Adrien Rabiot | signs 1 year deal at Juventus. See you all next year

Status
Not open for further replies.

Laurencio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
3,102
don’t think we will get frenkie, if we had wanted him before the latest vibes, then we would have got him. Literally no reason for united not to have got him earlier if he was an actual target.

rabiot doesn’t really fit as a partner with de jong, I think we are holding off on rabiot agreement to see what happens at barca. If de jong doesn’t move we will get rabiot, we will the probably chuck some money at tielemans, for the most underwhelming pairing. I’m guessing the hope that EtH can improve two players back to glory after a year of being poorer than our current players. No doubt they have more talent than mcFred but it’s not a high bar
Not sure I agree. Rabiot is quite skilled at winning the ball in the middle of the park and has the talent to recycle the ball well. I think he would work fairly well as a the deeper more defensive of the two. He's also acceptable in the air, which gives us more solidity in the middle of the park. He's clearly not a top class target, but a cheap and undervalued option. He is in no way creative enough or a skilled enough passer to be a replacement target for de Jong.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,525
I know we're desperate but we can't give out more excessive wages.
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
I wouldn't mind it, but I can't see it to be honest. He's been available all summer, if we wanted him, we'd have surely moved early.... In fact, now I think about it I can see it happening actually
mid we were getting de jong we wouldn’t want him. I think he is one of the plan bs they have talked about.

his major problem alongside rabiot is last seasons poor form. Tielemans was truly awful last year.

I’d prefer SMS but I think kazoo could turn down 45m, and I doubt we want to go big.
 

Elcabron

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2022
Messages
848
Rabiot can command much higher wages next summer when he walks away on a free, so I don't see him lowering his demands now.

Shame, we need midfielder players desperately and I'd happily take anyone who is better than current options, Rabiot fits that bill.
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
Not sure I agree. Rabiot is quite skilled at winning the ball in the middle of the park and has the talent to recycle the ball well. I think he would work fairly well as a the deeper more defensive of the two. He's also acceptable in the air, which gives us more solidity in the middle of the park. He's clearly not a top class target, but a cheap and undervalued option. He is in no way creative enough or a skilled enough passer to be a replacement target for de Jong.
Except de jong is better as the deeper player, rabiot prefers to play as a box to box, but is actually pretty poor as that type of player. His defending and ball recycling is good, but his progressive play, dribbling forward and goal creation as you say is poor.

I think we might leave too big a gap in midfield with rabiot / de jong.
 

Laurencio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
3,102
Rabiot can command much higher wages next summer when he walks away on a free, so I don't see him lowering his demands now.

Shame, we need midfielder players desperately and I'd happily take anyone who is better than current options, Rabiot fits that bill.
To be fair, a lot of players fit that bill :lol:
 

mikeyt

Full Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
786
Rabiot has ability and is better than what we have however if he is the alternative to FDJ then we're screwed. We must add another and that other needs to be quality and progressing the ball.
 

fergosaurus

Full Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
4,415
Rabiot can command much higher wages next summer when he walks away on a free, so I don't see him lowering his demands now.

Shame, we need midfielder players desperately and I'd happily take anyone who is better than current options, Rabiot fits that bill.
Who would pay them? The wages he's demanding are insane for a player of his quality. He looks like a £100k a week player at best.
 

Laurencio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
3,102
Except de jong is better as the deeper player, rabiot prefers to play as a box to box, but is actually pretty poor as that type of player. His defending and ball recycling is good, but his progressive play, dribbling forward and goal creation as you say is poor.

I think we might leave too big a gap in midfield with rabiot / de jong.
Personally I think de Jong is at his best when he has freedom to roam the middle of the park, not necessarily sitting deep.

Rabiot has the skill set to be a good defensive midfielder who can cover for de Jong and should not be played as a box to box for the obvious reasons we both point out. He simply doesn't have the ability for it. If we can see that we should damn well hope a coach like Ten Hag can.
 

Johan77

Full Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
605
Location
Sweden
He has 145k gross in Juve, why would he want more than 300k here? I don't buy that, no one could be that stupid...
 
Last edited:

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
He has 145k gross in Juve, why would he want more than 300k here? I don't buy that, no one could be that stupid...
Yeah obviously click bait. I’m sure wages are probably already agreed. We are just long with everything. Will Keane’s brother probably only works for us on Friday’s so we have to wait for him to do the paperwork.
 

Acrobat7

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
5,284
Supports
Bayern Munich
He has 145k gross in Juve, why would he want more than 300k here? I don't buy that, no one could be that stupid...
Wages in Italy are normally stated as net, not gross. He went to Juve as a free agent and I believe they are paying him veeerrry well.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Wages in Italy are normally stated as net, not gross. He went to Juve as a free agent and I believe they are paying him veeerrry well.
As Pogba and Lingard found out. Yesterday’s fees aren’t todays fee’s. He’s not going to get what has been reported if true.
 

