You literally complained about the existence of this thread on the other page
Yes because it’s superfluous when we already have the Amorim thread for people to moan in.
But you didn’t actually address my point.
You literally complained about the existence of this thread on the other page
That we have been in PL play this season is an extreme understatement. But we have one foot back into CL qualification, which was our sole objective this season.
We were out of the running for top 4/5 in the PL by the time ETH was sacked. Mathematically we were still in it of course, but in reality we were roadkill when Ruben arrived. That the club prioritized the EL above the PL is obvious. We still hate to see clubs like Wolves and Brentford shellac us, but these were matches that just didn't matter any longer by the time we got to mid-January and top 4/5 was out of reach.
Yes because it’s superfluous when we already have the Amorim thread for people to moan in.
But you didn’t actually address my point.
It’s been dreadful but the club showed in January that the short term wasn’t the priority. A struggling team loaning out players and not replacing them was confirmation that the focus wasn’t really on this season.
Bringing Amorim in midseason was to give him a head start for next season. It’s conceivable we will be significantly better with a few good signings and some of the younger players improving. It’s also conceivable we’ll stay in the bottom half and he’s gone very quickly next season.
We were 3 points behind Villa and Newcastle when Amorim took over. A 2 point per game average would have seen us comfortably into the top 4. Sure, not easy but it basically required our new top quality manager to do as well as ETH had done across an entire season in 22/23.
Really I had little expectations for this season around when ETH was sacked it was dismal. Then we bring in guy who was expected to join better prospects than us, who asked not to start until summer…yet came when we said no, and in first press conference told how he expected really what has since happen.How long will you accept this form for ? Or will you be happy no matter what crap is served up for you?
Thats a fair and balanced post, and a good point about loaning out some depth and not replacing it. Let's all hope that these months have been a real introduction to understanding the league and knowing exactly what he wants come summer.
Yes because we were a well coached team under Ole, ETH or that Ragnick (and ETH to be honest) didnt just give up after a few months trying to coach these players into a team shape.Come on now, don't let reality get in the way of moralising. Lets ignore that we came 3rd two seasons ago, winning a cup, and that while last season was very poor overall, we had plenty of good 'coached' results, namely the immaculately executed cup final win against city.
Yes because we were a well coached team under Ole, ETH or that Ragnick (and ETH to be honest) didnt just give up after a few months trying to coach these players into a team shape.
Well done on picking one game….can you point to a few months where we could actually see things looking better in terms of tactic, shape, pattern etc?
Yes because we were a well coached team under Ole, ETH or that Ragnick (and ETH to be honest) didnt just give up after a few months trying to coach these players into a team shape.
Well done on picking one game….can you point to a few months where we could actually see things looking better in terms of tactic, shape, pattern etc?
Nice that we give a manager this much leeway, the only real excuse are the injuries, coming in pre Christmas isn’t an excuse for not being able to get us playing half decent football so far.Really I had little expectations for this season around when ETH was sacked it was dismal. Then we bring in guy who was expected to join better prospects than us, who asked not to start until summer…yet came when we said no, and in first press conference told how he expected really what has since happen.
Since he came we’ve let Rashford, Antony leave from an attacking unit that was not working and replace neither. Had injuries to Martinez, Yorro, Heaven, Dalot, Deligt, Amad, Zirkzee, Mount and probably others.
Then there is context. This thread was made about twenty minutes after a loss in league game that has little meaning for us, where we played our kids because of game we have on Thursday that has lots of meaning…moaning about run of game that exists in the context of everything I have written and in all honesty…given since end Feb/March the situation hasn’t changed…the league is merely training at this point because we have to prioritise Europa.
Why wasn’t this thread created on Thursday?
I haven’t even started really judging this manager yet…except to note the better team shape and fact that players are getting used to system.
I will START to judge him from next season.
That’s fairWhich is fine as do I but I don’t see why people can’t admit Amorim has been disappointing so far. He admits it himself.
