ExecutionerWasp001
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2019
- Messages
- 439
I think think the comparable spend is regards to Net rather than Gross. It's mainly the media that peddle the comparable spend narrative to paint us in a bad light in regards to City. When we buy a player the reported figures include all bonuses whether targets are met or not. It's the same with wages too. City's transfer fees & wages are usually quoted at the basic with no mention of attainable bonuses.Thanks that's interesting, it really is night and day compared to City. Just the £300 million extra. I can't understand this narrative that we have spent comparatively.
It's pointless really comparing City's & Utd's spending as nobody but a select few knows, or will ever know, how far the rabbit hole goes down at City. We can only say that cheating isn't usually an isolated incident. Lance Armstong didn't stop taking Ped's after his first TDF. Marion Jones didn't stop taking EPO after the Sydney Olympics.
It is fair though to presume the corruption is widespread. The Mancini double salary was never refuted by the club. It's inconceivable that only 1 employee at the club was being greased. Money has to go through many important hands to keep up the charade at City.