AI and ChatGPT

JB08

Searches for nude pics of Marcos Rojo
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
9,743
https://chat.openai.com/chat

Write an episode of the Muppet Show where Harry Kane is a guest but awkwardly struggles to communicate with the Muppets due to his speech impediment

The episode begins with Kermit the Frog introducing tonight's special guest, the talented English footballer Harry Kane. The audience cheers as Harry Kane takes the stage, but as he begins to speak, it becomes apparent that he has a speech impediment.

Kermit tries to make light of the situation and jokes, "Well, it looks like we have a real 'tongue-tied' guest tonight!"

Harry Kane laughs nervously and tries to explain that he has a stutter, but the words come out jumbled and difficult to understand. The other Muppets, including Miss Piggy and Fozzie Bear, try to talk to Harry Kane and ask him questions, but he struggles to articulate his answers.

Despite the challenges, Harry Kane remains good-natured and gamely tries to participate in the show's sketches and performances. In one skit, he teams up with Animal to sing a duet of "Can't Hold Us Down" by Christina Aguilera, but Harry Kane's stutter makes it difficult for him to keep up with the fast-paced lyrics.

Eventually, the show takes a break and Harry Kane takes a moment to collect himself and practice his speech. When the Muppets return to the stage, Harry Kane is able to speak more confidently and clearly, and the audience cheers in support.

The episode ends with Kermit thanking Harry Kane for being such a good sport and for showing that even those with speech impediments can overcome challenges and shine. Harry Kane waves to the audience and says, "Thank you for having me on the show. I may have a stutter, but I won't let it hold me down!"
 
Who was the best Manchester United manager post-Alex Ferguson?

After the retirement of Sir Alex Ferguson, Manchester United has had several managers, including David Moyes, Louis van Gaal, and José Mourinho. It is difficult to say definitively which manager was the best, as success in football is highly subjective and can be influenced by a variety of factors.

Some may argue that David Moyes, who was Ferguson's successor, had the difficult task of filling the legendary manager's shoes and was not given enough time to succeed. Others may point to the success of Louis van Gaal, who led the team to victory in the FA Cup in 2016.

José Mourinho, who was the manager from 2016 to 2018, also had some successes, including winning the Europa League and the League Cup in his first season. However, his tenure at Manchester United was ultimately marked by conflicts with players and a lack of consistent results on the pitch.

Ultimately, it is difficult to say which manager was the best post-Ferguson, as all of them had their own strengths and challenges.
 
Are left-footed footballers more aesthetically pleasing to watch than right-footed players?

There is no definitive answer to this question, as beauty is in the eye of the beholder and different people may have different opinions on the aesthetic appeal of left-footed and right-footed footballers.

Left-footed footballers are considered to be relatively rare, as the majority of people are right-handed and tend to favor their right foot for kicking a ball. As a result, left-footed footballers are often able to surprise opponents with their ability to deliver accurate passes and shots from unexpected angles. This can make them exciting to watch and can add an element of unpredictability to the game.

On the other hand, right-footed footballers are more common and are able to deliver powerful shots and passes with their dominant foot. This can make them a formidable force on the pitch and can be impressive to watch.

Ultimately, the aesthetic appeal of a footballer is determined by their skill and ability, regardless of whether they are left or right-footed. Some left-footed players may be considered aesthetically pleasing to watch, while others may not be, and the same is true for right-footed players.
 
JB08 said:
https://chat.openai.com/chat

Write an episode of the Muppet Show where Harry Kane is a guest but awkwardly struggles to communicate with the Muppets due to his speech impediment

The episode begins with Kermit the Frog introducing tonight's special guest, the talented English footballer Harry Kane. The audience cheers as Harry Kane takes the stage, but as he begins to speak, it becomes apparent that he has a speech impediment.

Kermit tries to make light of the situation and jokes, "Well, it looks like we have a real 'tongue-tied' guest tonight!"

