Except City have never signed anyone for the price of either Lukaku or Maguire.@adexkola
My point being, when United make mistakes we have to live with them - as do every other team in the league.
When United signed ADM and he never settled, we had to sell him and recoup most of the money before we could buy again. City wouldn't have done, would just have kept him or packed him out on loan, see if he came good, as has happened with John Stones.
Likewise, when United wanted to sign Maguire, we had to sell Lukaku and leave ourselves short in attack to fund the transfer. City wouldn't have done, would have kept Lukaku AND bought Maguire.
I could go on and on, Blind, Depay, Schneiderlin… all bought in for fees, didn't really work out, had to be sold before new players could be bought in.
Just to be clear, this is NOT a problem unique to United, not having this problem is an advantage unique to City though
Martial was injured!With 20 minutes to go I'd have gone:
AWB Bailly Maguire ShawI'm 100% certain Fergie would've done the same. Hell, I'd have considered putting Telles left wing and just telling him and Shaw to keep whipping it in to Cavani.
James Bruno Matic Rashford
Cavani Martial
It’s still pretty simple, you put Rashord or Greenwood alongside Cavani in an extremely attacking 4-4-2 and go for it.Martial was injured!
I don't think he had many options at all. Our bench was atrocious.It’s still pretty simple, you put Rashord or Greenwood alongside Cavani in an extremely attacking 4-4-2 and go for it.
Stop making bullshit excuses like he had no options, he had plenty but thought they were all too risky.
Do 5 year cycles exist in football? Once we start approaching that players are agitating to leave, the ones hat don't are long past their prime. We didn't buy Bruno and Maguire with a plan to win in 2024.Generally, I'd say working in 5 year cycles with exponential growth and development targets.
I agree with this. This thread is the worst way to defend and explain why it's struggling. Look at all the shit results we've had, what the feck have they got to do with Man City ?So we need 300m+ worth of talent to beat Palace do we
Brighton had over 10 shots on goal more than us against them!
Most expensive signings in PL history:@adexkola
My point being, when United make mistakes we have to live with them - as do every other team in the league.
@adexkola
My point being, when United make mistakes we have to live with them - as do every other team in the league.
When United signed ADM and he never settled, we had to sell him and recoup most of the money before we could buy again. City wouldn't have done, would just have kept him or packed him out on loan, see if he came good, as has happened with John Stones.
Likewise, when United wanted to sign Maguire, we had to sell Lukaku and leave ourselves short in attack to fund the transfer. City wouldn't have done, would have kept Lukaku AND bought Maguire.
I could go on and on, Blind, Depay, Schneiderlin… all bought in for fees, didn't really work out, had to be sold before new players could be bought in.
Just to be clear, this is NOT a problem unique to United, not having this problem is an advantage unique to City though
God that's depressing.Most expensive signings in PL history:
1. Paul Pogba £89m
2. Harry Maguire £78m
3. Romelu Lukaku £75m
All made in the last 5 years. That money would've been enough to buy every single squad player mentioned in the OP tweet and then some.
Maybe let's start by not throwing record fees around if we're apparently too poor to replace mistakes (despite spending 1,3 billion in 10 years).
ExactlyWhy is it mutually exclusive? They have better players AND better coaching. We've also spent a similar amount of money compared to City. So you can't really say they just rely on spending more than us.
Agree. Absolutely no structure or vision for the way the club wants to play regardless of who the manager is.The main difference in spending is that City have had one aim, ran by one man for the entirety of our squad building which has been built and rebuilt by 4 managers in that time. If we had a vision, as a club and not as per each manager, we would no way be in the predicament we have been in over recent times. Managers deserve blame too, but the lack of any kind of planning beyond Fergie is the main reason to blame.
Our owners and management structure above Ole are nothing more than absentee landlords!
So just to be clear in a match where Palace probably had the best chances you then give them more space in midfield and arguably let them go on and win the game. I'm going to give Ole the benefit of the doubt in terms of not altering the shape. The WHOLE team ahead of the defenders were playing terribly. Everyone could see that. Bruno was misplacing balls, Cavani looked off fitness, Rashford running down blind alleys, Greenwood wasn't finding spaces, Matic was slow letting people run past him. The way the whole side was playing, if Ole had 'gone for it' in such a way as you wanted we would have lost. I know its about 'taking risks', but honestly I think him and the coaching staff were watching that and thinking this side can't switch it up a gear today.With 20 minutes to go I'd have gone:
AWB Bailly Maguire ShawI'm 100% certain Fergie would've done the same. Hell, I'd have considered putting Telles left wing and just telling him and Shaw to keep whipping it in to Cavani.
