'
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
10,665
With a goal record of a goal every 4 to 5 games I'm not so sure.
Talent isn’t only based on stats. He’s a world class talent and an elite finisher. I stand by he would be exceptional with the chances City produce.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,400
Genuine question, at what age would you say a signing isn't a "youth product"?
I know you didn't ask me but I'll try and answer anyway.

If a signing plays in the academy team/games he is considered a youth product.

Others can correct me.
 

backofthenet

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
4,534
Location
He's not the messiah... he's a very naughty boy
I know you didn't ask me but I'll try and answer anyway.

If a signing plays in the academy team/games he is considered a youth product.

Others can correct me.
I seem to recall that the caveat to that is if the player has ever played a first team game prior to joining the club. So Amad, for example, can never be a youth team product, whereas Pogba is considered one.
 

abbulf

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 25, 2013
Messages
25
I seem to recall that the caveat to that is if the player has ever played a first team game prior to joining the club. So Amad, for example, can never be a youth team product, whereas Pogba is considered one.
I believe that is the definition that Mr Mujac has used for his work with United youth. So that for example Lee Sharpe was not considered a youth player even if he joined at 17, as he already had played senior football for Torquay prior to joining United.

For what it is worth, I find it a good definition, that makes it easier to keep track and compare across clubs.
 

SecondFig

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
6,518
Location
▲ You Are Here
I seem to recall that the caveat to that is if the player has ever played a first team game prior to joining the club. So Amad, for example, can never be a youth team product, whereas Pogba is considered one.
I can see that - but that would mean we could sign a 19-yo youth player from whoever, play him in a single youth match and he'd be a "United youth product"? I do think Pogba, Hannibal, Tuanzebe etc should all be considered Utd youth products, but I'm always a little uncomfortable with claiming youth players in their late teens who were signed for (relatively) large fees...
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,518
Genuine question, at what age would you say a signing isn't a "youth product"?
I would go with this.

The criteria is...



1. Joined the club at 17 or younger without signing professional forms elsewhere

2. Not played professional league football elsewhere

3. Actually played in our Academy system



Pogba and Mejbri meet all those three criteria.



Mark Hughes left us and joined Barcelona and Bayern Munich. We bought him back for a large fee. Mark Bosnich left us for Aston Villa and we bought him back for a large fee.



Both players came through our system...it's fairly straight-forward.
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,587
Location
DownUnder
I can see that - but that would mean we could sign a 19-yo youth player from whoever, play him in a single youth match and he'd be a "United youth product"? I do think Pogba, Hannibal, Tuanzebe etc should all be considered Utd youth products, but I'm always a little uncomfortable with claiming youth players in their late teens who were signed for (relatively) large fees...
I‘d hope 8 would be classed as a bit lower that a youth product. No idea why you included him with our French imports...
 

SecondFig

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
6,518
Location
▲ You Are Here
I‘d hope 8 would be classed as a bit lower that a youth product. No idea why you included him with our French imports...
:lol: I have no idea why but I had him down as joining us from Ajax... Feck me, I think 8 is probably just about young enough to count as a homegrown youth product!
 

jb8521

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
4,526
I seem to recall that the caveat to that is if the player has ever played a first team game prior to joining the club. So Amad, for example, can never be a youth team product, whereas Pogba is considered one.
Yeah that's the criteria I'd use as well
 

Mr. MUJAC

Manchester United Youth Historian
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
6,245
Location
Walter Crickmer started it all...
The thinking is quite simple.

The U/23's are just a rebranded Reserve team and even though normally full of Academy players anyone can play at that level including senior players. I think the rule is 3-4 players over 23 but in the past you could have a whole team of senior players if you wanted. So 'The Academy' is our U/18 and below.

As mentioned above, there has to be some criteria to categorise who is defined as a youth player and who isn't and to be able to be consistent over time. So generally speaking these three criteria are most commonly used. You have to have had actually played in the Academy, you can't have played professional football elsewhere (you or your team weren't professional at the time) and you must be 17 or younger.

1. If you play in the Academy...then you have played in the Academy by definition. To do so means you are getting coaching and development within that Academy framework. It's like going to a school. You are being educated within that school environment. So you went to that school.

2. If you have played professional football somewhere else then you are good enough to reach the first team. So if you are deemed to be good enough for the first team then most of your Academy development is over.

3. You sign professional terms at 17 and have to be 18 or younger at 1st September to play in the FA Youth Cup. If you are older than this then you are too old for the Academy and Youth football in general. At 18 you are regarded in the world as a an adult. So it's hard to be described as a youth player.

I know UEFA use other criteria but these three have been consistently applied at United and other clubs over many decades.

Here are some examples.

