Ole Sack Watch

Should we replace the manager ?

  • Yes - Its time to make a change

    Votes: 3,004 87.8%
  • No - Give him more time

    Votes: 449 13.1%

  • Total voters
    3,423
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Jev

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
8,024
Location
Denmark
So 90 percent saying sack now. Am I remembering wrong or did it take very, very long for that consensus to occur with any of our last three managers? Surprised, pleasantly, to see the fanbase uniformly agreeing on this.
 

United Hobbit

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
8,912
Do we think we will get to a point where the fans turn? Did the Chelsea fans turn on Lampard, who's a club legend also, but was out of his depth?

Are they still singing the Ole song despite out current "performances?"

I think if this was a manager with no history to the club, they would have at least started to turn
 

IhabX7

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
6,009
This isn’t 1991. Any fan who puts any stock in contracts meaning anything are too busy attending their eleventh timeshare presentation sales pitch of the week to notice.
So what are you saying? he's getting sacked shortly?
 

RedBanker

I love you Ole
Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
2,660
So neither sacked nor walked. Amazing. And here people are citing what Bayern did to Kovac. Funny.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,236
I lowkey cringe every time they sing his name after a player scores. It's actually sad.
It wouldn't be so bad if there was at least enough intelligence there to wait until the result is assured.

Belting out Ole's at the wheel 20 minutes in and the game turns into the biggest clusterfeck of the season. So embarrassing.
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
Do we think we will get to a point where the fans turn? Did the Chelsea fans turn on Lampard, who's a club legend also, but was out of his depth?

Are they still singing the Ole song despite out current "performances?"

I think if this was a manager with no history to the club, they would have at least started to turn
Not that I recall. The difference was the ruthlessness of the owner and the ambitions of the club.
 

FatTails

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
1,859
So 90 percent saying sack now. Am I remembering wrong or did it take very, very long for that consensus to occur with any of our last three managers? Surprised, pleasantly, to see the fanbase uniformly agreeing on this.
None of our managers post-SAF survived this long and spent this much without winning anything, and none were less experienced. It’s never been this clear cut that we need a change.

He came in with big question marks about his credentials and three years in, and ~£450 in transfers later (not including “free” players like Cavani and Ronaldo), we actually seem to be getting worse.
 

FatTails

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
1,859
I can’t believe that Nuno’s spurs, who are supposedly a shambles, and who have already faced Arsenal away and both City and Chelsea at home, are actually above us in the table :lol: :lol:

This is Spurs who we’ve outspent for years, whose superstar and main striker is completely out of form, and who hired their 78th choice manager.
 

The Firestarter

Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
28,213
I can’t believe that Nuno’s spurs, who are supposedly a shambles, and who have already faced Arsenal away and both City and Chelsea at home, are actually above us in the table :lol: :lol:

This is Spurs who we’ve outspent for years, whose superstar and main striker is completely out of form, and who hired their 78th choice manager.
Surely Brighton is the more unexpected one.
 

FatTails

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
1,859
Surely Brighton is the more unexpected one.
I guess so. There’s just been so much misery around Spurs in the past few weeks, negative outlook among the fans, some really bad performances, and just lots of negative press…and they’re above us in the table.

I think everyone expects Brighton to fall off sooner or later.
 

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
The team Ole has at his disposal anything other than winning competitions is a failure. The top four argument is redundant given this squad. Ole either makes use of the resources at his disposal or he will squander it.
 

::sonny::

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
17,868
Location
Milan
The first thing is to add another cm with in a 433

But I don’t think there will be changes, he is really slow in understanding all the developments
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
I think the “rebuild the squad” argument is thinner than it looked a few months back. Theres a lot of quality there now for sure, but the squad is extremely unbalanced. Not just the lack of midfielders, but too many attackers who by design aren’t hard workers. Too many Nani’s not enough Ji Sung-Parks. A new manager coming in isn’t just getting a new midfielder or two in. They’re going to have to rebalance the attack too. So while we’re definitely better off than we were, we’re not in a position where one person slots in and it’s done. We’ve got quite a bit more wheeling and dealing to do.
It’s really not though, look at the volume of deadwood we had to get rid of before having to pretty much strengthen every area except GK and LW.

It was a huge rebuild, thanks to the mess left by ‘better managers’

The imbalance your referring to this season in particular is brought about by signing three starting 11 players and needing them to hit the ground running, on top of the ever present issue of Pogba/midfield due to the fact we were forced to sign Ronaldo instead of the DM we’ve needed for two years.

G Nev mentioned this a few weeks ago, not that I agree with him all that much recently.
Look, the start this season hasn’t been good enough anyway, I’m not denying that. But the rebuild has been done well for the vast majority.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
Usually the death knell for a manager but not this time when the board are too sentimental to pull that trigger
In all of his time here public backing hasn't just been for show. They mean it, they won't pull the plug after that renewal. Is this even close to our worst runs of form? The delusion at our club's board level is strong. It's not a fluid situation or anything, they firmly believe they have the right guy.
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
5,936
The team Ole has at his disposal anything other than winning competitions is a failure. The top four argument is redundant given this squad. Ole either makes use of the resources at his disposal or he will squander it.
With the form we're in Spurs or Everton look more likely to clinch 4th. Forget about trophies.
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
1,424
Not a chance this is his last week. I can see us losing the next 5 games and he will still be there. Match going fans will chant his name and all will be seen as a blip.
I honestly think he will be here until we can’t get top 4. Even then, he may still be here.
Chanting his name during the match doesn’t mean wanting him to stay on as manager. 90% of people have voted for him to get sacked, you think none of them are match going fans. More attention should be paid to fans post match reactions and comments.
 

hatchetmac

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
158
I am another who cannot believe they extended Ole's contract. Its not like another team were going to come in and steal him from under our noses.
 

