Which nation is The Gatekeeper in international football?

Scandi Red

Hates Music.
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Messages
4,670
I didn't find a good term so I just invented my own: The Gatekeeper

The Gatekeeper is a very strong football nation that is still not quite top class. To clarify who The Gatekeeper is is useful for weaker nations as it gives them a tangible level to reach for. If you can consistently outperform The Gatekeeper over many years, then you should by definition be allowed to join the ranks of countries like Brazil, Spain, Germany etc. When thinking in these terms it's important to have a long term perspective. In other words, a golden generation shouldn't be enough to earn you the top nation seal of approval.

Croatia is the perfect gatekeeper in my opinion. They have never won a world cup(not when they were a part of Yugoslavia either) and they don't have a top class domestic league, but the football quality of the country is still undeniable. They have produced great footballers like Suker and Modric and they have only failed to qualify for one world cup since they became a country in the early 90's!

For clarity, I consider the following 10 to be the top nations in football: Brazil, Argentina, Germany, France, England, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Netherlands, Uruguay.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,019
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
1) You've not invented the term gatekeeper. It's a commonly use term in sports

2) You've answered your question in your OP in Croatia

3) Netherlands haven't been a top side for atleast a decade.
 

Scandi Red

Hates Music.
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Messages
4,670
3) Netherlands haven't been a top side for atleast a decade.
Perhaps, but I would like to wait at least a few more years before removing them from the top flight. They still produce very good players, their domestic league isn't bad and they are generally better than most nations outside the list provided.
 

VanDeBank

Ma’am
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
4,862
Why is Croatia a better gate keeper than Holland? We've been doing it since the 70s and we're not a top side.
 

DRJosh

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
2,887
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Supports
United minus the Glazers
For some reason I feel people always overlook Croatia even with their proven pedigree.
 

Scandi Red

Hates Music.
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Messages
4,670
Why is Croatia a better gate keeper than Holland? We've been doing it since the 70s and we're not a top side.
Ouch, if the Dutch themselves don't consider the country a top nation then I might have to reconsider! :nervous:

There can probably be multiple gatekeepers, though.
 

VanDeBank

Ma’am
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
4,862
Ouch, if the Dutch themselves don't consider the country a top nation then I might have to reconsider! :nervous:

There can probably be multiple gatekeepers, though.
Ive never considered England a top nation either. Growing up, I can't recall ever having thought of them as a team capable of winning a cup or going past quarter finals even.

Uruguay could be considered one, but maybe it's a bit disrespectful cause they won it a million years ago.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,019
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
Ive never considered England a top nation either. Growing up, I can't recall ever having thought of them as a team capable of winning a cup or going past quarter finals even.

Uruguay could be considered one, but maybe it's a bit disrespectful cause they won it a million years ago.
2004, 2006, 2018, 2020(1), 2022. I'd be shocked if they weren't capable of getting out the quarters the next euros too.

Sure theres a few in the 90s too.
 

Ødegaard

formerly MrEriksen
Scout
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
11,474
Location
Norway
Not what you are asking about, but: Norway.
Always misses tournaments by a game or two.
 
Last edited:

VanDeBank

Ma’am
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
4,862
2004, 2006, 2018, 2020(1), 2022. I'd be shocked if they weren't capable of getting out the quarters the next euros too.

Sure theres a few in the 90s too.
Well Im not that young anymore, so I didnt consider the recent success. I was more thinking of the time Seaman was in goal and the aughts. I dont think I ever saw a good England team performance. They were overrated because of good individual players. Cant say I was a huge follower but they were not Brasil/Germany tier.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,366
Why is Croatia a better gate keeper than Holland? We've been doing it since the 70s and we're not a top side.
Things must be bad if you’re actually arguing over which country is a better gatekeeper :lol:
 

Krakenzero

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Messages
706
Supports
Santiago Wanderers
I'd say England could be a good example. Good results, lack of titles. All the better teams are multichampions. All the worse teams (bar the strange case of Uruguay) aren't.
 

massi83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,596
What makes Belgium better than Czechia, Sweden or Denmark apart from recency bias?
 

Abizzz

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
7,634
There are going to be tiers within the top tier but I find it hard to deny that England is a top football nation, even though Brazil is much better.
Without winning anything in half a century? All depends how broadly one defines top I guess.
 

Scandi Red

Hates Music.
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Messages
4,670
Without winning anything in half a century? All depends how broadly one defines top I guess.
Yeah, I think so. England are chronic under-performers when you look at the players they've had during these years. I don't think England is worse than Portugal, Netherlands and Uruguay and I consider all of them top nations. But I might be a little more generous than most.
 

Krakenzero

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Messages
706
Supports
Santiago Wanderers
The following is a list of official titles of the 8 WC winning nations:
TeamWCEuro/CAConfedLoNOlymp
Brazil594--
Germany43100
Italy42000
Argentina2151-0
Uruguay2150-2
France22210
Spain13000
England1000-

This reinforces the England gatekeeping theory.
 

Marauder1

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2022
Messages
174
Supports
Ex Liverpool.Football Agnostic
Agree with England being gatekeepers, frequently progress to quarters/semis but no further, apart from the most recent euros.
 

iHicksy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
1,833
Isn't gatekeeping the term for lauding it over others and deciding who gets to have an opinion on something based on their own purist, often misplaced ideals of the event?