Harry Kane laughs nervously and tries to explain that he has a stutter, but the words come out jumbled and difficult to understand. The other Muppets, including Miss Piggy and Fozzie Bear, try to talk to Harry Kane and ask him questions, but he struggles to articulate his answers.

Despite the challenges, Harry Kane remains good-natured and gamely tries to participate in the show's sketches and performances. In one skit, he teams up with Animal to sing a duet of "Can't Hold Us Down" by Christina Aguilera, but Harry Kane's stutter makes it difficult for him to keep up with the fast-paced lyrics.

Eventually, the show takes a break and Harry Kane takes a moment to collect himself and practice his speech. When the Muppets return to the stage, Harry Kane is able to speak more confidently and clearly, and the audience cheers in support.

The episode ends with Kermit thanking Harry Kane for being such a good sport and for showing that even those with speech impediments can overcome challenges and shine. Harry Kane waves to the audience and says, "Thank you for having me on the show. I may have a stutter, but I won't let it hold me down!"
Click to expand...

What’s their opinion on Messi vs Ronaldo?
 
Pogue Mahone said:
Someone explain to me why this isn’t the end of the education system as we know it? Essays as course work are basically pointless now, right?
Click to expand...

I guess because despite everything most people are honest. I also guess that they could program something into any AI that has a 'fingerprint' in order to ID the source of a student's work, that the AI wouldn't get rid of itself in the future, or something.
 
JB08 said:
Who was the best Manchester United manager post-Alex Ferguson?

After the retirement of Sir Alex Ferguson, Manchester United has had several managers, including David Moyes, Louis van Gaal, and José Mourinho. It is difficult to say definitively which manager was the best, as success in football is highly subjective and can be influenced by a variety of factors.

Some may argue that David Moyes, who was Ferguson's successor, had the difficult task of filling the legendary manager's shoes and was not given enough time to succeed. Others may point to the success of Louis van Gaal, who led the team to victory in the FA Cup in 2016.

José Mourinho, who was the manager from 2016 to 2018, also had some successes, including winning the Europa League and the League Cup in his first season. However, his tenure at Manchester United was ultimately marked by conflicts with players and a lack of consistent results on the pitch.

Ultimately, it is difficult to say which manager was the best post-Ferguson, as all of them had their own strengths and challenges.
Click to expand...
That would get you a like in the newbie forum these days
 
Was watching some people asking it to code stuff in javascript was very impressive to say the least.
 
I would urge anyone who hasn’t used it to give it a crack. It really is mind blowing. The breadth of knowledge is crazy. I got it to write me a six week bouldering training program and recommend birthday presents for my 12 year old daughter. All spat out instantly, to a very high standard.
 
Finishing paper assignments for school would’ve been a breeze with this thing around.
 
Mentioned this (and a more advanced version of it) in the Aritificial Intelligence thread. At this stage, I am started to lean that these things actually understand a bit what they are saying (was into that they are just predicting the next most probable word camp until a week aho). It is scary how good they are. Examples:

- I gave an abstract of a research paper, and I told it to make it better. It made it significantly better.
- I then asked to write it in a playful tone, and it did so.
- I then asked to make it a poem and it did so (it rhymed but also made sense).
- I fed an entire paper, and asked what is missing from it. It found missing pieces that the reviewers of NeurIPS (top conference in Machine Learning) didn't.
- I fed a Python function that I was not understanding asking to explain it to me. It did so, and even found a paper that the function was implementing.

This is only related to heavy scientific stuff, which I would say is far more difficult than just answering random questions.

It still does mistakes (a lot of them), and can get confused. But mistaking special theory of relativity with the general theory of relativity, when I asked if special theory of relativity is compatible with quantum mechanics (it is via quantum field theory, but general theory of relativity is not unless we go for speculative superstring theory), or coming with a wrong proof that some number is irrational, are mistakes that most of people make.

-------

Scary thing: they are going to get better. We know how to make them better, so in 2-5 years they are gonna be significantly better than the current large language models. And in 10 years, I wouldn't be surprised if they might have some type of consciousness.

