Is Jose Mourinho still our best manager post Fergie?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
31,763
Location
Ginseng Strip
I don't see how this is even up for debate. He won us a handful of trophies with a limited squad. Yes they weren't prestigious prizes but his tenure still had something tangible to show for it. All of our managers post Fergie have played tumescent football.
 

Che Guevara

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
804
Location
Wolverhampton
Supports
Celtic
Trophy Room > Wikipedia. Those who win are always remembered and no one can take that from them.
Exactly. In 2011 Sir Alex Ferguson said winning trophies is key to keeping your job as manager. "You can fulfil all your ideas and philosophies about how a team is run and how they play. But I judge my success by trophies."
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,469
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
I don't see how this is even up for debate. He won us a handful of trophies with a limited squad. Yes they weren't prestigious prizes but his tenure still had something tangible to show for it. All of our managers post Fergie have played tumescent football.
Jose record with United was one of significant promise followed by a hugely negative period.
But, like Van Gaal and Moyes, it is in the past.
The real question is whether Ole represents the future.
Football is not a place for sentiments.
It is a results based business.
And over his time here as a manager, results have been nothing like good enough.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,914
Location
Sunny Manc
I don't see how this is even up for debate. He won us a handful of trophies with a limited squad. Yes they weren't prestigious prizes but his tenure still had something tangible to show for it. All of our managers post Fergie have played tumescent football.
I don’t know where this “limited squad” myth has come from. He spent over £400m and that’s not even including Zlatan or Sanchez.

If the squad was limited, it’s because he was incredibly shit with the money he spent. And based on that I don’t know how anyone can determine his tenure to be successful, EL or not.
 

lefty_jakobz

I ❤️ moses
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
3,648
The only good thing about Jose’s time was his trophy count, nothing else. Had he come in instead of Moyes after SAF he would have been a lot more successful.
 

Ixion

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
15,275
1st-7th moyes

7-4-5 LvG (FA Cup)

5-6-2 (81 Pts) -6 Jose (Europa League, League Cup, FA Cup Final)

6-3-2 (74 Pts) -6 Ole (Europa League Final)
Just fleshing that out for you. If you add on transfer spend it would also not look as good for Ole.
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
875
I don’t know where this “limited squad” myth has come from.
From the man himself, who's never missed a chance to big himself up (see repeated comments about that 2nd place finish in 2018 being one of his greatest accomplishments). And his strangely cult-like fanbase laps it up.

We were expected to challenge for the title going into both his full seasons. He spent a lot of money, largely on good players (Ibrahimovic, Bailly, Mkhitaryan and Pogba in his first summer, Matic, Lindelof and Lukaku in his second) - it was not a limited squad at all.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,396
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
Trophy Room > Wikipedia. Those who win are always remembered and no one can take that from them.
That has nothing to do with what people remember 10-20 years from now. And it's an incredibly reductive way of looking at sports history. Manchester United's history isn't reduced to the accomplishments of SAF, Busby, and that bloke with the bowl hat in the 1900s
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,540
Location
Polska
That has nothing to do with what people remember 10-20 years from now. And it's an incredibly reductive way of looking at sports history. Manchester United's history isn't reduced to the accomplishments of SAF, Busby, and that bloke with the bowl hat in the 1900s
SAF built an actual global sport institution through accomplishments and became universal reference point when it comes to how we look on managers in a big clubs.

Current football standards also came from his accomplishments and will be look upon longer than this club exists as he's rightly considered best manager of all time. What comes with that he will be remembered longer than centuries.

From this perspective Mourinho actually achieving European trophy is definitely a tiny trace in history post SAF, but it's actually a visible one and one which managers after him did not achieved just yet. As far as I remember trophies were always perfect documentation of what one can achieve positive with a squad, especially for first English club that won European Cup.
 

GlasgowCeltic

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
5,286
But it doesn’t give this hypothetical new manager very long, does it? They’ll be expected to win instantly - something never expected of Ole - and then what? Are we gonna dominate for 5 years with a GK, a backline, Bruno and Pogba all in their 30s? Because that’s the whole point of this “foundations for the future” argument… it’s not that he spends 4 years building us up so the next manager can win one title, it’s so we can theoretically have long an illustrious period at the top, right? (Otherwise why not just hire a Conte?)
Except the longer we fanny about imagining that, all of these players get older, and it’s basically just Rashford, Greenwood and Sancho who are sure things to be top performers over the next 5 years and beyond… and only one of them was bought by Ole - and it’s the one we don’t even know will succeed here yet! We don’t know about Diallo, Pellestri, Henderson, Mejbri or the likes yet.. the other squad players who make it seem so young statistically. AWB is our youngest starting defender, but also probably the weakest link. McTominey too in midfield. Donnie and Dalot seem right offs. These are the young squad players who’re gonna set the world alight?

it’s all just so frustrating to see people giving him credit for something that hasn’t happened yet, and has no guarantee of happening at all, out of pure desperation to see this whole 3/4 year adventure as worthwhile, whilst our rivals manage to pick up trophies instantly after 1/2 year transitions. We’re a gullible bunch.