E.g when Klopp moans about teams using the longball because it beats his teams and it's "not real football"
 

VanDeBank

Ma’am
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
4,862
There are going to be tiers within the top tier but I find it hard to deny that England is a top football nation, even though Brazil is much better.
Like I said, I was going by my childhood memories, which excludes England's recent successful-ish era. I've always had way higher expectations of Brasil, Argentina, Germany, France, Italy and Portugal compared to England and Holland. That's why the last 2 are perfect as gate keepers. They can beat anyone on a good day, and people fear drawing them, but their actual chances of winning any given tournament are less than 1%.
Yeah, I think so. England are chronic under-performers when you look at the players they've had during these years. I don't think England is worse than Portugal, Netherlands and Uruguay and I consider all of them top nations.
I don't recall that many mind-blowing performances that raised my expectations of the English in the late nineties or aughts (if there were any, let me know) By comparison, Holland had some wow performances post '88, Euro 2008 in which they dominated the group of death sticks out in particular and I'm sure more than a few people had us as favorites in '98, maybe 2010 as well.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,008
Location
Moscow
Uruguay could be considered one, but maybe it's a bit disrespectful cause they won it a million years ago.
I thought about them first, early World Cup exploits aside.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,019
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
The following is a list of official titles of the 8 WC winning nations:
TeamWCEuro/CAConfedLoNOlymp
Brazil594--
Germany43100
Italy42000
Argentina2151-0
Uruguay2150-2
France22210
Spain13000
England1000-

This reinforces the England gatekeeping theory.
3/4 of Spain's wins came in the space of 4 years and have never looked like winning anything since (nor did they before the wins either really). Does that make Spain gatekeepers too?
 

Krakenzero

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Messages
706
Supports
Santiago Wanderers
3/4 of Spain's wins came in the space of 4 years and have never looked like winning anything since (nor did they before the wins either really). Does that make Spain gatekeepers too?
Maybe. They are multichampions tough.
 

Rodgerzzz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
218
Surely it's the Dutch, not only because their level isn't quite top tier anymore, albeit still competitive enough, but also because stylistically they demand an idealistic profile of football from their NT?
 

Demyanenko_square_jaw

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
1,055
Depends on how broadly you are setting the tiers at.

In sports if i see someone call a team/person a gatekeeper, it tends to mean they are above average and consistent, but never a contender for anything; a gatekeeper to the top 10/20 in the world etc...Netherlands is too historically successful to be a good fit. you can't be getting to multiple semi-finals and finals. if it's shorter term, they are a good fit for the last 5/6 years, as are Croatia or Uruguay.
 

Dirty Schwein

Has a 'Best of Britney Spears' album
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
31,953
Location
Miracle World
Supports
Luton Town
Stoke away on a cold Tuesday night.

Countries wise, I always see it as Poland and Switzerland. They usually beat the teams they should beat and lose to the teams they should lose to.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,520
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
Ouch, if the Dutch themselves don't consider the country a top nation then I might have to reconsider! :nervous:

There can probably be multiple gatekeepers, though.
We are overly critical really. We've had a shit spell last decade, but came in 2nd and 3rd in 2010, 2014 and have been consistentlt good since the late 80s (1990 didnt happen) If that's not good enough to be a top nation then I'm not sure what Uruguay is doing in that list. Or England :nervous:

The absolute power houses are Brazil, Argentina, France, Spain and Italy if you ask me.

After that it's England, Portugal, The Netherlands as almost power houses and under that Croatia and Uruguay etc.
 

Zetrio2002

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
368
Denmark as well. Always in every competition and always qualifying to knockout save for this time.
 

abundance

Full Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
621
Supports
Inter
Ok, I've no idea what's a gatekeeper is in sports, but,
I think,
the pattern is like this:
if you're a decently large country, you either are top shelf:
Brasil, Germany, France, Italy, England, Spain, Argentina
or seemingly never good at it:
China, India, USA ...

Then if you're small, chances are that the smaller you are, the better you may often be. During the years:
Scotland, Uruguay, Austria, Hungary, Czeckia, Sweden, Portugal, Yugoslavia, Belgium, Netherlands, Denmark, Croatia...
 

KeanoMagicHat

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
4,021
Mexico, first time they haven’t got to the last 16 in 7 or 8 attempts and it was on goal difference.

If you’re shit like Germany in 2018, they'll beat you. If you’re decent you can get a draw. If you’re good you’ll beat them. So beating Mexico is generally a sign of a good team.
 

Kanu

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
984
Location
Holland
Supports
Feyenoord & United
England and Netherlands are definitely in the same tier in International football. Last 30 years Netherlands have been more impressive than England. I would say those 2 nations would be "gatekeeper". Not quite a powerhouse, but not far from it.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,221
Location
Croatia
I didn't find a good term so I just invented my own: The Gatekeeper

The Gatekeeper is a very strong football nation that is still not quite top class. To clarify who The Gatekeeper is is useful for weaker nations as it gives them a tangible level to reach for. If you can consistently outperform The Gatekeeper over many years, then you should by definition be allowed to join the ranks of countries like Brazil, Spain, Germany etc. When thinking in these terms it's important to have a long term perspective. In other words, a golden generation shouldn't be enough to earn you the top nation seal of approval.

Croatia is the perfect gatekeeper in my opinion. They have never won a world cup(not when they were a part of Yugoslavia either) and they don't have a top class domestic league, but the football quality of the country is still undeniable. They have produced great footballers like Suker and Modric and they have only failed to qualify for one world cup since they became a country in the early 90's!

For clarity, I consider the following 10 to be the top nations in football: Brazil, Argentina, Germany, France, England, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Netherlands, Uruguay.
Good shout for us. Missed only one wc and one euro since independence, been 3rd in 1998 and 2nd in 2018, in the final four NL, all the while having a crap league and not much better infrastructure.

Dutch are a good shout also.