Again, you can say the same about Ronaldo. Missed the final, and Eder was the biggest reason that narrative changed on the NT stage.
Modric was a fine winner for 2018. I understand a debate about it but he was superb in that 2018 WC and as a midfielder was great in the 2018 Madrid side. He was always the engine of that team, providing the service to Ronaldo. He was the best midfielder in the world.
You are missing the point of discussion, the whole while we are talking about whether the player deserved to win Ballon D’or throughout the year as to whether they are overrated or not, you have put forward Ronaldo argument in Euro. I have then listed out their overall achievements, stats performance over their respective year for comparison sake, but you end up arguing about the one game he was injured by the opponents player. Lets just do it fairly and compare everything again, Ronaldo in 2016 vs Modric in 2018, as to who was being overrated in winning Ballon D’or then:
Ronaldo in 2016:
- Euro winner
- CL winner
- Portugal best player/top scorer/assist in winning Euro
- Real Madrid best player/top scorer in winning CL
- overall 55 goals 17 assist in 57 games in 2016
- La Liga: 7.99 avg rating in whoscored, 8 motm
- CL: 8.11 avg rating in whoscored, 7 motm
Modric in 2018
- CL winner
- Croatia best player in WC
- One of Real Madrid key player in winning CL
- overall 4 goals 8 assist in 44 games
- La Liga: 7.29 avg rating in whoscored, 0 motm
- CL: 7.02 avg rating in whoscored, 0 motm
Based on above, there’s night and day difference for the 2 players in terms of being worthy Ballon D’or winner or not. You may argue Modric has a great WC, especially during group stages, and a great CL campaign as one of his team key players winning the trophy. That’s about it. Over the course of the year, he wasn’t really stand out player for winning the award. For Ronaldo case, from whatever perspective, he clearly stands out.