Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's a possibility, although I think Bernie is going to give it another go, in which case I don't see any current Dem standing in his way.It will be Cuban vs Trump
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He’s not really done much to get his face associated with the role yet has he?BTW.....lol@Zuckerberg
The Dems would rather lose another election to Trump than have Bernie take over their party. Hillary to run again.Cuban vs The Rock
Bernie will not be the democrat runner. They will do everything possible to stop him.
And he's not even 35 yet, although he would be by the election.He’s not really done much to get his face associated with the role yet has he?
Would be hillarious if he bans other candidates from advertising on FB.Fake news on Zuckerberg’s own site would be his undoing.
Page 11 shows 10% of Trump voters going for Bernie, which is good. His slender lead and low numbers (he won NH with ~60% IIRC) is bad.
Those are probably the 10% who Bernie turned away from Hillary when he kept asking for her Goldman transcripts.Page 11 shows 10% of Trump voters going for Bernie, which is good. His slender lead and low numbers (he won NH with ~60% IIRC) is bad.
OH MY GOD, that's true! There's no way Trump would have come up with that original and so-smart attack on his own. What a unique genius Bernie was to dig up something from the obscurity of the front page of NYT.Those are probably the 10% who Bernie turned away from Hillary when he kept asking for her Goldman transcripts.
He has to win his gubenatorial race firstGavin Newsom?
Bernie would probably win against Trump. He's hard to attack so Trump would have a tough time going negative on him.Biden or Bernie should go for it. At worst if they're too old and their health becomes a problem during the Presidency itself then they can step down and hand it to their VP. Trump won't be able to go for the age attacks considering he'll be a 74-year old who'll no doubt be tired after dealing with four years in office.
The only worry would be that the GOP had some stuff stored away on Bernie that they'd then be able to pull out when it came to election time. They'd likely ramp up the "dirty socialist" rhetoric to unprecedented levels. Still, he doesn't have pretty much any of the weaknesses Hilary had against Trump and is a far, far better debater than she is as well.Bernie would probably win against Trump. He's hard to attack so Trump would have a tough time going negative on him.
I think Trump's kryptonite is a positive, aspirational character like Sanders, who doesn't go negative and puts forth a lot of good policy ideas that connect with people. It would be very difficult to beat that.The only worry would be that the GOP had some stuff stored away on Bernie that they'd then be able to pull out when it came to election time. They'd likely ramp up the "dirty socialist" rhetoric to unprecedented levels. Still, he doesn't have pretty much any of the weaknesses Hilary had against Trump and is a far, far better debater than she is as well.
I'm sure we will have one once the mid terms become newsworthy. Obviously most people are looking ahead to 2020.Shouldn't have a midterm election thread first? Not that the two are necessarily mutually exclusive, but the broader presidential campaign is damn long already. lol
For now anyway, Zuckerberg as another Bloomberg type figure (and that is likely being generous).
Take that backBidens too creepy.
From your perspective, what's wrong with Warren?I love Joe. I love the other two in the top 3. None should run.
70s. I wish she ran this previous cycle.From your perspective, what's wrong with Warren?
(IMO either she or Bernie will run, probably Bernie)
There's an article from 2014 explaining that her donors (who happen to be also Hillary donors) told her they wouldn't fund her if she did. Bernie only ran after understanding that Warren was out...70s. I wish she ran this previous cycle.