Southgate vs Solskjaer

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,077
We played psg this year. Beat them. Also beat the two cl finalists. We didn't play like England yesterday in any of the those games.
We played very well vs PSG in both games, but most of the time in big games, we play very cautiously and reactively and let the other teams take initiative. Not to the extent England did yesterday, but we don't really control games vs the big games.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
I think Southgate the better manager for what his job is. England done really well under him, but lost on pens. They reached a semi final and a final. That is really good job.

Us under Ole has never reached a CL semi final and we have not won the league. Also not won anything at all just like Southgate, but there are no minor trophies on international level.
Reach a bit further
 

He'sRaldo

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
3,200
My main problem with them is that because they're not good enough, they make stupid decisions which draws a lot of abuse onto the players.

Clear examples are Ole playing Rashford through multiple injuries, or playing for pens in the EL final and leaving DdG on the pitch. Both decisions which resulted in a ton of unnecessary abuse for said players, when the manager was ultimately responsible. And Ole's done that kind of thing quite a number of times without learning his lesson.

Same with Southgate and the Euro final fiasco. Now there's unnecessary pressure going forward for our lads and Saka, as well as an inquest for Grealish and other senior pros, all because the manager wasn't good enough.
 

big rons sovereign

New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Messages
6,160
Reach a bit further
It's surely not possible.

I did wonder how long it would be before the pochetino fanclub would reappear. Never thought it would take less than an hour though.

It's almost impressive, they must've been hopping around waiting for the tournament to finish, like a 5 year old trying to hold their pee.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,595
I’m not an Ole fan but he is levels and levels above Southgate.

Southgate took over Borough, was backed heavily and got them relegated, then got sacked. That’s literally all he did before he joined the U21s.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
Ole is very good when teams attack. Once England got the early goal it's Ole territory. The counter attacking game. Sterling is used to playing in a team that has possession. Rashford is used to play in a team that's counter attacking. You can see that England was defending deep and no one was even trying to get behind the Italian defense. Kane is too slow for that. And he was not able to hold the ball and get to the two wingers and also get into the box.
 

Rajiztar

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
2,102
Supports
Chelsea
Ole is very good when teams attack. Once England got the early goal it's Ole territory. The counter attacking game. Sterling is used to playing in a team that has possession. Rashford is used to play in a team that's counter attacking. You can see that England was defending deep and no one was even trying to get behind the Italian defense. Kane is too slow for that. And he was not able to hold the ball and get to the two wingers and also get into the box.
I would give it to ole. England didn't have that outlet when they got possession. Rashford and sterling after one hour might changed the dynamics of the game.
 

big rons sovereign

New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Messages
6,160
Ole is very good when teams attack. Once England got the early goal it's Ole territory. The counter attacking game. Sterling is used to playing in a team that has possession. Rashford is used to play in a team that's counter attacking. You can see that England was defending deep and no one was even trying to get behind the Italian defense. Kane is too slow for that. And he was not able to hold the ball and get to the two wingers and also get into the box.
Honestly thought starting Kane would be trouble. We needed pace against Italy's aging defenders, Sancho, Rashford or Grealish would've had Chiellini on toast. Instead we had the Kane from the group stage rather than Ukraine and Denmark. Ambling around and being no use whatsoever.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
We played very well vs PSG in both games, but most of the time in big games, we play very cautiously and reactively and let the other teams take initiative. Not to the extent England did yesterday, but we don't really control games vs the big games.
We want to but still can't, mainly because the quality of our midfield. We may to some extent of some parts of the game but largely we're simply trying our best to not be controlled/dominated by the opponents.

If you want to completely control the game against the big teams you're talking of a midfield around the calibre of Barcelona 2011. In fact, even Liverpool or City hardly control the games against the top teams. It's more like a here and there. It's incredibly difficult to aquire a midfield that would dominate other top midfields on a regular basis anyway.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,811
We played very well vs PSG in both games, but most of the time in big games, we play very cautiously and reactively and let the other teams take initiative. Not to the extent England did yesterday, but we don't really control games vs the big games.
Both teams have the same midfield and possession weaknesses.
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,012
I see the same frustrating issue in both managers that they both heavily rely on their best 11 players to win matches and afraid to sub their top stars during a game, where as you have managers like mancini and emery who were able to defeat both the former managers mentioned in finals by being able to get the best out of their entire match day subs bench to good effect in game.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
21,890
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
It's surely not possible.

I did wonder how long it would be before the pochetino fanclub would reappear. Never thought it would take less than an hour though.

It's almost impressive, they must've been hopping around waiting for the tournament to finish, like a 5 year old trying to hold their pee.
Well the "like a 5 year old" bit is certainly true.

How sad to use even the skinniest connection to make a poorly disguised dig at Ole.

It was all through the fecking tournament. Southgate makes a sub ... "Ole wouldn't have done that so soon". Southgate doesn't make a sub "just like Ole". England win a game (with that attacking talent!) "shows Ole how to control a game".

It's just relentless
 

big rons sovereign

New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Messages
6,160
Well the "like a 5 year old" bit is certainly true.