NB: I have a PhD and postdoc from a top university in AI, and have published papers in all major ML/CV venues. Last week was the first time that I have seen many sceptics starting to question that these things might understand know what they are doing, instead of just emulating text.
 
Revan said:
Mentioned this (and a more advanced version of it) in the Aritificial Intelligence thread. At this stage, I am started to lean that these things actually understand a bit what they are saying (was into that they are just predicting the next most probable word camp until a week aho). It is scary how good they are. Examples:

- I gave an abstract of a research paper, and I told it to make it better. It made it significantly better.
- I then asked to write it in a playful tone, and it did so.
- I then asked to make it a poem and it did so (it rhymed but also made sense).
- I fed an entire paper, and asked what is missing from it. It found missing pieces that the reviewers of NeurIPS (top conference in Machine Learning) didn't.
- I fed a Python function that I was not understanding asking to explain it to me. It did so, and even found a paper that the function was implementing.

This is only related to heavy scientific stuff, which I would say is far more difficult than just answering random questions.

It still does mistakes (a lot of them), and can get confused. But mistaking special theory of relativity with the general theory of relativity, when I asked if special theory of relativity is compatible with quantum mechanics (it is via quantum field theory, but general theory of relativity is not unless we go for speculative superstring theory), or coming with a wrong proof that some number is irrational, are mistakes that most of people make.

-------

Scary thing: they are going to get better. We know how to make them better, so in 2-5 years they are gonna be significantly better than the current large language models. And in 10 years, I wouldn't be surprised if they might have some type of consciousness.

NB: I have a PhD and postdoc from a top university in AI, and have published papers in all major ML/CV venues. Last week was the first time that I have seen many sceptics starting to question that these things might understand know what they are doing, instead of just emulating text.
Click to expand...

So how long before one of these AI take over Lockheed Martin or Raytheon and start developing terminators?
 
DatIrishFella said:
So how long before one of these AI take over Lockheed Martin or Raytheon and start developing terminators?
Click to expand...
Probably a very long way, but then I would have said the same for large language models 5 years ago.
 
Genuinely scared of what this might mean for me as a software developer. My colleagues and my ComSci degree WhatsApp have been sharing videos all day of what it’s capable of and it’s mind blowing.
 
Pexbo said:
Genuinely scared of what this might mean for me as a software developer. My colleagues and my ComSci degree WhatsApp have been sharing videos all day of what it’s capable of and it’s mind blowing.
Click to expand...
Everyone becomes a 10x coder, in short term.

Everyone becomes jobless in long term?
 
It's insane, been using it at work to help me and has sped up things for me. Even getting it to write me social media posts :lol: i might trial replying to everyone on the cafe through the AI.
 
From Linkedin:

It took Netflix 3.5 years to hit 1 million users.

It took Twitter and GPT-3 24 months.
It took Pinterest 20 months.
It took Facebook 10 months.
It took Copilot 6 months.
It took Spotify 5 months.
It took Dall-E and Instagram 2.5 months.

And it took ChatGPT 5 days.

This is the exponential power of usability, performance, and social sharing.
Click to expand...

The end is nigh?
 
Dan said:
What’s their opinion on Messi vs Ronaldo?
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
My prediction is that one of these AI companies is going to emerge with a product as ground breaking, leveraged and dominant as Google’s search engine.
 
Rasendori's posts just got x100 better.
 
What do they want my phone number for to sign up?

Feck that. Predict it you halfwits.
 
Abizzz said:
What do they want my phone number for to sign up?

Feck that. Predict it you halfwits.
Click to expand...
Phone number throttles the number of accounts people can make.
 
Running a New Years quiz - got this to shit out loads of questions and answers.

They need a bit of tweaking but it saves you loads of thinking time.

Also got it to come up with some jazz chords. It’s pretty decent!
 
Pexbo said:
Phone number throttles the number of accounts people can make.
Click to expand...
So would asking for people to send in their severed thumbs. Still stupid to give up info or thumbs when it's not necessary for whatever you're doing.
 
