WI_Red
Redcafes Most Rested
As expected.

Yes, but I’d caution that voters often have this weird compartmentalization between state vs federal races. Some Rs who were happy to vote for Cooper because they felt the R supermajority in NC legislatures can curb his worst instincts will be reluctant to do the same for a 6 year term Senate seat that can decide the majority.If anyone in this state stands a chance to pick up a Senate seat in NC it is going to be Cooper. He was very popular here, with both parties, and this State really is dictated by voter enthusiasm when it comes to statewide races.
Oh, for sure. NC has had back to back Dem Gov's and AG's. My excitement is "tepid". There is not incumbent, so the name ID is going to be with Cooper.Yes, but I’d caution that voters often have this weird compartmentalization between state vs federal races. Some Rs who were happy to vote for Cooper because they felt the R supermajority in NC legislatures can curb his worst instincts will be reluctant to do the same for a 6 year term Senate seat that can decide the majority.
The generic ballot now is D+5. It was D+8.4 in 2018 with a more favorable map and Rs increased their Senate majority then. You can’t just shout ‘blue wave’ and hope it will sort everything out. Senatorial candidates have a pretty damn big incumbency advantage.The logic behind it is a blue wave election where Trump isn't on the ballot (which means Rs can't rely on him to turn out voters), but is simultaneously incredibly unpopular because of everything from economics to Epstein to now foreign war. You shouldn't therefore look at things in terms of individual races, but instead how big a turnout the Dems can generate in early voting and in Nov.
The generic ballot now is D+5. It was D+8.4 in 2018 with a more favorable map and Rs increased their Senate majority then. You can’t just shout ‘blue wave’ and hope it will sort everything out. Senatorial candidates have a pretty damn big incumbency advantage.
Who do you think was president in 2018?The generic ballot seems increasingly less useful and predictive these days. Its a fun way to look back at past elections, but the dynamics of voter turnout are increasingly unpredictable in the Trump era.
Who do you think was president in 2018?
I'm hoping whoever wins (it does look like it will be Talarico at this point) has the support of the losing candidate. A united party in TX is essential to have a chance. It seemed to be a pretty amicable campaign.Its looking line a runoff for the Rs and Talarico for the Dems. If it ends up Paxton v Talarico, there is a chance.
I'm hoping whoever wins (it does look like it will be Talarico at this point) has the support of the losing candidate. A united party in TX is essential to have a chance. It seemed to be a pretty amicable campaign.
The dynamics have *intensified* since then. 20/22/24 all continued with the trend of Dems doing better in mid term and special elections, but still hitting against an oftimes much bigger wall in Senate races, Collins overperfomed her polling by 13 points in 20, Tester lost, Brown lost, Florida is solid R. Were it not for Trump’s very stupid antics in 2020, the Georgia double runoffs might well have turned out differently and D wouldn’t have 4 years of Senate control. Their saving graces were in races out west with the Reid machine remnants saving Cortez Masto and R shooting themselves in AZ by trying to push duds like McSally and Masters and a certified lunatic in Lake (and those races were open or with incumbency adv for D)The dynamics have shifted since then. It’s a nice way to look at old we elections though. Ultimately everything is a turnout game.
The dynamics have *intensified* since then. 20/22/24 all continued with the trend of Dems doing better in mid term and special elections, but still hitting against an oftimes much bigger wall in Senate races, Collins overperfomed her polling by 13 points in 20, Tester lost, Brown lost, Florida is solid R. Were it not for Trump’s very stupid antics in 2020, the Georgia double runoffs might well have turned out differently and D wouldn’t have 4 years of Senate control. Their saving graces were in races out west with the Reid machine remnants saving Cortez Masto and R shooting themselves in AZ by trying to push duds like McSally and Masters and a certified lunatic in Lake (and those races were open or with incumbency adv for D)
Quality of candidate still matters, but I will be extremely surprised if Dems manage to run the gamut and not only defend all their seats but pick up ME, NC and OH this Nov, let alone pipe dreams like TX or FL. In fact, I’m betting on precisely the opposite, and stand to gain, or lose, quite a bit of dosh from it.
