Conor
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2011
- Messages
- 5,529
Guys, please stop picking on poor aul religion, what has it ever done to the world?
slightly homophobic? Surely there's only homophobic, or not homophobic?Couldn't careless to be honest. Not interested in footballers personal lives at all.
Would clubs be fined for fans making slightly homophobic songs? Cause that's gonna happen for sure.
How much time have you spent around conservative Evangelicals?Your post, by 2021 standards, is hate speech towards Christians. Replace “conservative christians” with any other demographic and tell me you'd feel comfortable making that post again, but I guess they don't have a ‘phobia’ attached to their religion yet so they are fair game?
All manner of assumptions? You basically replied to a one line post of mine where I described my personal experience of modern day religious tolerance and basically told me history dictates that religion breeds war and therefore I'm wrong. For all your lengthy replies since, that's what your initial reply boils down to.No I did not do any of those things.
You have transferred all manner of assumptions onto a post making a general point about beliefs not inherently engendering tolerance in other beliefs, which specifically states not just religious beliefs, as a statement that all religious beliefs are intolerant and some sort of attack on your personal experience. The fact that this belief tolerance based on a shared experience if believing exists for you does not make that a position universally shared. That was the gist of it.
You were expected to read my initial reply based on the words contained therein. Notably the final sentence which clearly notes belief systems that are not religious were being discussed. This may have prevented you deciding to infer that I am an intolerant bigot based on feck all.
If you don't want your posts to result in passionate responses defending the person you're replying to's integrity don't question that integrity without first understanding that person's point.All manner of assumptions? You basically replied to a one line post of mine where I described my personal experience of modern day religious tolerance and basically told me history dictates that religion breeds war and therefore I'm wrong. For all your lengthy replies since, that's what your initial reply boils down to.
I posted my own personal experience, you replied with 'are you seriously suggesting... blah' Which clearly shows you disagreed with my experience of it. The fact I replied to somebody posting that people wrongly accuse religious people of being intolerant further formed my interpretation of your reply.
I never suggested the entire religious community are tolerant of every other opposing faith, simply that, in my experience followers of different faiths have been far more tolerant towards me than people of no faith have.
If you don't want your posts to be open to interpretation be concise.
Not sure if it's a good idea to interject in your discussion, but I feel compelled to add one thing to maybe bring your 2 views closer : when it comes to religion and homosexuality, it's important to consider if you are interacting within your religion community, meaning you are for example muslim and gay, or if you are interacting from outside a religion community, meaning you are atheist/christian and interacting with muslims.All manner of assumptions? You basically replied to a one line post of mine where I described my personal experience of modern day religious tolerance and basically told me history dictates that religion breeds war and therefore I'm wrong. For all your lengthy replies since, that's what your initial reply boils down to.
I posted my own personal experience, you replied with 'are you seriously suggesting... blah' Which clearly shows you disagreed with my experience of it. The fact I replied to somebody posting that people wrongly accuse religious people of being intolerant further formed my interpretation of your reply.
I never suggested the entire religious community are tolerant of every other opposing faith, simply that, in my experience followers of different faiths have been far more tolerant towards me than people of no faith have.
If you don't want your posts to be open to interpretation be concise.
I wasn't defending anybody's integrity, I replied to a post claiming that people tend to label religious people intolerant. I thought that much was clear.If you don't want your posts to result in passionate responses defending the person your replying to's integrity don't question that integrity without first understanding that person's point.
The fact, the despite my lengthy replies, you still can't see the point I was making without considering it an attack on your personal experiences leads me to believe that the concision or otherwise of my posts is unlikely to leas to an understanding between us.
I'll leave it at this: we both agree that people, whether religious or not, can be intolerant of sexualities. I'll take that as a win.
Yes I agree, the original back and forth started when I replied to a post about religious tolerance rather than tolerance of homosexuality.Not sure if it's a good idea to interject in your discussion, but I feel compelled to add one thing to maybe bring your 2 views closer : when it comes to religion and homosexuality, it's important to consider if you are interacting within your religion community, meaning you are for example muslim and gay, or if you are interacting from outside a religion community, meaning you are atheist/christian and interacting with muslims.
If you are interacting from outside a religion community, your experience is backed by what these religions preach : be kind to others even if they don't share your faith. And as you said, it's especially true for religious people having to deal with discrimination/racism.
Whereas if you are interacting inside your community it's still incredibly difficult to come out as anything else than heterosexual and you are going to get a lot of intolerance thrown at you, and again it's backed by what these religions preach.
indeed. The WNBA is labelled a lesbians league so it appears much more acceptable for females.There are plenty of openly gay professional footballers. They just all happen to be women.
