Lisandro Martinez | Signs for United

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dazzmondo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
9,137
Considering we don't even have a DM, that point is moot in relation to us, where he'd instantaneously be our best DM, by virtue of being our only DM. We're not in a position to barter about a role we've neglected so badly that he wouldn't even have competition for the position.

We need someone to facilitate what is supposed to be our marquee signing otherwise we make him redundant; even if it isn't Martinez, it better be someone like him.
We're getting De Jong to be dm. When he played at Ajax De Jong was the dm. Schone stayed relatively deep to help him but De Jong always played deeper than Schone. I'd imagine based on who we've been linked with we want Eriksen to play this deeper playmaking role. Maybe McTominay or Garner are the backups for the role or in specific games where we need extra defensive stability maybe we'd occasionally try Martinez there.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
I wouldn’t be surprised if we go 352.

De Gea
Maguire - Varane - Martinez
Dalot - Frenkie - ???? - Malacia
Bruno
Ronaldo - Sancho​
We are targeting Antony so the chance of 352 might be slim
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
Slow?

Technically average? Have you seen him on the ball or passing (short and longer)? Which bit was he technically average at?
Yes slow. As in he's not fast.

He boots the ball under pressure. I call that technically average for a centre back. Maybe it's because he's slow and worried about getting nicked but the end result is the ball getting booted.

Not constructive, not composed under pressure, not good enough.
 

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,069
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
He boots the ball under pressure. I call that technically average for a centre back. Maybe it's because he's slow and worried about getting nicked but the end result is the ball getting booted.
His pace and size are legitimate concerns but he’s in the 95th percentile for pass completion, 99th percentile for number of passes, 99th percentile for progressive passes and 96th percentile for progressive carries…what are you talking about?
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
His pace and size are legitimate concerns but he’s in the 95th percentile for pass completion, 99th percentile for number of passes, 99th percentile for progressive passes and 96th percentile for progressive carries…what are you talking about?
He plays for the best team in Holland against teams that sit back and let the centre halves have the ball. They even let the centre halves 'progress' it up to the midfielders.
I'm talking about football which I know a bit about. When he's under pressure, he boots it. When he's not he's Baresi reborn, he's the greatest libero that ever lived with stats to match. 99% progression, 99.9% passes to an unmarked player.

He'll be targeted by teams if we sign him because he's slow and he boots it under pressure and he'll get much more pressure in the PL. The sexy stats will drop.
 

AdNani

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,642
He was useful in Holland for Ten Hag. If we want to spend 50 million on a player, I can think of 100 that would be more useful.

He's slow and because of that, he gets rid of the ball ASAP when under pressure. We've got better defenders than this fella.
Slow :lol:

you've never watched him
 

Red the Bear

Something less generic
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Messages
9,127
Argentine [rated] DM's are honed in the craft - that same nebulous role he plays is a traditional forte of the nation; I would be leaning towards someone like him for the role based off his skills and traits as well as the football he was raised in. I don't see a deluge of options I think are seamless fits - even Rice who so many rate - so I don't have as much doubt about someone of his profile coming in and doing a very good job whilst offering even more to the team with his versatility and tactical flexibility.
I hope you're right mate, I really do.

Would be one of our shrewdest business moves if he turns out to be a success.
 

Aeryis

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 13, 2022
Messages
178
Yeah there are but some are not available in the transfer market and some are available with more expensive cost. Who doesn’t want ball playing centre back that is tall and good on the ball like VVD for example? But the point is if they are not available to suit to the given budget then the short one will still do because ten Hag doesn’t care about height and the cost is 40m.

I had some debate with other posters when we official signed ten Hag that I said of ten Hag number one priority demand on his defender is ball progression, he doesn’t care about the physicality. Looks like it is the case as 175cm is not a problem in ten Hag’s view.
What do you mean there aren't any tall technical CBs in the market? No one is saying get one as good as VVD, I'm not suggesting that at all. Regardless, the CB market isn't so barren that we'll have to resort to a CB that's literally as tall as Messi. I don't care what ten Hag thinks about this, getting a 4 foot centreback for 50 million euros is lunacy. It'd be okay if he was a winger, midfielder, striker, or fullback. But a CB? No way. What's next, getting a 5'6 goalkeeper because apparently heights not important there either?

CB is one of the only two positions on the pitch were height is a requirement. If we have 50m euros to spend on a midget, we have 50m euros to spend on a decently sized CB.
 