I’m not pretending…we weren’t. It’s hardly radical stuff or hot take. We had better players under Ole. Looking back now a much better side, but we were not good team, well coached team. We were moments FC. Players individually winning games.Respectfully, if you're pretending that we weren't structured and sound when finishing 2nd in the PL under Solskjaer and 3rd under Ten hag then there's no point discussing it. At the risk of wasting my time though: Solskjaer had a very clear structure that went awry when he tried to play more front foot football. He's gone to Besiktas now and implemented his very clear style quite quickly, and it was no surprise he beat Guardiola as well as he did. He couldn't take it to that next level, but he absolutely had a well drilled style. I cant explain why Ten Hags midfield fell apart in his second season - it was tough to watch, but by and large other than against the top sides, we looked like we could get a result in most games - I think we had maybe 4 terrible showings against non top sides that season with Palace demolishing us, Bournemouth brushing us aside at home etc.
You're too hyperbolic for my taste, you've said that a thread about 16 game run is a 'kneejerk' to 1 match at the weekend, and now youve dismissed three entire seasons where we actually looked quite well coached (2 of solskjaers and 1 of ten hags). You even announced that anybody critical of this really worrying run of results but also performances 'doesn't deserve' to see us win the Europa (Which may or may not happen)
I'm not going to reply any more if that's all good, I've plenty of posts here that show where I stand on this - pro amorim, hope he turns it around, deeply concerned by a simply shocking run of results.
Damn! You are making me reach my bottle of Zoloft. Stop it!I've updated the OP with the results. Without relegated teams its now
Played 16
Won 1
Drew 5
Lost 10
Scored 12
Conceded 29
I would say in about 6 of the games we have reached a level close to acceptable for at least one half. It's so bad I really am struggling to find positives, and is actually worse than I even thought it was in terms of form, and any semblance of progress with a system
Bollocks. It’s not unusual at all for a manager coming in during a season to be given more than six months to implement changes and see progress, and with summer transfer windows happening once a year and clubs always looking to reinforce during transfer windows, that means they usually get some new players.
If you feel the need to constantly straw man the argument, then maybe your argument isn’t a very good one
You don't know what straw man fallacy means.
But hey, good talk. We reached the CAF bingo within two posts. That's got to be some sort of record.
Is it followed at other clubs or is this exclusive to Manchester United that a manager need to spend half a billion before he/she can be judged?
So far this season we've pretty much managed the opposite of expectations - we haven't won the games we were sure we should win, we haven't been thrashed by the teams we expected to thrash us (Newcastle aside) we've beaten teams no one thought we could possibly beat - and the general feeling seems to be that Tottemham will beat us easily - based on the CAF's track record I fancy our chances!Absolutely scandalous statistic. And one of the reasons why I don't think we'd beat Tottenham in the Europa League Final (assuming we don't f*k up against Bilbao), as we currently seem incapable of beating any PL club outside of Southampton/Leicester/Ipswich.
I had completely forgotten about Marinez.Really I had little expectations for this season around when ETH was sacked it was dismal. Then we bring in guy who was expected to join better prospects than us, who asked not to start until summer…yet came when we said no, and in first press conference told how he expected really what has since happen.
Since he came we’ve let Rashford, Antony leave from an attacking unit that was not working and replace neither. Had injuries to Martinez, Yorro, Heaven, Dalot, Deligt, Amad, Zirkzee, Mount and probably others.
Then there is context. This thread was made about twenty minutes after a loss in league game that has little meaning for us, where we played our kids because of game we have on Thursday that has lots of meaning…moaning about run of game that exists in the context of everything I have written and in all honesty…given since end Feb/March the situation hasn’t changed…the league is merely training at this point because we have to prioritise Europa.
Why wasn’t this thread created on Thursday?
I haven’t even started really judging this manager yet…except to note the better team shape and fact that players are getting used to system.
I will START to judge him from next season.
The entire season hinges on "just one" match. This has been our worst season, without any doubt, in our entire existence in the Premier League. We need a new manager. And need it as soon as the Europa ends.