James Bruno Matic Rashford
Cavani Martial
Superb post and nails it on all points as wellYeah, maybe Moyes is more suited to mid sized club where the expectations are at modest levels and he can work with specific type of players. Tbh it's good to see him back at good level, he was very good manager at Everton.
Regarding the complaining, I have said it few times. As per many fans the ultimate conclusion/resolution for every problem is transfers.
We are not controlling the midfield? Sign a controlling midfielder like Thiago
We are conceding goals? Sign a CB to play alongside Maguire
We are not scoring enough goals? Sign a CF who is scoring many goals.
How about signing a manager who can actually fix the issue? Take Chelsea as example, they looked no where near convincing under Lampard, even though they played attacking football and in most cases controlling possession. But under Tuchel they already look like a well drilled team with each player knowing their responsibilities with and without ball. You don't follow the instructions, they are subbed out immediately.
Even City, they had team of Fernandinho, KdB, David Silva, Yaya Toure, Sterling, Aguero who were outplayed by ManUtd under Van Gaal with players like Fellaini, Rooney (in midfield), Herrera, Mata, Young. The same team under Pep started to completely dominate the games. Even before they won trophies but with Pep you can clearly see how dominating they were.
Under Jose, the common excuse was "you sign players from midtable, you should expect midtable position" and then you see Liverpool team signing players from midtable and relegation teams, then they won PL and CL.
It's a shame that clubs around us have invested wisely (which we also did) and also added very good coaches (which we haven't).
We are so passive on and off the pitch, it's unreal that somehow we call ourselves as "the biggest club in the world". Chelsea realized they are not going anywhere with Lampard, sacked him and signed Tuchel who was available.
Liverpool under this ownership hired Dalglish when they sacked Hodgson, he won couple of cups so they gave him permanent contract. When things didn't go well they sacked him next season and then hired Rodgers.
Rodgers went on to have one of their best PL season in recent years but when manager like Klopp was available, they were ruthless enough to sack Rodgers and hire Klopp.
We lack that ruthless nature, we are somehow scared to make the changes. We don't have manager who sets high expectations. Under SAF 2nd was a failure because SAF saw 2nd as failure. Jose saw 2nd as failure at his peak, Pep won't settle for 2nd place. Managers sets the expectations, at Manutd we have hired managers who somehow lowered the expectations ever since SAF retired.
Yeah there is no doubt that Ole's man management off the pitch is on point and he has definitely improved things post Jose, however like you say he lacks so many of the important elements of a top manager and his unwillingness to change any of these things is what constantly frustrates me time and time again and I just cannot understand why. This board is just so bloody halfway house as well because they come out today backing Ole to the hilt has done but you just know when the summer comes out comes the plead poverty stuff all over again.The thing is, Ole doesn’t need to be a terrible manager to fail at United. All he needs to be is not an absolutely exceptional, world class manager. So it shouldn’t be considered an insult to question his ability to take us to the top.
Even though we’ve had some great runs with him in charge we’ve never seen the sort of transformation on the pitch you see when one of the top managers takes charge at a club and moulds them in his image. Even someone like Conte at Chelsea (and now Inter) has shown Ole up in this regard.
Ole does seem to be the best man manager since Fergie tbf. Creating a happier squad, who will dig deep if we go behind. And he deserves credit for this. But it couldn’t be more obvious (to me, anyway) that he is lacking at other elements of his job. Not bad at them. Just not good enough. Buying more expensive players won’t change this.
You need somebody to convince you of this?Martial (I’d love to be convinced that he is inferior to Sterling)
Van De Beek (went for more than Gundogan and was a key member of a mesmerizing CL semis Ajax team)
Cavani (world class striker without a doubt, though ageing)
Rashford (young promising star)
Fred
This excuse is not tenable, let’s fix our shit. If Lukaku was delivering, we wouldn’t let him go. Many people on this board were content with him leaving. I remember posting that Auba was the surer bet when Redcafe, Chelsea and United managers were fawning over Lukaku and then Morata.