DevilRed

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
12,930
Location
Stretford End
Not convinced about this guy. Unless of course you tell me he can play as a defensive midfield and is the second coming of mascherano.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
21,898
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
Yes slow. As in he's not fast.

He boots the ball under pressure. I call that technically average for a centre back. Maybe it's because he's slow and worried about getting nicked but the end result is the ball getting booted.

Not constructive, not composed under pressure, not good enough.
He’s absolutely fine over 20 yards, he’s not asked to run half the pitch.

He boots the ball in the right situations, something I always like in a defender and we don’t see enough of at United who try to play the ball about in the last 30 when under pressure. I saw Rio, Stam, Hansen, Buchan, etc boot it plenty of times, all good defenders for decades have… at the right time.

And again, he’s not technically average. His CL games alone show that up
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,108
Location
...
Yes slow. As in he's not fast.

He boots the ball under pressure. I call that technically average for a centre back. Maybe it's because he's slow and worried about getting nicked but the end result is the ball getting booted.

Not constructive, not composed under pressure, not good enough.
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,708
Location
Inside right
We're getting De Jong to be dm. When he played at Ajax De Jong was the dm. Schone stayed relatively deep to help him but De Jong always played deeper than Schone. I'd imagine based on who we've been linked with we want Eriksen to play this deeper playmaking role. Maybe McTominay or Garner are the backups for the role or in specific games where we need extra defensive stability maybe we'd occasionally try Martinez there.
I don't know what your definition of a DM is, perhaps the player at the base of midfield, rather than via action? But I wouldn't consider De Jong to be one despite him obviously working through that area of the pitch, particularly so in collecting the ball deep in his own half - deep-lying something or other who needs complete freedom and licence to roam with someone picking up turnovers and being in place to cover for him.

Perhaps we can use Beckenbauer or Sammer as definitions of that sort of role who both had cover whenever they went walkabouts. But whatever we use, it's a unique role with a unique set of parameters to facilitate and that facilitator - the guy sitting, covering and essentially enabling, is the DM, for me as he is the player expected to be studious and resolutely doing the job that allows De Jong to do his. Basically a water carrier with a vital hand-holding job.

Unless you have a CB that can seamlessly push up and occupy a covering role in midfield periodically, you definitely don't want a CM doing that job as he's too far up the pitch and not in a position to cover an unexpected turnover of possession. All that to say, we don't have a partner for De Jong at the club right now, imo and we'd be wasting him trying to dump what's here into such a specialised role that they've all proven they are incapable of playing (Garner excluded).
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,708
Location
Inside right
Martinez in his first year at Ajax played as a defensive midfielder and did really well. It was clear he was a good player.
Good tackler, agile, technically versed, positional awareness. It was really a surprise and unfair that Martinez was merely a bench player in his second year, because Ten Hag concluded that he was only suited as a defender. A quick look and you might not have noticed, but in 20/21 season he was often just a substitute or replacement for either Blind or Tagliafico.

And then this season we found a golden duo with Timber and Martinez, which drove Blind to left back and Tagliafico (Argentinian international) to the bench.
Martinez missed some games this year, but that was because of injury. Otherwise he was one of our best and most important players.
Ten Hag is not going to use him in midfield. Especially because he would also get in the way of De Jong.
You should forget about putting a pure defensive midfielder next to De Jong.
It would only limit him and Ten Hag knows that.
Enjoyed your post. I'm not inclined to agree with all of it, but it's logical and well constructed.

I personally think needs must and we'll be more dynamic until the right pieces can be brought in over a few windows, so what was the norm at Ajax won't necessarily be so here, or at least not until we can get all the players in that we need, which is why someone like Martinez, who can be shuffled into numerous systems and ways of playing, would be readily utilised for what the manager needs right now, rather than 9months+ down the line.

One thing I think is not considered in posts about our midfield vis-a-vis Ajax's is that the latter's was a well-oiled machine with all the cogs in the right places and even the defence behind them knowing their midfield at an intrinsic level. By contrast, ours is a mess, being built from the ground up. We need the fundamentals down pat before we get to the level of being expansive and automaton like Ajax's was. It's going to take more than one window, I think.
 