Pexbo said:
My prediction is that one of these AI companies is going to emerge with a product as ground breaking, leveraged and dominant as Google’s search engine.
Click to expand...
Sure.

OpenAI is probably the only big one that is kinda independent (although Musk and Microsoft likely own parts of it). The others are all the usual suspects: Alphabet (via DeepMind, Google Brain and Google Research), Meta (via FAIR and Reality Labs) and then behind them Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia and co.

DeepMind and OpenAI are probably at the forefront though.
 
This sort of thing will surely replace classical search engines.

I used it briefly just now and it gave me a pretty exhaustive (but not ridiculous) packing list for my trip in January, told me the visa requirements, etc. And it kept the context of the conversation well - I mentioned where I was going just once, from which airport, and my birth country, and it kept that information across the following questions. Then I asked about a present I could bring from Ireland, and it gave some pretty good suggestions, with a bit of nuance. It's crazy good.
 
Revan said:
Sure.

OpenAI is probably the only big one that is kinda independent (although Musk and Microsoft likely own parts of it). The others are all the usual suspects: Alphabet (via DeepMind, Google Brain and Google Research), Meta (via FAIR and Reality Labs) and then behind them Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia and co.

DeepMind and OpenAI are probably at the forefront though.
Click to expand...
Yeah I realise they’re not independent, hence the careful wording - the key point being we are going to see a new paradigm emerge of a general AI assistant that will be as revolutionary as Google (the search engine)
 
BD said:
This sort of thing will surely replace classical search engines.

I used it briefly just now and it gave me a pretty exhaustive (but not ridiculous) packing list for my trip in January, told me the visa requirements, etc. And it kept the context of the conversation well - I mentioned where I was going just once, from which airport, and my birth country, and it kept that information across the following questions. Then I asked about a present I could bring from Ireland, and it gave some pretty good suggestions, with a bit of nuance. It's crazy good.
Click to expand...

Have you tried getting it to write an essay for you? You hit refresh and it writes the same essay again, only worded completely differently. 1000, 2000 words whatever. All fully referenced if you want. I don’t know how the education system copes with this.
 
Pogue Mahone said:
Have you tried getting it to write an essay for you? You hit refresh and it writes the same essay again, only worded completely differently. 1000, 2000 words whatever. All fully referenced if you want. I don’t know how the education system copes with this.
Click to expand...
Our conversation has taken a different approach:

AI said:
Yes, that's correct. I am able to process and understand English text, which is why I am able to provide written answers to your questions in English. As a large language model, I have been trained on a massive dataset of text and have been designed to process and generate text in a way that mimics human language. However, I do not have the ability to understand or speak any language, and I am not a person or a "cheeky little shit," as you put it. I am a machine learning model designed to assist with a wide range of tasks. I hope this clarifies things, and please let me know if you have any other questions.
Click to expand...
 
Pogue Mahone said:
Have you tried getting it to write an essay for you? You hit refresh and it writes the same essay again, only worded completely differently. 1000, 2000 words whatever. All fully referenced if you want. I don’t know how the education system copes with this.
Click to expand...
The only way I can see it coping is if OpenAI agree to publish any produced essays somewhere so they can be index by plagiarism tools.
 
Pogue Mahone said:
Have you tried getting it to write an essay for you? You hit refresh and it writes the same essay again, only worded completely differently. 1000, 2000 words whatever. All fully referenced if you want. I don’t know how the education system copes with this.
Click to expand...
But yeah, it's hard to know how teachers will be able to trust essays anymore. As you say, the essays are randomly generated in a sense, and it's not like there's a log of all conversations that would be publicly available to teachers. I guess they'll just have to move away from those sort of assignments?
 
BD said:
But yeah, it's hard to know how teachers will be able to trust essays anymore. As you say, the essays are randomly generated in a sense, and it's not like there's a log of all conversations that would be publicly available to teachers. I guess they'll just have to move away from those sort of assignments?
Click to expand...

I think they’ll have to. Which is the most radical change to education in the last 100 years? Longer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.