Candidate quality definitely does matter. The GOP is about to put up another flawed candidate in Ken Paxton.
I think Talarico stands a good chance of beating him.
I think it’s due to MAGA refusing to do a joint primary, so everyone is confused where to go to vote.Texas needs to get their election crap in order. This Dallas thing is rediculous.
She's getting clobbered by nearly 10 points and is apparently not concepding and will file a lawsuit
She's getting clobbered by nearly 10 points and is apparently not concepding and will file a lawsuit
She should if the State was telling people in Dallas the wrong precinct to go to then the state Supreme Court didn't allow them to extend the polling hours. They are screwing Jasmine over.
Probably not and I worry her voting block will sit out the general election because of this.She's getting smoked, so I don't think it would make up the difference.
Black voters aren’t new to this, they will turn out.Probably not and I worry her voting block will sit out the general election because of this.
I hope so. She would be formidable as a campaign ally to Talarico.Black voters aren’t new to this, they will turn out.
She also has to clean up her messaging, it’s fine highlighting irregularities and voter suppression, but don’t let it turn into intra-party fight if she still harbors future ambition. American voters don’t take kindly to sore losers (except Trump), crying foul probably killed Stacey Abrams career, and she had a much stronger case.
Probably not and I worry her voting block will sit out the general election because of this.

Hey, I voted for her!With all of the votes in (minus provisional), the NC Senate Majority Leader since 2011 Phil Berger Sr is down 2 votes to the sheriff of Rockingham County. The sheriff is an insane moron, but Berger losing would be a fantastic result.
https://er.ncsbe.gov/contest_details.html?election_dt=03/03/2026&county_id=0&contest_id=1942
Closer to home, it seems like Nida Allam isn't going to pull out the win over Valerie Foushee thanks to Orange and Chatham counties. I'm going to personally blame @WI_Red.![]()
Hey, I voted for her!
Edit: the bulk of the remaining ballots are wake and Durham, where she is leading, so it’s going to be close, but probably a close loss.
The Dems could learn alot from Talarico message
The dynamics have *intensified* since then. 20/22/24 all continued with the trend of Dems doing better in mid term and special elections, but still hitting against an oftimes much bigger wall in Senate races, Collins overperfomed her polling by 13 points in 20, Tester lost, Brown lost, Florida is solid R. Were it not for Trump’s very stupid antics in 2020, the Georgia double runoffs might well have turned out differently and D wouldn’t have 4 years of Senate control. Their saving graces were in races out west with the Reid machine remnants saving Cortez Masto and R shooting themselves in AZ by trying to push duds like McSally and Masters and a certified lunatic in Lake (and those races were open or with incumbency adv for D)
Quality of candidate still matters, but I will be extremely surprised if Dems manage to run the gamut and not only defend all their seats but pick up ME, NC and OH this Nov, let alone pipe dreams like TX or FL. In fact, I’m betting on precisely the opposite, and stand to gain, or lose, quite a bit of dosh from it.
I think long term the Dems will get Maine back, Collins should at best get this term and no more, she’d be pushing 80 by the time she’s up for election again. Beyond that, I don’t see where their next long term seat comes from, under their current political strategy, without DC statehood, while seats in place like PA, MI, WI become increasingly precarious (and even MN) due to demographic trends, while NV as it has shown in 24 is still purplish under certain conditions, that’s before we get to GA and AZ where they hold all 4 with all being swings/lean red seats.You'd imagine if republican base stopped nominating these characters, senate would be well out of reach for dems, they are close to maxing out on swing seats as it is.
She's getting clobbered by nearly 10 points and is apparently not concepding and will file a lawsuit
The Dems could learn alot from Talarico message
Looks like both Paxton and Cornyn will have a fight on their hands if the Rs are going to retain their seat.
and in Maine......looks like its Plattner's race to lose. That's assuming no further negative information about him comes out between now and June.
Regarding Texas I've come to the conclusion it's like watching match of the day and hoping for a different score.