Agree with your last bit. But I hope the club have a profile of who they want and stick to it.
Why not? The end result is likely to be the same. Three losses. But at least it will be statement of intent from the Board.
The point is that it's a board that's already shown before that they are willing to abandon all logical thought and pre planned decisions once a few good results come about. Ole was supposed to be a caretaker while we searched for our next manager, with absolutely no hint that he was ever up for the role full time, and suddenly he gets some nice results and bam, they hire him full time, and here we fecking are.
So what's the deal? We should stay with Ole until he dies of old age because no manager who comes here is guaranteed to win titles?
If Ole wins the next three games, or even just the City game, with the crowd bouncing and singing his name, they will not be able to sack him. If they're really wanting to get rid, then they're basically hoping he loses or they won't be able to.
Only fans care about "statement of intent". What difference does it make if Ole or Carrick oversee three loses on the bounce?
Sadly these mad people are a huge chunk of the fanbase and if they think it then they pay up. That's all that matters to the functioning of the Glazer business model, so long as we are actually winning enough games to make it vaguely credible.
But...we've been through this...Jose spent £283m net. How can that amount to 'not being backed'?
I previously would have agreed. In fact, right up until the Leicester game I was of the opinion that he should see out the season, but we should be making contingency plans. But enough is enough.
SAF always cares, but in the same time it doesn't sit with me well too, especially with all health issues he had to combat last years.
Surely you have that the wrong way round
I wouldn't worry. That's just SAF and Martin Edwards signing up to the caf today
It seems to be all about nostalgia, and it works.
So Fergie had Ronaldo over his knee while Martin Edwards disciplined Pogba. Promising.
This.
Yup, I am legitimately thinking it's best for this club if we lose games. I'm actually close to thinking that I want us to lose so we can get rid of this nightmare.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The point is there is no "right man". Because I've asked you 3-4 times now to mention this right man, and you have failed to do so. It should be very easy to do considering the lack of proven top managers who also play the brand of football you want.
I would argue that these posters are not real supportersWhere are those posters that wanted Liverpool to hammer them so Ole would be sacked?
It's actually going up mate. It was 12.3% yesterday, now it's 12.7%. I reckon its oppo fans.
No point in what? Should we allow childish name calling?
Whoosh.
Is he vetoing the sacking of Ole???
Agreed as we're the only big club left where the manager is constantly put up on a giant pedestal irregardless of results when they're just another employee at every other club.
There is no manager in the world who we can get, with whom it will be a "done deal" or even close to a "done deal". Conte is one of the few managers who have a very good winning track record, Simeone and Zidane(he doesnt want to come here) are others.
And the more important majority of Out voters is getting higher.
If all this is true, I can’t comprehend how a person of SAF’s intelligence would even involve himself in this circus-like situation.
Insane that you want us to keep Ole till the end of the season and waste it, because Conte will apparently come in and cause far more damage than Ole(despite being 10 times the manager he is). And that next summer suddenly the "right manager" will spontaneously materialize out of thin air and take our club to glory. Delusional stuff.
The good is that we’d be certain we will have a new manager. Stick with Ole while he luckboxes a few points from the next games and the inept board will revert to thinking he has done a phenomenal job.