Last edited:

Dazzmondo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
9,137
I don't know what your definition of a DM is, perhaps the player at the base of midfield, rather than via action? But I wouldn't consider De Jong to be one despite him obviously working through that area of the pitch, particularly so in collecting the ball deep in his own half - deep-lying something or other who needs complete freedom and licence to roam with someone picking up turnovers and being in place to cover for him.

Perhaps we can use Beckenbauer or Sammer as definitions of that sort of role who both had cover whenever they went walkabouts. But whatever we use, it's a unique role with a unique set of parameters to facilitate and that facilitator - the guy sitting, covering and essentially enabling, is the DM, for me as he is the player expected to be studious and resolutely doing the job that allows De Jong to do his. Basically a water carrier with a vital hand-holding job.

Unless you have a CB that can seamlessly push up and occupy a covering role in midfield periodically, you definitely don't want a CM doing that job as he's too far up the pitch and not in a position to cover an unexpected turnover of possession. All that to say, we don't have a partner for De Jong at the club right now, imo and we'd be wasting him trying to dump what's here into such a specialised role that they've all proven they are incapable of playing (Garner excluded).
The dm is the deepest cm, simple as that. Carrick was a dm despite not being somebody who went flying into tackles. Ndidi is also a dm despite being far more of a tackling machine. Similarly you have box to box midfielders who are excellent tacklers and effective at winning back possession like Keane, Kante or Fred but who probably go forward a bit too often to be considered dms. FDJ is probably closest to a Carrick, Rodri or Kimmich but he still drops deeper than any of these. He progresses the ball but then drops back into position when he should. His positional understanding is right up there with the best in the world imo.

In terms of a partner to play alongside him, Eriksen has played a disciplined role in cm before. I think it's wasting him a bit considering his creative ability but I assume ETH sees him being able to do the equivalent of what Schone did alongside FDJ. FDJ has already played his best football playing alongside a deep lying playmaker, not a traditional hard tackling dm. FDJ constantly dropped into the back 3 to progress the ball at Ajax and did his fair share of defensive work. The role he was asked to perform at Barcelona was completely different so if you're comparing stats on fbref or an equivalent site they're not really going to tell a particularly accurate story of the job ETH will want FDJ to perform.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
What do you mean there aren't any tall technical CBs in the market? No one is saying get one as good as VVD, I'm not suggesting that at all. Regardless, the CB market isn't so barren that we'll have to resort to a CB that's literally as tall as Messi. I don't care what ten Hag thinks about this, getting a 4 foot centreback for 50 million euros is lunacy. It'd be okay if he was a winger, midfielder, striker, or fullback. But a CB? No way. What's next, getting a 5'6 goalkeeper because apparently heights not important there either?

CB is one of the only two positions on the pitch were height is a requirement. If we have 50m euros to spend on a midget, we have 50m euros to spend on a decently sized CB.
You should care what ten Hag thinks because he’s our manager, we will play the way how he wants to play not how you want to play.

Did you not read what I said? I said some are not available in the transfer market and some are available with more expensive cost, which the point is they are not available in the range price to suit the given transfer budget we have right now so ten Hag has to find someone cheaper in the range of 30m-40m and that is this guy the 175cm.

Go on suggest some names who we could buy with the same price or less. May be if you put some effort to suggest the names of these tall ball playing CB, you will start to understand what I meant.
 
Last edited:

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,708
Location
Inside right
The dm is the deepest cm, simple as that. Carrick was a dm despite not being somebody who went flying into tackles. Ndidi is also a dm despite being far more of a tackling machine. Similarly you have box to box midfielders who are excellent tacklers and effective at winning back possession like Keane, Kante or Fred but who probably go forward a bit too often to be considered dms. FDJ is probably closest to a Carrick, Rodri or Kimmich but he still drops deeper than any of these. He progresses the ball but then drops back into position when he should. His positional understanding is right up there with the best in the world imo.

In terms of a partner to play alongside him, Eriksen has played a disciplined role in cm before. I think it's wasting him a bit considering his creative ability but I assume ETH sees him being able to do the equivalent of what Schone did alongside FDJ. FDJ has already played his best football playing alongside a deep lying playmaker, not a traditional hard tackling dm. FDJ constantly dropped into the back 3 to progress the ball at Ajax and did his fair share of defensive work. The role he was asked to perform at Barcelona was completely different so if you're comparing stats on fbref or an equivalent site they're not really going to tell a particularly accurate story of the job ETH will want FDJ to perform.
It's not as simple as that at all though. Deep-lying playmakers have taken that role and been covered by others whose job it was to enable them to function for literal decades.

