We're well into the realms of the only two explanations being that they are either getting decisions wrong on purpose to suit who they want to win the game, or getting decisions wrong on purpose to suit some other childish narrative that in reality should result in sackings. I think we were there two years ago though. Its just that for some reason everyone seems content to put up with it. You can obviously have subjective calls or close decisions that VAR is never going to take the controversy out of, but the problem is it's not those ones that are causing the controversy, its very obvious calls that they are getting wrong, ever single week. Sometimes every single game.
Often it happens when there is not even a decision to make in the first place. I mean our game was beyond any reasonable explanation with the two penalty calls, as there's nothing in the rules that allows the VAR ref to conclude neither is a foul. The Leicester game though they had a goal disallowed for offside where not only was it inexplicably wrong, but unless you WANTED to disallow the goal, there was no reason to even look at a potential offence in the first place. Earlier in the game they have a penalty awarded against them for one of their own players very clearly being fouled, because the ball hit his hand as he was being fouled. It woulld have been lliterally impossible to check the handball without noticing the foul, as one only happens due to the other. Even a highly incompetent referee would see this, which leaves the most plausible explanation being that the VAR ref did see it and just chose to get it wrong.
We get all this stuff about "they've never played the game"...I have never played professional football. I can tell an obvious foul from a handball when I am afforded a slow motion replay of it.