But I hope I’m wrong, naturally.
Fair post, hadn’t considered some of the points
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,023
Location
Moscow
Didn’t sign Fred for £52m. Jose stated many interviews it wasn’t his signing. A player who is currently a major issue in our midfield.
Mourinho saying something that makes him look better in retrospective? Yeah, that never happened. The sources for this is Daily Mail & Metro by the way: :lol:

Jose Mourinho 'never wanted Fred' at Manchester United and only accepted the £52m midfielder out of fear the club would not sign anyone else.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,023
Location
Moscow
You’ve got to admire Mourinho. One thing he does best is controlling the narrative, it’s uncanny how many of the arguments used there are his arguments that he either said/planted when he was here (directly or through the press via Castles & the likes) and after he has gone.
 

CM

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,352
Wish this thread would die a death. This guy was toxic and set us back years. He's one of the reasons Ole has lasted as long as he has in the job, such was the mess he left us in.
 

Ixion

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
15,275
Mourinho can win the EL and it's all its a Mickey Mouse Cup we should be in the CL. Ole can lose the EL Final and he's just one penalty kick away from his first trophy!

Mourinho can win 3 Semi-Finals out of 3, standard we're Manchester United. Ole can lose 4 in a row and he's just unlucky.

Mourinho can finish 2nd on 80+ points for the first time in 4 years and he gets stick for not winning it with the amount he's spent. Ole can finish 2nd on 74 points spending more than Mourinho, playing in front of empty stadiums, and he's brought United back from despair.

Oh yeah and Ole can keep using Mourinho's midfield for 3 years and get credit for his amazing transfer business.

The football we're seeing right now is also as dire as anything under Mourinho.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,722
You’ve got to admire Mourinho. One thing he does best is controlling the narrative, it’s uncanny how many of the arguments used there are his arguments that he either said/planted when he was here (directly or through the press via Castles & the likes) and after he has gone.
There's only really one argument which is all the football is inconsistent and generally cautious and so you have to revert to trophies. We play the same formation, the same limited double pivot, we still struggle against low block teams, we are more direct but essentially we traded + 5 goals for conceding +16 more goals and winning less games in the PL...he got through 2 CL groups out of 2 and won an EL final in the other season. Ole got knocked out of 1/1 Cl group and lost the EL final, he'd also hardly started this CL campaign well either. I absolutely hate Mou but point out to me what I just wrote which is not factual.

Mou's narrative is that he got 2nd with a terrible team and that's a great achievement & that he wasn't backed, no one here buys that. In the same way no one thinks it's an achievement that we finished 2nd last year when we were 12 points off 1st.

All managers, so far, have not been good enough and none of them have played 'attacking' football therefore what else can you do but look at their trophies?
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
Let’s be honest, they’ve each been awful

Moyes - never up to the job
LVG - past his prime by the time he got to us
Mou - past his prime by the time he got to us
Ole - never up to the job
 

L1nk

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
5,086
If Mourinho had not poisoned the well and kept going, maybe.

The reality is though, a couple of cups is nothing compared to the detriment of everything else he brought to the club in the end. Solskjaer will leave this club without a cup, with question marks over his head, and, in my opinion, being completely out of his depth, but long term the squad is in a much much better place in terms of personel and squad harmony for now and future success than it was when Mourinho had his hands all over it, which, in the post Fergie era, is a much bigger success for me.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,608
Location
London
How anybody could think a guy who left us in 9th, wasted big money and absolutely destroyed the confidence of so many players was our best i don't know. A league cup and europa league bought a completely disproportionate goodwill. We finished 6th that season and had the easiest el draw in a long time. Was great to win trophies but he took us backwards. Solskjaer needs to go but he brought club forward
To be fair, he left us sixth in the table. Same exact position that Ole finished the season, and the same position we are right now in the table. Although, he also managed to qualify from UCL group stage, something that Ole didn’t manage last year and is struggling this year.