Johan77

Full Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
605
Location
Sweden
Wages in Italy are normally stated as net, not gross. He went to Juve as a free agent and I believe they are paying him veeerrry well.
The are both gross and net on Capology, you can choose that, I choose gross and it says 145k. In net they are 112k
 

hellhunter

Eurofighter
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
18,054
Location
Stuttgart, Germany
Supports
Karlsruher SC
Wages in Italy are normally stated as net, not gross. He went to Juve as a free agent and I believe they are paying him veeerrry well.
I would assume so as well. Would be surprised if Juve, masters of overpaying for free transfers, managed to sign him for 'just' 145k. They paid Ramsey 400k ffs
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
He has 145k gross in Juve, why would he want more than 300k here? I don't buy that, no one could be that stupid...
He supposed to earn 9m gross. And as a foreigner, he is supposed to only pay half of the income taxes that an italian player would.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
As Pogba and Lingard found out. Yesterday’s fees aren’t todays fee’s. He’s not going to get what has been reported if true.
Even when you are in the same market, they are contextual. People trying to translate one wage to all the others are making a fairly poor mistake.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,668
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
I know we're desperate but we can't give out more excessive wages.
Well we can but it should be a short team deal only. We're in a position of relative weakness at the moment so we have to pay more. I don't know why we don't offer a big contract, 3 years with the option of a 4th, if we don't make CL in the next 2 seasons he's allowed to leave for half of what we paid for him.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,082
Well we can but it should be a short team deal only. We're in a position of relative weakness at the moment so we have to pay more. I don't know why we don't offer a big contract, 3 years with the option of a 4th, if we don't make CL in the next 2 seasons he's allowed to leave for half of what we paid for him.
We should do the same for Frenkie. Puts a bit more tension into the club in terms of ambition and expectation
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,396
Pull out of the deal and play the kids, with or without Rabiot this side won’t make top 4 he isn’t good enough to make a change to an already poor midfield. 200k a week for Rabiot :lol: this thread will be worse than the McTominay thread next summer when everyone realises we’ve signed another dud on massive wages.

They won’t do it but Arnold and co should release some type of statement saying they failed this summer and changes will be made to stop that happening again, I honestly expect the sacking or resignation of Murtough in September this has not only been unacceptable but an embarrassment to the club.
 

Johan77

Full Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
605
Location
Sweden
I don't know if capology are worth anything. The Monaco one is as bad as it gets.
I'm not totally sure either, but which site are better? Are there any reliable ones? If not we can just drop our speculation of wages to a player, as none have any clue at all
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
The issue is that in Italy for a player paid 9m per year gross their tax is around 1.5m.

converting that British tax regime to earn 7.5m net Rabiot would need to earn 15-16m.
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
The are both gross and net on Capology, you can choose that, I choose gross and it says 145k. In net they are 112k
That’s in gbp so if you assume he wants to take home the same as that in the uk he needs to earn 13m gbp
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
I'm not totally sure either, but which site are better? Are there any reliable ones? If not we can just drop our speculation of wages to a player, as none have any clue at all
None of these are good. You can try to find articles from more reputable papers but even then it's largely guess works.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,715
I'm not totally sure either, but which site are better? Are there any reliable ones? If not we can just drop our speculation of wages to a player, as none have any clue at all
For Serie A, GDS publish wages of all the players which are usually closer to what's reported by Italian journalists.

For other league, especially PL people shouldn't worry about individual wages, it's just PR battle. Just check total wages from official financial report (or usually Swiss ramble puts them in single tweet).
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
I'm not totally sure either, but which site are better? Are there any reliable ones? If not we can just drop our speculation of wages to a player, as none have any clue at all
no because wages are important, inconvenient as it may be.

people keep saying he is a cheap, low cost deal when he isn’t. 260k gbp wages is not peanuts. Is he worth it? I dunno, he’ll be worth it if he gets us cl
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
16,997
Location
England:
4 year contract at 10 million a year. No, not for his guy. Panic buying now.
If United pull out I almost guarantee that Juventus would massively reduce the transfer fee. They are desperate to sell him.

It’s bonkers to think we are willing to pay £20 million for him.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,788
Location
France
So now that we established what he probably didn't earn at Juve, what did he earn at Juve?
Supposedly 9m gross which is around 7m net. But that's meaningless because the player isn't in the same situation, he is older and not in similar demand.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,134
Location
Tool shed
When I saw that other locked thread I was hoping it was this one and that the transfer wasn't happening.

I am disappoint.
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
Supposedly 9m gross which is around 7m net. But that's meaningless because the player isn't in the same situation, he is older and not in similar demand.
He is older, but supposedly In his prime, and doesn’t seem keen on the move hence he needs convincing.

his mother, againfrom gods reporting wants a pay increase to 10m net, which I can’t see is doing, so will probably end up back at around his net level surely?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.