I haven't ventured into De Jong's thread for a proper read in quite some time, but I'd be surprised if this isn't a yo-yo topic that goes round in circles, and probably will for a number of seasons yet; what he does isn't something new, just not seen very often throughout the decades; primarily, we agree that he needs to be enabled to do hs thing and I think we're at odds in how or whom it requires for that to be so as I'm a firm believer in solid cover for him with someone ahead of both who works hard going backwards when needs be - Eriksen either ahead of the aforementioned or not featuring; certainly not in CM, as in side-to-side partner with De Jong, for me.

I've read some of the Schone discussions some weeks back and it is interesting reading. If we can find someone who harmonises like that who will be able to do it in the PL with our team, then by all means, but I favour the bog standard, dutiful guy who can play well enough to hold his own as a first port of call for us.

I'm not saying a magical Schone type should be overlooked, I just think that's more needle in a haystack than realistic this window.
 

Dazzmondo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
9,137
It's not as simple as that at all though. Deep-lying playmakers have taken that role and been covered by others whose job it was to enable them to function for literal decades.

I haven't ventured into De Jong's thread for a proper read in quite some time, but I'd be surprised if this isn't a yo-yo topic that goes round in circles, and probably will for a number of seasons yet; what he does isn't something new, just not seen very often throughout the decades; primarily, we agree that he needs to be enabled to do hs thing and I think we're at odds in how or whom it requires for that to be so as I'm a firm believer in solid cover for him with someone ahead of both who works hard going backwards when needs be - Eriksen either ahead of the aforementioned or not featuring; certainly not in CM, as in side-to-side partner with De Jong, for me.

I've read some of the Schone discussions some weeks back and it is interesting reading. If we can find someone who harmonises like that who will be able to do it in the PL with our team, then by all means, but I favour the bog standard, dutiful guy who can play well enough to hold his own as a first port of call for us.

I'm not saying a magical Schone type should be overlooked, I just think that's more needle in a haystack than realistic this window.
I think we need to keep in mind that it is very important for FDJ's partner to be very good at passing the ball as possession is very important to ETH. I saw a lot of people mentioning Sangare for example as someone worth considering. Sangare's an excellent tackler, very much in the mould of the bog standard type you suggest but his passing isn't very good, certainly not good enough for an ETH side. A bog standard cm won't suit the possession style ETH wants us to play. If we got someone like Rice that would be perfect as he can do everything we need while still being an excellent passer, but obviously we're talking massive fees for him and it definitely won't be happening in this window. I wouldn't completely discount Eriksen's ability to perform the role, even though I do agree that I think he would be better further up the pitch. I personally would go for Douglas Luiz from Aston Villa for the role (only 1 year left on his contract), but haven't seen any links with him at all. In general, we're linked with Eriksen and no other cm (not counting FDJ) so I assume that's who ETH sees playing the role. Again, if he wanted a versatile cb/dm to be his dm I don't see why we wouldn't be targeting Alvarez instead (and again this wasn't the type of player that played alongside FDJ at Ajax in the first place).
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,550
Martinez in his first year at Ajax played as a defensive midfielder and did really well. It was clear he was a good player.
Good tackler, agile, technically versed, positional awareness. It was really a surprise and unfair that Martinez was merely a bench player in his second year, because Ten Hag concluded that he was only suited as a defender. A quick look and you might not have noticed, but in 20/21 season he was often just a substitute or replacement for either Blind or Tagliafico.

And then this season we found a golden duo with Timber and Martinez, which drove Blind to left back and Tagliafico (Argentinian international) to the bench.
Martinez missed some games this year, but that was because of injury. Otherwise he was one of our best and most important players.
Ten Hag is not going to use him in midfield. Especially because he would also get in the way of De Jong.
You should forget about putting a pure defensive midfielder next to De Jong.
It would only limit him and Ten Hag knows that.
Surely without a DM next to him we are fair game against the best midfields in the league
 

Remember the geese

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
6,926
Location
Northampton
Ten Hag is not going to use him in midfield. Especially because he would also get in the way of De Jong.
You should forget about putting a pure defensive midfielder next to De Jong.
I find this really interesting because there has been a lot said about how De Jong needs a proper holding player next to him. A Fabinho or Rodri type. If this is not the case, then what profile of player do you consider to be the ideal partner for De Jong?
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,550
I find this really interesting because there has been a lot said about how De Jong needs a proper holding player next to him. A Fabinho or Rodri type. If this is not the case, then what profile of player do you consider to be the ideal partner for De Jong?
Yeah I am intrigued on who is the best fit there
 

ManRed

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
2,078
Location
London
Not sure we need him unless we are selling Baily, Jones, Tuanzebe in this window itself. Rather spend the funds on a RB CM and RW which we lack in quality.