Winrar

Full Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
12,824
Location
Maryland
Do we think we will get to a point where the fans turn? Did the Chelsea fans turn on Lampard, who's a club legend also, but was out of his depth?

Are they still singing the Ole song despite out current "performances?"

I think if this was a manager with no history to the club, they would have at least started to turn
Lampard got sacked before fans really had the time to turn on him like us with Ole, I think.

What should've happened here, but evidently the board is hanging Ole out to dry. I mean yes, it would be great if Ole just realizes this job isn't meant for him and resigns, but we would ideally be already looking out for a successor. (which I highly doubt is happening right now)
 
Last edited:

lilcurt

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
3,588
Location
Birmingham
Chanting his name during the match doesn’t mean wanting him to stay on as manager. 90% of people have voted for him to get sacked, you think none of them are match going fans. More attention should be paid to fans post match reactions and comments.
For the club, chanting his name is 100% showing support to him. They don't give a crap what is posted on Redcafe!
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
I think it'll be done in the next international break. Depending on how ugly things turn out against Liverpool, City and Chelsea.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,236
It was the same with Moyes. The stretford end were, at least vocally, deluded right to the end about him.
 

chiz2kul

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
680
Honestly doubt he's getting sacked anytime soon. He will be continue to be bailed out by individual moments of brilliance. The next run of wins and everyone will move past this. The cycle of football.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,126
Honestly doubt he's getting sacked anytime soon. He will be continue to be bailed out by individual moments of brilliance. The next run of wins and everyone will move past this. The cycle of football.
We have to get through a spell with Liverpool, Tottenham, City, Chelsea and Arsenal over about 6 league games.
If we get a "run" of wins out of that we'll all be amazed.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,890
Location
England
LVG and Jose did a shit job for the same reasons.

Firstly they played outmoded football. Jose finished second to a high press team. If City and Pep didn't exist he would have won the league. But they did exist and he didn't.

Secondly the Glazers didn't allow them to buy enough good players in the right positions. Instead player purchase was done by a committee dominated by accountants.

Both these things are still true with Ole and will be true with his successor most likely. And this is why sacking him might make a short term difference and salvage a top four place, but it will put us back in the same mess in a year's time. And the owners won't care.

Calling for the manager's head like a fantasy football playstation owner or swearing loyalty to him like a top red is to buy into a false narrative of what the actual problem is.
Jose didn't finish behind the high press but rather finished behind a coach who implements a possession heavy play style backed by a nation state.

Both LVG and Mourinho were backed heavily in the transfer market and were backed more than any other coach who was non nation state backed. Especially Mourinho who bought 2 CBs but still wanted a 3rd which was correctly turned down imo. And the transfer committee isn't dominated by accountants but rather people like Lawlor and Court who were Fergies guys and Marcel Bout who has been a match analyst under Jupp Heynckes at Bayern, who is a legendary manager and valued Bout's knowledge on breaking the game down when it comes to analysing the opposition.

And no those same things aren't true with Ole at all because Ole has shown a willingness to work with a newly formed recruitment structure and as a result our squad is much stronger. We probably need a better coach but the squad and the youth coming through hasn't been this strong for well over a decade.

Sacking managers is never good but it also shouldn't become a obsession to think that the manager is the be all and end all. The management side of the football club should imo be handled by people who are independent from the first team coaches. We do now have a recruitment structure which can do that, so sacking coaches shouldn't be seen as much of a big deal as it once was. Bayern can sack their head coach mid-season , appoint the assistant coach and still go on and win the Champions League. And they can do that because they retain control of their recruitment department due to having personnel dedicated to working on the football side of the club, people like Salihamidzic and Marco Neppe just to name two.
 

USREDEVIL

Full Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Messages
4,882
Location
California U.S.A.
I think the club is actually serious about keeping him almost no matter what. I think we're in for a long ride. I expect him to see the season out and if we're in 4th, another year.
 

Lappen

Full Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2021
Messages
332
Location
Sweden
Extending his contract really was a baffling decision. What was the reasoning behind it? Having a year left seemed the ideal situation to me. The board could have kept their options open and made it clear to Ole that if he kept showing progress and maybe challenged for the title or a cup then he'd get an extension. Instead, we gave him (and his staff) an extension and are now in the situation we're in. Because of the extension, I don't think there's a chance he's sacked any time soon. The board would essentially be admitting that they don't know what they're doing.
I honestly don't think any team should send out a manager to start a season on his last year contract. If you want a change you do it and pay the money it costs. If not, you extend.
Ole kind of deserved not to be sacked so the extention was expected.
And I do not think the money it will cost to sack him now, is going to be the thing that makes the club keep him. They will keep him because he is easy to handle.
But the club needs to start looking for the replacement... and that is a challenge Im happy not to be in charge of.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,391
I honestly don't think any team should send out a manager to start a season on his last year contract. If you want a change you do it and pay the money it costs. If not, you extend.
Ole kind of deserved not to be sacked so the extention was expected.
And I do not think the money it will cost to sack him now, is going to be the thing that makes the club keep him. They will keep him because he is easy to handle.
But the club needs to start looking for the replacement... and that is a challenge Im happy not to be in charge of.
He had one year left on his contract. Lots of managers are on rolling one year contracts. It's not like it is with players who can leave on Bosman's. Besides, there was ZERO risk of him being poached by anyone. It's just another layer of the multifaceted stupidity that is rife in this company, I mean, football club.
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,755
A sacking is miles off, I actually think Ole will end up resigning before he gets sacked.

Ole is a good guy, and will not let things get toxic, so he will only let it go so far, whereas our owners don't know where the line is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.