Who would this mystical manager or coach be and why would they join a club that sacks it's current one after a few months after he inherits a team that was shite and already going backwards?The entire season hinges on "just one" match. This has been our worst season, without any doubt, in our entire existence in the Premier League. We need a new manager. And need it as soon as the Europa ends.
For a 5 year contract to be fired in 9 months. Per hour it's a good job.Who would this mystical manager or coach be and why would they join a club that sacks it's current one after a few months after he inherits a team that was shite and already going backwards?
Barely seen anyone say this. If anything we are the overwhelming favourites considering it’s Spurs in a final.So far this season we've pretty much managed the opposite of expectations - we haven't won the games we were sure we should win, we haven't been thrashed by the teams we expected to thrash us (Newcastle aside) we've beaten teams no one thought we could possibly beat - and the general feeling seems to be that Tottemham will beat us easily - based on the CAF's track record I fancy our chances!
It's not a straw man, that's been a prevailing narrative on this website and has been used to defend every post Fergie manager except Moyes. Folks want every manager to get a bucket load of cash to spend before they can be judged whereas my argument is that a manager has show his mettle before they can be trusted with money to spend. Amo's record so far with us doesn't justify that kind of trust. People want the manager to get "his team" before he can be judged, which is fecking daft. Half billion was an exaggeration but don't take everything so literally. Although, the last manager did spend more than that and failed, but there were fanboys who were still making a case for him.That’s you posting a straw man fallacy on these very pages. No one has ever said a Manchester United manager needs to spend half a billion before being judged.
Were you too busy playing bingo to remember posting that nonsense?
It's not a straw man, that's been a prevailing narrative on this website and has been used to defend every post Fergie manager except Moyes. Folks want every manager to get a bucket load of cash to spend before they can be judged whereas my argument is that a manager has show his mettle before they can be trusted with money to spend. Amo's record so far with us doesn't justify that kind of trust. People want the manager to get "his team" before he can be judged, which is fecking daft. Half billion was an exaggeration but don't take everything so literally. Although, the last manager did spend more than that and failed, but there were fanboys who were still making a case for him.
I really hope you get it this time, because I am not going to explain it again.
Find me a single person who says Utd managers must spent half a billion before being judged. Until then, pipe down with your straw men lad.
Bye!
You don't know what straw man fallacy means.
It's not a straw man, that's been a prevailing narrative on this website and has been used to defend every post Fergie manager except Moyes. Folks want every manager to get a bucket load of cash to spend before they can be judged whereas my argument is that a manager has show his mettle before they can be trusted with money to spend. Amo's record so far with us doesn't justify that kind of trust. People want the manager to get "his team" before he can be judged, which is fecking daft. Half billion was an exaggeration but don't take everything so literally. Although, the last manager did spend more than that and failed, but there were fanboys who were still making a case for him.
I really hope you get it this time, because I am not going to explain it again.
Could it have possibly been the insistence on taking "half a billion" literally when it was already an admitted exaggeration, rather than your tenses, that soured this exchange?Typos > straw men.
You can't just cry straw man because the word exaggeration is in a definition. I mean the definition is right there - it tells you that in what you've quoted. You'd have to have a head full of bricks to think that exaggerating for effect as a rhetorical device was the same as intentionally misrepresenting a point of view. And no, that wasn't a straw man.For reference: “A straw man fallacy involves misrepresenting someone else's argument, often by exaggerating, oversimplifying, or taking their words out of context, to make it easier to attack or refute.”
Maybe this will help you avoid them in the future, although seeing you twist yourself in knots over it has been entertaining at least.
Could it have possibly been the insistence on taking "half a billion" literally when it was already an admitted exaggeration, rather than your tenses, that soured this exchange?
Also this:
You can't just cry straw man because the word exaggeration is in a definition. I mean the definition is right there - it tells you that in what you've quoted. You'd have to have a head full of bricks to think that exaggerating for effect as a rhetorical device was the same as intentionally misrepresenting a point of view. And no, that wasn't a straw man.