We need to get our CBs performing to better standards Varane, Maguire, Lindelof, Baily is a good mix but are not performing well.
 

Waynne

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
1,875
You should forget about putting a pure defensive midfielder next to De Jong.
It would only limit him and Ten Hag knows that.
I made previous post about Martinez's ability to step into the base of midfield and operate as DM. This sort of versatility as both a CB and DM would be highly beneficial to this new United side. Blind has done that for Ajax quite brilliantly.

I don't get this obsession with a DM destroyer. Carrick wasn't a destroyer and had very good spatial awareness to snuff out attacks but could also dictate from deep. Martinez has that same ability if he drops into the base of midfield.

Not sure we need him unless we are selling Baily, Jones, Tuanzebe in this window itself. Rather spend the funds on a RB CM and RW which we lack in quality.

We need to get our CBs performing to better standards Varane, Maguire, Lindelof, Baily is a good mix but are not performing well.
Jones and Baily are injury prone.

Can't rely on just Maguire, Varane and Lindelof. Not one of them are really comfortable on the ball. We need ball playing goalkeeper and CB's.
 
Last edited:

Wezzaldo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
381
Ten Hag always played 3-5-2 at FC Utrecht. However during his time at Ajax he has always embraced this 4-2-3-1 system. Where the nr. 10 basically plays like an attacker.
The backs go high and stay along the side line. The 4 offensive players overcrowd the centre of the pitch high up. And the central defenders and the central midfielders make a 3+1 build-up play formation.
Thanks for the info. The other thing that makes me think that he wouldn’t play with a three is that it would effect Frenkie’s role. (If we get him)
 

Pronewbie

Peep
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
6,654
Location
In front of My Computer
I find this really interesting because there has been a lot said about how De Jong needs a proper holding player next to him. A Fabinho or Rodri type. If this is not the case, then what profile of player do you consider to be the ideal partner for De Jong?
I've looked up Ajax's 2018-2019 CL line-ups and in most cases it was a trio of Schone, De Jong and Donny. Therefore, it could be a myth that De Jong needs a destroyer to partner him in midfield. However, there was at least 1 game (against Bayern) where Blind played as DM instead of Schone.

If so, I can see why we are in for Eriksen. His defensive stats for Brentford is comparable to Onyeka's last season (https://the18.com/en/soccer-entertainment/how-christian-eriksen-transformed-brentford) with multiples better offensive stats. It is possible that we line-up with a midfield trio of Eriksen, De Jong and Bruno against most opposition. Against stronger opposition is where we might see Martinez come in for Eriksen/Bruno to provide more steel in the midfield. I honestly wouldn't mind seeing one of McFred depart if he and Eriksen join us.
 

Herschel Krustofsky

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
714
Location
Manchester
Supports
Balanced perspectives
Can he dab though?
This is an excellent, and criminally overlooked factor.

I read somewhere that dabbing is an area of concern following recent departures.

Pretty sure the club are in the process of identifying a dabbing coach to address the issue.
 

RodyTur10

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
20
Supports
Ajax
I find this really interesting because there has been a lot said about how De Jong needs a proper holding player next to him. A Fabinho or Rodri type. If this is not the case, then what profile of player do you consider to be the ideal partner for De Jong?
A partner for De Jong has to be a player who's able to create offensive opportunities when left open (in case De Jong being manmarked) or willing to make runs towards the box to create more space for De Jong to operate. I think Fred might be good enough, he can make runs or dribbles, technically okay, and probably more comfortable playing a bit higher up where he can take more risks in his actions (De Jong will take a lot of risks playing deep, but that's not a playing style suited for just anyone).