You’re proving my point.Most expensive signings in PL history:
1. Paul Pogba £89m
2. Harry Maguire £78m
3. Romelu Lukaku £75m
All made in the last 5 years. That money would've been enough to buy every single squad player mentioned in the OP tweet and then some.
Maybe let's start by not throwing record fees around if we're apparently too poor to replace mistakes (despite spending 1,3 billion in 10 years).
Oh, I was squarely in that boat too and quite a few others. I was definitely not keen on Morata and rather underwhelmed by Lukaku. Then when those of us who did not know he had no first touch realised that, most of us wanted him out. Don't mind him as a character, he's just not a player for a progressive style of football. And Auba went for a lot less money as well.If Bruno has an off day, we have:
Pogba (Record fee for a midfielder, world cup winner. If it was the other guys that got Pogba, we would all be crying that they have destroyed football)
Mata (If he was on the other side people would be insisting that he is an elite player citing how great he was at Chelsea)
Martial (I’d love to be convinced that he is inferior to Sterling)
Van De Beek (went for more than Gundogan and was a key member of a mesmerizing CL semis Ajax team)
Cavani (world class striker without a doubt, though ageing)
Rashford (young promising star)
Fred
This excuse is not tenable, let’s fix our shit. If Lukaku was delivering, we wouldn’t let him go. Many people on this board were content with him leaving. I remember posting that Auba was the surer bet when Redcafe, Chelsea and United managers were fawning over Lukaku and then Morata.
We outbid Madrid for Bale, we tried for Fabregas.... how was Moyes not backed ?This is a good/fair post. The Moyes thing is particularly interesting. Not only was he not as heavily backed, financially, he also got a lot less patience than his successors in terms of the time allowed to build the squad he wanted.
Now my personal opinion is that he wasn’t cut out for this job but it’s funny to see him take a team that cost absolute peanuts to within a couple of points of us, 27 games into the season, while a bunch of United fans are still complaining about how the club hasn’t spent enough money and Ole needs yet another transfer window before he can be fairly judged.
I meant “inferior” talent wise. While you may disagree I am convinced that there is nothing Sterling has achieved or is achieving in his career that Martial couldn’t have easily matched.You need somebody to convince you of this?
Just purchase a sky subscription and watch the games as you must have missed them.
He’s been abysmal, through nothing but laziness, he’s been by a distance our worst performing player within the squad.
Cavani and Telles have played quite a bit. The others are for the future.Harry Maguire cost more than any player in their squad.
Ole spent nearly £100m this summer on players he never uses.
Right now they do, last season they didn´t.Pep has spent £421m on his defence, citing the cost of one player is hardly an argument. When you have bought loads of defenders that are £45m-£65m, there’s a good chance you are going to stumble across a back line that does the job.
I think the owner from Iraq.Manchester City is a institution of the Qatari royal government. It is built for longetivity and prestige, just like their other government agencies. Manchester United on the other hand is a business operating in a quasi monopoly and still relatively free from market pressures, which allow us leeway for mediocrity.
Feck no.Shaw has always been a great player. What's hampered him has been injuries and the fear of getting over his leg break. If psychologically Ole has helped him then credit to him but technically Shaw is the same as he's always been.
UAE. Qatar owns PSG.I think the owner from Iraq.
You forgot to add telles to the total.VDB has barely been used by Ole even when fit and even when we desperately needed goals. He has spent 130m on the defence which wasn't our biggest issue and still isn't a huge strength.
Very well said. Martial's attitude, body language, desire and most importantly, goal scoring, have all been off a pathetic nature. Schoolboy behavior. Especially goal scoring. This is his 6 th season with us . Played 166 league games , scored 55 goals. That works out at an average of 1 goal every 3 games. Most worrying, this season he's only scored 4 league goals. A true No. 9 , I very much doubt it. But still, Ole persists with him ? Baffling !You need somebody to convince you of this?
Just purchase a sky subscription and watch the games as you must have missed them.
He’s been abysmal, through nothing but laziness, he’s been by a distance our worst performing player within the squad.