Our EL path was easy, I guess. It was easy last year too, it typically is. That’s what Europa League is.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,608
Location
London
I'm still puzzled why Jose was sacked, I am sure the team wd be much stronger by now. Just like now, United were 6th at that point, so was it his fallout with Pogba, or the loss to Liverpool, or because Jose was generally disliked by the fanbase?
He should have been thanked and sacked at the end of his second season, I said so back then. And when he got sacked, the team was going nowhere, so it was the absolutely right (albeit delayed) decision.

Same for Ole who should have never become permanent (although I wanted him to be), should have been sacked at the end of his first season, probably survive his sesond, but definitely be sacked last season either when he failed to pass in that UCL group, or at the end of last season. Now it has reached Mourinho’s stage of why on Earth he is still manager.
 

Desert Eagle

Punjabi Dude
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Messages
17,148
Let’s be honest, they’ve each been awful

Moyes - never up to the job
LVG - past his prime by the time he got to us
Mou - past his prime by the time he got to us
Ole - never up to the job
Exactly this. Couldn't care less who is the best out of the feck up four.
 

The_Midfielder

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
3,616
You conveniently left out silverware. And Ole is currently 6th.
People have. a short memory..We forgot the following for Mourinho
Bought Pogba for 90M
bought lukaku for 80M
bought Bailey
Bought Lindelof
football heritage and Sevilla masterclass
bought Mikhi
exchanged mikhi
brought Sanchez maybe the worst transfer ever .
Bought Matic when we has almost done
Wouldn't allow Martial to see his newborn during pre season
 

The Bloody-Nine

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
6,211
Ole
Mourinho
Van Gaal
Moyes
If Ole wasn't an ex player I'm sure your list would look quite different. He certainly isn't the best based on his success. Jose both matched his best finish, achieving more points while doing so, and won trophies on top of it.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,440
Depends on parameters

Didn't our u21 look terrible or get relegated ? Now it's flourishing or we have a good amount of prospects (even if they get sold)?

Trophies there's only one winner. But then you have league positions and the trajectory?
And also the look and potential of the squad that's been left behind

If ole gets sacked now, I think there's no doubt that the next manager will have the best squad followed by what Moyes had, then Jose, followed by ole, then lvg.

In terms of results and enjoyment from games, I think I've enjoyed going to old Trafford the most under Ole, followed by Jose first season, then lvg first season. Lvg second season and Jose other seasons were boring AF...

Again depends how you judge it as a fan or supporter
 

The_Midfielder

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
3,616
If Ole wasn't an ex player I'm sure your list would look quite different. He certainly isn't the best based on his success. Jose both matched his best finish, achieving more points while doing so, and won trophies on top of it.
People have. a short memory..We forgot the following for Mourinho
Bought Pogba for 90M
bought lukaku for 80M
bought Bailey
Bought Lindelof
football heritage and Sevilla masterclass
bought Mikhi
exchanged mikhi
brought Sanchez maybe the worst transfer ever .
Bought Matic when we has almost done
Wouldn't allow Martial to see his newborn during pre season
 

The_Midfielder

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
3,616
Depends on parameters

Didn't our u21 look terrible or get relegated ? Now it's flourishing or we have a good amount of prospects (even if they get sold)?

Trophies there's only one winner. But then you have league positions and the trajectory?
And also the look and potential of the squad that's been left behind

If ole gets sacked now, I think there's no doubt that the next manager will have the best squad followed by what Moyes had, then Jose, followed by ole, then lvg.

In terms of results and enjoyment from games, I think I've enjoyed going to old Trafford the most under Ole, followed by Jose first season, then lvg first season. Lvg second season and Jose other seasons were boring AF...

Again depends how you judge it as a fan or supporter
This
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
Depends on parameters

Didn't our u21 look terrible or get relegated ? Now it's flourishing or we have a good amount of prospects (even if they get sold)?

Trophies there's only one winner. But then you have league positions and the trajectory?
And also the look and potential of the squad that's been left behind

If ole gets sacked now, I think there's no doubt that the next manager will have the best squad followed by what Moyes had, then Jose, followed by ole, then lvg.

In terms of results and enjoyment from games, I think I've enjoyed going to old Trafford the most under Ole, followed by Jose first season, then lvg first season. Lvg second season and Jose other seasons were boring AF...

Again depends how you judge it as a fan or supporter
Are we giving Ole now credit for u21 team results ? :lol: :lol:
 

The Bloody-Nine

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
6,211
People have. a short memory..We forgot the following for Mourinho
Bought Pogba for 90M
bought lukaku for 80M
bought Bailey
Bought Lindelof
football heritage and Sevilla masterclass
bought Mikhi
exchanged mikhi
brought Sanchez maybe the worst transfer ever .
Bought Matic when we has almost done
Wouldn't allow Martial to see his newborn during pre season
How does any of that change what I said?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.