Stopped them buying this summer.what is the point of these bans anyway
We have well and truly moved on from the win now and feck the consequences after kind of game, thankfully so because our last three title defense season's have been soul destroying.You never know with Roman. You lot have sacked better managers in the past. What makes you think Roman will not pull the plug if Lampard finishes 4th without any trophies.
Thanks for posting. Really enjoyed that.
I've never seen players just talk like this. There should be more of this.
Two things that really annoyed me about this. Why are there subtitles? Why did the editor put in a random drum beat every 20 seconds.
I've never seen players just talk like this. There should be more of this.
The journalist is Matt Law, who is usually reliable for Chelsea I believe. I didnt think Rashford warranted that bumper contract, but paying 120k/week for a youngster still to prove everything at the top level seems like a huge gamble. For context, Heung-min Son earns only 20k/week more than CHO.Chelsea are no closer to agreeing contracts with Tammy Abraham or Reece James, having negotiated new deals with the rest of their first-team Academy graduates.
Fikayo Tomori last week followed Callum Hudson-Odoi, Mason Mount, Ruben Loftus-Cheek and Bill Gilmour in signing new Chelsea contracts as a reward for their development under head coach Frank Lampard.
Chelsea are now keen to agree new deals with Abraham and James, whose current contracts will have two years remaining at the end of this season.
But progress on both players has not been as fast as had been hoped and Chelsea are not thought to be imminently preparing to announce a new contract for either man.
Abraham is Chelsea’s top scorer this season with 13 goals, making himself Lampard’s first-choice striker, and has also become a regular member of Gareth Southgate’s England squad.
The fact 19-year-old Hudson-Odoi signed a five-year contract worth £120,000-a-week in September is likely to mean that Abraham wants at least parity, if not a better deal.
Hudson-Odoi has recovered from the ruptured Achilles that meant he missed the opening to the new season, but he has still only started six Premier League games for Chelsea and is yet to score his first League goal.
Bayern Munich had wanted to sign Hudson-Odoi, which inflated his value, but 22-year-old Abraham would already be worth at least £60 million and would be wanted by a number of clubs at home and abroad if there was ever any possibility of a move.
His importance to Lampard’s team was further highlighted when they lost and failed to score against West Ham United and then beat Aston Villa, thanks to his goal and assist, on Abraham’s return.
Abraham signed his last £50,000-a-week contract in the summer of 2017 before joining Swansea City on loan.
James made his first-team debut for Chelsea in September and became the club’s youngest-ever goalscorer in the Champions League, when he netted in the 4-4 draw with Ajax. He has now made 14 Blues appearances in total. The 20-year-old only signed a new deal last summer ahead of his season-long loan at Wigan Athletic.
It's definitely a gamble but do you let the player leave to Munich on a free and then spend have to £50 million on his replacement?Chelsea no closer to agreeing new deals with Reece James and Tammy Abraham
The journalist is Matt Law, who is usually reliable for Chelsea I believe. I didnt think Rashford warranted that bumper contract, but paying 120k/week for a youngster still to prove everything at the top level seems like a huge gamble. For context, Heung-min Son earns only 20k/week more than CHO.
Think the club got scarred by how they let KDB, Salah and the like go for peanuts and see them be successful elsewhere. Like you said, if he lives upto his potential, this will look like a bargain. Although I read on social media that he looks off the pace since returning from injury. Maybe it's a mental thing.It's definitely a gamble but do you let the player leave to Munich on a free and then spend have to £50 million on his replacement?
Spurs are known for underpaying their talent, it's why half the team want out.
Tammy will get at least the same, probably more, James will get less. They've both got two years left on their contracts so no rush.Think the club got scarred by how they let KDB, Salah and the like go for peanuts and see them be successful elsewhere. Like you said, if he lives upto his potential, this will look like a bargain. Although I read on social media that he looks off the pace since returning from injury. Maybe it's a mental thing.
Surely you guys got to pay Tammy atleast on par or more than Hudson-Odoi? Reece James looks like a talent as well.
Chelsea is pure class. Love this club. And what a beautiful title for the video, no way this is a 12y old twat that wrote it, no way.Our official YouTube channel decided to post this video today Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas matey!Chelsea is pure class. Love this club. And what a beautiful title for the video, no way this is a 12y old twat that wrote it, no way.
Is that the match where the ref sent off mistakenly sent off Gibbs instead Ox?Our official YouTube channel decided to post this video today Merry Christmas!
Arsene is that you?Chelsea is pure class. Love this club. And what a beautiful title for the video, no way this is a 12y old twat that wrote it, no way.
Indeed it is - Andre Marriner's finest hourIs that the match where the ref sent off mistakenly sent off Gibbs instead Ox?
Yup, this game was actually really interesting when you look at it. Not just because the wrong player got sent off .Indeed it is - Andre Marriner's finest hour
I honestly think you shouldn't have sold Schurrle. Perhaps he wouldn't have declined so quickly if he stayed at Chelsea as a valuable squad player who chipped in with ~10 goals a season.Yup, this game was actually really interesting when you look at it. Not just because the wrong player got sent off .
Current Arsenal and Chelsea manager both there, Lampard on the bench for us. Salah scoring for us looks very weird now, and Giroud was playing for Arsenal.
Also one of the last great Mourinho Performances, we won the league the next year but only got near this level of attacking performance against Everton and a lot of that season was super attritional wins by 1 goal.
For people with hearing disabilities?Two things that really annoyed me about this. Why are there subtitles? Why did the editor put in a random drum beat every 20 seconds.
Love to see these guys doing well though, I'm from the same area (Earlsfield) as Antonio.
Youtube does that anyway. Someone who can't hear will have "close captions" turned on and because whoever made that vid also added their own, it's much more difficult to read (as they overlap each other).For people with hearing disabilities?
Lampard ia a strange one. He really has the media onside to the point theyre on a shit run and all the commenators talk about is how he has created a fantastic atmosphere at the club and how Abrahams and Mount etc are integrated so well despite being next to useless for a long time now.Surely there should be a Lampard sack watch thread by now?
Didn't watch the whole game but Tammys hold up play was fine. Can't see Giroud being the difference. The intensity was just off, Southampton out pressed and out harried Chelsea all game long.We aren't scoring enough at home, only 11 all season in the league. If we're selling Giroud need replace with someone better who knows how to play against teams sitting deep.
Solution could be as simple as starting Giroud in all our home games from now on. Need someone link the attack together.
The way we're trying to play at home doesn't work.
Away we're doing fine.
It's a pattern all season long at home. We're averaging only slightly more than a goal a game and falling, pretty hard to win matches at the bridge scoring so few goals.Didn't watch the whole game but Tammys hold up play was fine. Can't see Giroud being the difference. The intensity was just off, Southampton out pressed and out harried Chelsea all game long.
Which games in the winning run were we "far from convincing" out of curiosity?Lampard ia a strange one. He really has the media onside to the point theyre on a shit run and all the commenators talk about is how he has created a fantastic atmosphere at the club and how Abrahams and Mount etc are integrated so well despite being next to useless for a long time now.
All the while theyve lost 5 in 6 and even before that they were far from convincing.
Ive answered that to you before. Youve lost 5 in 6 but it goes beyond those 6 games. Youve won 3 times in the league since the 30th of fecking October.Which games in the winning run were we "far from convincing" out of curiosity?
And as i replied to you, that's only the case if you look at the score without context.Ive answered that to you before. Youve lost 5 in 6 but it goes beyond those 6 games. Youve won 3 times in the league since the 30th of fecking October.
If Villa took points off you there would habe been no complaints. Thats 1 out of 3 right there. Even then its not a run.