Facebook, Amazon etc....

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,123
I think the point, and correct me if I'm wrong, is that Amazon make a big effort to promote themselves and their warehouses as decent places to work and as if they are above all others. Those shiny videos and tv shows sure show that well. When in reality, and I know this first hand as I've worked at many of their places (not for them directly of course, so I'm free to comment), they are soulless shit holes that don't give a damn about worker's health and safety.

Through promoting themselves as something different they have, rather cleverly I might add, turned attention away from the fact they really are worse than most companies because they have the power to be. It extends beyond the warehouse too, ask the contract delivery drivers how they are treated for example.
I can't say I like the way amazon treats its workers at all, they have massive blind spot I can't understand why they can't see it but I just see a massive disconnect between everyone's anger over this and everyones eagerness to use Amazon. I mean all those orders that make the workers lives miserable come from us. It's not normal to be able to deliver something the same dau or the next day from the other side of a continent... That burden falls on the people being asked to meet these impossible consumer demands.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,626
I keep coming back to the same question: why can't legislators do more to protect workers from shady practices? At some point we have to realize the incentives are there for major corporations like Amazon to exploit the law.
 

OleBoiii

New Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
6,021
I keep coming back to the same question: why can't legislators do more to protect workers from shady practices? At some point we have to realize the incentives are there for major corporations like Amazon to exploit the law.
First you need competent politicians who genuinely care about people. Most countries don't have that.

I'm not sure if I agree with George Carlin when he says that a country's politicians are a reflection of its people. Most of the stuff politicians do ultimately fly over the head of the "common man". It's not until you see the results that people will go: "Fine... That was a smart decision."

In the case of the US: workers' rights, social mobility and heavier taxation of the rich will be converted to "more useless government regulations, more taxes and fewer jobs because the honorable elites will escape the country".
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,542
Location
Sydney
These are opinion pieces. I'm looking for specific instances where Bezos changed the narrative of how the Post actually covers the news in its news section.
this seems kinda impossible to prove
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
9,874
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
Which is why speculating about it is futile. People are simply going to invent the outcome they want to praise or vilify.
If it's impossible to prove one way or another, why do you chose to believe he doesn't interfere?

In previous posts you said he was a business man who takes advantage of what the system allows him in order to profit. Now that he owns a newspaper he's not going to take advantage of it? Doesn't seem in character.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
129,967
Location
Hollywood CA
If it's impossible to prove one way or another, why do you chose to believe he doesn't interfere?

In previous posts you said he was a business man who takes advantage of what the system allows him in order to profit. Now that he owns a newspaper he's not going to take advantage of it? Doesn't seem in character.
The burden is on those making the accusation, not on those who aren't.

The previous post was about maximizing profits, not about a conspiracy of clandestinely using a newspaper to advance Bezos' political interests.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
9,874
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
The burden is on those making the accusation, not on those who aren't.

The previous post was about maximizing profits, not clandestinely using a newspaper to advance Bezos' political interests.
But you agreed it's impossible to prove it one way or another, or did I misunderstand?
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
9,874
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
Yes. That's correct. If there is tangible evidence then let's see it instead of engaging in conspiratorial accusations.
Does it really seem so farfetched to you, knowing how he conducts himself in his other businesses, apparently taking advantage of everything he can? With the WaPo he's just a good samaritan? I don't buy it. Saying ruthless businessmen do shady things to advance their interests is hardly a conspiracy.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
129,967
Location
Hollywood CA
Does it really seem so farfetched to you, knowing how he conducts himself in his other businesses, apparently taking advantage of everything he can? With the WaPo he's just a good samaritan? I don't buy it. Saying ruthless businessmen do shady things to advance their interests is hardly a conspiracy.
I suppose people are going to believe whatever fits their preferred narrative. If there was any truth to this sort of conspiracy then all kinds of former WaPo employees would be talking about it to competing outlets, but that hasn't happened, in fact the narrative appears to be to the contrary since the editor of the Post has said Bezos has never interfered in a single story.
 

Ady87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2011
Messages
8,489
Location
Now Accepting Positive Reps.
Is the point that editorially more pro-billionaire opinion pieces are getting through these days than pre-takeover? If anything allowing the point to get across in opinion pieces which plenty of people will digest as straight up news is worse.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,542
Location
Sydney
Playing devil's advocate here: why should people automatically believe the argument that Bezos committed editorial interference?
yeah I agree

I'd just think he was because he seems like a bit of a scumbag to me, but I can't prove anything
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
9,874
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
I suppose people are going to believe whatever fits their preferred narrative. If there was any truth to this sort of conspiracy then all kinds of former WaPo employees would be talking about it to competing outlets, but that hasn't happened, in fact the narrative appears to be to the contrary since the editor of the Post has said Bezos has never interfered in a single story.
It just strikes me as strange that you seem to see Bezos as two different people. Amazon Bezos is a businessman who spends truckloads of cash lobbying to further his interests even if that hurts a lot of people, many of whom are his employees. WaPo Bezos is a guy who wouldn't dream of using his power in the media to further his interests. Hard to believe in my opinion.