How sad to use even the skinniest connection to make a poorly disguised dig at Ole.

It was all through the fecking tournament. Southgate makes a sub ... "Ole wouldn't have done that so soon". Southgate doesn't make a sub "just like Ole". England win a game (with that attacking talent!) "shows Ole how to control a game".

It's just relentless
Madness. We've not even started preseason and they're already at it.
 

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,321
Location
UK
Ole is a lot better, they’re not really comparable. United’s football is better, we score a ton of goals, and yet barely have a quality player outside of the first XI. Ole picks his best players, Gareth doesn’t and sticks with his favourites. Ole holds off on subs because he has little game-changing quality on the bench. Ole goes defensive against teams with a lot of quality, but goes for the throat when we have the upper-hand.

This really is the most ridiculous of comparisons, just another thread to have a pop at our manager.
 

Kajus

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
795
There really is no limit to how fecking stupid some of the posters here can get :lol::lol::lol:
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,546
Location
india
No idea who is better tbh. Ole's done a decent job but keeps doing the bare minimum rather than anything groundbreaking. Southgate has also done a decent stabilising England who need someone more expansive. My gut feeling tells me that both United and England will reach the level they want to with someone else.
 

JustAGuest

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
742
Ole is a lot better, they’re not really comparable. United’s football is better, we score a ton of goals, and yet barely have a quality player outside of the first XI. Ole picks his best players, Gareth doesn’t and sticks with his favourites. Ole holds off on subs because he has little game-changing quality on the bench. Ole goes defensive against teams with a lot of quality, but goes for the throat when we have the upper-hand.

This really is the most ridiculous of comparisons, just another thread to have a pop at our manager.
/thread
 

padzilla

Hipster
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
3,387
Only putting Rashford and Sancho on in a final to take penalties is like having a Ferrari and only using it to drive to get milk at the corner shop. What message is sent to players of that stature whose manager doesn't trust them to play in open play in a major final? They were probably insulted by the lack of playing time, I could understand if England were pushing the Italians on to the back foot but they were crying out for something else up front, instead the emphasis was placed on the manager's favourites who work hard but were not producing quality.
 

DiMaria

Full Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
118
Difference is Southgate has unlimited options on the bench and Solskjaer has none.
Excellent point. Look at our bench vs Villarreal and England’s bench vs Italy. If only we had those choices...Also I think Ole would never have a 19 year old take the 5th penalty. Not even Greenwood who I would like to think takes penalties better than Saka.

I think next season if we really do buy sancho varane and another name and finally have 3-4 quality subs we can count on week in week out when those signings slot into the starting lineup, Ole will continue to prove the haters wrong and we will take another step forward and finally win something.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Well the "like a 5 year old" bit is certainly true.

How sad to use even the skinniest connection to make a poorly disguised dig at Ole.

It was all through the fecking tournament. Southgate makes a sub ... "Ole wouldn't have done that so soon". Southgate doesn't make a sub "just like Ole". England win a game (with that attacking talent!) "shows Ole how to control a game".

It's just relentless
We call that the "her husband" phenomenon here :lol:
 

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,321
Location
UK
Excellent point. Look at our bench vs Villarreal and England’s bench vs Italy. If only we had those choices...Also I think Ole would never have a 19 year old take the 5th penalty. Not even Greenwood who I would like to think takes penalties better than Saka.

I think next season if we really do buy sancho varane and another name and finally have 3-4 quality subs we can count on week in week out when those signings slot into the starting lineup, Ole will continue to prove the haters wrong and we will take another step forward and finally win something.
Ole spent his playing career at the highest level, playing with proven winners in high-stress situations. What has Southgate done? A couple of league cups? He’s way out of his depth. I feel for him because he seems like a decent bloke, but he royally fecked this game up.

Ole will have a better bench next season, so expect to see this reputation crumble. Ole’s bench in the EL final: Fred (not fully fit), Mata, Tuanzebe, James, Telles. A flat downgrade on absolutely everyone else out there, and you’d only bring them on because they would be fresh legs.

Southgate had Rashford, Saka, Sancho, Grealish, DCL. All game-changing players! I’m still fuming at how badly he bottled this.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
In the hullabaloo it reminds us that there is something more important than just football. It's human dignity.
I would rather have Ole as manager and win nothing compared to winning everything under a racist prick.
 

Flexdegea

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
2,342
Ole head in my opinion. Went to shit at the end but we played well at periods and scored a lot of goals.


Silly argument as ultimately southgate going to get sacked too
 

Tavern in the town

New Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2022
Messages
1,532
Ole was miles better. They’re both managers who aren’t great tactically and tend to rely more on creating a good environment for the players. But even in spite of that Ole occasionally pulled out some decent tactical tweaks in big games.
 

sewey89

Incorrectly predicted the de Jong transfer 2022
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
10,672
Location
Chesterfield
I’ve always thought they’re very similar. This was his Liverpool moment. I think he’ll be gone after a poor WC.
 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,668
Quite eerie how they mirror each other, even down to the length of the good results in large part to other teams/countries falling apart.
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
Southgate has done better. Before this nations league England had great results.

Ole never had that with us.