£20m Summer Transfer Budget

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,918
Location
Rehovot, Israel
I have no expectation of signing 5 players. That’s just not how we roll.
We signed five players in LVG's second summer, and six during his first summer. We signed four players in Mourinho's first summer.

People would say we always get three players max, but it's just not true. It depends on circumstances.
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
Is anyone stupid enough to believe that’s our budget? :lol: :lol: :lol:
I very much doubt anyone believes it.

I'd expect (hope) this will be the biggest summer spluge in the history of our club, especially with the £70 million a year saved through players leaving/released.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,197
Location
Salford
If true it's likely to be 20m of new money on top of Salaries off the books and Incoming fees.
Nothing to see here.
That’s still dreadful

20m plus fees from sales… so maybe £10m-15m for Henderson.. and maybe £10m for martial. That’s it.

Wages freed up will surely have to be spent on the wages of incoming players
 

mancsarered

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
632
Maybe if we keep leaking this instead of headlines about, "war chests" we wouldn't have to sign players for 150% their value.
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,148
I don't see what the problem is guys. We got Dwight Yorke for 12.6m. That leaves around 7m++ for us to then get Bebe.
 

Red00012

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
12,180
Is it better than telling the whole world money isn’t a problem. Looks like we are learning . Good riddance Woodward
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,111
It's that time of season where someone will create a thread of the sales we'll make, and estimate an utterly hilarious total we'll apparently bring in.

Made more difficult this year by the likes of Cavani,Lingard, Mata, Matic (i assume?) and Pogba being out of contract. As otherwise they'd suggest we'd be looking at 120m for that lot.

Actually, wow, if those 5 do go for free (although I suspect we'll sign at least 2 of them back up), that's one big reduction to the squad.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,255
Who here was arguing that we only spent 28m last summer or something like that?
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,154
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Nice agenda poster - Ronaldo came to light on the last days of the transfer window and was acted on without any hesitation - as we had already said before that we had ended with all our transfer business.

So Ronaldo was a prime example that, we can get over the line in any deal that we really want to. But splashing 150 on Declan Rice isn't gonna happen as it's insane.
:rolleyes:
Go on then, what’s my agenda?! I’m curious….
I certainly didn’t mention Rice, nor would I support such a signing for that much.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,154
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
We signed five players in LVG's second summer, and six during his first summer. We signed four players in Mourinho's first summer.

People would say we always get three players max, but it's just not true. It depends on circumstances.
Hope for the best, expect the worst. I would think 3/4 signings tops.

We seem to have learned from the mistakes made under LVG.
 
Last edited:

choccy77

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
6,059
Why do people even bother posting this rubbish.

Do they actually think it's true.

Ban them.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
95,988
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Being a sports journalist is an easy job, you can write anything and basically cover yourself with "sources from the club".
There needs to be some accountability from these rags
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,918
Location
Rehovot, Israel
I would think 3/4 signings tops.

We seem to have learned from the mistakes made under LVG.
I don't think that there's a right or wrong when it comes to signing a certain amount of players.

Sure, in a good situation, when you have a good team, you don't want to disrupt it by making too many signings at the same time.

If you don't have a good team, then there's nothing to disrupt. And if you plan to sign a large number of players over the next few transfer windows anyway, then you might as well get as many as you can in early.

How many can you get? Obviously it depends on the targets, their availability and their prices. If you go for big names mostly, of course it will be hard to afford many at the same time.
 

SirReginald

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
2,295
Supports
Chelsea
:lol:

Does that actually work in that game?
Anything is possible on simulation games. Remember a bug in championship manager 03/04 where you could create a new manager at a different team, put a player you wanted in the youth team, swap back to your real team and sign them on a free transfer as the game considered them to have youth contracts :lol:
 

Longshanks

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
1,781
Anything is possible on simulation games. Remember a bug in championship manager 03/04 where you could create a new manager at a different team, put a player you wanted in the youth team, swap back to your real team and sign them on a free transfer as the game considered them to have youth contracts :lol:
I can remember CM 95/96 you could change the transfer offer even after it had been accepted, offer 20m wait for the offer to be accepted then change the offer to zero and sign basically whoever you wanted. Signed the deadly strike duo of Shearer and Bierhoff for nothing.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
This is a piece from a Guardian article a few years ago that highlighted myths about how football transfers work:

Clubs do not have transfer budget, war chests and kitties
If anyone tries to tell you “big club x” has “y amount” to spend they are likely talking nonsense. Ask them to show their work on how they arrived at that number.

As we just discussed, there’s a lot more that goes into player costs than transfer fees. Unless the number being offered up clearly includes wages (which is more than half of the equation), and ideally at least a nod towards agent fees and image rights payments, you can safely disregard it as not reflective of that club’s available resources to bolster its squad.
Clubs don't have one budget for transfer fees and another random budget for every other part of the transfer's cost. Free transfers don't magically have zero impact on what else you can spend in the summer, as if only nominal fees count but not wages. Just ignore these yearly stories.
 

Red Rash

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Messages
2,163
Come again?

Not suggesting that this is necessarily true but if we lost Pogba, Matic, Mata, Lingard ,Cavani and maybe a few others, that should free up a lot in terms of salaries. If we can buy good players without ridiculous wage demands, we should be able to spend 150 million plus in my opinion. We will need to anyway to try and make sure we have enough depth in the squad