100m budget for 2019 Summer window

Discussion in 'Transfer Forum' started by bond19821982, Jun 20, 2019.

  1. Aug 8, 2019

    Seven Seas Sardines Full Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,369
    Location:
    Back in Sweden til 2020
  2. Aug 8, 2019

    Dante Bang Average but can post Blindfolded for 15 secs

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Messages:
    15,901
    Location:
    My wit's end
    Not as good as KFC's Tweet.

    Food-wise, they're equally shit.
  3. Aug 8, 2019

    Escobar Poster originally known as Michel04

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2004
    Messages:
    23,707
    Location:
    La-La-Land
    Joke of a mgmt
  4. Aug 8, 2019

    manunited1919 Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2015
    Messages:
    2,717
    It’s Fred and Pereira that will get undeserved chances. Would rather see McT, Gomes, and Garner.
  5. Aug 8, 2019

    GamerKurisu New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2018
    Messages:
    44
    Man I just watched more replays of them two v Rotherham, they need a chance! I will be so so gutted if Gomes ends up leaving, last time I felt like that about a player is when we didn't get Ronaldinho over the line! But if you think about it.

    I just feel like in our current state we are relying on too many players having to step up.
  6. Aug 8, 2019

    Le Red Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2017
    Messages:
    509
    You're looking at the wrong way. From Woodward's and the Glazer's standpoint it was a very successful season, because they made lots of money.
    Does anyone still believe that Woodward cares if we're a shit team?
    A few years back the goal was to be in UCL. Now that he knows the money keeps rolling in even without UCL the only goal WW has is to keep us where we are now: EL garbage with a strong brand. Eventual UCL qualification is now just a plus.
  7. Aug 8, 2019

    fergosaurus Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,917
    Even fast food chains are bantering us now.
  8. Aug 8, 2019

    sunama Baghdad Bob

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2014
    Messages:
    14,093
    You are right.
    We had a net spend of about £75M I think it was, so our budget was actually lower.
    Arsenal's budget was higher due to their ambitions.

    I normally write that 4th place is our target, but I am beginning to think that perhaps Woodward is targeting 6th place.
  9. Aug 8, 2019

    sunama Baghdad Bob

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2014
    Messages:
    14,093
    Woodward has been in charge for 6+ years. After all that time, you still believe this?
    You cannot be serious. If you are, I have a time share to sell you, which will see you earn 10% ROI. All you need to do is transfer the funds to my account and I will draw up the paperwork.
  10. Aug 8, 2019

    nainaisson New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2016
    Messages:
    465
    Location:
    Mourinho Cult HQ
    If we were so concerned about our bloated wage bill, we wouldn't keep giving poor and aging players contract extensions. Players like Smalling, Jones, Young, Rojo, and Mata should be encouraged to leave as soon as possible so we can replace them with players of a standard that befits the size and status of the club. However, we won't force them out because it's cheaper to keep crap players on the wage bill than it is to spend the increasingly exorbitant transfer fees to replace them.

    It all comes down to spending as little as possible, despite the fact that the club could spend half a billion in each transfer window without worrying about violating FFP restrictions. Usually, we only spend enough in each window to keep the squad competitive for Champions League places, but after the past few windows, I'm not entirely sure that's true anymore.
  11. Aug 15, 2019 at 12:35

    bond19821982 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,556
    Good thread. This is how our 100m theory also works.
  12. Aug 16, 2019 at 08:02

    Ballist1x New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2019
    Messages:
    111
    Truth is we've bought incredibly badly season after season for a long while now.

    The board and the owners are probably sick of slashing out only to lose millions on these players who fail and are either a write off or worth a tiny fraction of their buy price.

    I think past managers have been supported and bad contracts have been given, leading to this situation.

    Do I wish we had spent more and bought a midfielder? Yes.

    Are the board skeotucal having taken a bath on Fellaini, losing Hererra on a free and possibly being forced to write Sanchez off? That's the equivalent of £60m plus write off there.

    Not to mention Fred who looks like a £50m write off currently.
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 16, 2019 at 09:17
  13. Aug 18, 2019 at 04:34

    Scholsey2004 Full Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    2,212
    Location:
    Barnsley
    I suspect that Ed Woodward has been the leading figure in a lot of our previous signings. There's a tendency to maintain the same transfer targets after a manager gets sacked for instance, which suggests Woodward pushes on with those targets rather than wasting the groundwork he's already put in. That would be understandable if we were then bringing in a manager with the same MO but that isn't usually the case.