If Eriksen signs with Man Utd, I would be interested in watching a midfield of Eriksen - Van de Beek - De Jong. Maybe I'm too much of an idealist, but that midfield would have so much technical ability, passing ability, creativity, scoring ability, IQ, offensive awareness and selflessness. Defensively I'd count on De Jong tracking back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sultan

Remember the geese

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
6,926
Location
Northampton
A partner for De Jong has to be a player who's able to create offensive opportunities when left open (in case De Jong being manmarked) or willing to make runs towards the box to create more space for De Jong to operate. I think Fred might be good enough, he can make runs or dribbles, technically okay, and probably more comfortable playing a bit higher up where he can take more risks in his actions (De Jong will take a lot of risks playing deep, but that's not a playing style suited for just anyone).

If Eriksen signs with Man Utd, I would be interested in watching a midfield of Eriksen - Van de Beek - De Jong. Maybe I'm too much of an idealist, but that midfield would have so much technical ability, passing ability, creativity, scoring ability, IQ, offensive awareness and selflessness. Defensively I'd count on De Jong tracking back.
Thanks for the reply. An Eriksen - Van de Beek - De Jong midfield does sound tasty and I think you could get away with it for the majority of games due to the reasons you mentioned. The real test would come against the top sides where I think you would need a bit more steel. Although Ajax were very competitive in 18/19 without sacrificing their usual midfield makeup, so under the right manager and system, it might be possible?
 
Last edited:

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,708
Location
Inside right
A partner for De Jong has to be a player who's able to create offensive opportunities when left open (in case De Jong being manmarked) or willing to make runs towards the box to create more space for De Jong to operate. I think Fred might be good enough, he can make runs or dribbles, technically okay, and probably more comfortable playing a bit higher up where he can take more risks in his actions (De Jong will take a lot of risks playing deep, but that's not a playing style suited for just anyone).

If Eriksen signs with Man Utd, I would be interested in watching a midfield of Eriksen - Van de Beek - De Jong. Maybe I'm too much of an idealist, but that midfield would have so much technical ability, passing ability, creativity, scoring ability, IQ, offensive awareness and selflessness. Defensively I'd count on De Jong tracking back.
Which is a 'problem' in transference from Dutch to English football, as even by far the most offensive sides in the country have more studious and dutiful players working through the middle to enable them to do what they do whilst keeping reprisals at a bare minimum.

I'm not sure even peak ten Hag sides will be able to have such idealism in midfield. The very first thing that will be looked at in any midfield we put out is how to best deconstruct and compromise it, and a very obvious tactic out the gate is to let De Jong roam, as he does, than absolute drive into the space he vacates and draw defensive bodies to that area of the pitch. Without the correct cover, there will be potential for chasms to run into through midfield, which is, I believe, the first thing we ourselves have to cater for and have contingencies in place for. Hence 'DM' or anchor who is ready and able to sweep up at a moment's notice and recycle the ball back to a De Jong who is already in place to receive it and redouble the attacking or transitional action.

Ajax were by far the most dominant team in Holland in terms of progressive stats and what it enabled them to do as a unit; even City at their very best cannot be so overwhelming with that kind of abandon, and we're some way off them, so it's even less so for us. I doubt ten Hag can implement such overwhelming football here, or certainly not initially anyway, which is where compromises must be made, I would think.
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,708
Location
Inside right
I think we need to keep in mind that it is very important for FDJ's partner to be very good at passing the ball as possession is very important to ETH. I saw a lot of people mentioning Sangare for example as someone worth considering. Sangare's an excellent tackler, very much in the mould of the bog standard type you suggest but his passing isn't very good, certainly not good enough for an ETH side. A bog standard cm won't suit the possession style ETH wants us to play. If we got someone like Rice that would be perfect as he can do everything we need while still being an excellent passer, but obviously we're talking massive fees for him and it definitely won't be happening in this window. I wouldn't completely discount Eriksen's ability to perform the role, even though I do agree that I think he would be better further up the pitch. I personally would go for Douglas Luiz from Aston Villa for the role (only 1 year left on his contract), but haven't seen any links with him at all. In general, we're linked with Eriksen and no other cm (not counting FDJ) so I assume that's who ETH sees playing the role. Again, if he wanted a versatile cb/dm to be his dm I don't see why we wouldn't be targeting Alvarez instead (and again this wasn't the type of player that played alongside FDJ at Ajax in the first place).
I don't disagree with most of this, but I think such a player is quite the unicorn, especially for us, which is why if we can't get him, we need something robust and dependable in his stead in the meantime.

I'm absolutely all for the kind of player you're talking about, I just feel they are like gold dust.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.