I really can't fault any gay male footballers for not coming out. Sadly the verbal abuse would probably be brutal. In addition, there is also likely to be some stigma within the dressing room.
No, I was defending my integrity! You know, because you decided I tarred all religious people with the intolerant bigot brush. Your integrity wasn't being challenged. Remember? Sheesh.I wasn't defending anybody's integrity, I replied to a post claiming that people tend to label religious people intolerant. I thought that much was clear.
On the bolded, yes, we agree.
A lot and it sucks. Everyone here is aware of that. But what is also incredibly annoying are people who frame the issue as an exclusively religious one. That doesn’t help anyone and is factually wrong.Guys, please stop picking on poor aul religion, what has it ever done to the world?
when you said 'defending the person your replying to' I thought you meant who I originally replied to, which started this sordid exchange.No, I was defending my integrity! You know, because you decided I tarred all religious people with the intolerant bigot brush. Your integrity wasn't being challenged. Remember? Sheesh.
Surely you can’t pick and choose which parts of the text you believe?The idea that, at least the Abrahamic religions, have unambiguously intolerant guidance and statements in their holy books and that a good proportion of those believers adhere to these teachings of intolerance is indisputable.
This includes Islam and absolutely also includes the position that homosexuality is wrong.
This does not mean that all religious people choose to follow those parts of their text or are anything other than welcoming but it clearly does not make it nonsense that LGBQT people might view religious institutions and even individuals with wariness.
Homophobic was the wrong word.slightly homophobic? Surely there's only homophobic, or not homophobic?
The last (and only as far as I know) gay footballer, Justin Fashanu is not a good advert for it, sadly, as he ended up taking his life. I went to a match in the latter stages of his career and the abuse from the crowd was pretty much nonstopI would like to see a footballer coming it some day soon, but imagine the pressure that would be on their shoulders. They would become the poster boy LGBTQ football/sport along with having a bunch of drunken bigotted idiots on a Saturday abusing him. Its going to take a very mentally strong person to finally do it, but again I do hope it happens sooner rather than later and they dont have to go through anything too bad.
Except for starting most of the wars in human history, not muchGuys, please stop picking on poor aul religion, what has it ever done to the world?
Amazingly, I think less than 10% of wars have religion as one of the causes, and when looking at primary causes the number is even lower.Except for starting most of the wars in human history, not much
I dare you to post that on twitterDamn gays, can't they just suck each others cocks behind closed doors so us normal people don't have to hear about their sex life. This just makes me more homophobic!
Or something. Am I rite?!
I can't, they banned me. Also, Twitter has no white textI dare you to post that on twitter
pah, I'm on my third account now. They'll never stop me....I can't, they banned me. Also, Twitter has no white text
This will happen eventually even if its not next week. You would now hope we're in a position in English football where this can happen. We've been taking the knee for two years before every match against discrimination (primarily racial I know) so I hope the game is ready for openly gay players.https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/18571090/footballer-come-out-first-openly-gay-male/amp/
I know it’s the sun but will be interesting to see if he does go through with it or is advised against it, as I assume others have been in the past. And if he does, the reaction within the sport.
It’s a strange one as no one wants to be the first. If I was his parent or agent I’d also maybe advise to hold off at first as it may be a detriment to his career. I don’t know. If he does come out he’d just be a PR player like Rashford and may not have a real career. Rashford did have a few years of high performance though rather than being a championship player.https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/18571090/footballer-come-out-first-openly-gay-male/amp/
I know it’s the sun but will be interesting to see if he does go through with it or is advised against it, as I assume others have been in the past. And if he does, the reaction within the sport.
I personally don't think it's about the level of abuse, most will be accepting and rightly so.I may be very naive but I don’t think there’ll be major abuse. Or at least any more than is shouted at football matches already. The groundswell of public opinion will be supportive and he will have loads of opportunities to move the public discourse along, in much the same way as Rashford has. Plus, though I’m sure it won’t factor into his thinking, there will be huge opportunities to monetise this if he’s inclined.
Because Lesbians are hot!Why is it seemingly "easier" for women footballers to come out as gay, and even date their teammates, then it is for males to do likewise??
For example, hypothetically speaking here, what would be so wrong if Shaw and Sancho were to date each other??
We have had a gay manager in charger of our women's team in Casey, and gay players such as Amy Turner, yet nothing seemingly on the same level with regards to the men's team, it is very odd to have such a huge contrast at the same club.