Sylar
Full Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 40,440
So again, this is from my reading of this thread and not being invested in Either side except justice (based on what we've seen in this trial the right decision was made - if further evidence is released on an appeal then I'll obviously change my stance)Your assumptions on bias, and of people being embarrassed about it or unable to admit it. And about people ignoring negative evidence. I just didn’t see that. Perhaps there is inherent bias in what I’m about to say but I really only saw Heard getting the kind of negative one-sided treatment you describe.
As I said I won't call anybody out but since you replied it certainly seemed like you yourself were one of the people biased towards heard. You can and may disagree but you also pointed to the fact that the UK trial heavily influenced your thoughts. Your posts whilst the trial was ongoing was more negative depp than pro heard however but there certainly was a bias there
Again you may disagree and I won't argue that.
The other main poster who was obviously pro heard ignored a lot of what was bad against heard and went in against depp citing 'balance' and is now nowhere to be seen (could be coincidence so won't assume)
Heard defo deserved to be called out for all the nonsense that was going on
I also still don't agree to the notion
'They are as bad as each other' which has been said so many times.
I just didn't see that at all from the case and evidence, one is clearly worse