1. Lee Sharpe arrived at 17 (one tick), played in our youth team (two ticks), but was already playing professional football for Torquay when we signed him = 2/3 does not qualify
2. Shaun Goater arrived at 18 (no tick), played in our youth team (one tick), and hadn't played professional football anywhere else (two ticks) = 2/3 does not qualify
3. Amad Diallo arrived at 18 (no tick), played for Atalanta first team as a professional (no tick), hasn't played in our Academy (no tick) = 0/3 does not qualify
4. Rafael & Fabio Da Silva arrived at 18 (no tick), hadn't played professionally elsewhere (one tick), didn't play in our Academy (no tick) - 1/3 does not qualify
5. Regan Poole arrived at 17 (one tick), played in our Academy (two ticks), played professionally for Newport County (no tick) = 2/3 does not qualify
6. Gerard Pique arrived at 17 (one tick), played in our Academy (two ticks), did not play professionally at Barcelona (three ticks) - 3/3 QUALIFIES AS A YOUTH PLAYER
7. John O'Shea arrived at 17 (one tick), played in our Academy (two ticks), did not play professionally for Waterford (three ticks) = 3/3 QUALIFIES AS A YOUTH PLAYER

Some of the other names mentioned like Hoogewerf, Mejbri, Pogba, Rossi and many others all meet the three criteria. So therefore, in very simple terms, they went to our school and graduated from our school as professionals. They then go on to play in the first team of Manchester United or some other club.

Finally, there are quite a few players in the league like Dwight McNeil at Burnley, Jack Harrison at Leeds and many others. These lads were very young when they were at our club and whilst obviously received a lot of coaching in that time...they never reached our U/16's where competitive football really starts. Over the decades lads have arrived at United and played for our U/16's...not younger. Kids could only join at 15. So for consistency purposes I personally use that as an additional criteria. I would argue that Burnley and Leeds respectively, should take the credit for their development McNeil and Harrison into first team players.
 

Sea-Cow

Full Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
1,571
The thinking is quite simple.

The U/23's are just a rebranded Reserve team and even though normally full of Academy players anyone can play at that level including senior players. I think the rule is 3-4 players over 23 but in the past you could have a whole team of senior players if you wanted. So 'The Academy' is our U/18 and below.

As mentioned above, there has to be some criteria to categorise who is defined as a youth player and who isn't and to be able to be consistent over time. So generally speaking these three criteria are most commonly used. You have to have had actually played in the Academy, you can't have played professional football elsewhere (you or your team weren't professional at the time) and you must be 17 or younger.

1. If you play in the Academy...then you have played in the Academy by definition. To do so means you are getting coaching and development within that Academy framework. It's like going to a school. You are being educated within that school environment. So you went to that school.

2. If you have played professional football somewhere else then you are good enough to reach the first team. So if you are deemed to be good enough for the first team then most of your Academy development is over.

3. You sign professional terms at 17 and have to be 18 or younger at 1st September to play in the FA Youth Cup. If you are older than this then you are too old for the Academy and Youth football in general. At 18 you are regarded in the world as a an adult. So it's hard to be described as a youth player.

I know UEFA use other criteria but these three have been consistently applied at United and other clubs over many decades.

Here are some examples.

1. Lee Sharpe arrived at 17 (one tick), played in our youth team (two ticks), but was already playing professional football for Torquay when we signed him = 2/3 does not qualify
2. Shaun Goater arrived at 18 (no tick), played in our youth team (one tick), and hadn't played professional football anywhere else (two ticks) = 2/3 does not qualify
3. Amad Diallo arrived at 18 (no tick), played for Atalanta first team as a professional (no tick), hasn't played in our Academy (no tick) = 0/3 does not qualify
4. Rafael & Fabio Da Silva arrived at 18 (no tick), hadn't played professionally elsewhere (one tick), didn't play in our Academy (no tick) - 1/3 does not qualify
5. Regan Poole arrived at 17 (one tick), played in our Academy (two ticks), played professionally for Newport County (no tick) = 2/3 does not qualify
6. Gerard Pique arrived at 17 (one tick), played in our Academy (two ticks), did not play professionally at Barcelona (three ticks) - 3/3 QUALIFIES AS A YOUTH PLAYER
7. John O'Shea arrived at 17 (one tick), played in our Academy (two ticks), did not play professionally for Waterford (three ticks) = 3/3 QUALIFIES AS A YOUTH PLAYER

Some of the other names mentioned like Hoogewerf, Mejbri, Pogba, Rossi and many others all meet the three criteria. So therefore, in very simple terms, they went to our school and graduated from our school as professionals. They then go on to play in the first team of Manchester United or some other club.

Finally, there are quite a few players in the league like Dwight McNeil at Burnley, Jack Harrison at Leeds and many others. These lads were very young when they were at our club and whilst obviously received a lot of coaching in that time...they never reached our U/16's where competitive football really starts. Over the decades lads have arrived at United and played for our U/16's...not younger. Kids could only join at 15. So for consistency purposes I personally use that as an additional criteria. I would argue that Burnley and Leeds respectively, should take the credit for their development McNeil and Harrison into first team players.
Take this to the bank