And again, I don't think having the opinion that rich billionaires resort to shady practices is in any way conspiratorial.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
129,967
Location
Hollywood CA
It just strikes me as strange that you seem to see Bezos as two different people. Amazon Bezos is a businessman who spends truckloads of cash lobbying to further his interests even if that hurts a lot of people, many of whom are his employees. WaPo Bezos is a guy who wouldn't dream of using his power in the media to further his interests. Hard to believe in my opinion.

And again, I don't think having the opinion that rich billionaires resort to shady practices is in any way conspiratorial.
I don't think its strange at all. I'm not a Bezos fan per say, but I also don't go for fabricated conspiracies as a device to pile on the guy in the absence of any evidence.
 
Last edited:

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
9,874
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
I don't think its strange at all. I'm not a Bezos fan per say, but I also don't go for fabricated conspiracies as a device to pile on to an individual in the absence of any evidence.
I don't know why you keep bringing up the word conspiracy. It doesn't apply here at all.

Do you think saying powerful people use their money and influence on the media to make themselves and their businesses look good is a conspiracy?

Is saying politicians' decisions are influenced by the money they get from corporations a conspiracy? You can't prove it either, they can just say they vote a certain way because it's the best for their constituents.

And by the way, if you google you will find cases of WaPo people saying their were penalized for criticizing Bezos. Also, we all know people often self-censure, a reporter is less likely to criticize their boss or their interests. You choose to believe this isn't Bezos' intention at all when buying such an influential a media group, even though his behavior in other businesses suggest he's not the kind of person who goes around spreading good intentions.

You always seem to be very pragmatical on political issues on this forum and very aware of the cynicism and less honorable intentions behind money and politics. I don't understand why you're applying a different logic in this case.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
129,967
Location
Hollywood CA
And by the way, if you google you will find cases of WaPo people saying their were penalized for criticizing Bezos. Also, we all know people often self-censure, a reporter is less likely to criticize their boss or their interests. You choose to believe this isn't Bezos' intention at all when buying such an influential a media group, even though his behavior in other businesses suggest he's not the kind of person who goes around spreading good intentions.
This wouldn't be a surprise. Who is going to go out of their way to criticize their boss, much less do so publicly. As for Bezos, he had no interest in buying the Post and actually had to be coaxed and cajoled into doing it by others who convinced him it would be a good idea. Sometimes Billionaries just do this stuff out of vanity or altruism (ie wanting to promote the press or wanting to turn a struggling business into a profitable one). The guy who runs Salesforce recently bought Time Magazine. Do i think he bought it to promote Salesforce ? Of course not.
 
Last edited:

nimic

something nice
Scout
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
31,038
Location
And I'm all out of bubblegum.
I don't think its strange at all. I'm not a Bezos fan per say, but I also don't go for fabricated conspiracies as a device to pile on the guy in the absence of any evidence.
In my experience, when people say they're not something per se, they're kinda still something. It's the mildest possible way to distance yourself from something.

Or is that not how you used it?
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,539
Good thread:


These are the main points:


 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,626
Facebook has repeatedly found that its Instagram app is harmful to a number of teenagers, according to a Wall Street Journal report published Tuesday.

The Journal cited Facebook studies over the past three years that examined how Instagram affects its young user base, with teenage girls being most notably harmed. One internal Facebook presentation said that among teens who reported suicidal thoughts, 13% of British users and 6% of American users traced the issue to Instagram.

“Thirty-two percent of teen girls said that when they felt bad about their bodies, Instagram made them feel worse,” the researchers reportedly wrote. Facebook also reportedly found that 14% of boys in the U.S. said Instagram made them feel worse about themselves
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/14/facebook-documents-show-how-toxic-instagram-is-for-teens-wsj.html
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,626
Anyone else getting the Resident Evil vibe with Big Tech? Just read that Apple is studying the potential of airpods as a health device.

These companies are becoming an Umbrella Corporation-esque entity. They'll dominate everything.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,871
Location
Sunny Manc
I try to avoid Amazon as much as possible. Evil company bent on taking over the world, the same goes for all the tech giants. Governments are seemingly letting the opportunity to bring them down a peg or two go by.