I'm amazed that either candidate has picked up any votes, given that the "someone else" option was included in the poll.
I think people just want a change and would accept anything, just like after Jose.
Anything but Southgate I would yeah
I think one can say that even Pochettino has proven himself in the CL.Tottenham beat Ajax to reach the final after all…My order of preference would probably be-1)Pochettino,2)Zidane 3)Rodgers.
Sadly, any manager will be at risk of utter failure due to incompetence in the upper management, lack of modernization within, and the owners primary concern - using the club as a personal ATM.
I'm pretty sure that there has been a significant amount of modernization done since 2013, the issue being that the club only started in 2014 and we haven't really had a top manager that is in his prime and has the character to contribute to the betterment of the club.
I completely disagree with this.Blaming the Owners for our travails on the pitch isn’t going to cut much ice beyond a point.Just think about how this current manager has been backed by the owners…They have given him an 80 million quid CB…,A 55 million RB….They then splashed another 55 million on Bruno in January when the manager and the club needed help….This summer they signed Cristiano,Varane and Sancho!
Ten Hag is definitely good enough and probably the best possible option. But, he’s only good enough if the club is properly organized from top to bottom, like Ajax is. I think the chances are he’d get eaten up at United.
Actually to be fair now the owners don’t know a thing about football and our board is bad mainly due to not sacking Ole but you do understand we have nearly spent a billion in the last few years right ? This isn’t 2010 anymore you can blame the owners and board for certain things but spending is not one of them
I do not see anywhere in my post that mentions the club does not spend.
You said use the club as a ATM? All owners will take money from a club that is making millions unless you have owners like City. The good thing to see is we our spending loads of money, when we weren’t spending due to the owners paying back there loan for buying the club that was a problem but not anymore
It's common knowledge the Glazers are far more concerned with siphoning as much funds as possible, more so than any other ownership has been accused of that I know of. The main gist of the post is that an organization's effectiveness and success starts at the top. If the Glazers were more concerned with sporting success it will radiate downward. Until that becomes their primary focus there will be many road bumps to sustained success for whoever is manager.
Agree. As good as he is in Holland. He is at the biggest club, with the most money, in a small league. Only one step up from say Celtic in the Scottish league.
Yes I kinda agree on this. While owners have not been ideal, it cannot be said that they did not back the manager. Imagine what Klopp, Pep or Tuchel can do with this squad. But on the other hand, it is also due to their negligence that we have wasted so much money on a bloated squad, on bad manager appointments, low infrastructure investment. At least these are the 3 areas that all of us can agree on. I do not know what happens at the backend to say our structure are bad with regards to recruitment or outdated academy (I actually think our academy are still producing good young players).
